|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Jul 8, 2015 12:18:50 GMT
Probably the same sort of thoughts that Sutton and Salisbury are having over their friendlies this weekend. I was waiting for this one. It is NOTHING like that at all. We are sending teams with plenty of first team players involved.
The games against Sutton and Salisbury are against semi professional clubs . On the other hand we are a full time long established professional football club with a support base of tens of thousands just like the club from North London, we are both part of the full time professional game but because of gloryhunting and the FA's divisive policies the gap between us is getting ever bigger and now we are only fit to play their under 21s and most of our supporters seem to think that's great!
So Sutton 2 leagues below us deserve less respect than us sat 3 leagues below Arsenal? As to the rest what garbage. Rest assured if we draw Sutton or Arsenal all 3 teams will respectively play a first team instead of an under 21 side or a side cobbled together from trainees, youths, triallists and first team players. |
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Jul 8, 2015 10:23:53 GMT
Keep taking the pills it will get better in the end No it wont get better for us as a football club when we have dicks thinking its great that we are playing someone else's under 21s in a first team game. This is exactly what Greg Dyke was proposing in his recent shake up and if he had his way this would be a league game! Its unacceptable and devalues us and we should be having no truck with it. Probably the same sort of thoughts that Sutton and Salisbury are having over their friendlies this weekend. |
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Jul 6, 2015 10:08:16 GMT
He's not been found guilty or not guilty of anything, people don't understand the British legal system. He looks good on YouTube but no-one has seen him play. Yeah but you're forgetting people base their opinions on a player's abilities on how he's done for them on Fifa True but that's got me stumped as have never played it |
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Jul 6, 2015 9:34:39 GMT
He's not been found guilty or not guilty of anything, people don't understand the British legal system.
He looks good on YouTube but no-one has seen him play.
|
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Jul 5, 2015 10:43:36 GMT
Innocent until PROVEN guilty therefore get on with your lives and support ALL signings instead of 4 pages of absolute crap. Totally agree... Some of the posts on here are an absolute disgrace ....talk about self righteous some of you . Opinionated...arguing amongst yourselves when no one has access to the facts !FFS .... Give the guy a chance .... Seriously ....this forum is starting to become really poor! Well facts are out there but people don't like them. |
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Jul 5, 2015 10:21:57 GMT
Looks to me like a job lot of nicked wooden pallets.
|
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Jul 4, 2015 14:45:26 GMT
Amazing how threatened & worked up people get when you post facts on here.
|
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Jul 4, 2015 11:04:49 GMT
I wouldn't attend games if Rovers were to employ a convicted rapist. Would you have your bins emptied by a convicted rapist or shop at a company that employs a convicted rapist? |
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Jul 4, 2015 10:53:04 GMT
Charity time You are obviously slow of learning. But shall we say £50 to a charity of your choice if you can find a court record that says he was found not guilty on the rape charge? My charity is St Peters Hospice. Tell me yours if you find the evidence, happy to pay up. Oh my days! 2 million sperm and you were the fastest? You need help. How about the other way around. £50 if you find a court record that says he was found 'guilty' of the rape allegation. Good luck with that sunshine. Here is a tip. Try reading again my comments but this time dont be selective on what you read as you may be surprised to see that I have said he was NOT found 'guilty' AND NOT found 'not guilty'. This, you have said yourself. So we are in agreement with each other about the outcome of the rape allegation. So why do you keep trying to argue your point with me? What on earth is your issue here? Explain because you are not making any sense, at all. You obviously dont accept the phrase I used which was - Not guilty until proven guilty. We established that he was not found guilty of rape, unlike Ched Evans for example. If he was not found guilty then leave him alone and me for that matter. Yes of course not being found 'not guilty' doesnt look good but it also doesnt make him guilty either. This is where you fail to grasp the understanding. If you will, like me, give Montano the benefit of doubt then shut up and stop going on. Leave his past behind and look to the future, like the majority of us will be. If you wont give him the benefit of the doubt then I will respect your opinion but 100% disagree with it. Either way, I have dumbed myself down enough to your level to help open your mind and that was too far of a drop for me. I refuse to debate this with you any further. Trust me, this is not for just my benefit. Its for your benefit too, to help you to stop making yourself look even more stupid. You're not taking up the challenge then? Didn't think you would. But you are right we seem to be in perfect agreement that he wasn't found not guilty. It's a shame that people don't seem to understand the British legal system and keep on spouting about him being not guilty or innocent. I'm absolutely certain that Christian would've preferred that the judge had announced him as not guilty like the other defendents instead of saying the jury couldn't reach agreement. Not my problem though I have tried to educate people on this forum but people know best & don't seem, to want to be educated. Again there is someone on another thread spouting on that the Wonga company will own the Mem because of their charge, just seems you can't educate some people. What this thread has shown though is that apart from a few YouTube clips no-one has seen this guy play so if we admit it none of us no whether he is a good signing or not. Of course there are the people that say DCs signed him so he most be good (I mean let's forget about Jamie White or Goldberg or Wall) or those that seem to be saying he's played in L1 so he must be good (well I''l give you Robbie Ryan to counter that argument). So I'll just sit here & think I hope he's good signing. As to someone bringing up Ched Evans if you understand & accept the British legal system then it's not a case of signing or not signing a rapist, the only consideration is whether he is better than the players you have and if you view he his then will his impact on the pitch out way any impact on a clubs reputation & commercial activities. |
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Jul 3, 2015 22:09:10 GMT
Charity time
You are obviously slow of learning. But shall we say £50 to a charity of your choice if you can find a court record that says he was found not guilty on the rape charge? My charity is St Peters Hospice. Tell me yours if you find the evidence, happy to pay up.
