|
Post by stevek192 on Mar 18, 2017 20:38:34 GMT
After a huge disappointment in the midweek defeat at Bury we turned up at the Mem today with another game where we would start as favourites and in some ways I was pleased that Sinclair was suspended as I feel we are a much better side when we start with two attacking wide players and so was quite pleased that we were back to a straight 4-4-2 with Montano starting on the left and Ollie Clarke returning after suspension. I must say it is one of the first times that I have got the team selection exactly the same as DC.
It was very much a game of two halves where with the incentive of a first minute goal set the stage for what really was a shoot on sight performance where only the goalkeeper kept the score down to a respectable level. There was a lot of good football played as Gaffney produced an excellent first half performance. It was not all one way but Chesterfield despite good work down the flanks were very wasteful. The second half was also a fairly one sided half but not as exciting as the first half as we made too many wrong decisions with either the final shot or more often the final cross or pass. To be honest we did not look in any trouble until the visitors scored their later goal and then the nerves seem to set in but luckily we managed to see the last ten minutes through with no further incidents for a deserved win.
Lumley 7
Competent in everything he did and must try to get him signed up for next season as he makes such a big difference. Had no chance with the goal but a safe pair of hands throughout and for one so young has great positional sense.
Leadbitter 8
Storming game after a hesitant start where his winger had too much space on a couple of occasions. Made some great runs and put in a number of crosses of varying standard.
Lockyer 7
Distribution let him down at times but overall a good solid game where little went past him and unlucky not to score with a header in the first half.
Sweeney 7
Not quite up to his "rock" performances but still solid throughout,he was probably lucky that the referee was a bit lenient when his mistake let in a Chesterfield player for a clear run but he fouled him and I am sure if it had been Tuesdays referee we would have again been down to ten players. We will certainly miss him next week on International duty especially as his natural replacement Clarke-Salter is away as well but surely it will at last providea chance for Jonny Burns to show what he can do.
Brown 6.5
For me he relied too much on Montano to cover him in the first half and didn't get close enough to his player but gave a good performance in the second half . Unlucky with a free kick in the first half but didn't do as much attacking as usual and whereas last season Browner provided our main attacking down the wing this season Leadbitter is far more dangerous.
Bodin 6
Chesterfield seemed aware of the danger that Bodin provides and they stuck to him like glue and he was very restricted and probably should have been the one substituted rather than Montano as he was the least effective of our attacking players.
O. Clarke 9 MOM
We have missed Ollie in our last two games but he marked his return today with a cracking goal in the first minute when a header down reached himn just outside the penalty area and he struck a powerful shot low into the left hand side of the goal. He got in some great challenges and also put in some strong runs particularly in the first half and I can only think that he must have been carrying a knock when he was substituted by Mansell in a substitution that did not really work.
Lines 8
Very dominant and some great runs and in him and Lines we have two midfielders who are on great form. Always trying to set chances up and rarely loses the ball. Had a couple of half chances from long range that didn't come off but my main criticism would be his corners as they are so predictable and I just don't know why DC doesn't get Montano and Bodin to take them or at least take a share of them. Most of the corners we have stay in the air too long.
Montano 7
Ran himself into the ground in the first half and put over three crosses that each should have been attacked better and had a couple of shots blocked and also set up a couple of opportunities with good forward passes however his most eye catching work was the number of times he closed down opponents and protected Lee Brown but his reward was yet again a predictable substitution which surprised me on this occasion because Bodin was a far less influence on the game and his defensive work is very limited. We were well on top and therefore it was not as if we were relying on him to score one of his special goals.
James 6
Again ran his socks off and had a couple of good shots and set up the second goal for Gaffney but his penalty miss could have been very costly. I can understand why he took it to give him a goal and confidence but a poor penalty that was easily saved by the visiting keeper had the opposite effect and he faded more and more as the game went on. I am sorry DC but you can say all you like about us being a better overall side without MT and you can build up Luke as much as you like but until he scores some goals I am afraid that he looks well off a League 1 quality striker.
