Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2020 0:05:56 GMT
Yeah, in the 50 years I've been following Rovers it's happened time and again. Course, different managers, different players, different opponents every time. Um Yeovil home, down to 10 and drew. Think I remember a game at the Mem when Rob Trees got sent off, did we get a reult then? Wigan 4 sent off, ok lost one nil. Am sure we have had some results when sp down to 10. 4 sent off at Wigan, they had one sent off, we lost 3-0 The Rob Trees one I think was against Bournemouth and weren't we down to 9 (edit Jason Roberts was also sent off) and we won 1-0. Wasn't Gurnam Singh the ref?
|
|
Rex
Predictions League
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 3,287
|
Post by Rex on Feb 23, 2020 7:51:17 GMT
Shock horror we lose at sunderland! They have been better than us for 150 years and probably always will be.While that much is true, we are actually in the same division at the moment and we should be able to give anyone a game in this league. I saw us dick them 4-0 at Twerton in what I think was a promotion season for them and I think we may have snuck a draw at Roker that year as well.
|
|
|
Post by fatherjackhackett on Feb 23, 2020 8:41:27 GMT
Shock horror we lose at sunderland! They have been better than us for 150 years and probably always will be.While that much is true, we are actually in the same division at the moment and we should be able to give anyone a game in this league. I saw us dick them 4-0 at Twerton in what I think was a promotion season for them and I think we may have snuck a draw at Roker that year as well. Yeah 1-1. Holloway’s first game back after Gerry Francis paid Brentford 10 grand out of his own pocket to bring him home.
|
|
Rex
Predictions League
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 3,287
|
Post by Rex on Feb 23, 2020 9:19:46 GMT
While that much is true, we are actually in the same division at the moment and we should be able to give anyone a game in this league. I saw us dick them 4-0 at Twerton in what I think was a promotion season for them and I think we may have snuck a draw at Roker that year as well. Yeah 1-1. Holloway’s first game back after Gerry Francis paid Brentford 10 grand out of his own pocket to bring him home. I'm pretty sure I saw us draw up there in another game as well, as we were driving out of the ground one of the friendly locals put a brick through the windscreen of the car in front.
|
|
|
Post by o2o2bo2ba on Feb 23, 2020 9:33:07 GMT
Yeah 1-1. Holloway’s first game back after Gerry Francis paid Brentford 10 grand out of his own pocket to bring him home. I'm pretty sure I saw us draw up there in another game as well, as we were driving out of the ground one of the friendly locals put a brick through the windscreen of the car in front. I was there as well. We shut the Roker roar up by going 1-0 up. Similar here because I drove up, after match fella spots one in our car with Rovers shirt on and tries to stop it by started kicking it with his mates.......you have to pick your fights sometimes. Anyway no problem. The car wasn't mine! 😁 Haha!
|
|
|
Post by fatherjackhackett on Feb 23, 2020 10:21:23 GMT
Yeah 1-1. Holloway’s first game back after Gerry Francis paid Brentford 10 grand out of his own pocket to bring him home. I'm pretty sure I saw us draw up there in another game as well, as we were driving out of the ground one of the friendly locals put a brick through the windscreen of the car in front. Yeah 91-92 season, just after Dennis Rofe took over. The ex wife had family in Darlington so stayed there for the weekend.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2020 10:32:11 GMT
Going by what has introduced so far, it looks promising, I can’t see JCH going because of his continuing recurring injuries, certainly not to a team in the championship at least, as for what some of you think is a disaster waiting to happen, obviously some think it has happened already 😀I cannot see it , painful at the moment but slow germination is there , upwards and onwards Hope your optimism is rewarded, we all want the same thing, a winning team, but you won't be surprised to hear that I don't agree with any of what you say. JCH has had a couple of minor injuries, but it's not like Swampy, where you pretty much knew that he was going to miss a long period every year. Others are talking about being able to see what Garner is trying to do, I can't, all he's done is mess with the formation, sometimes during games, and set us up badly and get us playing with no urgency or desire. As I've said elsewhere, you simply can't expect to bring talent through and play Wengerball football in L1, that type of player gets taken by higher clubs at an early stage. Anybody who thinks that would work simply hasn't paid any attention to anything that's happened over the last 25 years. If this is the plan, we'll carry on getting beaten up by grizzled old L1 hoofers and scuffers, then the same thing will happen in L2.
