warehamgas
Predictions League
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,600
|
Post by warehamgas on Apr 18, 2021 13:03:42 GMT
Yes astaf, a good win for Gloucestershire. A close match throughout and as predicted the team winning a session or two on the Saturday would win it which Gloucestershire did. They learnt from last year’s thrashing and that’s what you hope your team does. This match our bowlers didn’t get us out of trouble as they so often do and the difference between the teams was James Bracey. Well done to him, dug in on Friday gained the benefit today. Still a long way to go but this conference style system is throwing up some unusual contenders perhaps.
|
|
irishrover
Global Moderator
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 3,372
|
Post by irishrover on Apr 19, 2021 12:23:18 GMT
Fantastic win for Glos. Their challenge has to be considered real now although I wonder if they may lose Bracey now. Given England's injury woes he must be in the frame.
Which leads me to ask the following question that I'm not sure I know the answer to - When was the last time a Gloucestershire batsman was selected for the England test side and who was it?
I'm not convinced this has happened in my lifetime (1983 onwards). There's been a few bowlers and obviously Jack Russell. But I'm drawing a blank for batsmen in that period. The only one I can think of is Chris Broad but I'm not at all sure that's right as I think he'd moved onto Notts by the time he made his debut.
Any ideas? Have I forgotten someone obvious?
|
|
warehamgas
Predictions League
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,600
|
Post by warehamgas on Apr 19, 2021 14:53:19 GMT
Fantastic win for Glos. Their challenge has to be considered real now although I wonder if they may lose Bracey now. Given England's injury woes he must be in the frame.
Which leads me to ask the following question that I'm not sure I know the answer to - When was the last time a Gloucestershire batsman was selected for the England test side and who was it?
I'm not convinced this has happened in my lifetime (1983 onwards). There's been a few bowlers and obviously Jack Russell. But I'm drawing a blank for batsmen in that period. The only one I can think of is Chris Broad but I'm not at all sure that's right as I think he'd moved onto Notts by the time he made his debut.
Any ideas? Have I forgotten someone obvious?
Walter Hammond?😉 I honestly don’t know. Must be Chris Broad as a batsman or bowler David Lawrence or Mike Smith for 1 test? I hope for Bracey’s sake he doesn’t get the England call. Last season was a waste of time for him and I’d imagine Lawrence of Essex would be above him. Bracey needs to be playing cricket, not carrying the drinks. And without him Gloucestershire would suffer. It was great win for them against Somerset but if Bracey hadn’t got his runs in both innings a very different result I think. His first innings century was a brilliant knock and he played well, yesterday he was more fortunate playing and missing esp against Overton several times. He needs to push on now have a good summer and get on one of the tours next winter.
|
|
|
Post by The Concept on Apr 19, 2021 16:45:56 GMT
... I like to go on spinner watch at this stage of the season. I notice Lancashire didn’t pick poor old Matt Parkinson. He must be pretty fed up having spent the winter sat on the subs bench. Not great news for England, although it’s good to see that Mason Crane has got a game for Hampshire. ... I take it you saw his 'ball of the century' last week?
|
|
|
Post by tenniscourtgas on Apr 19, 2021 16:59:24 GMT
I would say that the last Gloucestershire batsman to play for England would be Arthur Milton. I can remember from the childhood, him being chosen to play against NZ in a very one sided series in 1958. He scored a hundred, then was selected for the Australia tour in the winter. He played in a couple of tests, without much success, I seem to remember he picked up an injury, as we lost 4-0, He then played a couple of tests against India in the 1959 summer, but again, didn’t make runs, and lost his place for good, as England looked to younger, more inexperienced players. In those days, India were a weak side, we won the series 5-0, and batsmen such as Ken Barrington and Ted Dexter established themselves as great Test batsmen. Tom Graveney played for England whilst with Gloucestershire, but was in and out of the side,. The first test match I can remember, was him playing for England v West Indies in 1957, he scored a big hundred, I can remember watching him on TV, then going up to the dentist in Kingswood, to have a tooth out! In those days, Allen and Mortimer often played for England, even David Smith, a seamer was chosen for a tour of India, playing a couple of matches. Fantastic to see Glo’shire starting so well, and being able to watch it on stream. Bracey is clearly the class batsman we have been lacking for years, maybe we really are now genuinely competitive, with the top sides in the four day game. I enjoyed seeing his disciplined batting, and this format is a pleasant change at the moment from a seemingly endless diet playing Derbyshire, Leicestershire, Glamorgan in the old system. Didn’t expect to beat Somerset so convincingly, great support from Matt Taylor, and Dent really seems to have matured over the last few seasons. Interesting to see if Brathwaite can make a difference, he seems a well organised player, with a decent test record. We are maybe still a batsman short to really push on, time for George Hankins to step up to the plate, he has had plenty of chances, but never really kicked on yet. The arrival of Worrall from Australia should strengthen the seam bowling, hope he stays fit.
