Icegas
Joined: September 2014
Posts: 1,414
|
Post by Icegas on Oct 16, 2024 6:07:28 GMT
It's brilliant isn't it..😆 he is just enjoying himself and dancing as he is enjoying that lottery ticket called life on stage. Seriously, Oldie mate this is shameful..! The guy is there 'dancing' and enjoying a moment with music.Nothing...NOTHING suggests that anything is mentally irregular, odd or any psychological trauma has happened to him. You loons on the left are creating something after your jockey Sleepy-Joe fell at the first hurdle in 2024. What's Harris policy's again? Btw...that's still the same Trump you guys hated in 2015..🤗🥰🤭😘😎👋👊👍 Well The wilfully blind I am afraid tend to accept being led by donkeys. Although in Trumps case it is a case of a donkey imitating someone on drugs. But there you go, as typical supporter of Trump you are as incapable of articulating his economic policies as Trump is. There is a trend there, something symptomatic of supporters of Boris Johnson, Nigel Farage and Donald Trump. I believe you have or do support all three. What a Pra..t.... you are being controlled by donkeys I agree. I used to enjoy them at Weston-super-Mare as a child. Sorry, did I say that out loud..?
|
|
oldie
Joined: September 2021
Posts: 6,957
|
Post by oldie on Oct 16, 2024 6:11:30 GMT
Well The wilfully blind I am afraid tend to accept being led by donkeys. Although in Trumps case it is a case of a donkey imitating someone on drugs. But there you go, as typical supporter of Trump you are as incapable of articulating his economic policies as Trump is. There is a trend there, something symptomatic of supporters of Boris Johnson, Nigel Farage and Donald Trump. I believe you have or do support all three. What a Pra..t.... you are being controlled by donkeys I agree. I used to enjoy them at Weston-super-Mare as a child. Sorry, did I say that out loud..? Been called a lot worse, typically by people whose expressed opinions do not add up. Hey ho, twas ever thus
|
|
bluetornados
Predictions League
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 15,235
|
Post by bluetornados on Oct 16, 2024 16:00:01 GMT
Donald Trump talks women's rights at all-female town hall..by Brandon Livesayi.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/10/16/15/90923439-0-image-a-387_1729089999862.jpgTrump's town hall has started and the first question is from a woman named Lisa, who asks if Trump would outline his plans to "revitalise the economy again as president, and policies that specifically support the middle class when re-elected?" Trump hits his usual economic talking points: He says America will drill for more fossil fuels - what he calls "liquid gold" - and bring down energy costs. He says he will incentivise more US-based manufacturing and "make it possible for companies to come into our country again". "We're going to have record setting jobs," he claims. Trump has sought to appeal to women voters by making the economy and other issues like immigration and crime front and centre. Fox News host Harris Faulkner is working hard to keep Donald Trump on the topic of each question. The former president frequently switches his talking points when answering. At one point he was talking about the border and she steered him back to talk about the economy. Later, Trump started talking about the 2020 election and Faulkner guided him back to talk about inflation. When he was asked about minority voters, he switched the topic to law enforcement and border patrol. The woman admits she's nervous - "I'm shaking like a freaking leaf", she says - but she also tells Trump she broke her neck last year and that it has been difficult to balance the costs of childcare with her recovery. She asks how Trump will help parents with the cost of raising children. Trump replies that his daughter, Ivanka Trump, was pushing for child tax credits during his previous administration. He says that they will "re-adjust things so that it's fair to everybody" and that he primarily sees the programme in the form of a tax cut. Both Trump and Kamala Harris have unveiled child tax credit proposals. Trump has spent a chunk of time during this pre-recorded town hall with an all-women audience talking about the border. But he has pivoted to comments made earlier this week, when he talked of "enemies within". He once again says "the enemy from within" is more dangerous than China and Russia. Trump specifically mentions "the Pelosi's" and Adam Schiff - who led the impeachment case against him - as "the enemy from within". Trump goes on to say there are "Marxists, and communists and fascists" among this group he has designated.