|
|
eppinggas
Administrator
Ian Alexander
Don't care
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 8,600
|
Post by eppinggas on Feb 23, 2020 10:53:34 GMT
I'm not quite as pessimistic as Bambi, but he has a point. The 'Plan' is flawed. 1. To unearth these fantastically talented footballers we are in competition with a host of other Clubs. Over time our facilities have become increasingly unattractive. Why would a young player come here to help pick fox sh*t off of a field we don't even own before commencing training? IMHO the fact that we lack of our own Training Facility is even more damning than our inadequate Stadium, that has long been unfit for purpose. 2. Should we strike it lucky - then the talent is off as soon as we attract a decent bid, or even a crap bid (Bodin). Or they run down their contract and leave for nothing (Lockyer). I actually like the look of what Ben Garner is trying to achieve given the current situation. All we are short of is two decent full-backs, two players to replace Ginelli and JML when their loan period finishes, and a decent creative mid-fielder. Piece of piss. Given the over-whelming odds that Ben Garner faces - I'm backing him. Logic dictates the chances of success are slim. But I'm still backing him. UTG & Keep The Faith.
|
|
Rex
Predictions League
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 3,287
|
Post by Rex on Feb 23, 2020 10:57:30 GMT
Going by what has introduced so far, it looks promising, I can’t see JCH going because of his continuing recurring injuries, certainly not to a team in the championship at least, as for what some of you think is a disaster waiting to happen, obviously some think it has happened already 😀I cannot see it , painful at the moment but slow germination is there , upwards and onwards Hope your optimism is rewarded, we all want the same thing, a winning team, but you won't be surprised to hear that I don't agree with any of what you say. JCH has had a couple of minor injuries, but it's not like Swampy, where you pretty much knew that he was going to miss a long period every year. Others are talking about being able to see what Garner is trying to do, I can't, all he's done is mess with the formation, sometimes during games, and set us up badly and get us playing with no urgency or desire.
As I've said elsewhere, you simply can't expect to bring talent through and play Wengerball football in L1, that type of player gets taken by higher clubs at an early stage. Anybody who thinks that would work simply hasn't paid any attention to anything that's happened over the last 25 years. If this is the plan, we'll carry on getting beaten up by grizzled old L1 hoofers and scuffers, then the same thing will happen in L2. I tend to agree. For the life of me I can see absolutely nothing that Garner has done to improve things, we were 4th in the league FFS, how anyone can think this is better is beyond me. The one thing I do disagree with Bambi on, is that I think we have to stick with Garner for the foreseeable. The owners are obviously not remotely interested in investment, so if he did go, they would just be looking around the office and asking if anyone else fancied having a go. So Garner it is for me, at least until the end of the season. I don't think relegation is ever quite as catastrophic as fans make out, it is just part and parcel of the game but assuming we do avoid it this season (surely to God he couldn't take us down this time) I would like to see some signs that we may be avoiding a relegation battle for the following season before handing him the reins again for another go.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2020 11:07:28 GMT
Hope your optimism is rewarded, we all want the same thing, a winning team, but you won't be surprised to hear that I don't agree with any of what you say. JCH has had a couple of minor injuries, but it's not like Swampy, where you pretty much knew that he was going to miss a long period every year. Others are talking about being able to see what Garner is trying to do, I can't, all he's done is mess with the formation, sometimes during games, and set us up badly and get us playing with no urgency or desire.
As I've said elsewhere, you simply can't expect to bring talent through and play Wengerball football in L1, that type of player gets taken by higher clubs at an early stage. Anybody who thinks that would work simply hasn't paid any attention to anything that's happened over the last 25 years. If this is the plan, we'll carry on getting beaten up by grizzled old L1 hoofers and scuffers, then the same thing will happen in L2. I tend to agree. For the life of me I can see absolutely nothing that Garner has done to improve things, we were 4th in the league FFS, how anyone can think this is better is beyond me. The one thing I do disagree with Bambi on, is that I think we have to stick with Garner for the foreseeable. The owners are obviously not remotely interested in investment, so if he did go, they would just be looking around the office and asking if anyone else fancied having a go. So Garner it is for me, at least until the end of the season. I don't think relegation is ever quite as catastrophic as fans make out, it is just part and parcel of the game but assuming we do avoid it this season (surely to God he couldn't take us down this time) I would like to see some signs that we may be avoiding a relegation battle for the following season before handing him the reins again for another go. I guess that the thing we don't know is who will own the club when next season starts. If these owners think they will still be here then Garner can go today, this just isn't working, and obviously his mate that he's drafted in can't work it out either, so we may as well draw a line under this madness now. If on the other hand new owners are a genuine possibility, then getting rid of Ben today is a bit pointless as they'll replace him PDQ anyway. As a footnote, I think that you watch a lot of football, in different Leagues, so it's interesting that you can't see these 'green shoots' that others keep talking about. Final thought, and I've mentioned this a couple of times already, I hope that the club are talking to Ben and the rest of the management team and making sure they are OK, they must be feeling the pressure of this and at the end of it all, it's just a job.
