Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2018 14:32:36 GMT
I’ve just read in another thread, that you believe that no football matches should be played on Sunday as it’s Armistice Day. I certainly agree with this. You now state you are refereeing two matches on Sunday. Ridiculous. why ridiculous ? I see that The FA, Prem League and Football League have not postponed matches so as I have been appointed to two matches and have no intention of letting young footballers down by not reffing how then should I proceed ? The refs secretary has instructed all match officials to undertake a minutes silence which of course I shall. I wish he posted on here. |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2018 15:15:16 GMT
Whilst I can't remember the detail (I'll find it if anyone is that interested) he did something similar a year or so ago, wrote something completely ridiculous. I'm fairly sure that his books are sold on club premises and I've just checked the club website, they are for sale there, surely someone needs to have a word and explain that if he holds a position (is he the official club historian?), or if he's a commercial partner he's a club representative, 24/7 and that there are both privileges and responsibilities that come with that. You would imagine that Hani would cringe if he saw how he conducts himself on here. The other very odd thing is that he comes on here starting fires and creating trouble all over the place, then in the next breath he's posting in the wrong forum section advertising his tat and expects us to buy it off of him. Utterly bizarre. Alistair....That did make me laugh. Rovers are the ones I always have to chase to get money for the book sales I give commercial shops 30 days to pay their account they never do !.
What I say on here are my views and frankly nothing to do with Hani whoever he is. I don't try and upset you or others on here just try to put you right when you spout off untruths. You seem to want to question my motives about writing books about our Club and I have offered to meet you to discuss further but you have refused. I feel you could contribute towards the Rovers History Group but you seem reluctant to even attend a meeting. Next one is on 7 January ?
Are you feeling unwell? Then stop using them to tout your stuff. Personally, had they treated a friend of mine in the way that Keith was treated I wouldn't have used their facilities a couple of days later in a grubby attempt to hawk my product. Club historian doesn't know who owns Rovers. Says it all. OK, point me towards those untruths and I'll retract and apologise. One of my main objectives in life is to believe as many true things as possible and cast off as many untrue things as I can. Thanks for the help here. But before you start, make sure you grasp the difference between opinion and statement of fact. When you can't find anything on here which I've written which is a lie I'll want a clear and unreserved apology from you. Wrong as usual. Previously I haven't, but now I formally will. I think you are a nasty piece of work, you've even threatened violence on here on more than one occasion, what's the expression you like to use, 'somebody deserves a slap' I think. But being a coward you've not even threatened to do it yourself, you say that a friend of yours will be throwing his fists around on your behalf. I don't want to meet you or anybody like you. |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2018 15:22:48 GMT
Is it half term already
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2018 15:24:14 GMT
Or are you letting your prejudices affect your interpretation No I don't think so. Either way, the post caused offence. A simple acknowledgement and apology could have saved further discussion. As could self-deletion of the offending post. However the option chosen was to re-write it (twenty three and a half hours later) to make it look as if nothing contentious had ever been said. Not the first time that approach has been taken. Presumably designed to make the poster look innocent and the objector appear deluded. Did you actually read the post |
|
Angas
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 2,069
|
Post by Angas on Nov 10, 2018 15:28:14 GMT
No I don't think so. Either way, the post caused offence. A simple acknowledgement and apology could have saved further discussion. As could self-deletion of the offending post. However the option chosen was to re-write it (twenty three and a half hours later) to make it look as if nothing contentious had ever been said. Not the first time that approach has been taken. Presumably designed to make the poster look innocent and the objector appear deluded. Did you actually read the post Yes. I've said a couple of times previously that I did. |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2018 15:31:13 GMT
so not jumpimg on the bandwagon
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2018 15:35:43 GMT
It strikes me that people are very quick to condemn other people when they themselves are far from perfect.as the old saying goes people in glasshouses shouldn't throw stones.