|
|
aghast
David Williams
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 662
|
Post by aghast on Oct 16, 2024 17:41:27 GMT
I do think Trump might be losing his marbles. I've always considered him pretty sharp in the past. Disagreed with him totally, but respected his political manoeuvres and incendiary comments as part of his game. Now however he seems to be acting and speaking in a random and unpredictable way which makes me doubt his fitness for office. It's never easy to watch. I was hoping against hope that Biden would get his act together but it became clear that his days of high office were beyond him. Very sad, but undeniable and not helpful to the individual or the electorate to pretend otherwise. I feel Trump too has entered that stage. I would be very concerned indeed to think of him in charge of the free world, as some in the USA like to see it. Again as with my response to Oldie it's the same here. Nothing suggests anything is wrong with Trump, if there was then I would be the first to bring it up. I want the safety of the world, I'm not a blind Trumper. The MSM and the left are trying to play the same card that was used on Biden but now on Trump.One was clear, a mental disaster happened on worldwide TV in Biden, the other today is just a hope by the Democratic party in bringing Trump down. Trump clearly has aged, but nothing shows that he isn't fit to run for office. Nothing. We're clearly watching different videos of Donald Trump then.
|
|
oldie
Joined: September 2021
Posts: 6,957
|
Post by oldie on Oct 16, 2024 17:53:31 GMT
Again as with my response to Oldie it's the same here. Nothing suggests anything is wrong with Trump, if there was then I would be the first to bring it up. I want the safety of the world, I'm not a blind Trumper. The MSM and the left are trying to play the same card that was used on Biden but now on Trump.One was clear, a mental disaster happened on worldwide TV in Biden, the other today is just a hope by the Democratic party in bringing Trump down. Trump clearly has aged, but nothing shows that he isn't fit to run for office. Nothing. We're clearly watching different videos of Donald Trump then. I think Ice must be watching "Jackanory'
|
|
bluetornados
Predictions League
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 15,235
|
Post by bluetornados on Oct 16, 2024 20:46:41 GMT
Kamala Harris brands Trump IVF remarks 'bizarre' ahead of Fox interview..by Caitlin Wilson and Sam Hancock in Washington DCichef.bbci.co.uk/ace/standard/1024/cpsprodpb/d03d/live/392b5cd0-8bfb-11ef-81f8-1f28bcc5be15.jpgVice-President Kamala Harris has responded to comments from Donald Trump that we brought you earlier, when he called himself the "father of IVF" during a town hall of women voters. Speaking to reporters before boarding Air Force 2 to Pennsylvania, Harris says Trump's label for himself on the reproductive procedure was "quite bizarre". She says he should in fact be taking responsibility for the women living under abortion bans or restrictive abortion laws around the country. "So let's not be distracted by his choice of words. The reality is, his actions have been very harmful to women and families in America on this issue," she says. Harris is referring to the fact that many US states have some kind of abortion ban or restriction on the books after the 2022 overturning of the law that guaranteed the right to an abortion nationally. That decision was made by a conservative-majority Supreme Court, three of whom were nominated by Trump when he was president. Trump has said he is not in favour of some of the most restrictive abortion regulations that some in the Republican party have championed, but that he wants to leave the matter up to state law rather than federal.
|
|
Icegas
Joined: September 2014
Posts: 1,414
|
Post by Icegas on Oct 16, 2024 21:29:30 GMT
We're clearly watching different videos of Donald Trump then. I think Ice must be watching "Jackanory' Seriously your attempts at humour or insults are either awe inspiring, or ghastly. Maybe they are both at the same time. Not sure yet?
|
|
Icegas
Joined: September 2014
Posts: 1,414
|
Post by Icegas on Oct 16, 2024 21:32:11 GMT
Kamala Harris brands Trump IVF remarks 'bizarre' ahead of Fox interview..by Caitlin Wilson and Sam Hancock in Washington DCichef.bbci.co.uk/ace/standard/1024/cpsprodpb/d03d/live/392b5cd0-8bfb-11ef-81f8-1f28bcc5be15.jpgVice-President Kamala Harris has responded to comments from Donald Trump that we brought you earlier, when he called himself the "father of IVF" during a town hall of women voters. Speaking to reporters before boarding Air Force 2 to Pennsylvania, Harris says Trump's label for himself on the reproductive procedure was "quite bizarre". She says he should in fact be taking responsibility for the women living under abortion bans or restrictive abortion laws around the country. "So let's not be distracted by his choice of words. The reality is, his actions have been very harmful to women and families in America on this issue," she says. Harris is referring to the fact that many US states have some kind of abortion ban or restriction on the books after the 2022 overturning of the law that guaranteed the right to an abortion nationally. That decision was made by a conservative-majority Supreme Court, three of whom were nominated by Trump when he was president. Trump has said he is not in favour of some of the most restrictive abortion regulations that some in the Republican party have championed, but that he wants to leave the matter up to state law rather than federal. The only way Harris wins is on this issue. If Trump does lose in 20 days then it's on this subject ,and his own fault.