|
|
|
Post by laughinggas on Feb 23, 2020 11:15:59 GMT
I'm not quite as pessimistic as Bambi, but he has a point. The 'Plan' is flawed. 1. To unearth these fantastically talented footballers we are in competition with a host of other Clubs. Over time our facilities have become increasingly unattractive. Why would a young player come here to help pick fox sh*t off of a field we don't even own before commencing training? IMHO the fact that we lack of our own Training Facility is even more damning than our inadequate Stadium, that has long been unfit for purpose. 2. Should we strike it lucky - then the talent is off as soon as we attract a decent bid, or even a crap bid (Bodin). Or they run down their contract and leave for nothing (Lockyer). I actually like the look of what Ben Garner is trying to achieve given the current situation. All we are short of is two decent full-backs, two players to replace Ginelli and JML when their loan period finishes, and a decent creative mid-fielder. Piece of piss. Given the over-whelming odds that Ben Garner faces - I'm backing him. Logic dictates the chances of success are slim. But I'm still backing him. UTG & Keep The Faith. All players leave at some point, will their ever be another Stuart Taylor? So not getting your point. Recruitment is tricky whatever the model, for every Tony Craig who come in and does well there is a Bennett! If we only recruit players who then go down the leagues then we will be going down the leagues. Broadbent, Tom N, Gavin R recently. To recruit any player we are in competition with other clubs. So your point must be valid against any recruitment strategy. Back to luck and chemistry?
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2020 11:38:12 GMT
I'm not quite as pessimistic as Bambi, but he has a point. The 'Plan' is flawed. 1. To unearth these fantastically talented footballers we are in competition with a host of other Clubs. Over time our facilities have become increasingly unattractive. Why would a young player come here to help pick fox sh*t off of a field we don't even own before commencing training? IMHO the fact that we lack of our own Training Facility is even more damning than our inadequate Stadium, that has long been unfit for purpose. 2. Should we strike it lucky - then the talent is off as soon as we attract a decent bid, or even a crap bid (Bodin). Or they run down their contract and leave for nothing (Lockyer). I actually like the look of what Ben Garner is trying to achieve given the current situation. All we are short of is two decent full-backs, two players to replace Ginelli and JML when their loan period finishes, and a decent creative mid-fielder. Piece of piss. Given the over-whelming odds that Ben Garner faces - I'm backing him. Logic dictates the chances of success are slim. But I'm still backing him. UTG & Keep The Faith. All players leave at some point, will their ever be another Stuart Taylor? So not getting your point. Recruitment is tricky whatever the model, for every Tony Craig who come in and does well there is a Bennett! If we only recruit players who then go down the leagues then we will be going down the leagues. Broadbent, Tom N, Gavin R recently. To recruit any player we are in competition with other clubs. So your point must be valid against any recruitment strategy. Back to luck and chemistry? The point is, players who fit this 'ball on the floor, one touch' style of play don't ply their trade in L1, unless they aren't very good at it. And even if you have a team who a pretty darn good at that style of play you still find it difficult to get results 46 times, especially with referees who are totally unpredictable. Just ask Sunderland. Look at the squad they had last season, that had ex PL and internationals in it, and not just journeymen looking for a final pay day, that was a good team. L1 is not the place to tippy tappy, you just get smashed by 6'6'' monsters.
