|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Dec 12, 2016 20:02:01 GMT
So the ref gets all decisions about the scrum correct? Think there is cheating there. You'll have to equate that one again. As in all sports rugby players push the rules to the limit but they recognise the dangers of the game & don't seek to deliberately injury other players or feign injury to make a hard job even harder for the referee let alone seek to get another player sent off. Still if you agree with footballers play acting to get another player sent off then just say it. |
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Dec 12, 2016 19:44:08 GMT
You prove the point perfectly April 2009 that happened and you can't think of anything else since. It was enough. It's got to be enough because you can't think of anything else, which tells you a lot about respect in the 2 sports. |
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Dec 12, 2016 19:24:49 GMT
Apologies Bamber my response was to your last para re Pipe being booked. I should have taken the Stoke bit out. With regard to the Stoke incident it was obvious later that there was nothing wrong with the guy. In rugby you don't get that type of cheating so much because quite frankly it is embarrassing.However where someone is seen to cheat like that and it is so blatantly obvious that it can be proved after then retrospective action should be taken and a harsh penalty invoked. There are laws in place to punish players who cheat or feign injury and they are not used! It is not going to happen because neither FIFA nor the Premier League nor the EFL have the bottle to do it. And let's be fair a lot of European countries league games would have to be cancelled if they did do it. Shame it has come into our game. just blood capsules. You prove the point perfectly April 2009 that happened and you can't think of anything else since. |
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Dec 12, 2016 16:13:48 GMT
Thanks Angas Always a good sign when someone like Gary uses "we" when referring to Rovers Wasn't so good on Saturday when he confused Oxford with Mansfield when talking about the relegation game. Still a great man so easily forgiven. |
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Dec 11, 2016 10:40:39 GMT
Easily solved follow rugby's lead if there is an alleged head injury force them to go off for a Head injury assessment. Managers won't stand for putting on a replacement player for 10 minutes whilst a doctor checks a players make up. Will stop the feigning very quickly
|
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Dec 9, 2016 12:46:11 GMT
More likely to be renamed The Peter Crouch Future of England Fund
|
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Dec 9, 2016 11:15:35 GMT
Unfortunately I suspect the whole investigation will focus on the past and take focus / resources away from current practices. But it will grab headlines, people and past practices will be investigated and the conclusion will be that the system has changed beyond recognition. Would prefer that resources were directed at current not historical issues, if after that there still remain resources to look at historical claims then go for it.
|
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Dec 6, 2016 11:49:10 GMT
s*** being the word actually. A s*** draw. Home to League 1 rubbish. At least we'll be in the 4th round I guess. We'll never know the result unless you win |
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Dec 3, 2016 16:26:43 GMT
Did Lee Maddison perhaps stop there on his sojourn back from Scotland?
|
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Nov 25, 2016 11:17:42 GMT
Shoveller is bang on - and repeating comments made after departures and 1-5 drubbings has that kind of effect upon people.
I have no personal opinion at this point in time, but as a sh*t Ed acquaintance enjoys chuntering at me - nothing has happened yet, other than Clarkes good fortune giving the owners an easier ride-introduction than could had been wished for.
The stadium situation and lack of news does not help, lets not forget the chairman's comments a few months back 'news tomorrow imminent' saga followed by stone silence.
Pinch of salt regarding team performance, but the 4-0 at Millwall did not help the situation.
Perhaps you should explain to the uneducated one that we were facing administration prior to WAQ's arrival, this is no longer the case, we now have the biggest squad we have ever had and a back from staff of 11 employees that were not here before WAQ's arrival and were on the verge of purchasing land for our academy and we recently purchased additional land from UWE to build a hotel and leisure facilities, i will take that as a ''nothing has happened yet'' comparing it to past directors, hopefully that level of nothing has happened will continue quietly behind the scenes at the pace it has done so far.. I think the stumbling block is we haven't purchased any land from UWE. Not sure where you plucked that idea from. |
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Nov 24, 2016 13:14:57 GMT
Transfer business will be influenced by Matty staying or leaving I hope the planing is realistic and based on MT leading. Unlike when Lambert left and pt/LL hadn't planned for what everyone else could see was coming. Saying the above I'll be more than happy if that planning is wasted and he stays |
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Nov 24, 2016 12:47:57 GMT
He's joined Brighton as assistant manager, which he's probably better suited for. Good luck Trolls! Back with an old friend, perfect for him. |
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Nov 23, 2016 11:12:40 GMT
Ouch
|
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Nov 22, 2016 22:48:45 GMT
Who could of predicted shipping goals would cost us?
