trymer
Joined: November 2018
Posts: 2,543
|
Post by trymer on Nov 20, 2024 11:56:16 GMT
That doesn't make him a farmer. Many people work on farms and are not farmers. It's inbuilt and a way of life not a part time job or an investment for rich people. They too are not farmers! I watched GB News once, but laughed at some of the manufactured outrage,,,, I said,he said,he worked on a farm. Agreed,that does'nt make him Gods gift to agriculture. As it happens he's more the opposite. GB News interviewed 2TK.
|
|
|
Post by baldrick on Nov 20, 2024 12:24:42 GMT
Reform get a question again today, Lee Anderson raising farming.
|
|
Nobbygas
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 4,056
Member is Online
|
Post by Nobbygas on Nov 20, 2024 12:55:32 GMT
How can anybody defend this ? "Cutting winter fuel payments for pensioners will drive 100,000 more into poverty by 2026, the government has admitted Tens of thousands more pensioners will fall into relative poverty next year as a result of Labour’s decision to means test the payment, worth up to £300, government estimates have shown. The change, unveiled by Rachel Reeves in July, will strip winter fuel payments from around 10 million pensioners. And, while 50,000 additional pensioners will face relative poverty as a result of the change next year, according to an official impact assessment, the figure jumps to 100,000 additional pensioners facing poverty from 2026 onwards. The winter fuel payment is being restricted to only those claiming pension credit from this winter, aimed at saving the public purse £1.5bn a year. Government analysis of the impact of its decision to restrict the payment was published by the House of Commons Work and Pensions Committee on Tuesday. A letter to the committee from work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall said: “The latest modelling shows that compared to the numbers that would have been in poverty without this policy, it is estimated that in each year in question there will be an additional 50,000 pensioners in relative poverty after housing costs in 2024-25, 2025-26 and 2027-28, instead.
“The modelling also shows that an additional 100,000 pensioners are estimated to be in relative poverty after housing costs in 2026-27, 2028-29 and 2029-30. “For all other measures of poverty, it is estimated that there will be an additional 50,000 pensioners in poverty each year from 2024-25 to 2029-30.”" www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/winter-fuel-payments-pensioners-poverty-dwp-b2649951.html
|
|
oldie
Joined: September 2021
Posts: 7,516
|
Post by oldie on Nov 20, 2024 13:26:52 GMT
How can anybody defend this ? "Cutting winter fuel payments for pensioners will drive 100,000 more into poverty by 2026, the government has admitted Tens of thousands more pensioners will fall into relative poverty next year as a result of Labour’s decision to means test the payment, worth up to £300, government estimates have shown. The change, unveiled by Rachel Reeves in July, will strip winter fuel payments from around 10 million pensioners. And, while 50,000 additional pensioners will face relative poverty as a result of the change next year, according to an official impact assessment, the figure jumps to 100,000 additional pensioners facing poverty from 2026 onwards. The winter fuel payment is being restricted to only those claiming pension credit from this winter, aimed at saving the public purse £1.5bn a year. Government analysis of the impact of its decision to restrict the payment was published by the House of Commons Work and Pensions Committee on Tuesday. A letter to the committee from work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall said: “The latest modelling shows that compared to the numbers that would have been in poverty without this policy, it is estimated that in each year in question there will be an additional 50,000 pensioners in relative poverty after housing costs in 2024-25, 2025-26 and 2027-28, instead.
“The modelling also shows that an additional 100,000 pensioners are estimated to be in relative poverty after housing costs in 2026-27, 2028-29 and 2029-30. “For all other measures of poverty, it is estimated that there will be an additional 50,000 pensioners in poverty each year from 2024-25 to 2029-30.”" www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/winter-fuel-payments-pensioners-poverty-dwp-b2649951.htmlI have had my winter fuel allowance withdrawn. I updated my fix term contract with my duel fuel supplier and am now paying around a half of what I was paying under the previous contract, saving me over £850 a year. I should never have had the allowance in the first place. This is the right policy, however we need to work out how to mitigate adverse impacts for those who cannot, for whatever reason, work their way out of it themselves. The faux outrage from our right of centre leaning friends is absolutely hilarious. Food banks anyone?