,
|
|
jackthegas
David Pritchard
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 313
|
Post by jackthegas on Apr 19, 2021 21:20:14 GMT
Fantastic win for Glos. Their challenge has to be considered real now although I wonder if they may lose Bracey now. Given England's injury woes he must be in the frame.
Which leads me to ask the following question that I'm not sure I know the answer to - When was the last time a Gloucestershire batsman was selected for the England test side and who was it?
I'm not convinced this has happened in my lifetime (1983 onwards). There's been a few bowlers and obviously Jack Russell. But I'm drawing a blank for batsmen in that period. The only one I can think of is Chris Broad but I'm not at all sure that's right as I think he'd moved onto Notts by the time he made his debut.
Any ideas? Have I forgotten someone obvious?
What about Bill Athey? Played for England and Glos I think but can't confirm he did both at the same time as it was way before my time!
|
|
|
Post by tenniscourtgas on Apr 20, 2021 5:51:58 GMT
I’m sure you are correct, jackthegas. I forgot about Bill Athey,:he joined Gloucestershire in the mid 80s, and I can remember him playing for England in the Ashes win in Australia. He had played for Yorkshire previously, and it was quite a coup to get him, I might be wrong, but I think he arrived near the time that Chris Broad left for Notts.
|
|
irishrover
Global Moderator
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 3,372
|
Post by irishrover on Apr 20, 2021 21:52:33 GMT
I would say that the last Gloucestershire batsman to play for England would be Arthur Milton. I can remember from the childhood, him being chosen to play against NZ in a very one sided series in 1958. He scored a hundred, then was selected for the Australia tour in the winter. He played in a couple of tests, without much success, I seem to remember he picked up an injury, as we lost 4-0, He then played a couple of tests against India in the 1959 summer, but again, didn’t make runs, and lost his place for good, as England looked to younger, more inexperienced players. In those days, India were a weak side, we won the series 5-0, and batsmen such as Ken Barrington and Ted Dexter established themselves as great Test batsmen. Tom Graveney played for England whilst with Gloucestershire, but was in and out of the side,. The first test match I can remember, was him playing for England v West Indies in 1957, he scored a big hundred, I can remember watching him on TV, then going up to the dentist in Kingswood, to have a tooth out! In those days, Allen and Mortimer often played for England, even David Smith, a seamer was chosen for a tour of India, playing a couple of matches. Fantastic to see Glo’shire starting so well, and being able to watch it on stream. Bracey is clearly the class batsman we have been lacking for years, maybe we really are now genuinely competitive, with the top sides in the four day game. I enjoyed seeing his disciplined batting, and this format is a pleasant change at the moment from a seemingly endless diet playing Derbyshire, Leicestershire, Glamorgan in the old system. Didn’t expect to beat Somerset so convincingly, great support from Matt Taylor, and Dent really seems to have matured over the last few seasons. Interesting to see if Brathwaite can make a difference, he seems a well organised player, with a decent test record. We are maybe still a batsman short to really push on, time for George Hankins to step up to the plate, he has had plenty of chances, but never really kicked on yet. The arrival of Worrall from Australia should strengthen the seam bowling, hope he stays fit. , Thanks - yes, I was wondering if you had to go back to Arthur Milton but thinking surely there had to be a batsman since then. But I just couldn't think who it would have been. I'm sure Jack has nailed it with Bill Athey although are we absolutely certain he played for England while at Glos? He may well have done - I just don't know for sure. I always associate him with Sussex because that was where he finished when I was young and am just about old enough to remember seeing him play for them. When I was about 5/6 he was one of my favourite players - absolutely no idea why, but I famously had weird prefereces for quite mundane cricketers when I was little. Instead of the superstars I took to players like Asif Din, Arnie Sidebottom and John Carr - I was clearly destined for a lifetime as a county cricket fan from a young age!
