bluetornados
Predictions League
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 15,742
|
VAR
Feb 17, 2023 22:53:01 GMT
Post by bluetornados on Feb 17, 2023 22:53:01 GMT
Lee Mason: Official leaves referees' body PGMOL after VAR error..ichef.bbci.co.uk/onesport/cps/800/cpsprodpb/E02A/production/_128668375_leemason.jpgLee Mason officiated over 500 fixtures after he progressed to the Football League in 1998 Lee Mason will no longer officiate in the Premier League after leaving referees' body PGMOL by mutual consent. The 51-year-old's departure comes days after his mistake during Arsenal's 1-1 draw with Brentford. Mason, as the Video Assistant Referee, did not draw the guidelines to check for offside on Ivan Toney's equaliser. "We would like to thank Lee for his dedicated service to the professional game and wish him all the best for the future," PGMOL said. Following the draw with Brentford, Arsenal then dropped to second in the table after they were beaten 3-1 by Manchester City in midweek - a result that moved Pep Guardiola's side into top spot. PGMOL chief refereeing officer Howard Webb contacted Arsenal to "acknowledge and explain the significant error" that occurred. However, Gunners boss Mikel Arteta said the apology was not acceptable and added: "It wasn't human error, it was not understanding your job. "It cost Arsenal two points that are not going to be restored so we are going to have to find those two points somewhere else in the league." Bolton-born Mason was a Premier League referee for 15 years, overseeing 287 top-flight matches.
|
|
bluetornados
Predictions League
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 15,742
|
VAR
Oct 2, 2023 8:45:45 GMT
Post by bluetornados on Oct 2, 2023 8:45:45 GMT
Alan Shearer, speaking on Match of the Day, described the refereeing decisions and VAR review that led to Luis Diaz's goal being ruled out for offside and the Curtis Jones sending off as "incomprehensible". He added: "A horrendous day for the officials and VAR. We have seen some howlers but that is the biggest. Trust is going to be a big thing going forward."
VAR failed to intervene after clear and obvious factual error - PGMOL The PGMOL issued a statement on Saturday in response to the VAR controversy at Spurs. "The goal by Luis Diaz was disallowed for offside by the on-field team of match officials. This was a clear and obvious factual error and should have resulted in the goal being awarded through VAR intervention, however, the VAR failed to intervene."
PGMOL apology 'doesn't help' - Klopp Jurgen Klopp said after the match that any PGMOL statement or apology "doesn't help" and referenced the apology Wolves received for the decision not to award a penalty at Manchester United earlier in the season. While Reds skipper Virgil van Dijk admitted he was losing faith in VAR after Saturday's costly officiating blunder. And goalkeeper Alisson Becker was this morning reported in the Mirror as saying Liverpool had every right to be "outraged" and players were treated like "prisoners", unable to have their say on bad decisions through fear of facing extra punishment.
'VAR blunder refs dropped by top flight' On Sunday morning, the PGMOL said Darren England had been replaced as the fourth official for Sunday's Premier League game between Nottingham Forest and Brentford, while Dan Cook has been replaced as assistant referee for tonight's game between Fulham and Chelsea.
Darren England might have been replaced as the fourth official at the City Ground on Sunday, but the VAR controversy continued as 10-man Nottingham Forest fought back to claim a 1-1 draw at home to Brentford. Forest manager Steve Cooper and Brentford boss Thomas Frank were left frustrated with refereeing decisions on another controversial day of Premier League football. Cooper was unhappy with Moussa Niakhate's red card, while Frank felt Brentford should have had a penalty. "We all want referees to be in a good place," said Cooper after the game. "But they have just raised more questions than answers."
It transpired on Sunday that Darren England, Dan Cook and Michael Oliver, who was the fourth official at the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium, were also part of a match officiating team that took charge of a league game in the United Arab Emirates on Thursday. The Football Association had approved the trip and the trio arrived in London on Friday to prepare for Saturday's game. It is understood that Liverpool also want this looked at as part of PGMOL's review.
GET INVOLVED - FANS VIEWS Anon: Football was fun in the 90/00s because it was about the football. Refs just turned up and did a job. Now it’s overly-complicated rules and all about the refs. Whether VAR works or not isn’t the issue. Make it about the football again. We don’t remember great moments because of technology, we remember the human element. Long live football..
