Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2014 11:13:56 GMT
I know he got sent off against Forest Green but I thought that was just a 1 match ban meaning he would miss the Dorchester game. He hasnt been selected in the squad since missing Telford & Tranmere.
Im guessing that im wrong that it was either a 3 match ban so he should now be available for tomorrows game against Alfreton or he is injured which I have missed?
Can someone enlighten me? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Nov 10, 2014 11:17:44 GMT
As it was a straight red for a bad tackle why would he only get a one game ban? He will be available for selection agains on Tuesday after serving his 3 games ban.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2014 11:32:37 GMT
As it was a straight red for a bad tackle why would he only get a one game ban? He will be available for selection agains on Tuesday after serving his 3 games ban. A straight red for a bad tackle doesnt always mean a 3 match ban. It depends on what the ref's report classes it. Violent conduct = 3 match ban. Professional foul = 1 match ban. Like Mildenhall only got 1 match ban at Eastleigh. By the way im not comparing Leadbitters tackle to Mildenhalls foul when they both got reds but it depends what the ref has reported the incident to be. I havent seen anywhere where its been said he had a 3 match ban. If I did I wouldnt have made this thread would I. I obviously missed it which is why I asked for someone to enlighten me if it was either a 3 match ban or is he injured. All you had to say was it was a 3 match ban instead of questioning why I was asking. Good grief. This is why I often avoid posting. Thanks anyway. |
|
dido
Predictions League
Peter Aitken
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,883 
|
Post by dido on Nov 10, 2014 12:06:36 GMT
You could spend the time you took to write all that in finding out for yourself.
|
|
faggotygas
Byron Anthony
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,862
|
Post by faggotygas on Nov 10, 2014 12:14:20 GMT
As it was a straight red for a bad tackle why would he only get a one game ban? He will be available for selection agains on Tuesday after serving his 3 games ban. A straight red for a bad tackle doesnt always mean a 3 match ban. It depends on what the ref's report classes it. Violent conduct = 3 match ban. Professional foul = 1 match ban. Like Mildenhall only got 1 match ban at Eastleigh. By the way im not comparing Leadbitters tackle to Mildenhalls foul when they both got reds but it depends what the ref has reported the incident to be. I havent seen anywhere where its been said he had a 3 match ban. If I did I wouldnt have made this thread would I. I obviously missed it which is why I asked for someone to enlighten me if it was either a 3 match ban or is he injured. All you had to say was it was a 3 match ban instead of questioning why I was asking. Good grief. This is why I often avoid posting. Thanks anyway. What? A straight red for a bad tackle isn't a professional foul, nor is it violent conduct, its Serious Foul Play. Bad tackle = Serious Foul Play = 3 match ban. Violent Conduct (eg punching someone) = 3 match ban. Denial of Obvious Goalscoring Opportunity (aka Professional Foul) = 1 match ban. |
|
LJG
Peter Beadle
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 969
|
Post by LJG on Nov 10, 2014 13:05:21 GMT
A straight red for a bad tackle doesnt always mean a 3 match ban. It depends on what the ref's report classes it. Violent conduct = 3 match ban. Professional foul = 1 match ban. Like Mildenhall only got 1 match ban at Eastleigh. By the way im not comparing Leadbitters tackle to Mildenhalls foul when they both got reds but it depends what the ref has reported the incident to be. I havent seen anywhere where its been said he had a 3 match ban. If I did I wouldnt have made this thread would I. I obviously missed it which is why I asked for someone to enlighten me if it was either a 3 match ban or is he injured. All you had to say was it was a 3 match ban instead of questioning why I was asking. Good grief. This is why I often avoid posting. Thanks anyway. What? A straight red for a bad tackle isn't a professional foul, nor is it violent conduct, its Serious Foul Play. Bad tackle = Serious Foul Play = 3 match ban. Violent Conduct (eg punching someone) = 3 match ban. Denial of Obvious Goalscoring Opportunity (aka Professional Foul) = 1 match ban. There's plenty of denial of the obvious goes on around here. |
|
brizzle
Lindsay Parsons
No Buy . . . No Sell!