I'm not sure I have my Glos chronology quite right - how much earlier than Milton would Tom Graveney have been? Were they contemporaries at Glos? I always think Dave Allen is a bit hard done by in the annuls of Glos history by the way. He should be right up there really but he feels a little bit forgotten. A very good Test record and a decent number of Tests in an era when fewer were played and over 1000 first class wickets. Plus you can't really get more local than him - literally born round the corner. Nice man too, I was coached by him as a junior. His methods were a bit outdated but he was always worth listening to. Should be a stand named after him at least I'd have thought.
I think I'm now a convert to this new format for these exact reasons by the way. It just freshens things up although I am a bit dissapointed that I've missed out Glos visiting Old Trafford in the Championship finally after all these years up here!
|
|
jackthegas
David Pritchard
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 313
|
Post by jackthegas on Apr 21, 2021 8:42:05 GMT
I would say that the last Gloucestershire batsman to play for England would be Arthur Milton. I can remember from the childhood, him being chosen to play against NZ in a very one sided series in 1958. He scored a hundred, then was selected for the Australia tour in the winter. He played in a couple of tests, without much success, I seem to remember he picked up an injury, as we lost 4-0, He then played a couple of tests against India in the 1959 summer, but again, didn’t make runs, and lost his place for good, as England looked to younger, more inexperienced players. In those days, India were a weak side, we won the series 5-0, and batsmen such as Ken Barrington and Ted Dexter established themselves as great Test batsmen. Tom Graveney played for England whilst with Gloucestershire, but was in and out of the side,. The first test match I can remember, was him playing for England v West Indies in 1957, he scored a big hundred, I can remember watching him on TV, then going up to the dentist in Kingswood, to have a tooth out! In those days, Allen and Mortimer often played for England, even David Smith, a seamer was chosen for a tour of India, playing a couple of matches. Fantastic to see Glo’shire starting so well, and being able to watch it on stream. Bracey is clearly the class batsman we have been lacking for years, maybe we really are now genuinely competitive, with the top sides in the four day game. I enjoyed seeing his disciplined batting, and this format is a pleasant change at the moment from a seemingly endless diet playing Derbyshire, Leicestershire, Glamorgan in the old system. Didn’t expect to beat Somerset so convincingly, great support from Matt Taylor, and Dent really seems to have matured over the last few seasons. Interesting to see if Brathwaite can make a difference, he seems a well organised player, with a decent test record. We are maybe still a batsman short to really push on, time for George Hankins to step up to the plate, he has had plenty of chances, but never really kicked on yet. The arrival of Worrall from Australia should strengthen the seam bowling, hope he stays fit. , Thanks - yes, I was wondering if you had to go back to Arthur Milton but thinking surely there had to be a batsman since then. But I just couldn't think who it would have been. I'm sure Jack has nailed it with Bill Athey although are we absolutely certain he played for England while at Glos? He may well have done - I just don't know for sure. I always associate him with Sussex because that was where he finished when I was young and am just about old enough to remember seeing him play for them. When I was about 5/6 he was one of my favourite players - absolutely no idea why, but I famously had weird prefereces for quite mundane cricketers when I was little. Instead of the superstars I took to players like Asif Din, Arnie Sidebottom and John Carr - I was clearly destined for a lifetime as a county cricket fan from a young age!
I'm not sure I have my Glos chronology quite right - how much earlier than Milton would Tom Graveney have been? Were they contemporaries at Glos? I always think Dave Allen is a bit hard done by in the annuls of Glos history by the way. He should be right up there really but he feels a little bit forgotten. A very good Test record and a decent number of Tests in an era when fewer were played and over 1000 first class wickets. Plus you can't really get more local than him - literally born round the corner. Nice man too, I was coached by him as a junior. His methods were a bit outdated but he was always worth listening to. Should be a stand named after him at least I'd have thought.
