trymer
Joined: November 2018
Posts: 2,395
|
Post by trymer on Sept 29, 2024 8:44:24 GMT
So labour did have an MP with principles.
|
|
baselswh
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 6,423
Member is Online
|
Post by baselswh on Sept 29, 2024 8:50:40 GMT
Lord of the Gay Realm, Lord Alli.Why has he given so much money and gifts to 2TK,his wife and others in the Labour Party? What's he getting back? Has he eg,penetrated the PMs inner circle? Gay Realm? Hope you don't have any issues with him being gay. Why the comment? Lord Alli is an openly gay Muslim Baldrick,probably a brave thing and is to be applauded.
|
|
|
Post by lostinspace on Sept 29, 2024 9:03:36 GMT
Anti gay rhetoric? On this forum? Surely not? Best to Come out now ššš " Come out"... Get out? Or be ousted?
|
|
|
Post by baldrick on Sept 29, 2024 9:19:05 GMT
Gay Realm? Hope you don't have any issues with him being gay. Why the comment? Lord Alli is an openly gay Muslim Baldrick,probably a brave thing and is to be applauded. Not the point I was making, but never mind.
|
|
Icegas
Joined: September 2014
Posts: 1,426
|
Post by Icegas on Sept 29, 2024 9:21:17 GMT
University tuition fees will rise with inflation, hitting Ā£10,500 in the next five years, it has been reported. The government is drawing up plans which will see university tuition fees, which have been frozen since 2017, rise by 13.5 per cent over the next five years according to The Times. Every one will be better off under a commie goverment šššš Labour has āno plansā to raise university fees or funding, Just before the election , not being up front with students as didnāt want to loose there vote !!!!š Default prime minister Starmer is a nasty piece of work. The public don't like him. His own party hates him as he is a colossal hypocrite and a compulsive liar. He's incompetent, along with being corrupt. Even our biased leftist media can't defend him.
|
|
baselswh
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 6,423
Member is Online
|
Post by baselswh on Sept 29, 2024 9:37:00 GMT
Lord Alli is an openly gay Muslim Baldrick,probably a brave thing and is to be applauded. Not the point I was making, but never mind. Quite.
|
|
bluetornados
Predictions League
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 15,256
|
Post by bluetornados on Sept 29, 2024 10:32:58 GMT
Labour has āno plansā to raise university fees or funding, Just before the election , not being up front with students as didnāt want to loose there vote !!!!š Default prime minister Starmer is a nasty piece of work. The public don't like him. His own party hates him as he is a colossal hypocrite and a compulsive liar. He's incompetent, along with being corrupt. Even our biased leftist media can't defend him. Maybe Sir Keir could go to the Tories and say, "If i resign, can i come over to you, it's a damn sight better being in opposition than the sh**hole i'm in at the minute".... Or would Nige have him..?
|
|
ltdgas
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 1,037
|
Post by ltdgas on Sept 30, 2024 7:12:04 GMT
I must commend the BBC's restraint in covering Labour corruption. It doesn't show up anywhere on their news page, only well down the politics section does it mention Labour are planning to tighten hospitality rules. I wonder if on reflection they think banging on about "partygate" for a year was a bit excessive?
|
|
|
Post by Nobbygas on Sept 30, 2024 7:27:40 GMT
Were these and other 'meetings' secretly recorded? Is there a security implication? What else went on in this apartment that could have been recorded and possibly used to compromise politicians? Security worries
|
|
|
Post by baldrick on Sept 30, 2024 7:40:04 GMT
Were these and other 'meetings' secretly recorded? Is there a security implication? What else went on in this apartment that could have been recorded and possibly used to compromise politicians? Security worries
Ā And you don't think that would have been checked by the Civil Service and thecm appropriate security teams before? Guido just putting out suggestions, even the article states unconfirmed reports about those present. Who is providing the information and why?
|
|
baselswh
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 6,423
Member is Online
|
Post by baselswh on Sept 30, 2024 7:41:32 GMT
Awful Government and it looks as if it'll get worse.Bullying hypocrites at the top.
Britons politeness is being sorely tested.Just as this protesting Left tests the West in general.
The Lefts hatred of our past heroes,our history,our religion,the promotion above all other religions of Islam etc.
The Left are very rude,appalling manners People will respond in kind sooner or later.We're very close to this point because if they hate our past,our religion,insist anyone with concerns for our culture and immigration are racist,whilst they themselves are often racist against Jewish people.Why should peopletolerate this dangerousnonsense?
"From the river to the sea". 2 tier policing,backed by antisemites.
We're told what words to say,what jokes are acceptable ,don't laugh at Islam,remember Charlie Hebdow and others.The rise to power of Islam is completely dangerous,backed by our nasty middle class Left.
BLM rubbish.Absolute f**king joke,a corrupt organisation, but that was treated like the light,the truth and our only way and of course those that dared speak out were lambasted bt our nasty middle class as "racists"!