Nicky Holender: It was a mistake by VAR official that he thought a goal had been given, nothing more nothing less. Everyone makes mistakes. It didn’t alter the outcome of the game, Spurs completely dominated Liverpool’s 10 men and probably would have won anyway I suspect. Nobody talks about the true mistake that cost Liverpool the game was Matip putting the ball in his own net. Should he be sat down for a couple of games? No of course not it was just a mistake he made.
Matt, Paignton: All the controversy around VAR and offsides again...let's just get rid of the offside rule! More goals and more entertainment but much less controversy.
Dave: VAR has to go, it has added nothing but misery to the game. It is supposed to add clarity to decisions and it does not do that, never has, never will. Do the right thing and bin it and spend the money on something more meaningful.
Max Davison, Malvern: It's time to remove the human factor from offside. A.I. is perfectly capable of doing the job in milliseconds.
Adam: So an official made a mistake in a football match and disallowed a goal. That's been happening for years - it's football. You win some you lose some, move on and get over it!
|
|
bluetornados
Predictions League
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 15,742
|
VAR
Oct 3, 2023 8:13:50 GMT
Post by bluetornados on Oct 3, 2023 8:13:50 GMT
'A horrendous mistake that is unprecedented'..ichef.bbci.co.uk/live-experience/cps/624/cpsprodpb/vivo/live/images/2023/10/3/cf7bafee-93a8-41fe-b031-3c67cd5aba3e.jpgFormer Liverpool defender Jamie Carragher on VAR, following Luis Diaz's disallowed goal on Saturday. "I do feel as if this is almost like a crisis point for VAR in this country," Carragher said on Sky Sports' Monday Night Football. "It is not just on the back of this decision, it is what has been happening all season, like when there was a situation with Wolves against Manchester United. "I don't want to pile on to an official or [referees' chief] Howard Webb - I could imagine they feel absolutely awful the last couple of days. "I am not into the conspiracy theories, that this one favours that team or another - no-one gains anything from this in terms of the officials. "We have all been there in our jobs and made mistakes, so I feel for them. "But it is a horrendous mistake that is unprecedented, and you can't actually quite believe the explanation that has been given." Referees' chief Howard Webb is set to bow to pressure, according to the Telegraph, and release the audio of discussions between match officials that led to Saturday's controversial offside decision in Tottenham's win over Liverpool. Liverpool waiting for PGMOL response to request for audioLiverpool are pressing the PGMOL for audio of discussions between the match officials in their 2-1 defeat at Tottenham. The Telegraph is reporting that referees' chief Howard Webb is set to bow to pressure to release the audio. PGMOL, the governing body for referees, had said that the decision to rule out Luis Diaz's strike was "a significant human error". In response, Liverpool released a statement on Sunday saying the explanation was "unacceptable" and that "sporting integrity has been undermined". The club called for a "review with full transparency" and added they will "explore the range of options available given the clear need for escalation and resolution".
|
|
darloGas
Joined November 2014
Joined: August 2023
Posts: 199
|
VAR
Oct 3, 2023 10:16:57 GMT
Post by darloGas on Oct 3, 2023 10:16:57 GMT
Either, Mason will make a lucrative living in the Middle East (remember a handball is punishable by immediate hand amputation), where football is being slowly hijacked (sportswashing). Or, the EFL will be persuaded to foist Mason on our beleaguered divisions. #UpTheROVERS
|
|
bluetornados
Predictions League
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 15,742
|
VAR
Oct 3, 2023 11:20:51 GMT
Post by bluetornados on Oct 3, 2023 11:20:51 GMT
Mark Clattenburg attributes considerable blame to linesman as he shares thoughts on VAR crisis..by Peter Kenny Jones, Empire of the Kop.ichef.bbci.co.uk/onesport/cps/800/cpsprodpb/10C8E/production/_125705786_gettyimages-1164126119.jpgMark Clattenburg has done what not many referees normally do and lambasted the officials in charge of Liverpool’s game against Tottenham Hotspur but after a gaff so bad as we saw for Luis Diaz’s disallowed goal – it’s hard for anyone to back what happened. Writing for the Daily Mail, the former Premier League referee said: ‘The PGMOL brought in Phil Bentham last year to improve communications between the match officials because of his background in rugby league. ‘As a former TMO [television match official], his every word was broadcast live, and Howard Webb has been striving for his Premier League officials to make their messages clear and concise. ‘But there was a total breakdown in basic communication at Tottenham on Saturday. Assistant Adrian Holmes should have been shouting ‘offside, offside’ after raising his flag against Luis Diaz. ‘Referee Simon Hooper should have been relaying that to the players, too. All this should have been picked up by their earpieces and heard by VAR Darren England and his assistant Dan Cook at Stockley Park’. It seems as though the 48-year-old thinks that because the linesman Adrian Holmes wasn’t making it clear enough that he had flagged for offside, this could be where the confusion around Darren England’s catastrophic decision stemmed from. However, the presence of Simon Hooper on the pitch and Dan Cook in the VAR room should mean that this wrongly given decision never happens. Quite how a referee, two linesmen, a fourth official and two VAR cannot see that an error was made is almost incomprehensible – surely one of them should have been able to add some clarity on the matter. Everything was done so quickly that when panic did set in, it was too late to rectify the error but that’s just where another issue lies, as there should be room for common sense on this matter. Although VAR is not allowed to stop the game again after it has been restarted, when what appears to be a genuine mistake does occur like we saw against Spurs then someone should step in to make sure justice is served. So what if they would have been disciplined for stopping the game again – this would have all been much easier to swallow if anyone in a position of power of the game had made the right call and fixed a monumental error.