I think I'm now a convert to this new format for these exact reasons by the way. It just freshens things up although I am a bit dissapointed that I've missed out Glos visiting Old Trafford in the Championship finally after all these years up here! I know this is a really minor point in the grand scheme of things but Gloucestershire are rubbish at this. Even old Gilbert Jessop has been relegated to a suite following the ground redevelopment. I don't think the new stand has a name. Compare this to Taunton where Botham, Trescothick and Caddick have all had stands named after them. In the same period the likes of Russell, Alleyne, Walsh & Procter have played for Gloucestershire and are genuine club legends. I think we have the Hammond roof and the Grace Gates and that's pretty much it I think. Why they went for the Bristol Pavilion rather than honouring a former player I do not know.
|
|
|
Post by tenniscourtgas on Apr 21, 2021 9:05:15 GMT
Yes, both Milton and Graveney were regulars in the 1950s team, in an era before the coming of one day cricket. Graveney was a class, very stylish and calm batsman, who was the captain of Glos for two or three seasons, but the committee, in their infinite wisdom, decided to replace him as captain with Tom Pugh, an amateur, not really worthy of his place in the side. Several counties in those days had decided that an amateur, preferably someone from a public school, Oxbridge, possessed better leaderships qualities than a professional. Needless to say, the decision caused outrage, Graveney immediately demanded to leave, and spent a year playing second team cricket for Worcestershire before qualifying for them, such were the regulations in those days! He was one of the most popular players in the country, the fans were denied years of his talent, and he eventually continued to score heavily in county cricket, won the Championship with Worcestershire, regaining his England place after several years in the wilderness, and was a mainstay in the test team for three or four years in his late thirties. Pugh did actually play as a batsman with Graveney before becoming captain, the two of them making a record wicket partnership for the county, but barely made a run after that. I think Pugh lasted about two seasons before being sacked, and was was very bitter about his dismissal. Everyone played nearly 30 three day Championship fixtures, no play on a Sunday, it was more, or less constant from April to early September. One of my memories of Graveney was going to watch a Sunday afternoon benefit match at Stroud in the early sixties. We autograph hunters waited to get the signatures of the players after the match, the England captain of the time, Ted Dexter strode out of the pavilion, refusing to sign any autographs, whilst Graveney sat on a wall, lined up all the kids, signed every book, and said “Thank you” to everyone one of us, as he signed. Graveney was my favourite player anyway, I was about 12, and never forgot it, or forgave the Glos Committee. In many ways, he was the David Gower of the time, not fully trusted by some decision makers, but loved by the spectators, greatly admired by most of his peers He was in and out of the England side in the 50s, which was dominated by the batting of May, and Cowdrey, but was a heavy scorer in county cricket. That match I mentioned in 1957 against West Indies was the match in which he scored 250. Graveney was the captain in the 1959:season when we finished second, the side featured Milton, Smith, Tony Brown, Mortimer, Allen, a very good left arm spinner, Sam Cook, and two players, Ron Nichols, an opening batsman, and Barrie Meyer, the wicket keeper, who had played for Rovers for years! Bert Tann had eventually got fed up with Nicholls and Meyer missing pre season training to play cricket, and moved both of them on! In those days, Gloucestershire often fielded three spinners, I can remember one match in that 1959 season, when we list a low scoring match with Surrey at the end of the season. Glos played Allen, Mortimer and Cook, but unfortunately, Surrey had Jim Laker and Tony Lock! Nicholls was a consistent batsman, scored 1.000 runs each season for years, and formed a reliable opening partnership with another fine batsman, Martin Young. Graveney and Milton were both on that Australian tour in 1958, I can remember Mortimer being flown out to join the tour, and playing in one of the tests. Laker and Lock were the two established England spinning stars for years, but were replaced after that tour, David Allen got into the England side a years or so later, and played regularly for six or seven years, especially on away tours, he was preferred to Mortimer and Ray Illingworth, and was often a useful batsman. I can remember coming home from school, passing an Evening Post newspaper stand, which had a headline saying that he had scored 74 not out in a test against Pakistan. He also achieved nationwide fame when he calmly played out the last few balls to gain a draw against the famous West Indies side of 1963. England were chasing a target on the last day, lost wickets near the end, and Colin Cowdrey had to bat at No 11 after having had his arm broken by Wes Hall earlier. England were only a handful of runs short of victory, but Allen couldn’t take the risk of Cowdrey being put at risk of facing the fastest bowler in the world at that time. The match was live on BBC, and I think they even delayed The News to see the match conclusion! I agree that Allen is too much under the radar in terms of recognition, he was a better performer at test level than Mortimer, who made only a handful of matches, but Mortimer was often preferred at county level as they both got older, and only one spinner was usually chosen. Funnily enough, I too remember David Allen doing a coaching session at school one afternoon, and telling me to cut out the sweep shot! Hi