|
|
Nobbygas
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 4,056
Member is Online
|
Post by Nobbygas on Nov 20, 2024 13:33:45 GMT
How can anybody defend this ? "Cutting winter fuel payments for pensioners will drive 100,000 more into poverty by 2026, the government has admitted Tens of thousands more pensioners will fall into relative poverty next year as a result of Labour’s decision to means test the payment, worth up to £300, government estimates have shown. The change, unveiled by Rachel Reeves in July, will strip winter fuel payments from around 10 million pensioners. And, while 50,000 additional pensioners will face relative poverty as a result of the change next year, according to an official impact assessment, the figure jumps to 100,000 additional pensioners facing poverty from 2026 onwards. The winter fuel payment is being restricted to only those claiming pension credit from this winter, aimed at saving the public purse £1.5bn a year. Government analysis of the impact of its decision to restrict the payment was published by the House of Commons Work and Pensions Committee on Tuesday. A letter to the committee from work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall said: “The latest modelling shows that compared to the numbers that would have been in poverty without this policy, it is estimated that in each year in question there will be an additional 50,000 pensioners in relative poverty after housing costs in 2024-25, 2025-26 and 2027-28, instead.
“The modelling also shows that an additional 100,000 pensioners are estimated to be in relative poverty after housing costs in 2026-27, 2028-29 and 2029-30. “For all other measures of poverty, it is estimated that there will be an additional 50,000 pensioners in poverty each year from 2024-25 to 2029-30.”" www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/winter-fuel-payments-pensioners-poverty-dwp-b2649951.htmlI have had my winter fuel allowance withdrawn. I updated my fix term contract with my duel fuel supplier and am now paying around a half of what I was paying under the previous contract, saving me over £850 a year. I should never have had the allowance in the first place. This is the right policy, however we need to work out how to mitigate adverse impacts for those who cannot, for whatever reason, work their way out of it themselves. The faux outrage from our right of centre leaning friends is absolutely hilarious. Food banks anyone? "The faux outrage from our right of centre leaning friends is absolutely hilarious." - Did you really write that?
|
|
oldie
Joined: September 2021
Posts: 7,516
|
Post by oldie on Nov 20, 2024 13:43:00 GMT
I have had my winter fuel allowance withdrawn. I updated my fix term contract with my duel fuel supplier and am now paying around a half of what I was paying under the previous contract, saving me over £850 a year. I should never have had the allowance in the first place. This is the right policy, however we need to work out how to mitigate adverse impacts for those who cannot, for whatever reason, work their way out of it themselves. The faux outrage from our right of centre leaning friends is absolutely hilarious. Food banks anyone? "The faux outrage from our right of centre leaning friends is absolutely hilarious." - Did you really write that? I absolutely did. Brilliant phrasing as always, even if I do say so myself😂 Are you upset?
|
|
Nobbygas
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 4,056
Member is Online
|
Post by Nobbygas on Nov 20, 2024 15:25:32 GMT
"The faux outrage from our right of centre leaning friends is absolutely hilarious." - Did you really write that? I absolutely did. Brilliant phrasing as always, even if I do say so myself😂 Are you upset? Am I upset? You are joking right? No, I am not upset, just really disappointed in your "I'm alright Jack" attitude. The fact you find more and more OAP's are heading towards poverty is 'hilarious' says everything about you. When you describe anyone opposing this WFA policy as using "faux outrage" is also concerning. I notice that you don't comment on the official government figures as outlined in the post, but instead save your 'humour' and ire towards people posting on here. It sums you up as someone who is only really interested in s**t stirring.
|
|
Nobbygas
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 4,056
Member is Online
|
Post by Nobbygas on Nov 20, 2024 15:53:17 GMT
Today's Labour feck up......Huge cuts to Defense announced today in the HoC by the Defense Secretary. Are they not aware that the world is a pretty dodgy place right now?