|
|
eppinggas
Administrator
Ian Alexander
Don't care
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 8,600
|
Post by eppinggas on Feb 23, 2020 12:16:45 GMT
I'm not quite as pessimistic as Bambi, but he has a point. The 'Plan' is flawed. 1. To unearth these fantastically talented footballers we are in competition with a host of other Clubs. Over time our facilities have become increasingly unattractive. Why would a young player come here to help pick fox sh*t off of a field we don't even own before commencing training? IMHO the fact that we lack of our own Training Facility is even more damning than our inadequate Stadium, that has long been unfit for purpose. 2. Should we strike it lucky - then the talent is off as soon as we attract a decent bid, or even a crap bid (Bodin). Or they run down their contract and leave for nothing (Lockyer). I actually like the look of what Ben Garner is trying to achieve given the current situation. All we are short of is two decent full-backs, two players to replace Ginelli and JML when their loan period finishes, and a decent creative mid-fielder. Piece of piss. Given the over-whelming odds that Ben Garner faces - I'm backing him. Logic dictates the chances of success are slim. But I'm still backing him. UTG & Keep The Faith. All players leave at some point, will their ever be another Stuart Taylor? So not getting your point. Recruitment is tricky whatever the model, for every Tony Craig who come in and does well there is a Bennett! If we only recruit players who then go down the leagues then we will be going down the leagues. Broadbent, Tom N, Gavin R recently. To recruit any player we are in competition with other clubs. So your point must be valid against any recruitment strategy. Back to luck and chemistry? Exactly. We are back to "Luck and Chemistry". But now this "cross your fingers and hope for the best" strategy is handicapped by the fact we have comparatively worse training facilities and stadiums than a majority of our 'old' competitors have. Pretty much everyone else seems to have moved forward. We haven't evolved. Simple as.
|
|
TaiwanGas
Paul Bannon
Tom Ramasuts Left Foot.
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 1,537
|
Post by TaiwanGas on Feb 23, 2020 12:20:00 GMT
Just watched the game again on ifollow replay, yesterdays stream was very poor, the app dropped out at least a dozen times and seems to be getting worse by the week.
Anyway, Sunderland looked totally uninterested imo and coasted along probably knowing they would get the result, nothing dynamic about the game from either side.
Ref should have given a pen for the Mitchell -Lawson tackle from behind, and Ogogo was at worst a yellow card, Harries came on in Midfield?, did not see or hear anything after he came on?, and Barratt did blaze a 35 yarder 5mtrs over the bar and then started his spinning backward passes, roll on Shrewsbury!....
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2020 13:06:16 GMT
Coventry city are full of young players and they play out from the back and pass the ball on the deck. Its not just them but they are the proof that the signing young players and playing football is totally feasible in league one.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2020 14:10:16 GMT
Coventry city are full of young players and they play out from the back and pass the ball on the deck. Its not just them but they are the proof that the signing young players and playing football is totally feasible in league one. So what you are saying is it’s possible but under a totally different set of conditions? Who is the scout at Coventry? What are the training facilities like? How does their budget compare to ours? Is Coventry situated more favourably geographically than we are? Is their manager any good? Etc etc. Coventry have got us beat on a lot of those points. So whilst it.’s totally fair to use them as an example of how it can be done to my mind it’s the same as pointing at Peterborough and saying “they develop players and sell them for 5 million so we can too” As has been said above by other posters the training ground seems to be going under the radar here. If we are going to play sexy football primarily with young players then we will need to attract the best that there are. When they see the facilities, or their parent club see the facilities, why would they come here? Maybe because they have more of a chance of actually playing? Perhaps. Certainly the days of Jeff Hughes and his “they pay good wages” comment are over. They will be paid a pittance to train in conditions that would shame a load of local schools. I just can’t see it. I can’t see us actually competing for the best young players needed to make this work because they will prefer to go to “bigger” clubs that pay more and are in an easier part of the world to adjust to if they get released and have to find another club without up-rooting themselves. We have traditionally always faced a lot of disadvantages when recruiting at Rovers and we always used to smooth them over with cash. Quite obviously we can’t do that now and imo, I can’t see changing the model to youth players suddenly solving those disadvantages. We will obviously recruit young players as we have done this window, but are the likes of Harries, Daly and Abraham the best or are they the runts of their respective litter? Time will tell on that one but I suspect it’s likely to be the latter given what we have to offer as a club. And that is all, of course, without even discussing the issue of the manager or a club swooping early for the one or two who might come good. As a plan there is so, so much that could go wrong that it is hard for me to buy into as a viable strategy for a club like Rovers and we should be looking to be progressive but in a different way.