|
|
irishrover
Global Moderator
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 3,372
|
Post by irishrover on Apr 21, 2021 10:37:56 GMT
Yes, both Milton and Graveney were regulars in the 1950s team, in an era before the coming of one day cricket. Graveney was a class, very stylish and calm batsman, who was the captain of Glos for two or three seasons, but the committee, in their infinite wisdom, decided to replace him as captain with Tom Pugh, an amateur, not really worthy of his place in the side. Several counties in those days had decided that an amateur, preferably someone from a public school, Oxbridge, possessed better leaderships qualities than a professional. Needless to say, the decision caused outrage, Graveney immediately demanded to leave, and spent a year playing second team cricket for Worcestershire before qualifying for them, such were the regulations in those days! He was one of the most popular players in the country, the fans were denied years of his talent, and he eventually continued to score heavily in county cricket, won the Championship with Worcestershire, regaining his England place after several years in the wilderness, and was a mainstay in the test team for three or four years in his late thirties. Pugh did actually play as a batsman with Graveney before becoming captain, the two of them making a record wicket partnership for the county, but barely made a run after that. I think Pugh lasted about two seasons before being sacked, and was was very bitter about his dismissal. Everyone played nearly 30 three day Championship fixtures, no play on a Sunday, it was more, or less constant from April to early September. One of my memories of Graveney was going to watch a Sunday afternoon benefit match at Stroud in the early sixties. We autograph hunters waited to get the signatures of the players after the match, the England captain of the time, Ted Dexter strode out of the pavilion, refusing to sign any autographs, whilst Graveney sat on a wall, lined up all the kids, signed every book, and said “Thank you” to everyone one of us, as he signed. Graveney was my favourite player anyway, I was about 12, and never forgot it, or forgave the Glos Committee. In many ways, he was the David Gower of the time, not fully trusted by some decision makers, but loved by the spectators, greatly admired by most of his peers He was in and out of the England side in the 50s, which was dominated by the batting of May, and Cowdrey, but was a heavy scorer in county cricket. That match I mentioned in 1957 against West Indies was the match in which he scored 250. Graveney was the captain in the 1959:season when we finished second, the side featured Milton, Smith, Tony Brown, Mortimer, Allen, a very good left arm spinner, Sam Cook, and two players, Ron Nichols, an opening batsman, and Barrie Meyer, the wicket keeper, who had played for Rovers for years! Bert Tann had eventually got fed up with Nicholls and Meyer missing pre season training to play cricket, and moved both of them on! In those days, Gloucestershire often fielded three spinners, I can remember one match in that 1959 season, when we list a low scoring match with Surrey at the end of the season. Glos played Allen, Mortimer and Cook, but unfortunately, Surrey had Jim Laker and Tony Lock! Nicholls was a consistent batsman, scored 1.000 runs each season for years, and formed a reliable opening partnership with another fine batsman, Martin Young. Graveney and Milton were both on that Australian tour in 1958, I can remember Mortimer being flown out to join the tour, and playing in one of the tests. Laker and Lock were the two established England spinning stars for years, but were replaced after that tour, David Allen got into the England side a years or so later, and played regularly for six or seven years, especially on away tours, he was preferred to Mortimer and Ray Illingworth, and was often a useful batsman. I can remember coming home from school, passing an Evening Post newspaper stand, which had a headline saying that he had scored 74 not out in a test against Pakistan. He also achieved nationwide fame when he calmly played out the last few balls to gain a draw against the famous West Indies side of 1963. England were chasing a target on the last day, lost wickets near the end, and Colin Cowdrey had to bat at No 11 after having had his arm broken by Wes Hall earlier. England were only a handful of runs short of victory, but Allen couldn’t take the risk of Cowdrey being put at risk of facing the fastest bowler in the world at that time. The match was live on BBC, and I think they even delayed The News to see the match conclusion! I agree that Allen is too much under the radar in terms of recognition, he was a better performer at test level than Mortimer, who made only a handful of matches, but Mortimer was often preferred at county level as they both got older, and only one spinner was usually chosen. Funnily enough, I too remember David Allen doing a coaching session at school one afternoon, and telling me to cut out the sweep shot! Hi Thank you - that's really interesting. That must have been a very strong Glos side in the late 50s then.