|
|
oldie
Joined: September 2021
Posts: 7,516
|
Post by oldie on Nov 20, 2024 16:15:44 GMT
I absolutely did. Brilliant phrasing as always, even if I do say so myself😂 Are you upset? Am I upset? You are joking right? No, I am not upset, just really disappointed in your "I'm alright Jack" attitude. The fact you find more and more OAP's are heading towards poverty is 'hilarious' says everything about you. When you describe anyone opposing this WFA policy as using "faux outrage" is also concerning. I notice that you don't comment on the official government figures as outlined in the post, but instead save your 'humour' and ire towards people posting on here. It sums you up as someone who is only really interested in s**t stirring. Not at all. I don't believe in unfunded universal benefits which are not means tested. That's all. Nor do you, which is why I smile. If "I am alright Jack" it's because I didn't sit on my hands shouting "not fair". What is definitely "not fair" is demanding younger people, quite probably with children, paying their taxes for me to get a universal benefits I don't need. Me along side 100s of 1000s of boomers.
|
|
trymer
Joined: November 2018
Posts: 2,543
|
Post by trymer on Nov 20, 2024 17:09:16 GMT
I absolutely did. Brilliant phrasing as always, even if I do say so myself😂 Are you upset? Am I upset? You are joking right? No, I am not upset, just really disappointed in your "I'm alright Jack" attitude. The fact you find more and more OAP's are heading towards poverty is 'hilarious' says everything about you. When you describe anyone opposing this WFA policy as using "faux outrage" is also concerning. I notice that you don't comment on the official government figures as outlined in the post, but instead save your 'humour' and ire towards people posting on here. It sums you up as someone who is only really interested in s**t stirring. The same 'humour' on the stabbings thread, he rarely comments on there but I remember when he did get outraged and that was because a knife wielding thug was tasered by the police !
|
|
trymer
Joined: November 2018
Posts: 2,543
|
Post by trymer on Nov 20, 2024 17:12:04 GMT
Am I upset? You are joking right? No, I am not upset, just really disappointed in your "I'm alright Jack" attitude. The fact you find more and more OAP's are heading towards poverty is 'hilarious' says everything about you. When you describe anyone opposing this WFA policy as using "faux outrage" is also concerning. I notice that you don't comment on the official government figures as outlined in the post, but instead save your 'humour' and ire towards people posting on here. It sums you up as someone who is only really interested in s**t stirring. Not at all. I don't believe in unfunded universal benefits which are not means tested. That's all. Nor do you, which is why I smile. If "I am alright Jack" it's because I didn't sit on my hands shouting "not fair". What is definitely "not fair" is demanding younger people, quite probably with children, paying their taxes for me to get a universal benefits I don't need. Me along side 100s of 1000s of boomers. What about all the taxpayers young and old who are paying for illegal immigrants to reside in (centrally heated) hotels ? these illegals have never paid into our welfare system whereas OAPs some of whom will die of cold this winter HAD to pay into the system.