|
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Jul 3, 2015 21:36:28 GMT
Sorry UTG I should've reiterated that he wasn't found not guilty, unlike the rest of the defendants who were found not guilty. Perhaps you can’t understand the difference between not guilty and the jury not coming to a decision Apology accepted. Oh and perhaps I can understand the difference but CHOOSE to accept the FACT he was NOT found guilty. Yes he wasnt found not guilty either. So at the end of the day is he a criminal or not? Obviously NOT. So he should be given the benefit of the doubt by us. Now perhaps you dont understand that! Frankly I dont care if you do or dont. Oh dear I've hit a sore point, discount the British legal system if u like but the legal system has stood umpteen years of scrutiny. |
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Jul 3, 2015 20:27:01 GMT
Sorry UTG I should've reiterated that he wasn't found not guilty, unlike the rest of the defendants who were found not guilty. Perhaps you can’t understand the difference between not guilty and the jury not coming to a decision
|
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Jul 3, 2015 20:24:07 GMT
Well actually if you read about the case his co-defendents were found not guilty on his charge the jury couldn't reach a verdict so he was neither found guilty or not guilty. As to suing Oldham and then dropping the case would suggest he either had a very weak case or didn't want other things to be made public. How do you treat someone who was found neither not guilty or guilty? My answer is to give him the benefit of the doubt. Its a shame that some treat him as guilty when not found guilty. Who is treating him as guilty? I'm merely stating the facts that others obviously aren't aware of. I think though a really good question would be to ask him why he dropped his case against Oldham. |
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Jul 3, 2015 11:45:25 GMT
I like grass and the unpredictability that they bring at different times of the season You need a better supplier then that can deliver a consistent product |
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Jul 3, 2015 11:00:00 GMT
It's quite funny that when Matt Le Tissier openly admits trying to spot fix football matches it's all "Ah that's funny, lovely bloke, blah, blah, blah" when it's a lower league player that isn't actually proved to have done it they're a bad egg and s*** bloke. I'm with you I find it hilarious that a professional footballer couldn't get a booking without being caught. |
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Jul 3, 2015 10:01:15 GMT
Did he actually sue Oldham for wrongful dismissal? Yes and no. He started the process then dropped it. Its a strange one for me. Here we have Cristian who has been found NOT GUILTY for rape claims yet Oldham sack him. But not long after, Oldham tried to sign a convicted rapist in Ched Evans. Strange. Well actually if you read about the case his co-defendents were found not guilty on his charge the jury couldn't reach a verdict so he was neither found guilty or not guilty. As to suing Oldham and then dropping the case would suggest he either had a very weak case or didn't want other things to be made public. |
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Jul 3, 2015 8:33:51 GMT
Did he actually sue Oldham for wrongful dismissal?
|
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Jul 3, 2015 8:25:18 GMT
DC had the training pitches marked up to the exact dimensions of Wembley for the last week of training. Possibly takes longer than that to adapt for a keeper. Something of a drawback for a goalkeeper if he can't adapt to the dimensions of a pitch wouldn't you say? Especially as 23 of the pitches he'll possibly play on he'll only see once a season |
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Jul 3, 2015 8:22:00 GMT
DC had the training pitches marked up to the exact dimensions of Wembley for the last week of training. Did he also put up virtual Wembley stands around the training pitch  Just the empty Grimsby ones |
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Jul 2, 2015 19:20:16 GMT
Gawd 'elp us, will it never end?  A decent keeper that catches crosses rather than flap at them, has the best distribution from hand that I can remember in a rovers keeper and is a good shot stopper. It's nice to have a modern keeper who is very quick out of his area and prevented a goal in the first leg at FGR by getting to the ball before their forward, and heading it away, after a shocking back pass by Tom L. I suspect part of the problem with the first 20 minutes at Wembley was the different dimensions of the pitch and also now that the hanger is gone he will have more leeway with his kicking. DC had the training pitches marked up to the exact dimensions of Wembley for the last week of training. |
|