Gaffney 8.5
it was a close call between him and Ollie Clarke for Man of the Match but for me Ollie just edged it. Gaffs took his goal very well as he took a Luke James pass in his stride ,drew the keeper and calmly slid it past him into the far right corner of the net. He led the attack very well and was rarely beaten to any ball at all and only a couple of good saves by the keeper prevented him from scoring further goals.
Subs:
Moore 6
A couple of reasonable runs but nothing really to suggest he should be starting a game ahead of Montano which will probably happen next week.
Easter 6
Great to see him back in the squad after a small operation and also having been told by DC he will not feature again. he did, understandably look short of Match fitness but surely he was denied a clear chance of a goal when he was clearly held back after getting the wrong side of the defender with a run on goal. He probably should have taken a shot himself late on when he had a clear sight of goal but instead set it up and the chance went begging.
Mansell 6
Not really long to do a lot but got in a couple of interceptions but we did appear to be getting over run a bit in the later stages and it was not really surprising when Chesterfield scored as they did come back into the game in the second half and not for the first time recently the substitutions did not really work.
Crowd 8
A noisy 8500 crowd on a cold day and not a bad attendance following the big defeat in the week when you consider that there is unlikely to be anything to really play for other than pride and Chesterfield are hardly the type of opponnets to draw in the fans.
Ref 9
I thought he gave a very good display which was a relief after Tuesday. Got the majority of decisions right and tried to keep the game moving whenever possible. The only decision I can recall him missing was the foul on Easter that he should have seen but there again surely his linesman should have been able to help him out.
Chesterfield 5 Easy to see why they are where they are in the League and could not have complained if Rovers were out of sight by half time. That said they did attack with purpose at times and found some success down the flanks but far too often their final ball was overhit. Scored a very good goal and provided a nervous last ten minutes but Rovers well deserved to end their mini revival which had seen them win one and draw two of their last four games.
DC Felt he got his initial selection correct and we were for the majority of the game in command but unless the players substituted were carrying knocks I see no reason for the three substitutions and if anything Bodin should have been the player replaced. We are now not far off our best total for many years and so I am not going to be critical as it has been largely an enjoyable season. Could DC produce magic again now by going on another winning run to the end of the season? I think not but will be happy to be proved wrong. I just don't feel our attacking options are good enough and the failure to anticipate Taylor leaving will prove our downfall. In truth it might not be a bad thing as I don't feel we are anywhere near ready but hopefully Darrell has in mind plans for the summer signings which can make us an even better side next season.
So we move on to another game next week where we will be favourites which is a role that we do not seem to be that comfortable with and our main problem is that for all our possession and chances we do not score enough goals and that means that no game is going to be easy. We will miss Sweeney and Clarke -Salter (his natural replacement) net week but surely it should give us an insight into next season with a chance for Jonny Burns to show what he can give us. Personally it is the only change I would make from the starting eleven today but no doubt DC will have other ideas. Anyway I just hope that another big following next week will be rewarded with a good performance and three points that could ; depending on other results; keep our season interesting. Lets hope we can keep our discipline and keep eleven players
|
|
|
Post by o2o2bo2ba on Mar 18, 2017 21:49:24 GMT
Great report, Steve!
Agree with your appraisals.
Next week.....apart from keeping our own interests alive, I find it quite staggering that if results in other games go a certain way, we could relegate Cov if we win! !
Rotherham apart, they could be the first casualty this season.
Hope you're reading this, (t)watola!
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2017 23:47:46 GMT
Holy duck. The best ref's in the league can usually aspire to a 7 from Steve. I've never noticed you giving any ref a nine. Good to read you in such optimism.
|
|
Peter Parker
Global Moderator
Richard Walker
You have been sentenced to DELETION!