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 4,293
|
Post by brizzle on Nov 10, 2014 13:12:47 GMT
What? A straight red for a bad tackle isn't a professional foul, nor is it violent conduct, its Serious Foul Play. Bad tackle = Serious Foul Play = 3 match ban. Violent Conduct (eg punching someone) = 3 match ban. Denial of Obvious Goalscoring Opportunity (aka Professional Foul) = 1 match ban. There's plenty of denial of the obvious goes on around here.  |
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Nov 10, 2014 13:13:05 GMT
As it was a straight red for a bad tackle why would he only get a one game ban? He will be available for selection agains on Tuesday after serving his 3 games ban. A straight red for a bad tackle doesnt always mean a 3 match ban. It depends on what the ref's report classes it. Violent conduct = 3 match ban. Professional foul = 1 match ban. Like Mildenhall only got 1 match ban at Eastleigh. By the way im not comparing Leadbitters tackle to Mildenhalls foul when they both got reds but it depends what the ref has reported the incident to be. I havent seen anywhere where its been said he had a 3 match ban. If I did I wouldnt have made this thread would I. I obviously missed it which is why I asked for someone to enlighten me if it was either a 3 match ban or is he injured. All you had to say was it was a 3 match ban instead of questioning why I was asking. Good grief. This is why I often avoid posting. Thanks anyway. All OK but how could a two footed lunge be a professional foul i.e. stopping a goal scoring oppertunity. |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2014 13:20:29 GMT
A straight red for a bad tackle doesnt always mean a 3 match ban. It depends on what the ref's report classes it. Violent conduct = 3 match ban. Professional foul = 1 match ban. Like Mildenhall only got 1 match ban at Eastleigh. By the way im not comparing Leadbitters tackle to Mildenhalls foul when they both got reds but it depends what the ref has reported the incident to be. I havent seen anywhere where its been said he had a 3 match ban. If I did I wouldnt have made this thread would I. I obviously missed it which is why I asked for someone to enlighten me if it was either a 3 match ban or is he injured. All you had to say was it was a 3 match ban instead of questioning why I was asking. Good grief. This is why I often avoid posting. Thanks anyway. All OK but how could a two footed lunge be a professional foul i.e. stopping a goal scoring oppertunity. Like I said, im not comparing the 2 red cards. What I am saying is it depends exactly what the ref puts down in his report. |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2014 13:26:35 GMT
You could spend the time you took to write all that in finding out for yourself. Well thats helpful isnt it. Who said I havent looked for myself? I did look for it myself for the record before posting this thread. I couldnt find anything which actually says 3 match ban. Hense why I asked if someone knew. Grow up. |
|
dido
Predictions League
Peter Aitken
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,883
|
Post by dido on Nov 10, 2014 13:29:54 GMT
Someone told you but you didn't thank him. Far from it.
|
|
Igitur
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 2,294
|
Post by Igitur on Nov 10, 2014 13:43:09 GMT
You could spend the time you took to write all that in finding out for yourself. Well thats helpful isnt it. Who said I havent looked for myself? I did look for it myself for the record before posting this thread. I couldnt find anything which actually says 3 match ban. Hense why I asked if someone knew. Grow up.
Now, now children stop squabbling in the back row, we are all gasheads after all.
|
|
|
|
Post by DudeLebowski on Nov 10, 2014 13:50:01 GMT
A Rovers forum will never fail to amaze me.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2014 14:07:51 GMT
Someone told you but you didn't thank him. Far from it. Seriously? You're being a child because you think I didnt thank him? I have read it all now. Just when I think this forum cant get much worse, it does. How pathetic. By the way, I said "thanks" twice. 1) when I made the thread which is saying thanks in advance. 2) when I replied to Topper's confirmation it was a 3 match ban I said "thanks" then too at the end. Those who selective read only makes said people look stupid. Think. |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2014 14:08:43 GMT
A Rovers forum will never fail to amaze me. Me neither. |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2014 14:16:14 GMT
Can a mod get rid of this thread please. I asked a question, I got the answer so its done. But the thread is now turning into somethings else which is not needed.
Thanks.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2014 14:17:55 GMT
Crikey, some of you lot could start a row in an empty ground (Whaddon Road or something)
|
|
|
|
Post by stig-of-the-gas on Nov 10, 2014 19:30:14 GMT
Can a mod get rid of this thread please. I asked a question, I got the answer so its done. But the thread is now turning into somethings else which is not needed. Thanks. Good question - he got a 3 match ban. Personally I wouldn't pick him either way at full back as any player who's second touch is a tackle is a liability. He did it several times in that game. In one, the tackle ricocheted into space and he went on a great run. Many on here said it was a great run but it was equally as shocking - he just got lucky. On the third or fourth occasion he got sent off. Right wing or nowhere for me. |
|
Bridgeman
Alfie Biggs
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,549
|
Post by Bridgeman on Nov 10, 2014 20:17:35 GMT
Can a mod get rid of this thread please. I asked a question, I got the answer so its done. But the thread is now turning into somethings else which is not needed. Thanks. Just ignore them mate.....they're really not worth getting worked up about..... |
|
|
|
Post by stevek192 on Nov 10, 2014 21:17:06 GMT
There are always the bright sparks who think they know better than others. You asked a question which was not unreasonable and all that it needed was a polite answer however instead people show themselves up. Pathetic. Personally i think the game has been ruined by the confusion on judging a tackle on whether the boot has come off the ground. The sending off on the Barnet player was the most questionable decision. He went for the ball and got the ball but his feet were off the ground but the opposing player arrived AFTER the ball had been touched by the Barnet player. On this case it means that ANY ball where the feet come off the ground should be a sending off even if an opponent is nowhere near. Its absolutely ridiculous as was Monkhouse's sending off. How do you decide on any jump if it was led by the elbow? The arm has to go somewhere and most of the time it is clear to see that there has not been intent.
What is the real intent of making the rules? It should be to avoid injury but to be honest most bad injuries are caused by playing on poor pitches and all the rules have done is make tackling a dying art.
|
|