|
|
bluetornados
Predictions League
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 15,741
Member is Online
|
Post by bluetornados on Nov 20, 2024 17:26:45 GMT
Labour accuse Jeremy Clarkson of being 'rude' and 'aggressive' as BBC Newsnight descends into chaos while guests clash over farmer protest..by Aiden Radnedge
i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/11/20/10/92278641-14104605-image-a-2_1732099423203.jpg Clarkson clashed with BBC presenter Victoria Derbyshire in an interview on Tuesday afternoonA row broke out on BBC's Newsnight over Jeremy Clarkson's appearance at the farmers' 'tractor tax' protest in London after his angry interview with presenter Victoria Derbyshire. Former Labour minister Jim Murphy condemned former Top Gear host Clarkson as 'rude' and 'aggressive' - but ex-Conservative party chairman Sir Jake Berry hit back, defending him. They clashed on last night's BBC2 show which was presented by Derbyshire just hours after she had questioned Clarkson at the demonstration in central London. Thousands of farmers and their supporters had descended on the capital for a mass protest against Chancellor Rachel Reeves' Budget plan to limit the existing 100 per cent inheritance tax relief on farms to only the first £1million. Clarkson was among those taking part in the protest and challenged the Government to 'back down' over what he called its 'cocked up' inheritance tax raid. The 64-year-old, who is recovering from a life-saving heart operation, attended the event alongside his Clarkson's Farm co-stars Kaleb Cooper and Charlie Ireland, theatre legend Andrew Lloyd-Webber and dozens of MPs including new Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch and Reform UK's Nigel Farage. The Metropolitan Police estimated 13,000 people attended the protest in central London, which called on the Government to scrap those changes announced in the Chancellor's Budget last month. Ms Reeves says the measures will only affect the wealthiest 500 estates each year but experts from the NFU say it will be up to 70,000 farms. Clarkson became exasperated with Derbyshire when interviewed in Whitehall on Tuesday afternoon, accusing her of failing to be impartial and saying: 'Classic BBC - you people.' Footage of their exchange was shown at the start of last night's Newsnight broadcast and Derbyshire began her exchanges with her studio guests by asking Mr Murphy: 'What did you make of Mr Clarkson, what he had to say?' Mr Murphy, a former leader of the Scottish Labour Party, replied: 'I know I'm in a minority, but I think it's the first time I've ever seen him on television – I don't watch cooking or motor car programmes. I hear a rumour he does at least one of those. 'He does a farming programme, he's a farmer now? Okay. Look, I think the farmers are pretty ill served by him being one of their spokespeople.' When asked 'Why?', Mr Murphy responded by saying: 'I think he's rude, I think he's aggressive, I think from what I read he invested in a farm for inheritance tax reasons. i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/11/20/10/92278241-14104605-image-a-13_1732099897724.jpg Jeremy Clarkson joined thousands of farmers outside Downing Street protesting against changes to agricultural inheritance tax rules on farms valued above £1million'I think it's a disservice to the hardworking hundreds and thousands of farmers in the country.' But fellow Newsnight guest Sir Jake, who was a Conservative MP from 2010 until losing his seat at the general election in July this year, came to Clarkson's defence. Sir Jake, who also attended Tuesday's protest, told Mr Murphy: 'I was talking to farmers and I think you're wrong actually. 'I think Jeremy Clarkson is warmly regarded by the farming community because, whether you like what he stands for or what he says, he draws public attention to the plight of farmers. 'If you look for example at cereal farmers, they've had a 73 per cent drop in their income because of the adverse weather we've had, so it is a sector under massive pressure. 'When I was there, what people were asking me, what people were really concerned about is that it doesn't feel the Labour party has got a real grip on the number of people who are going to be affected by this – it feels like a bit of a stab in the dark.' Under Labour's plans, full inheritance tax relief will be restricted to the first £1million of combined agricultural and business property relief, above which landowners will pay a rate of 20 per cent, compared with 40 per cent on other estates. The measure comes into effect in April 2026 and can be paid in instalments over 10 years interest free, the Government has said. i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/11/20/10/92278203-14104605-image-a-15_1732099961733.jpg
|
|
aghast
David Williams
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 725
|
Post by aghast on Nov 20, 2024 17:36:35 GMT
I have had my winter fuel allowance withdrawn. I updated my fix term contract with my duel fuel supplier and am now paying around a half of what I was paying under the previous contract, saving me over £850 a year. I should never have had the allowance in the first place. This is the right policy, however we need to work out how to mitigate adverse impacts for those who cannot, for whatever reason, work their way out of it themselves. The faux outrage from our right of centre leaning friends is absolutely hilarious. Food banks anyone? "The faux outrage from our right of centre leaning friends is absolutely hilarious." - Did you really write that? You can pretend to mock, but it's true. Hypocritical nonsense from the benefit cutting right wingers.
|
|
Nobbygas
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 4,056
Member is Online
|
Post by Nobbygas on Nov 20, 2024 17:45:10 GMT
"The faux outrage from our right of centre leaning friends is absolutely hilarious." - Did you really write that? You can pretend to mock, but it's true. Hypocritical nonsense from the benefit cutting right wingers. Whoa there cowboy. Where are people being hypocritical about the WFA? Can you please point this out to everyone? Once again you are someone who hasn't posted a comment regarding the official government figures showing that the loss of the WFA will push even more OAP's into poverty. You seem happier to attack the posters rather than debate the issue highlighted. And why do you think that everyone who opposes the government policy regarding the WFA are 'right wingers'? There are many many Labour supporters who are embarressed by what the government has done.