I knew that Graveney was the great romantic stylist his generation, that he was a lot of people's favourite play and that there was a big falling out with Glos. I don't think I knew it was about the classic amateur-professional divide which really does look bizarre when you look back at it from 2021. Were people united in thinking it was daft back then or was opinion a bit more split? I mean among the real fans, rather than the snobs who were protecting their status (still exists by the way - just in different forms). We know what they thought.
I have another general question that's connected - when and why did Glos stop producing spinners? If you go back into the distant past that was something they were famous for. An absolute production line that was almost unbroken. Charlie Parker, Tom Godard, Wells, Allan, Mortimore etc and it makes sense. Bristol is a big ground and a slow track. I know the game obviously changed significantly over time and spin more maginalised but Martin Ball is really the only significant county standard spinner they've had in my time and was hardly in the same league as those players. There's been very little since he retired of any significance in the spin department and that's been 15 years. I find it slightly strange - you'd think it would be something they'd prioritise but they don't seem to.
|
|
|
Post by tenniscourtgas on Apr 21, 2021 14:52:26 GMT
I was only about 11 or 12 when the Graveney situation occurred, but the amateur v professional issue was obvious even to me, even at that age. There was an annual Gentlemen v Players match up until 1961 or 1962, will all the top England players playing against each other. The Gentlemen side contained the amateur Oxbridge/ Public school set, such as Cowdrey,May, Dexter, MJK Smith, even a young Mike Brearley! Trueman, Statham, Lock,Close, Barrington would be the leading lights for the Players, and it was usually played at Lords. The amateurs usually had their own dressing room on the county circuit, and even the England captain was always an amateur until Len Hutton in the early 1950s.. The distinction was abolished in the early 1960s, and amateurism was abolished. In those days, if you came from the right background, and were talented, you were usually fast tracked into becoming captain at an early stage, despite a lack of experience. I have read quite a few books by 50s and 60s cricketers covering the situation in most counties, where the experienced professionals were often overlooked for the captaincy, breeding resentment. Freddie Trueman was always scathing about the system, and it seemed the Yorkshire side of the 50s and 60s were often at each other’s throats, even before Boycott got there, but that was not due to the amateur v professional situation. I can remember him writing that many a time he can recall being on tour, complaining about a player not good enough to be playing for England to management, but being told that the individual was “ a jolly good chap, who had very good season with his county!” There was a very famous Telegraph cricket writer, EW Swanton, a pompous man, very well in with MCC, who used to have a regular feature on Public Schools cricket in his newspaper. Apparently, Peter Richardson, the Worcester and England opener, used to gave great fun sending Swanton fictitious Public school scores and achievements by letter, giving the letters to fellow cricketers to post in various towns around the circuit, when they crossed paths. Swanton continued to publish the scores, oblivious to what was going on! Your Lancashire friends might know about the story of Bob Barber, an ex Cambridge all rounder, talented batsman and leg break bowler, who was appointed captain, with very little experienced, and was dictated to by basket case committee men. In one match, Barber set a total for a Kent side captained by Colin Cowdrey, then England captain to chase, they declined to chase hard, and one of the Lancashire players blasted Cowdrey in the papers, much to the anger of the Lancashire committee. Barber, apparently was ordered to apologise to Cowdrey, not forcefully enough for the committee, who sacked him later on, whilst he was away on an England tour. They replaced him with a character plucked from Chorley, Joe Blackledge, with no first class experience, but from a public school background, who lasted a year, as Lancashire plunged down the table! Barber left Lancashire, moved to Warwickshire, and became a very successful fast scoring opener, partnering Boycott in the England team for a couple of years, or so. County cricketers