|
|
Post by Gregory Stevens on Oct 4, 2014 17:35:11 GMT
That was possibly the worst decision I have ever seen.
Stonewall penalty and Puddy should have been walking off immediately.
Ref looked at the linesman, I was directly behind him and I couldn't believe my eyes.
I jeered him but their no 27 was right to be mad, complete joke.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 4, 2014 17:37:54 GMT
I was following the ball so didn't see the collision - it did seem to me though that we may have been somewhat fortunate!
|
|
toteend
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 305 
|
Post by toteend on Oct 4, 2014 17:41:35 GMT
Saw it clearly from the Blackthorn, and both players turned to get on the ball and collided. No penalty.
|
|
|
|
Post by clockendgas on Oct 4, 2014 17:43:18 GMT
swings and roundabouts after tues nights soft second booking imo
|
|
crater
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 1,444
|
Post by crater on Oct 4, 2014 17:45:05 GMT
Definite pen to us at the end of the first half not given. Foul on Martin was a free kick anywhere else on the pitch.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gregory Stevens on Oct 4, 2014 17:52:09 GMT
Saw it clearly from the Blackthorn, and both players turned to get on the ball and collided. No penalty. You should go to specsavers. |
|
gass
Joined: July 2014
Posts: 118
|
Post by gass on Oct 4, 2014 19:13:49 GMT
That was possibly the worst decision I have ever seen. Stonewall penalty and Puddy should have been walking off immediately. Ref looked at the linesman, I was directly behind him and I couldn't believe my eyes. I jeered him but their no 27 was right to be mad, complete joke. I have to say, I disagree. I think the main reason that the pen wasn't given was because their player would not have made it to the ball, we had a covering defender, who cleared it and who would have got there first. I think he collided with Puddy, as opposed to Puddy impeding him. Swings and roundabouts maybe, as I thought Trotman committed a foul which was a stonewall pen in the second half. |
|
|
|
Post by Curly Wurly on Oct 4, 2014 21:14:54 GMT
Sorry controversial, but I am definitely with totend on this. Puddy and 27 both turned as Trotman's misplaced pass headed towards goal. 27 decided to throw himself to the ground as he did several times later in the afternoon (often with hilarious effect). No foul committed, no penalty.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 4, 2014 21:19:42 GMT
no way a penalty puddy was looking at the ball and collided with there lad by accident
|
|
|
|
Post by Curly Wurly on Oct 4, 2014 21:23:44 GMT
no way a penalty puddy was looking at the ball and collided with there lad by accident .......a lad who was looking for any opportunity to con the ref into giving him free kicks. |
|
|
|
Post by stevek192 on Oct 5, 2014 0:16:26 GMT
Have to agree with the majority here and say that their player was looking for free kicks all afternoon and it was a collision. However what i would say is that some referees would have given a penalty. Anyway it evens out over a season and only have to look at last game at Eastleigh and also the ridiculous penalty at Braintree. Actually thought the referee today was one of the better ones and did try often to let the game flow.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gregory Stevens on Oct 5, 2014 3:08:24 GMT
Bollocks wait for the highlights.
|
|
|
|
Post by cheese4ead on Oct 5, 2014 3:27:12 GMT
Stonewall, no pen, stonewall, no pen, stonewall, no pen!!! I wasn't there but it can't be both lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by Curly Wurly on Oct 5, 2014 5:42:34 GMT
Stonewall, no pen, stonewall, no pen, stonewall, no pen!!! I wasn't there but it can't be both lol. Well it wasn't as the record books will show. |
|
|
|
Post by PeterHooper57 on Oct 5, 2014 6:41:45 GMT
27 was a wining **** who was looking for a penalty, he should have been booked. UTG
|
|
|
|
Post by stevek192 on Oct 5, 2014 8:02:26 GMT
I agree that the foul on Martin was a penalty and I think would have been given IF the referee had given a penalty to Dover in that incident. The problem is that due to too many players "looking" for penalties (and their 27 was one of those) then most referees will think twice before pointing to the spot. Truth is that maybe today if he had given Dover a penalty maybe Puddy would have saved it because in my mind Mildenhall for all his other skills is one ot the worst penalty facers I have seen!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Oct 5, 2014 8:52:52 GMT
Bollocks wait for the highlights. What highlights? |
|
Igitur
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 2,294
|
Post by Igitur on Oct 5, 2014 11:00:26 GMT
Stonewall, no pen, stonewall, no pen, stonewall, no pen!!! I wasn't there but it can't be both lol. On my referee training course we had a video, yes it was that long ago, of about ten live incidents from league games from at least three different angles. From one or two angles each tackle appeared to be good or bad, and in the other angle(s) bad or good. Only bad tackles in the opinion of the ref, or lino, are penalised. |
|
ricardo
Steve Elliot
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 138
|
Post by ricardo on Oct 5, 2014 11:13:45 GMT
stonewall pen and a red for me, not that I am going to write to the league and complain! After what happened at Braintree think it has evened up.
|
|
|
|
Post by markczgas on Oct 5, 2014 12:39:50 GMT
Sorry controversial, but I am definitely with totend on this. Puddy and 27 both turned as Trotman's misplaced pass headed towards goal. 27 decided to throw himself to the ground as he did several times later in the afternoon (often with hilarious effect). No foul committed, no penalty. Agreed, But Dover had a clear pen early in the second half when Martin (strangely in the right back position) tripped their guy up and then broke away with the ball - couldn't believe ref didn't give it (away team bad luck !!). |
|