|
|
Icegas
Joined: September 2014
Posts: 1,414
|
Post by Icegas on Oct 17, 2024 4:08:42 GMT
This interview ended it. Trump's won..👋
She is a horrible person.
She didn't answer one question, she just blamed Trump for everything,and everything bad she is currently doing..
She is blaming it on the 45th President.
And apparently, this woman wants to go on Joe Rogans podcast! As does Donald...
Btw ...hats off to Baier for pushing this disgusting person.
Remember,she never got one vote to be running in November!
And when she was questioned about her failings as being vice President for the past 3 and a half years , she blamed Trump.
I remember a few people on here blaming Trump also for past events also?
|
|
|
Post by Nobbygas on Oct 17, 2024 8:23:03 GMT
This interview ended it. Trump's won..👋 She is a horrible person. She didn't answer one question, she just blamed Trump for everything,and everything bad she is currently doing.. She is blaming it on the 45th President. And apparently, this woman wants to go on Joe Rogans podcast! As does Donald... Btw ...hats off to Baier for pushing this disgusting person. Remember,she never got one vote to be running in November! And when she was questioned about her failings as being vice President for the past 3 and a half years , she blamed Trump. I remember a few people on here blaming Trump also for past events also? Terrible interview for her. She seems to have adopted the Labour election policy of not saying anything. Her stock answer seems to be "It's a discussion we need to have"! Apart from that, every other answer was "It's Trump's fault"! Her biggest failure there was on immigration. She said the system needs to be fixed. More judges are required. More border guards, more support etc. She seems to have forgotten that she has been in charge of this for the last four years. She is suffering from the same problem as the Tories had in that she's claiming to fix something but she hasn't fixed anything in the last four years, so why should anyone believe her?
|
|
trymer
Joined: November 2018
Posts: 2,386
|
Post by trymer on Oct 17, 2024 8:31:33 GMT
This interview ended it. Trump's won..👋 She is a horrible person. She didn't answer one question, she just blamed Trump for everything,and everything bad she is currently doing.. She is blaming it on the 45th President. And apparently, this woman wants to go on Joe Rogans podcast! As does Donald... Btw ...hats off to Baier for pushing this disgusting person. Remember,she never got one vote to be running in November! And when she was questioned about her failings as being vice President for the past 3 and a half years , she blamed Trump. I remember a few people on here blaming Trump also for past events also? Terrible interview for her. She seems to have adopted the Labour election policy of not saying anything. Her stock answer seems to be "It's a discussion we need to have"! Apart from that, every other answer was "It's Trump's fault"! Her biggest failure there was on immigration. She said the system needs to be fixed. More judges are required. More border guards, more support etc. She seems to have forgotten that she has been in charge of this for the last four years. She is suffering from the same problem as the Tories had in that she's claiming to fix something she but she hasn't fixed anything in the last four years, so why should anyone believe her? Again like Labour only winning because people disliked the Tories so much, the only reason that people will vote for Harris is to stop Trump from winning...if she does win people will soon turn against her the same as is happening here with the labour govt.
|
|
oldie
Joined: September 2021
Posts: 6,957
|
Post by oldie on Oct 17, 2024 8:49:07 GMT
You got to love it. Harris goes out there and puts herself on the line with a right leaning media channel, one that at one point was a fanatic Trump supporter, and of course they go for her. At one point trying desperately to not let her answer the question.
Whilst Trump runs scared and cancels his CNBC interview and previously cancelled his CBS 60 minutes interview. He was interviewed by Bloomberg (referenced by me on here a couple of days ago) and he made a complete ass of himself.
But of course the screaming banshees, desperate for a tit bit to counter Trump's quite shocking performances during the whole of this campaign, scratch around looking for solace.