were badly paid in the 50s and 60s, and the opportunity to become captain, would no doubt have seen a useful salary hike, when the pro am system was abolished in the early 60s, which Committees no doubt took into consideration! The spinner question is a very interesting one, many spinners did seem to have very long careers years ago, Mortimore playing on until the mid 70s, he was also captain for a while. David Graveney was in the side for the best part of 20 years, was also a captain, guaranteed a place in the side. John Childs was another left arm spinner, who was with Glo’shire for years, couldn’t get in the side, was released, went to Essex, and his career took off. He played for England at the age of 36, but the dearth of spinners has been going on for many years, not just in Gloucestershire cricket. Freddie Titmus, the old Middlesex spinner played for England until he was about 40, as did John Emburey. Ray Illingworth was in his late thirties still playing for England. I suppose one day cricket brought the trend of having more all rounders in sides, to the exclusion of spinners, unless they could bat. Probably the same situation as with wicketkeepers, sides always wanted somebody who can bat a bit for balance, so seamers seemed to get the nod, especially in English conditions. When you think about it, and I may have forgotten one or two,the most successful England spinners in the last forty years or so have been , Miller, Edmunds, Emburey, Tufnell, Underwood, Giles, Swann and Panesar. Only three of those were off spinners, and only Miller, Giles and Swann could you say could have their moments with the bat. Glo’shire have certainly been short of off spinners for many years, looks like most counties have preferred the up and down seamer as the default bowler. When overseas cricketers came into the county game in the mid sixties onwards, I think that if a county wanted a top class spinner, they would bring him in from India, Pakistan, West Indies in particular, there were always plenty of English seamers about. Incidentally, I have just looked up the 1959 season in one of my old cricket annuals. Glo’shire played 28 three day Championship fixtures, and if the bowlers, the wicket takers were,.....Allen 80 at 15.02, Mortimore 103 at 16.81, Cook 100 at 18.31, and the two seamers Smith 110 at 22.90 and Brown 110 at 23.08. Meanwhile, at the same time, Rovers were finishing sixth in the old Division 2(Modern day Championship). I wasn’t to know, that was going to be as good, as it was ever to be!
|
|
warehamgas
Predictions League
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,600
|
Post by warehamgas on Apr 21, 2021 18:47:04 GMT
Thanks tenniscourt, I really enjoyed reading about Gloucestershire of the 50s and 60s. The early 60s were the years when I would spend days at Ashley Down watching Gloucestershire with my granny, who loved cricket. Strange that David Allan has been mentioned because during those years he was my favourite cricketer and even now is amongst my all time favourite cricketers. My grandad knew him well and was quite friendly with him and I usually spent the summer living with my gran and grandad so I remember him really well. A genuinely friendly man. He played about 30 tests iirc, so was no slouch with the bat or ball. I remember that 1963 test so well, it would never happen today.
Yes Somerset as they’ve developed their ground have named many parts of the ground after former players most of whom are within living memory. As well as those you’ve mentioned jack there’s the Colin Atkinson Pavilion, the Brian Rose Gates, the Joel Garner Gates and Gimblett Hill. So a great reminder of our glory days. Perhaps Gloucestershire when they’ve finished their ground development may re-name this eparts.
|
|
|
Post by lostinspace on Apr 25, 2021 9:18:49 GMT
I do get the impression this is very much a gloucester biased cricket section 😊Somerset won yesterday, but is already chip paper news 🏏😀
|
|
warehamgas
Predictions League
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,600
|
Post by warehamgas on Apr 25, 2021 10:47:30 GMT
I do get the impression this is very much a gloucester biased cricket section 😊Somerset won yesterday, but is already chip paper news 🏏😀 Well I suppose Gloucestershire have had a good week so fair enough. I was going to post about us yesterday but I didn’t want to turn it into a Somerset thread!!! 😉 Very good win, bowlers again did the business and the batsmen slowly coming into form perhaps. Still along way to go. Some interesting finishes today I think esp at Hampshire and Sussex.