|
|
aghast
David Williams
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 725
|
Post by aghast on Nov 20, 2024 18:28:15 GMT
You can pretend to mock, but it's true. Hypocritical nonsense from the benefit cutting right wingers. Whoa there cowboy. Where are people being hypocritical about the WFA? Can you please point this out to everyone? Once again you are someone who hasn't posted a comment regarding the official government figures showing that the loss of the WFA will push even more OAP's into poverty. You seem happier to attack the posters rather than debate the issue highlighted. And why do you think that everyone who opposes the government policy regarding the WFA are 'right wingers'? There are many many Labour supporters who are embarressed by what the government has done. There are indeed many non right wingers who think it was handled badly, including me, but I don't think Starmer needs any lessons from the right when it comes to cutting public services.
|
|
Nobbygas
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 4,056
Member is Online
|
Post by Nobbygas on Nov 20, 2024 19:26:36 GMT
Whoa there cowboy. Where are people being hypocritical about the WFA? Can you please point this out to everyone? Once again you are someone who hasn't posted a comment regarding the official government figures showing that the loss of the WFA will push even more OAP's into poverty. You seem happier to attack the posters rather than debate the issue highlighted. And why do you think that everyone who opposes the government policy regarding the WFA are 'right wingers'? There are many many Labour supporters who are embarressed by what the government has done. There are indeed many non right wingers who think it was handled badly, including me, but I don't think Starmer needs any lessons from the right when it comes to cutting public services. Do you think he needs any lessons about pushing OAP's into poverty as outlined in the official government figures?
|
|
oldie
Joined: September 2021
Posts: 7,516
|
Post by oldie on Nov 20, 2024 19:59:14 GMT
There are indeed many non right wingers who think it was handled badly, including me, but I don't think Starmer needs any lessons from the right when it comes to cutting public services. Do you think he needs any lessons about pushing OAP's into poverty as outlined in the official government figures? But why should younger people with children pay for it? Answers on a postcard to "Jumping on a Bandwagon Hypocrites Inc Guido House"
|
|
oldie
Joined: September 2021
Posts: 7,516
|
Post by oldie on Nov 20, 2024 20:00:35 GMT
Not at all. I don't believe in unfunded universal benefits which are not means tested. That's all. Nor do you, which is why I smile. If "I am alright Jack" it's because I didn't sit on my hands shouting "not fair". What is definitely "not fair" is demanding younger people, quite probably with children, paying their taxes for me to get a universal benefits I don't need. Me along side 100s of 1000s of boomers. What about all the taxpayers young and old who are paying for illegal immigrants to reside in (centrally heated) hotels ? these illegals have never paid into our welfare system whereas OAPs some of whom will die of cold this winter HAD to pay into the system. But what about the Duchy of Cornwall?
