According to members on the other forum news due in October

I guess as Bankers the minimum they would want is to get out flat. ie the £8mil (or whatever it was they bought BRFC for) + £5mil (or whatever debt they have piled on) = approx. £13mil?
I wouldn't blame them for slapping on a bigger price tag and trying their luck... after all they're in it for money, not love.
But ultimately - they bought a dog, and a dog with fleas (to paraphrase Mr Gecko) and there won't be a long queue of potential buyers. 
Every day that passes makes the Club more expensive and less attractive to buyers. I don't see a potential buyer wanting Wael staying on. Just like when Dwane Sports decided not to invite Nick Higgs to remain on the Board.
Anchors away!

Surely Dwane Sports are in an impregnable position, they cannot lose can they ?

At a time of their choosing they can sell the land to a developer and recoup all of their loan plus a profit on top.

According to the information we were given at the outset Dwane Sports is owned equally by four members of the Al-Qadi family so three of them can outvote Wael and proceed with the deal.

Past history suggests the football club would then be handed free gratis to some of our worthy and wealthy fans who would work in conjunction with the Supporters Club and Presidents Club to find a new home and a way of keeping us afloat financially.

I believe The Mem. was last valued at £18mil as a potential residential site (can't remember where I read that).
If,as Vaughan suggests, they want £25mil, then they are have a f******g laugh.  

Which is why it's dangerous to repeat everything you hear.

In one breath certain posters want us to believe that we are moments away from a takeover, in the next it's that the price was, broadly, the value of the asset plus clearing the internal debt, which of course, set against a loss making company, was never ever in a million years going to happen.

Of course, you can suggest that it's viable as a new stadium makes the clearing debt manageable, but if that's the case then these owners would be building it, not handing the potential over, this is exactly what they came here to do.

I went in West Enclosure on Sat. When floodlights were on, it could have been 1982 at Eastville, given the state of the ground.

Basic! Hard to justify why so little has been spent.

It was around that time when someone described Eastville Stadium as a "broken down builders yard" and I can remember how the comment hurt me because, despite everything, it was impossible then to escape the sense of pride you felt about your club and your stadium especially when only a few years before the place had been rocking with 20 000+ crowds and a wonderfully charged atmosphere.

Now, unfortunately, Rovers have a different type of charge hanging over the ground.

you are thinking that this might be the real reason for taking the charge in the first place I take it

Completely agree, the Mem & Colony sold off to Developers, this is what I am sadly expecting.

On reflection I think the specific reason for the charge was that the original deal left £930 000 still owing to two former shareholders and in the aftermath of the take over Dwane soon realized the position they were in and indicated that the £930 000 may not be repaid. But they were probably advised that if a successful action was taken to force repayment the plaintiffs could obtain a charge over the Mem to secure what they were owed. And so they made a preemptive strike by placing their own first charge over the Mem. In the end common sense prevailed and a "proportionate amount" of £722 000 was paid to the former shareholders as shown in the June 2017 accounts.