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 4,920
|
Post by Peter Parker on Mar 19, 2017 5:10:43 GMT
Indeed DC can.ssy what he like about DC. At the end of the day he is our player while he is here and he has to build or keep his confidencr up or whats the point
Inever take anything most mansgers say at face value as you never know when they are bending the truth just a little
I.wouldnt br suprisdd if we signed James though. Ticks effort and.desire
Not sqying he would be first choice but cold see him in squad
|
|
danrory
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 171
|
Post by danrory on Mar 19, 2017 8:09:54 GMT
Thanks Steve. A Rovers performance and result to provide concollation after the grief from events in Dublin!
|
|
crater
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 1,444
|
Post by crater on Mar 19, 2017 8:55:05 GMT
Ref was a bit lenient I thought. Couple of chunky challenges from theirs deserved cards...could even have been a red
|
|
|
Post by The Concept on Mar 19, 2017 8:56:27 GMT
It would be unusual for us all to agree with every player appraisal. The only one I think is harsh is 6 for Luke James - I thought his overall performance warranted more.
I don't agree that it was a 'poor penalty that was easily saved' ... - How often do you see the hard and high / straight down the middle shot saved? - How often do you see the goalkeeper stay on his feet and not dive one way or the other? - Ellis Harrison struck every one of his penalties hard down middle, and scored every time. - Watching the highlights programmes last night there were several identical penalties. The ones that spring to mind being Bolton, Stoke, and even City's from Friday night, where the pundits said you just don't save those.
I would credit their goalkeeper for good reactions, and who pulled off excellent saves throughout the game.
For a really poor penalty, have a look out for Portsmouth's at Stevenage yesterday!
|
|
Igitur
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 2,294
|
Post by Igitur on Mar 19, 2017 9:02:57 GMT
Choosing James as the penalty taker was a bad decision. Few of us are happy when we're 3-0 up. Their keeper was on form and no pushover. Using a penalty to give a player some confidence is a double-edged sword and harmed LJ nearly as much as the team. There were better penalty takers on the field. LJ's assist was good, no vital, as they scored, but his miss definitely knocked him and could have affected the result.
He will have some more knockers in the crowd, though he is turning in to MT's replacement as he missed a one-on-one.
|
|
warehamgas
Predictions League
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,430
|
Post by warehamgas on Mar 19, 2017 10:10:13 GMT
Thanks for that Steve. Sounds as if the referee was a lot better than Tuesday night. Although it doesn't guarantee anything an early goal takes the pressure off and makes it a lot easier and less stressful although listening to DC the late goal didn't help his heart rate. I'm glad Gaffney got a goal, it sounds as if he had his normal game but with a goal. I always like him in the team, he gives something every match when I've seen him and keeps the opposition on their toes but when he doesn't score then some get on his back. As the season wears on I think it's likely to see DC tinker with the team a lot less. The starting line up here was almost predictable and a straightforward 442. Thanks for the time on the report. UTG!
|
|
|
Post by laughinggas on Mar 19, 2017 12:08:27 GMT
Highlights
|
|
|
Post by laughinggas on Mar 19, 2017 12:10:40 GMT
Technical issue with link
|
|
eppinggas
Administrator
Ian Alexander
Don't care
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 8,131
|
Post by eppinggas on Mar 19, 2017 13:31:09 GMT
Good report Steve - sums up what I saw. We really should have hammered Chesterfield. There was a lot of support for James - but have to say - that was a bloody awful penalty. If you're going to go down the middle - you have to hit it hard. He didn't.
|
|
|
Post by outwoodgas on Mar 19, 2017 13:45:41 GMT
Thanks for the report as ever, Steve. I was standing behind the dug-out and saw Ollie motion to the bench, whereupon Darrell got Manse to start warming up. That was about ten minutes before Ollie actually came off, so I'd imagine the knock wasn't a bad one and he'll be fit next week. He really has come on this season, and his work-rate certainly allows Linesy more scope to do his own thing.