I am not condemning or condoning what he wrote because I did not see it.but it does strike me that anyone who has any association with the supporters club is fair game on here and must be whiter than white instead of the varying shades of grey the rest are.my opinion and I am as entitled to it as anyone else
|
|
Angas
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 2,069
|
Post by Angas on Nov 10, 2018 15:41:08 GMT
so not jumpimg on the bandwagon No Padstow. As I have also said on here, I don't remember the wording of that post now. I do know what I thought when I read it. I came very close to objecting, but I have trained myself not to react to Harry's posts. |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2018 15:44:34 GMT
Training hasn't worked then because that is exactly what you are doing.
I also ask myself if it had been anyone else who posted that alleged remark and I say alleged because I haven't seen it nor read interpretations of what he said,then would you have been quite so holier than thou about it,i am very doubtfull
|
|
Angas
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 2,069
|
Post by Angas on Nov 10, 2018 15:51:08 GMT
It strikes me that people are very quick to condemn other people when they themselves are far from perfect.as the old saying goes people in glasshouses shouldn't throw stones. I am not condemning or condoning what he wrote because I did not see it.but it does strike me that anyone who has any association with the supporters club is fair game on here and must be whiter than white instead of the varying shades of grey the rest are.my opinion and I am as entitled to it as anyone else Yes you absolutely are entitled to your opinion. All I can tell you is that I felt the post was in very poor taste. I don't know what anyone else thought apart from Oxon as he was the only one who responded to it. Perhaps others were of the same mind as me, that these things are sometimes best ignored and left to be lost and forgotten. Which it was for a full eleven days, until someone noticed that admin had deleted it. |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2018 15:52:58 GMT
Training hasn't worked then because that is exactly what you are doing. I also ask myself if it had been anyone else who posted that alleged remark and I say alleged because I haven't seen it nor read interpretations of what he said,then would you have been quite so holier than thou about it,i am very doubtfull How can you judge how someone may have reacted to something you haven't ever seen? You're making this up as you go along  |
|
Angas
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 2,069
|
Post by Angas on Nov 10, 2018 16:00:24 GMT
Training hasn't worked then because that is exactly what you are doing. I also ask myself if it had been anyone else who posted that alleged remark and I say alleged because I haven't seen it nor read interpretations of what he said,then would you have been quite so holier than thou about it,i am very doubtfull Training has worked pretty well. It worked for the eleven days that the post remained. Then someone noticed it had been deleted. It was apparent they were mistaken as to whose post the deletion referred to. I replied to clear that confusion. I did not respond to Harry. |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2018 16:30:56 GMT
Training hasn't worked then because that is exactly what you are doing. I also ask myself if it had been anyone else who posted that alleged remark and I say alleged because I haven't seen it nor read interpretations of what he said,then would you have been quite so holier than thou about it,i am very doubtfull How can you judge how someone may have reacted to something you haven't ever seen? You're making this up as you go along Not at all but I accept that people have the right to free speech I was not aware we live in a country such as north korea where the thought police are every where. As I said before you get all righteous just look in the mirror abnd convince yourself that you have never called anyone a name either in print or vocally,seems you abnd a few others are getting very precious about your feelings being upset by a comment not even aimed at you |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2018 16:32:31 GMT
Did you actually read the post Yes. I've said a couple of times previously that I did. So if you are ignoring it why have you brought the subject up on several occasions |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2018 16:36:13 GMT
Training hasn't worked then because that is exactly what you are doing. I also ask myself if it had been anyone else who posted that alleged remark and I say alleged because I haven't seen it nor read interpretations of what he said,then would you have been quite so holier than thou about it,i am very doubtfull How can you judge how someone may have reacted to something you haven't ever seen? You're making this up as you go along If you are so offended by the word used as you and a couple of others said then you must have led a very sheltered life. When I played football I was called a lot worse than that and just laughed it off I didn't go running to my mother saying how upset I was at being sworn at.For gods sake grow up.there are much more important things happening at this moment in time both at rovers and the country in general |
|
|
|
Post by Blue Mist on Nov 10, 2018 16:47:07 GMT
Whereas this is all very interesting to read sat on this fence of mine it doesn't really have anything to do with the original thread According to members on the other forum news due in October.