|
|
|
Post by Colyton Gas. on Feb 23, 2020 14:48:44 GMT
Shrewsbury at home up next.Our performance away there was the best I've seen this season.Amazingly we scored 4 in one game but under BG I think that's been the whole total.Being honest ,lovely man but he needs to start winning and scoring as his record thus far is as bad as it gets.People say they can see the improvements but let's see how we play compared with our win at Shrewsbury and then judge.After 31,000 yesterday back down to earth this Sat and think the crowd will be around 6000.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2020 22:58:35 GMT
Coventry city are full of young players and they play out from the back and pass the ball on the deck. Its not just them but they are the proof that the signing young players and playing football is totally feasible in league one. So what you are saying is it’s possible but under a totally different set of conditions? Who is the scout at Coventry? What are the training facilities like? How does their budget compare to ours? Is Coventry situated more favourably geographically than we are? Is their manager any good? Etc etc. Coventry have got us beat on a lot of those points. So whilst it.’s totally fair to use them as an example of how it can be done to my mind it’s the same as pointing at Peterborough and saying “they develop players and sell them for 5 million so we can too” As has been said above by other posters the training ground seems to be going under the radar here. If we are going to play sexy football primarily with young players then we will need to attract the best that there are. When they see the facilities, or their parent club see the facilities, why would they come here? Maybe because they have more of a chance of actually playing? Perhaps. Certainly the days of Jeff Hughes and his “they pay good wages” comment are over. They will be paid a pittance to train in conditions that would shame a load of local schools. I just can’t see it. I can’t see us actually competing for the best young players needed to make this work because they will prefer to go to “bigger” clubs that pay more and are in an easier part of the world to adjust to if they get released and have to find another club without up-rooting themselves. We have traditionally always faced a lot of disadvantages when recruiting at Rovers and we always used to smooth them over with cash. Quite obviously we can’t do that now and imo, I can’t see changing the model to youth players suddenly solving those disadvantages. We will obviously recruit young players as we have done this window, but are the likes of Harries, Daly and Abraham the best or are they the runts of their respective litter? Time will tell on that one but I suspect it’s likely to be the latter given what we have to offer as a club. And that is all, of course, without even discussing the issue of the manager or a club swooping early for the one or two who might come good. As a plan there is so, so much that could go wrong that it is hard for me to buy into as a viable strategy for a club like Rovers and we should be looking to be progressive but in a different way. Coventry have had a dreadful time off the pitch,twice having to play home matches at other clubs grounds.short of money,relegated to league 2. But robins had a plan and stuck to it and has produced a very good league one side that play cracking football. All this despite having to sell their best players. I do not know if garner can do what robins has done but it can be done clearly. Ps the geography thing is a red herring,it applies to any player your signing,not just young players.
|
|
GasMacc1
Les Bradd
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,423
|
Post by GasMacc1 on Feb 24, 2020 9:28:34 GMT
I'm not quite as pessimistic as Bambi, but he has a point. The 'Plan' is flawed. 1. To unearth these fantastically talented footballers we are in competition with a host of other Clubs. Over time our facilities have become increasingly unattractive. Why would a young player come here to help pick fox sh*t off of a field we don't even own before commencing training? IMHO the fact that we lack of our own Training Facility is even more damning than our inadequate Stadium, that has long been unfit for purpose. 2. Should we strike it lucky - then the talent is off as soon as we attract a decent bid, or even a crap bid (Bodin). Or they run down their contract and leave for nothing (Lockyer). I actually like the look of what Ben Garner is trying to achieve given the current situation. All we are short of is two decent full-backs, two players to replace Ginelli and JML when their loan period finishes, and a decent creative mid-fielder. Piece of piss. Given the over-whelming odds that Ben Garner faces - I'm backing him. Logic dictates the chances of success are slim. But I'm still backing him. UTG & Keep The Faith. Good post. Just one thing, though. How would a £10million training complex prevent foxes defaecating on the pitches?
|
|
eppinggas
Administrator
Ian Alexander
Don't care
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 8,600
|
Post by eppinggas on Feb 24, 2020 9:44:53 GMT
... So what you are saying is it’s possible but under a totally different set of conditions? Coventry have had a dreadful time off the pitch,twice having to play home matches at other clubs grounds.short of money,relegated to league 2. But robins had a plan and stuck to it and has produced a very good league one side that play cracking football. All this despite having to sell their best players. I do not know if garner can do what robins has done but it can be done clearly. Ps the geography thing is a red herring,it applies to any player your signing,not just young players. Despite having horrendous problems since their move to (and from) the Ricoh - interestingly Coventry have always had excellent training facilities. www.ccfc.co.uk/news/2018/april/news-sky-blues-plans-for-new-training-ground-heard-by-inspector/ They have now started work. So not only do they own their existing training facilitiy - it is better than Rovers, and they are significantly improving it. Given the glaring disparity in the standards of training facility - Garner has very little hope of emulating what Robins has done. How does he attract these players? Where will they train? We are not "Brentford". We are not "Coventry". We are rag-bag Rovers. One day, wind in the right direction, we might be as well run as Exeter.
|
|