|
|
bluetornados
Predictions League
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 15,742
|
VAR
Oct 3, 2023 11:26:37 GMT
Post by bluetornados on Oct 3, 2023 11:26:37 GMT
Former Premier League referee Dermot Gallagher, speaking on Five Live Breakfast, on the decision to rule out Luis Diaz's strike for Liverpool at Tottenham: “It’s one of the biggest errors we can remember. But you have to drill down into it. How did it happen? What is the learning process? "You can’t fudge it away. It was a really big error. But you can’t dwell on it. You have to find out what happened and more importantly make sure it never ever happens again.” ichef.bbci.co.uk/live-experience/cps/624/cpsprodpb/vivo/live/images/2023/10/3/63b31ec0-df40-4d1f-b8c5-0a9f7f95d6c5.jpg “It was about the process. There’s nothing wrong with what happened apart from small details and sometimes small details are very important. “The process needs steps - one, two, three and four. And the first thing was ‘what was the on-field decision?’. If that been asked the VAR could have checked for offside. Unfortunately he presumed the goal had been given. That’s where it fell down. “He then looked, saw it was onside and used those words ‘check complete’. The referee Simon Hooper has to go on that as he can’t see the images. As soon as the free kick is taken the game goes on. The laws say it can’t go back. “The fundamental flaw was not asking that first question.” On whether fatigue was an issue on Saturday after the VAR officials took charge of a game in the UAE: “It is no different to when they go to the Champions League. When I refereed they didn’t have the support systems they have now. "I went to Vladivostok once and had to leave on the Sunday, didn’t get back until the Thursday and refereed on the Saturday. It is part and parcel of the job. You are resting while travelling and don’t have the demands of a 9-5 job. “I can only talk about my own experience. I want to referee games. I would rather take charge of a midweek game than just going Saturday to Saturday.” A final word from Dermot Gallagher on what VAR improvements could be made: “Howard Webb wants things to get better. We have seen more transparency but at the moment (Football's law makers) Ifab do not allow the VAR conversations to be heard in the stadiums. Whether that will change in the future I don’t know, but there’s a big push to get that." ichef.bbci.co.uk/live-experience/cps/624/cpsprodpb/vivo/live/images/2023/10/3/48fd01cf-e6c7-4f13-841d-706ae72f24bc.jpgHoward Webb
|
|
bluetornados
Predictions League
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 15,742
|
VAR
Oct 3, 2023 11:48:00 GMT
Post by bluetornados on Oct 3, 2023 11:48:00 GMT
ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/800/cpsprodpb/0e4f/live/985c4ce0-4265-11ee-9b58-cb80889117a8.jpgAdam: Chris Sutton misses a central point - look at the big picture. If Liverpool's statement, however ill-advised, catalyses positive change, then it has done its job. That's the endgame - movement towards a positive place for VAR in football in the future. Anon: VAR - referees should have microphones, which people can hear in real time. Rugby uses this effectively. In addition there needs to be a clear process to VAR reviews where the referee and VAR official confirm what the on-field decision was, what VAR understand they are reviewing, and their decision based on that review. No system will be perfect but improved transparency will lead to better decision making. Alan: The whole VAR debate is not about what it really should be. Its purpose was to get decisions right but on Saturday that wasn't possible because of the conflict between VAR and the laws of the game. It's the laws which need updating. Nick, Kent: Football needs to learn from other sports when it comes to technology. Have an independent team review decisions, clear communication/transparency with fans (rugby) and limit both teams to a set number of ‘challenges’ (tennis). It’s overused, misused and causing mass confusion and inevitably anger currently. Bob: This is not a unique situation, last season Newcastle had a goal disallowed because VAR didn't show the on-pitch referee the push by a Palace player. But you can't believe that it was a conspiracy. Agree with Chris Sutton, we all make mistakes. Anon: If you think VAR is the problem then you are only looking at the surface level and using the technology as a scapegoat. The officials using it have been in decline but is it any wonder. Why would anyone want to become a referee right now with the abuse they receive at all levels of the game every week. Yes, standards need to improve but you'll get no fresh blood coming through right now because fans and players treat them horrendously without punishment every match day.