|
|
oldie
Joined: September 2021
Posts: 7,516
|
Post by oldie on Nov 20, 2024 20:04:05 GMT
Labour accuse Jeremy Clarkson of being 'rude' and 'aggressive' as BBC Newsnight descends into chaos while guests clash over farmer protest..by Aiden Radnedge
i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/11/20/10/92278641-14104605-image-a-2_1732099423203.jpg Clarkson clashed with BBC presenter Victoria Derbyshire in an interview on Tuesday afternoonA row broke out on BBC's Newsnight over Jeremy Clarkson's appearance at the farmers' 'tractor tax' protest in London after his angry interview with presenter Victoria Derbyshire. Former Labour minister Jim Murphy condemned former Top Gear host Clarkson as 'rude' and 'aggressive' - but ex-Conservative party chairman Sir Jake Berry hit back, defending him. They clashed on last night's BBC2 show which was presented by Derbyshire just hours after she had questioned Clarkson at the demonstration in central London. Thousands of farmers and their supporters had descended on the capital for a mass protest against Chancellor Rachel Reeves' Budget plan to limit the existing 100 per cent inheritance tax relief on farms to only the first £1million. Clarkson was among those taking part in the protest and challenged the Government to 'back down' over what he called its 'cocked up' inheritance tax raid. The 64-year-old, who is recovering from a life-saving heart operation, attended the event alongside his Clarkson's Farm co-stars Kaleb Cooper and Charlie Ireland, theatre legend Andrew Lloyd-Webber and dozens of MPs including new Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch and Reform UK's Nigel Farage. The Metropolitan Police estimated 13,000 people attended the protest in central London, which called on the Government to scrap those changes announced in the Chancellor's Budget last month. Ms Reeves says the measures will only affect the wealthiest 500 estates each year but experts from the NFU say it will be up to 70,000 farms. Clarkson became exasperated with Derbyshire when interviewed in Whitehall on Tuesday afternoon, accusing her of failing to be impartial and saying: 'Classic BBC - you people.' Footage of their exchange was shown at the start of last night's Newsnight broadcast and Derbyshire began her exchanges with her studio guests by asking Mr Murphy: 'What did you make of Mr Clarkson, what he had to say?' Mr Murphy, a former leader of the Scottish Labour Party, replied: 'I know I'm in a minority, but I think it's the first time I've ever seen him on television – I don't watch cooking or motor car programmes. I hear a rumour he does at least one of those. 'He does a farming programme, he's a farmer now? Okay. Look, I think the farmers are pretty ill served by him being one of their spokespeople.' When asked 'Why?', Mr Murphy responded by saying: 'I think he's rude, I think he's aggressive, I think from what I read he invested in a farm for inheritance tax reasons. i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/11/20/10/92278241-14104605-image-a-13_1732099897724.jpg Jeremy Clarkson joined thousands of farmers outside Downing Street protesting against changes to agricultural inheritance tax rules on farms valued above £1million'I think it's a disservice to the hardworking hundreds and thousands of farmers in the country.' But fellow Newsnight guest Sir Jake, who was a Conservative MP from 2010 until losing his seat at the general election in July this year, came to Clarkson's defence. Sir Jake, who also attended Tuesday's protest, told Mr Murphy: 'I was talking to farmers and I think you're wrong actually. 'I think Jeremy Clarkson is warmly regarded by the farming community because, whether you like what he stands for or what he says, he draws public attention to the plight of farmers. 'If you look for example at cereal farmers, they've had a 73 per cent drop in their income because of the adverse weather we've had, so it is a sector under massive pressure. 'When I was there, what people were asking me, what people were really concerned about is that it doesn't feel the Labour party has got a real grip on the number of people who are going to be affected by this – it feels like a bit of a stab in the dark.' Under Labour's plans, full inheritance tax relief will be restricted to the first £1million of combined agricultural and business property relief, above which landowners will pay a rate of 20 per cent, compared with 40 per cent on other estates. The measure comes into effect in April 2026 and can be paid in instalments over 10 years interest free, the Government has said. i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/11/20/10/92278203-14104605-image-a-15_1732099961733.jpg 🤯🤯 Ummm, is there a point in there somewhere? I gave up after the 21st paragraph of regurgitation. Cue, in true Dick Emery style "Oh Les, you are awful, but I like you" 🤭🤭🤭
|
|
bluetornados
Predictions League
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 15,741
Member is Online
|
Post by bluetornados on Nov 20, 2024 20:58:01 GMT
Labour accuse Jeremy Clarkson of being 'rude' and 'aggressive' as BBC Newsnight descends into chaos while guests clash over farmer protest..by Aiden Radnedge