She may well lose, but her loss will not be predicated upon any merit that Trump brings to the Presidency, but almost entirely due to the rank stupidity of his supporters.
|
|
|
Post by Nobbygas on Oct 17, 2024 8:59:06 GMT
You got to love it. Harris goes out there and puts herself on the line with a right leaning media channel, one that at one point was a fanatic Trump supporter, and of course they go for her. At one point trying desperately to not let her answer the question. Whilst Trump runs scared and cancels his CNBC interview and previously cancelled his CBS 60 minutes interview. He was interviewed by Bloomberg (referenced by me on here a couple of days ago) and he made a complete ass of himself. But of course the screaming banshees, desperate for a tit bit to counter Trump's quite shocking performances during the whole of this campaign, scratch around looking for solace. She may well lose, but her loss will not be predicated upon any merit that Trump brings to the Presidency, but almost entirely due to the rank stupidity of his supporters. Why do you need to use this sort of language? Trump has made a huge number of unscripted interviews over the years. He has stood up at the lecturn and taken questions countless times. Yes, he makes mistakes. Harris on the other hand doesn't stand at that lecturn and take questions. She hasn't done it once. She seems incapable of talking freely off-script, but just adheres to her script and stock answers. In this way, although Trump makes mistakes he comes across to voters as more authentic than Harris. This is the main problem Harris has, she's just not authentic. With Trump you get what you see, warts 'n all. Harris comes across as false and contrived.
|
|
Icegas
Joined: September 2014
Posts: 1,414
|
Post by Icegas on Oct 17, 2024 9:34:32 GMT
Terrible interview for her. She seems to have adopted the Labour election policy of not saying anything. Her stock answer seems to be "It's a discussion we need to have"! Apart from that, every other answer was "It's Trump's fault"! Her biggest failure there was on immigration. She said the system needs to be fixed. More judges are required. More border guards, more support etc. She seems to have forgotten that she has been in charge of this for the last four years. She is suffering from the same problem as the Tories had in that she's claiming to fix something she but she hasn't fixed anything in the last four years, so why should anyone believe her? Again like Labour only winning because people disliked the Tories so much, the only reason that people will vote for Harris is to stop Trump from winning...if she does win people will soon turn against her the same as is happening here with the labour govt. I agree,the only reason people will vote for her is to stop Trump. Difference between the Torries and Trump is that Trump is EXTREMELY POPULAR, while the Torries were not.
|
|
Icegas
Joined: September 2014
Posts: 1,414
|
Post by Icegas on Oct 17, 2024 9:39:16 GMT
You got to love it. Harris goes out there and puts herself on the line with a right leaning media channel, one that at one point was a fanatic Trump supporter, and of course they go for her. At one point trying desperately to not let her answer the question. Whilst Trump runs scared and cancels his CNBC interview and previously cancelled his CBS 60 minutes interview. He was interviewed by Bloomberg (referenced by me on here a couple of days ago) and he made a complete ass of himself. But of course the screaming banshees, desperate for a tit bit to counter Trump's quite shocking performances during the whole of this campaign, scratch around looking for solace. She may well lose, but her loss will not be predicated upon any merit that Trump brings to the Presidency, but almost entirely due to the rank stupidity of his supporters. Trump has been screwed over by that mob for years, CNN, CNBC etc... Anything he has said on there has been heavily edited and taken out of context many times previously. He has gone head to head with them many times before,why would it be advantageous to do so again given his position?