|
|
bluetornados
Predictions League
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 15,742
|
VAR
Oct 3, 2023 13:43:44 GMT
Post by bluetornados on Oct 3, 2023 13:43:44 GMT
The New York Times' Rory Smith explained on BBC Radio 5 Live's Monday Night Club what he felt was the main issue raised by the VAR controversy in Saturday's match between Tottenham and Liverpool.
He said: "What I find astonishing is that as soon as Spurs took the free-kick [after Luis Diaz's goal had been wrongly disallowed] no-one said 'hang on, that shouldn't be happening'.
"The rules say that once the whistle goes you can't bring it back. That is a stupid rule, if something is obviously wrong you should be able to bring it back.
"Are you telling me that if VAR said to [on-field referee] Simon Hooper straight away 'Simon there has been a breakdown in communication, blow the whistle again, we need to sort this out' that anyone in the stadium would have objected? Not a chance.
"The referees now seem to function under the assumption that maintaining refereeing protocol is more important than sporting integrity. That is the real problem."
|
|
bluetornados
Predictions League
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 15,742
|
VAR
Oct 4, 2023 8:01:40 GMT
Post by bluetornados on Oct 4, 2023 8:01:40 GMT
|
|
bluetornados
Predictions League
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 15,742
|
VAR
Oct 4, 2023 8:03:32 GMT
Post by bluetornados on Oct 4, 2023 8:03:32 GMT
|
|
bluetornados
Predictions League
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 15,742
|
VAR
Oct 4, 2023 8:12:58 GMT
Post by bluetornados on Oct 4, 2023 8:12:58 GMT
ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/800/cpsprodpb/0e4f/live/985c4ce0-4265-11ee-9b58-cb80889117a8.jpgAdam, Southport: What struck me about the audio is the complete lack of structure to the discussion and decision making processes. Why aren't those procedures standardised? Why are they chatting like they're down the pub? What means do they have to assure the quality and accuracy of their decisions? None. None at all. They need to look at how it's managed in that room, install professional standards and it may just improve. Alex, Edinburgh: The problem with the VAR audio is that there was no direct communication between the ref and VAR on what the on-field decision was. This is a protocol issue, not a VAR issue. The mistake from Darren England is one everyone has made in their life, you lose concentration for a moment and do something on autopilot. All that needs to change is a protocol so VAR says "Goal allowed onside, check complete" rather than just "Check complete". This means if the VAR has misinterpreted the on-field decision it gives the ref that extra protection to correct the issue. It's not the first goal to be awarded/disallowed incorrectly, move on!! Anon: In cricket, for every review, the third umpire goes through a standard process. For an LBW - front foot check, snicko for involvement of bat, pitching outside leg, impact in line, wickets hitting. There is absolutely no room for mistake. And even with all this, the umpire’s call or close decisions become controversial. VAR in the Tottenham v Liverpool match was just shambolic! Zero defined process. The VAR referee didn’t even know what the original on-field decision was. He remembered or was reminded that the on-field decision was the opposite of his assumption AFTER he made the decision. Schoolboy errors in the whole VAR process. Need to learn. And fast. Tariq, Milton Keynes: Everyone forgetting that these VAR officials are actual people. This widespread assassination of them is bound to harm their mental health. Humans make mistakes. It's not life or death!