|
|
|
Post by tenniscourtgas on Apr 25, 2021 13:48:58 GMT
Yes, convincing, but expected win for Somerset! Overton was impressive against Glo’shire, and seems to have made a very good start to the season. Gloucestershire struggling today, will do well to save the game at Hampshire. Really enjoy the streaming coverage, makes up for not being able to attend matches. Some impressive batting performances around the country, big hundred from Bedingham at Durham, and nice to see that Hameed, the ex Lancashire opener, who was heralded as the coming star a few years ago, has made something of a comeback with Notts. He has been a bit of a forgotten figure, is still young, but has had a nightmare couple of years. As he doesn’t seem to be a white ball batsman, it must be very difficult to iron out faults, then get match practice, when you don’t play from June to September with our system. I think we have opportunities at Test level this summer, if batsmen score consistently Despite their big names, Surrey lost heavily again, they seem have a collapse in them, and are prone to flop with both bat and ball.
|
|
jackthegas
David Pritchard
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 313
|
Post by jackthegas on Apr 25, 2021 17:14:26 GMT
Tense finish at Southampton!
|
|
jackthegas
David Pritchard
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 313
|
Post by jackthegas on Apr 25, 2021 17:24:30 GMT
Cracking effort by Shaw and Goodman to bat out the last hour!
|
|
absent
Joined: February 2021
Posts: 306
|
Post by absent on Apr 25, 2021 18:20:55 GMT
I think the Glos bias is to be expected on a Rovers forum?
An amazing escape at the Rose Bowl today, they batted out 18 overs for the 10th wicket to draw after following on.
|
|
warehamgas
Predictions League
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,600
|
Post by warehamgas on Apr 25, 2021 18:47:12 GMT
Yes this round of games has been very good with runs and some good individual performances. Gloucestershire did well to get a good draw against Hampshire. Unlucky to miss avoiding the follow on and then to lose those 3 wickets near the end. But they look to have a determination to survive. Run rate a little over 2 an over throughout the game for them so I’m glad not to have to watch it but it was an effective draw. Hampshire look to have a good batting line up. James Vince came in at No. 6! I know the night watchman came in at 5 on the first evening but even so. And their batsmen are in very good form. Still my pick to win the Championship. With Abbas and Abbott to bowl they will be hard to beat. Warwickshire and Northamptonshire had good wins. Surrey look to be going through a hard patch and I noticed Joverton didn’t play, was he dropped or just another injury? So many more runs than you would expect in April but I suppose the very dry weather has made the conditions more August-like than ever before in April. I was half hoping for a Hampshire win from a Somerset pov but couldn’t quite get up the enthusiasm for it. Their sense of entitlement doesn’t sit well with me so I was glad to see Gloucestershire hold on. I bet it feels like a win after the last hour. To answer irish’s question about the extra points being given for a draw: It’s a long way to go but perhaps there’s a bigger incentive for clubs to bat out for a draw if they can’t get the win. The Hampshire v Gloucestershire match was a case in point perhaps. Hampshire were lucky to be able to enforce the follow on by 1 run. Had Gloucestershire avoided it and Hampshire had had to bat again and presumably set a target for Gloucestershire to chase then they might have actually won because Gloucestershire might have gone for the target (up to a point) and would have had to bat with a bit more adventure giving Hampshire more of a chance. As it was enforcing the follow on meant that Gloucestershire couldn’t win and so were happy to flat bat their way at 2 runs an over and just frustrate Hampshire. Enforcing the follow on after their bowlers had just bowled 132 overs on a good pitch was odd though I’m normally an advocate for enforcing the follow on. Not much of a cricketing spectacle even if it was a very good rear-guard action. And just to finish, Glamorgan must be mightily upset after scoring over 400 runs to lose the match by 7 wickets. This whole championship is boiling up nicely to be a good contest.
|
|