Etc.
|
|
|
Post by Nobbygas on Sept 30, 2024 9:15:57 GMT
Were these and other 'meetings' secretly recorded? Is there a security implication? What else went on in this apartment that could have been recorded and possibly used to compromise politicians? Security worries
And you don't think that would have been checked by the Civil Service and thecm appropriate security teams before? Guido just putting out suggestions, even the article states unconfirmed reports about those present. Who is providing the information and why? This...."Guido asked the Cabinet Office if any of the talks took place at his property to which a government spokesman said: āWe donāt comment on access talks.ā That is not a denialā¦" A simple 'no' would have sufficed. That would have been the end of story. With all the comings and goings at this apartment, just how did Starmer's son find the peace to study?
|
|
oldie
Joined: September 2021
Posts: 6,980
|
Post by oldie on Sept 30, 2024 9:16:11 GMT
Were these and other 'meetings' secretly recorded? Is there a security implication? What else went on in this apartment that could have been recorded and possibly used to compromise politicians? Security worries
Ā And you don't think that would have been checked by the Civil Service and thecm appropriate security teams before? Guido just putting out suggestions, even the article states unconfirmed reports about those present. Who is providing the information and why? Precisely More targeted disinformation from the right, licking their wounds.
|
|
|
Post by Nobbygas on Sept 30, 2024 9:21:29 GMT
And you don't think that would have been checked by the Civil Service and thecm appropriate security teams before? Guido just putting out suggestions, even the article states unconfirmed reports about those present. Who is providing the information and why? Precisely More targeted disinformation from the right, licking their wounds. Disinformation? Whoa there. Last week we were told that Starmer had accepted 16k in 'bribes' 'donations' and this week it has risen to 32k, because someone 'forgot to declare some other clothes'. What other freebies have yet to be declared? Please explain where is this 'disinformation'?
|
|
|
Post by baldrick on Sept 30, 2024 9:38:55 GMT
And you don't think that would have been checked by the Civil Service and thecm appropriate security teams before? Guido just putting out suggestions, even the article states unconfirmed reports about those present. Who is providing the information and why? This...."Guido asked the Cabinet Office if any of the talks took place at his property to which a government spokesman said: āWe donāt comment on access talks.ā That is not a denialā¦" A simple 'no' would have sufficed. That would have been the end of story. With all the comings and goings at this apartment, just how did Starmer's son find the peace to study? By saying no, they would be commenting.
|
|
|
Post by Nobbygas on Sept 30, 2024 10:06:08 GMT
This...."Guido asked the Cabinet Office if any of the talks took place at his property to which a government spokesman said: āWe donāt comment on access talks.ā That is not a denialā¦" A simple 'no' would have sufficed. That would have been the end of story. With all the comings and goings at this apartment, just how did Starmer's son find the peace to study? By saying no, they would be commenting. A pretty weak defence
|
|
Cheshiregas
Global Moderator
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 2,857
|
Post by Cheshiregas on Sept 30, 2024 10:07:44 GMT
I must commend the BBC's restraint in covering Labour corruption. It doesn't show up anywhere on their news page, only well down the politics section does it mention Labour are planning to tighten hospitality rules. I wonder if on reflection they think banging on about "partygate" for a year was a bit excessive? Perhaps that is because all the headlines are based on declared items. And they are supposed to be tightening rules on second jobs and expenses which will severely impact a lot of Tory Party and Reform Party Ltd MPs. Hence their friends in the right wing media going after them.
|
|
|
Post by Nobbygas on Sept 30, 2024 10:25:17 GMT
I must commend the BBC's restraint in covering Labour corruption. It doesn't show up anywhere on their news page, only well down the politics section does it mention Labour are planning to tighten hospitality rules. I wonder if on reflection they think banging on about "partygate" for a year was a bit excessive? Perhaps that is because all the headlines are based on declared items. And they are supposed to be tightening rules on second jobs and expenses which will severely impact a lot of Tory Party and Reform Party Ltd MPs. Hence their friends in the right wing media going after them. Terry, you are hiding behind this "declared" headline. It was not all 'declared' but it is coming out in a drip drip fashion. Let me give you an example of this "declared" nonsense. Sunday morning Labour wheeled out Pat MacFadden across the tv stations to defend Labour. What has Pat been up to? He had a house in his constituency that he lived in. He then bought the house next door. He rented out his first house and then made every claim available on his "second home". Everything was 'declared' but this stinks of corruption. The whole point of a 'second home' is that MP's have somewhere to live closer to Parliament and not the house next door to the one you classify as your ',main home'. But apparently it's all ok, nothing to see here, move along.
|
|
|
Post by baldrick on Sept 30, 2024 10:26:40 GMT
By saying no, they would be commenting. A pretty weak defenceĀ No, not really. They can confirm, deny or make no comment. Bearing in mind who the conduit is, I'm not surprised they won't be drawn either way. I'm not saying it didn't happen, but the absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence. Remember whenever the press ask about UK Special Forces, the stock response is "we don't comment on [insert appropriate term]." Same for a lot of Civil Service responses.
|
|
|
Post by baldrick on Sept 30, 2024 10:28:41 GMT
Robert Jenrick anyone? Questions over donations and a planning application.
Someone may well be on Operation Deflection.
|
|