|
|
bluetornados
Predictions League
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 15,742
|
VAR
Oct 4, 2023 14:24:47 GMT
Post by bluetornados on Oct 4, 2023 14:24:47 GMT
Alan Shearer - Former England striker on BBC Breakfast..i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article29922457.ece/ALTERNATES/s615b/1_Screenshot-2888.jpgUse whatever word you want - chaotic, shambolic. A mess would be the appropriate one. I listened to that last night [VAR audio] like everyone else. It is chaotic - you have got so many voices going on. Can you imagine being the referee? It's hard enough in that pressurised situation anyway, when you have got to make a crucial decision, but if you have got four or five voices in your ear pinging away to you... You have got two professional people in the VAR room - the VAR and the VAR's assistant. How on earth can the both of them get such a decision like that wrong? There has to be more communication [in the stadium]. It happens in rugby, where there is one voice in the stadium talking to the VAR official. There is no game without the fans. Fans mean everything, fans make football. They need to hear, in the stadium, what is going on. That is one thing that has to improve. I think more football people should be in that room, helping them make decisions, who have played the game of football. Not necessarily at the highest level, but certainly the game of football. That would help as well. There are so many things. We need better understanding. It [VAR] is not going away, it is here to stay. We have to get on with it and put up with it, but it has to improve going forward. The big thing they are going to have now is the trust issue. There were people anyway who weren't believing in it. You can imagine what it is going to be like now, going forward. I know what [referees' chief] Howard [Webb] is trying to do. Communication has definitely improved under Howard. I know Howard, I know how hard he is working to try and make everything work, but this is certainly three or four steps backwards and, as I said, trust going forward is going to be a big issue and they are going to have to work hard at that.
|
|
bluetornados
Predictions League
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 15,742
|
VAR
Oct 4, 2023 14:33:44 GMT
Post by bluetornados on Oct 4, 2023 14:33:44 GMT
ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/800/cpsprodpb/0e4f/live/985c4ce0-4265-11ee-9b58-cb80889117a8.jpgMore Var views from fans
Robert, Kent: Totally agree with Adam about the audio conversation sounding so unprofessional, muddled and rushed. Nothing like clear concise rugby union TMO. Anon: Utter incompetence - sack the lot of them. After four seasons to perfect the system it gets worse every week. This horrible system is draining the lifeblood from the game. Richard, Burnley: Having heard the audio, I think the LFC statement had a point - PGMOL were extremely quick to rush to 'significant human error', but that feels like throwing the referees under the bus. They made a mistake, but the framework and protocols they are working with are equally at fault for not foreseeing and mitigating the possibility of human error. PGMOL shouldn't have commented on a cause without an independent review, and that review may well conclude that it was a systematic failure of how VARs are trained to communicate. Feels like PGMOL are deflecting onto the refs instead of taking a long hard look at the systems they implement.
|
|
bluetornados
Predictions League
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 15,742
|
VAR
Oct 4, 2023 14:40:42 GMT
Post by bluetornados on Oct 4, 2023 14:40:42 GMT
Liverpool manager Jurgen Klopp said: "The audio didn't change it at all because I was not really interested in why things happened because I knew - I saw the outcome, I saw the goal and we scored. It didn't count so I was not waiting for the audio and a statement and hoping to find out how it could happen. He added: "I think the only outcome should be a replay. That's how it is, [although that] probably will not happen." Liverpool manager Jurgen Klopp on why a replay is the right thing to do: "The argument against that probably will be that if you open that gate then everybody will ask for it. I think the situation is that unprecedented that it didn't happen before. Something like that, as far as I can remember, never happened that's why I think a replay would be the right thing. "If it would happen again then I think the replay would be the right thing to do, or the ref has the opportunity to bring both coaches together and say 'sorry we made a mistake but we can sort it, let Liverpool score a goal and we start from there'." Liverpool manager Jurgen Klopp said on the match officials: "I am not angry with anybody at all. They [the match officials] made a mistake and they felt horrible that night, I am 100% sure. That's enough, for me. Nobody needs further punishment." Liverpool manager Jurgen Klopp on what needs to happen to improve VAR: "In the end, they are going to put it right. Believe it or not, but I believe in that. "Mistakes happened, they shouldn't, but that is how it is - it is fine. "[The key thing is to] learn from it, find a solution how to deal with it. "The solution for me is not only improving the process. Things need as much time as they need. The problems are obvious. We should try to create a situation where these people can make the best decisions." Jurgen Klopp returned to his initial call for a replay while saying he believes there should be a change in the rules in the future to allow officials to call back play if they realise a mistake has been made. He said: "In a situation like this - a real, massive mistake with a lot of people involved - correct it in that moment. "But obviously the people thought that's not what they can do. Fine, then let's do a replay and if it happens next time then give them the chance to do it like this [calling back play] then we don't have that problem [the need for a reply] at least any more." i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article31103641.ece/ALTERNATES/s615b/1_GettyImages-1680921575.jpg