|
|
GasMacc1
Les Bradd
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,423
|
Post by GasMacc1 on Mar 19, 2017 13:51:49 GMT
Leadbitter 8 Storming game after a hesitant start where his winger had too much space on a couple of occasions. Made some great runs and put in a number of crosses of varying standard. He also got us out of a spot of bother on 69 minutes with a great Zidane turn near the touchline. Chesterfield's Dimaio promptly clattered him, and was rightly booked!
|
|
kegandeg
Joined: December 2016
Posts: 376
|
Post by kegandeg on Mar 19, 2017 16:51:42 GMT
Do not use a player as a penalty taker just to hopefully give them a bit more confidence that's assuming they score as has been previously mentioned that's a rank bad decision as a footballer you need to earn your stripes simple as.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 19, 2017 16:56:52 GMT
I'm all for giving our players confidence. It strikes me as a good approach.
|
|
|
Post by DudeLebowski on Mar 19, 2017 20:46:51 GMT
Not sure where the problem is on the penalty. We are 2-0 up & cruising, James asked for the ball and Bodin let him have it. He's a striker, so why the hell not? The Criticism Luke James has received is extremely out of order in my view. He's ran himself in the ground for the side, got himself some assists and is doing everything right, other than getting that ball over the line. It'll definitely come.
|
|
irishrover
Global Moderator
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 3,372
|
Post by irishrover on Mar 20, 2017 14:54:23 GMT
I'm all for giving our players confidence. It strikes me as a good approach. Surely the other question related this is 'who is our regular penalty taker?'. Could it be nothing to do with confidence anyway - ie. James was designated as our penalty taker for this game. No particular reason why he shouldn't be - he's a centre forward. I thought it was an OK looking penalty and the goalie did exceptionally well. He could have hit it harder but it wasn't that bad. I was more interested in how many of our chances he seemed to take an active role in creating.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 20, 2017 17:24:59 GMT
I'm all for giving our players confidence. It strikes me as a good approach. Surely the other question related this is 'who is our regular penalty taker?'. Could it be nothing to do with confidence anyway - ie. James was designated as our penalty taker for this game. No particular reason why he shouldn't be - he's a centre forward. I thought it was an OK looking penalty and the goalie did exceptionally well. He could have hit it harder but it wasn't that bad. I was more interested in how many of our chances he seemed to take an active role in creating. Totally agree. IF (a big if) there was any element of showing trust and confidence in the lad, I think that would be a good thing, and it's absurd to knock that. Basically, though, far too much is being made of a routine penalty taking decision and (just a few, admittedly) folk should stop having a dig. That was my point.
|
|
irishrover
Global Moderator
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 3,372
|
Post by irishrover on Mar 20, 2017 17:35:55 GMT
Surely the other question related this is 'who is our regular penalty taker?'. Could it be nothing to do with confidence anyway - ie. James was designated as our penalty taker for this game. No particular reason why he shouldn't be - he's a centre forward. I thought it was an OK looking penalty and the goalie did exceptionally well. He could have hit it harder but it wasn't that bad. I was more interested in how many of our chances he seemed to take an active role in creating. Totally agree. IF (a big if) there was any element of showing trust and confidence in the lad, I think that would be a good thing, and it's absurd to knock that. Basically, though, far too much is being made of a routine penalty taking decision and (just a few, admittedly) folk should stop having a dig. That was my point. It's just one of those things really - a non-scoring striker is always going get a bit of stick I think but, you are right, that shouldn't mean people pick apart every thing that he does. From the highlights it looked to me as if he was generating chances by picking the ball up in deep areas which is what I would like to see from James. I've only seen him in away games so far where he is largely ineffective because he's playing up top with no support and rarely seems to get the ball at his feet which is his strength. I like the idea of him sitting a bit deeper as Taylor did originally when he started with us before being slowly pushed further up the field. Much easier to do that in home games where you are making the running though. One thing I'm pretty sure on - if we really are to mount any sort of a bid for a playoff place then one of our strikers is going to have to catch fire or we're not going to be able to get the away points we would need - that's as likely to be James as anyone else I think.
|
|