|
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Nov 21, 2016 13:44:55 GMT
some of the most loyal supporters in the land. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Yeah those loyal fans that have sold out a 12k stadium twice in 3 years. That have a HIGHEST home attendance 8,700 lower than our AVERAGE home attendance. Fk me if that's the most loyal in the land I'd hate to see the rest.... A man that supports a club that took 76 fans to Hull City, hardly a loyal following but you had been relegated and loyalty counts for nothing in south Bristol unless you're winning. |
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Nov 20, 2016 18:43:26 GMT
So you were the person warehamgas was referring to when he talked about people hiding under new user names. You couldn't make this s*** up. i changed my user name as i quit the forum and used gaschat because i found this forum negative but after a bit i came back to try it again with a nice cheery username. ive always been pro darrell clarke. you seem to use expletives quite a lot? No I just use lots of asterisks when I read relentless negative crap from the same posters. Any excuse why it is okay for you to slag players off & then change your mind but others aren't allowed to change any view they may have had of DC? It's not an excuse but I presume it's because you're a hypocrite? |
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Nov 20, 2016 16:30:33 GMT
So if it's ''great'' for you to be wrong, why didn't you dig up your post having a dig at Lines and Easter and apologise for it, why take a cheap shot at others, most of whom, myself included, have already conceded that they misjudged Clarke's ability as a manager? In reality, all that's happened is we comment based on what we see in front of us, sometimes history proves us right, sometimes not. If someone was still digging that post of yours up in 2 years and throwing it in your face, unprovoked, you would think they were either unwell or just plain unpleasant wouldn't you? i didnt remember the post about lines/easter but accept it and im happy that its been re-visited,to your credit you have publicly stated you got it wrong with dc. i find your posts on here arrogant and smug and i dislike you based on your posts and i despised your posts in the conference years when i had a different user name. maybe im not cut out for forums though? So you were the person warehamgas was referring to when he talked about people hiding under new user names. You couldn't make this s**t up. |
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Nov 19, 2016 10:50:28 GMT
Disagree. I think there are some whom just don't like him. A very small minority, but some nevertheless. If there was an amnesty, an honest chance to weigh in with criticism free from being abused, or trolled, I think you might find there is a silent minority. I remember a few dissenting voices when we were in Conference. Some renounced and publicly said they had it wrong. Others whom didn't probably won't change and just stay stuum (is that a word?). The thing is, it's always fair enough to give constructive criticism, but not to give DC a chance and publicly slate is always wrong. I wonder whom put those stickers around training ground wishing dc out early on? (john ward, probably!). We have to remember, we have been in some sort of dreamland last two years, something which is quite unprecedented and of the like we may never see again. It still feels like a honeymoon period. Wait until this fails and fickleness rears it's head again.. Ah constructive criticism, that was well received on the no defence thread wasn't it? Christ DC said exactly the same thing but people git slaughtered for their constructive criticism |
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Nov 19, 2016 10:22:48 GMT
Who is hiding? The board took the cheap easy option when we got relegated. At the start of the conference season that looked questionable but they held their nerve and DC has rewarded them.
As bluesky is trying to start an argument I'll go along with it and say what a complete and utter **** bluesky is.
|
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Nov 17, 2016 11:55:24 GMT
You'd think, wouldn't you: leagues of 20 need 8 fewer fixture slots than leagues of 24. It smacks of a nonsense explanation, which prompts a thought about what's really behind the change of mind and not being said. Is it overly cynical to note, at this stage, the way the experiment elsewhere with Premiership B teams has (not) worked and been received? (not this proposal apparently ever involved that, oh no, not at all, as if, perish the thought). Harvey is definitely a pillock and his explanations were nonsense
However whatever the rights and wrongs of the 100 club system, the EFL are right (and it is their responsibility) to look at the future of the leagues and put proposals forward to be voted on even if keeping things the same wins out
Just seems they have ideas but no real thought has gone into any of them
Must be a bit of a blow to you after enthusiasticly supporting the idea. It was crap put forward by crap people and full of holes but some still followed it unquestioningly. |
|