i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/11/20/10/92278641-14104605-image-a-2_1732099423203.jpg Clarkson clashed with BBC presenter Victoria Derbyshire in an interview on Tuesday afternoonA row broke out on BBC's Newsnight over Jeremy Clarkson's appearance at the farmers' 'tractor tax' protest in London after his angry interview with presenter Victoria Derbyshire. Former Labour minister Jim Murphy condemned former Top Gear host Clarkson as 'rude' and 'aggressive' - but ex-Conservative party chairman Sir Jake Berry hit back, defending him. They clashed on last night's BBC2 show which was presented by Derbyshire just hours after she had questioned Clarkson at the demonstration in central London. Thousands of farmers and their supporters had descended on the capital for a mass protest against Chancellor Rachel Reeves' Budget plan to limit the existing 100 per cent inheritance tax relief on farms to only the first £1million. Clarkson was among those taking part in the protest and challenged the Government to 'back down' over what he called its 'cocked up' inheritance tax raid. The 64-year-old, who is recovering from a life-saving heart operation, attended the event alongside his Clarkson's Farm co-stars Kaleb Cooper and Charlie Ireland, theatre legend Andrew Lloyd-Webber and dozens of MPs including new Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch and Reform UK's Nigel Farage. The Metropolitan Police estimated 13,000 people attended the protest in central London, which called on the Government to scrap those changes announced in the Chancellor's Budget last month. Ms Reeves says the measures will only affect the wealthiest 500 estates each year but experts from the NFU say it will be up to 70,000 farms. Clarkson became exasperated with Derbyshire when interviewed in Whitehall on Tuesday afternoon, accusing her of failing to be impartial and saying: 'Classic BBC - you people.' Footage of their exchange was shown at the start of last night's Newsnight broadcast and Derbyshire began her exchanges with her studio guests by asking Mr Murphy: 'What did you make of Mr Clarkson, what he had to say?' Mr Murphy, a former leader of the Scottish Labour Party, replied: 'I know I'm in a minority, but I think it's the first time I've ever seen him on television – I don't watch cooking or motor car programmes. I hear a rumour he does at least one of those. 'He does a farming programme, he's a farmer now? Okay. Look, I think the farmers are pretty ill served by him being one of their spokespeople.' When asked 'Why?', Mr Murphy responded by saying: 'I think he's rude, I think he's aggressive, I think from what I read he invested in a farm for inheritance tax reasons. i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/11/20/10/92278241-14104605-image-a-13_1732099897724.jpg Jeremy Clarkson joined thousands of farmers outside Downing Street protesting against changes to agricultural inheritance tax rules on farms valued above £1million'I think it's a disservice to the hardworking hundreds and thousands of farmers in the country.' But fellow Newsnight guest Sir Jake, who was a Conservative MP from 2010 until losing his seat at the general election in July this year, came to Clarkson's defence. Sir Jake, who also attended Tuesday's protest, told Mr Murphy: 'I was talking to farmers and I think you're wrong actually. 'I think Jeremy Clarkson is warmly regarded by the farming community because, whether you like what he stands for or what he says, he draws public attention to the plight of farmers. 'If you look for example at cereal farmers, they've had a 73 per cent drop in their income because of the adverse weather we've had, so it is a sector under massive pressure. 'When I was there, what people were asking me, what people were really concerned about is that it doesn't feel the Labour party has got a real grip on the number of people who are going to be affected by this – it feels like a bit of a stab in the dark.' Under Labour's plans, full inheritance tax relief will be restricted to the first £1million of combined agricultural and business property relief, above which landowners will pay a rate of 20 per cent, compared with 40 per cent on other estates. The measure comes into effect in April 2026 and can be paid in instalments over 10 years interest free, the Government has said. i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/11/20/10/92278203-14104605-image-a-15_1732099961733.jpg 🤯🤯 Ummm, is there a point in there somewhere? I gave up after the 21st paragraph of regurgitation. Cue, in true Dick Emery style "Oh Les, you are awful, but I like you" 🤭🤭🤭 Les, Oh dear les, i really do expext more from a 72 year-old gent like yourself, if it upsets you so much then you do not have to read it or respond. Les, you do need to watch your health by getting all het-up about topics that are just news after all, the nonsensical inane regurgitation is boring Les. Les, just about to sit back with my milk and cookies to watch that Jack Nicholson 1975 classic One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, have a good evening...
|
|