- its not news from the other forum
- its not October
This thread is dead.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2018 16:52:03 GMT
How can you judge how someone may have reacted to something you haven't ever seen? You're making this up as you go along If you are so offended by the word used as you and a couple of others said then you must have led a very sheltered life. When I played football I was called a lot worse than that and just laughed it off I didn't go running to my mother saying how upset I was at being sworn at.For gods sake grow up.there are much more important things happening at this moment in time both at rovers and the country in general That's called a Strawman. People do that when they talk themselves into a corner. Sure, there are lots of bad things happening, try to discuss them on here and you get shouted down by people saying that it's a football forum, so, in context, we are left with things like Harry and his threats of violence. |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2018 17:02:35 GMT
If you are so offended by the word used as you and a couple of others said then you must have led a very sheltered life. When I played football I was called a lot worse than that and just laughed it off I didn't go running to my mother saying how upset I was at being sworn at.For gods sake grow up.there are much more important things happening at this moment in time both at rovers and the country in general That's called a Strawman. People do that when they talk themselves into a corner. Sure, there are lots of bad things happening, try to discuss them on here and you get shouted down by people saying that it's a football forum, so, in context, we are left with things like Harry and his threats of violence. Absolutely rubbish you are trying to defend the indefensible |
|
harrybuckle
Always look on the bright side
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 5,577 
|
Post by harrybuckle on Nov 10, 2018 17:16:04 GMT
Alistair....That did make me laugh. Rovers are the ones I always have to chase to get money for the book sales I give commercial shops 30 days to pay their account they never do !.
What I say on here are my views and frankly nothing to do with Hani whoever he is. I don't try and upset you or others on here just try to put you right when you spout off untruths. You seem to want to question my motives about writing books about our Club and I have offered to meet you to discuss further but you have refused. I feel you could contribute towards the Rovers History Group but you seem reluctant to even attend a meeting. Next one is on 7 January ?
Are you feeling unwell? Then stop using them to tout your stuff. Personally, had they treated a friend of mine in the way that Keith was treated I wouldn't have used their facilities a couple of days later in a grubby attempt to hawk my product. Club historian doesn't know who owns Rovers. Says it all. OK, point me towards those untruths and I'll retract and apologise. One of my main objectives in life is to believe as many true things as possible and cast off as many untrue things as I can. Thanks for the help here. But before you start, make sure you grasp the difference between opinion and statement of fact. When you can't find anything on here which I've written which is a lie I'll want a clear and unreserved apology from you. Wrong as usual. Previously I haven't, but now I formally will. I think you are a nasty piece of work, you've even threatened violence on here on more than one occasion, what's the expression you like to use, 'somebody deserves a slap' I think. But being a coward you've not even threatened to do it yourself, you say that a friend of yours will be throwing his fists around on your behalf. I don't want to meet you or anybody like you. comedy time ..not sure which made me laugh the most your response or Preston winning at BS3. I have never hit a person in my life but might make an exception in your case. That's a joke so dont call the Police ! You seem like a troll I think you need to get out more. Apologies if you feel Hani owns the club actually the fans own it -we will be there long after he has returned to Jordan.
|
|
Angas
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 2,069
|
Post by Angas on Nov 10, 2018 17:56:38 GMT
Yes. I've said a couple of times previously that I did. So if you are ignoring it why have you brought the subject up on several occasions I think perhaps you need to go back to page 15 of this thread. And then skip to page 17 where the main discussion started and is now being continued on this page. You will see that I haven't kept bringing the subject up. Most of my posts are on this page, and result from you asking me questions. Now, I quote from your post above in response to Bamber. What you say here suggests that you misunderstand what the debate is about. In which case there's probably not a lot anyone can say to appease you. "If you are so offended by the word used as you and a couple of others said then you must have led a very sheltered life.
When I played football I was called a lot worse than that and just laughed it off I didn't go running to my mother saying how upset I was at being sworn at."
|
|