|
|
Icegas
Joined: September 2014
Posts: 1,414
|
Post by Icegas on Oct 17, 2024 9:41:05 GMT
You got to love it. Harris goes out there and puts herself on the line with a right leaning media channel, one that at one point was a fanatic Trump supporter, and of course they go for her. At one point trying desperately to not let her answer the question. Whilst Trump runs scared and cancels his CNBC interview and previously cancelled his CBS 60 minutes interview. He was interviewed by Bloomberg (referenced by me on here a couple of days ago) and he made a complete ass of himself. But of course the screaming banshees, desperate for a tit bit to counter Trump's quite shocking performances during the whole of this campaign, scratch around looking for solace. She may well lose, but her loss will not be predicated upon any merit that Trump brings to the Presidency, but almost entirely due to the rank stupidity of his supporters. Why do you need to use this sort of language? Trump has made a huge number of unscripted interviews over the years. He has stood up at the lecturn and taken questions countless times. Yes, he makes mistakes. Harris on the other hand doesn't stand at that lecturn and take questions. She hasn't done it once. She seems incapable of talking freely off-script, but just adheres to her script and stock answers. In this way, although Trump makes mistakes he comes across to voters as more authentic than Harris. This is the main problem Harris has, she's just not authentic. With Trump you get what you see, warts 'n all. Harris comes across as false and contrived. He can't help it, when losing an argument he goes back to his default mode of the bully. Also, as you said Trump is far from perfect , but he is real. There is no BS with him whether you like him or not.
|
|
oldie
Joined: September 2021
Posts: 6,957
|
Post by oldie on Oct 17, 2024 11:43:02 GMT
Why do you need to use this sort of language? Trump has made a huge number of unscripted interviews over the years. He has stood up at the lecturn and taken questions countless times. Yes, he makes mistakes. Harris on the other hand doesn't stand at that lecturn and take questions. She hasn't done it once. She seems incapable of talking freely off-script, but just adheres to her script and stock answers. In this way, although Trump makes mistakes he comes across to voters as more authentic than Harris. This is the main problem Harris has, she's just not authentic. With Trump you get what you see, warts 'n all. Harris comes across as false and contrived. He can't help it, when losing an argument he goes back to his default mode of the bully. Also, as you said Trump is far from perfect , but he is real. There is no BS with him whether you like him or not. No BS from Trump??? That has to be another incredible statement in a litany of preposterous propositions put forward by you
|
|
oldie
Joined: September 2021
Posts: 6,957
|
Post by oldie on Oct 17, 2024 11:46:24 GMT
You got to love it. Harris goes out there and puts herself on the line with a right leaning media channel, one that at one point was a fanatic Trump supporter, and of course they go for her. At one point trying desperately to not let her answer the question. Whilst Trump runs scared and cancels his CNBC interview and previously cancelled his CBS 60 minutes interview. He was interviewed by Bloomberg (referenced by me on here a couple of days ago) and he made a complete ass of himself. But of course the screaming banshees, desperate for a tit bit to counter Trump's quite shocking performances during the whole of this campaign, scratch around looking for solace. She may well lose, but her loss will not be predicated upon any merit that Trump brings to the Presidency, but almost entirely due to the rank stupidity of his supporters. Why do you need to use this sort of language? Trump has made a huge number of unscripted interviews over the years. He has stood up at the lecturn and taken questions countless times. Yes, he makes mistakes. Harris on the other hand doesn't stand at that lecturn and take questions. She hasn't done it once. She seems incapable of talking freely off-script, but just adheres to her script and stock answers. In this way, although Trump makes mistakes he comes across to voters as more authentic than Harris. This is the main problem Harris has, she's just not authentic. With Trump you get what you see, warts 'n all. Harris comes across as false and contrived. Quote one? I will help you out, as it is his current proposition. "I will impose import tariffs on..., and the foreign manufacturers will pay those tariffs" You are not stupid Nobby, explain exactly how the overseas manufacturers actually pay those proposed tariffs...
|
|
oldie
Joined: September 2021
Posts: 6,957
|
Post by oldie on Oct 17, 2024 11:53:09 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Nobbygas on Oct 17, 2024 12:19:59 GMT
Why do you need to use this sort of language? Trump has made a huge number of unscripted interviews over the years. He has stood up at the lecturn and taken questions countless times. Yes, he makes mistakes. Harris on the other hand doesn't stand at that lecturn and take questions. She hasn't done it once. She seems incapable of talking freely off-script, but just adheres to her script and stock answers. In this way, although Trump makes mistakes he comes across to voters as more authentic than Harris. This is the main problem Harris has, she's just not authentic. With Trump you get what you see, warts 'n all. Harris comes across as false and contrived. Quote one? I will help you out, as it is his current proposition. "I will impose import tariffs on..., and the foreign manufacturers will pay those tariffs" You are not stupid Nobby, explain exactly how the overseas manufacturers actually pay those proposed tariffs... Why are you firing that at me?
|
|