|
|
bluetornados
Predictions League
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 15,742
|
VAR
Oct 4, 2023 16:34:58 GMT
Post by bluetornados on Oct 4, 2023 16:34:58 GMT
ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/800/cpsprodpb/cf43/live/bbc86660-62cb-11ee-94c0-b3871aa6e509.jpgWest Ham forward Michail Antonio says Saturday's controversy surrounding Liverpool and Tottenham has strengthened his view that "VAR should be binned". He believes football would be better if it went back to its "original state" without the technology, with the acceptance that human errors are likely to occur. He told BBC Sounds' Footballer's Football Podcast: "VAR should be binned. That’s my thoughts. It’s not the first time I’ve said it, it’s not going to be the last time I’ll say it. "At the end of the day, VAR got brought in because of the debates that were going on after every single game. Too many human errors that were happening. You brought in technology so there won’t be so many debates. But if you look at the stats, the debates are still going on. Now we’ve got technology and there are still human errors. "It’s got to the stage where you need to start accepting that human errors are part of football and it made football better. People are losing their heads over it but referees are human and humans can make mistakes. Those mistakes are part of the parcel of football. Trying to change it is not making it any better. You might as well bring it back to the original state of football and how football was made." Newcastle's Callum Wilson added: "For me, the VAR situation was a disappointing one because that’s one that stands out and has had a spotlight on it as a human error. "How many other little fine margins have gone by over time that have slipped through the net and no-one's actually noticed because they want to keep the integrity of the game or make sure people are still voting for VAR? "I personally don’t really like it anyway, I’ve said that from the start. Are they going to change it? Probably not. It’s one error in however many games. For me it’s hold your hands up, say sorry, someone is maybe going to get a slap on the wrist and we carry on as normal and next week it’s forgotten about and there will be someone else to talk about."
|
|
bluetornados
Predictions League
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 15,742
|
VAR
Oct 6, 2023 5:23:17 GMT
Post by bluetornados on Oct 6, 2023 5:23:17 GMT
ichef.bbci.co.uk/onesport/cps/976/cpsprodpb/B0BC/production/_131344254_star.jpgEngland manager Gareth Southgate has criticised the video assistant referee system for the negative impact it has on match-going fans. The VAR officials failed to change the decision when Liverpool's Luis Diaz had a goal wrongly flagged for offside in a 2-1 defeat at Tottenham last Saturday. Reds boss Jurgen Klopp has since called for the game to be replayed. "I was always brought up as a kid that the referee's decision was final," said Southgate. "You might agree or disagree but we have to get on with it." Southgate explained why he feels a lack of enthusiasm for VAR on the day he announced his England squad for games against Australia and Italy. He nevertheless accepts football is "unlikely to go back to a world where we don't have technology as part of that decision-making process". Elaborating on his feelings towards VAR, Southgate added: "All I would say is everybody used to go to the pub and moan about the ref and they still go to the pub and moan about the ref. "So I'm not sure what we've resolved, really. "When I am at games I am always conscious that the only people who don't know what is going on are the people who have paid to go. I find that really difficult. "I am sitting in the stadium next to people and I am lucky as I normally get a free ticket and other people pay a lot of money and haven't got a clue or are on the phone to someone at home asking what's going on. "The frustration, you can feel it in the stadium, you can feel the view. "I know if we didn't have it people would go back to, 'well this could be resolved', but when I am in the stadiums my sense is they don't necessarily want 14 minutes of added time or a decision by something that they are not totally across the process of." ichef.bbci.co.uk/onesport/cps/976/cpsprodpb/6EB8/production/_131344382_express.jpg
|
|
bluetornados
Predictions League
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 15,742
|
VAR
Oct 10, 2023 22:46:09 GMT
Post by bluetornados on Oct 10, 2023 22:46:09 GMT
|
|
bluetornados
Predictions League
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 15,742
|
VAR
Nov 22, 2023 9:15:42 GMT
Post by bluetornados on Nov 22, 2023 9:15:42 GMT
Get Involved - How would you fix VAR ?
Anon: England last night and now Wales, is some of the worst officiating I have seen - I thought things were supposed to be getting better!
Tom: VAR should only be used for offsides, and if the ball went out of play. They keep getting subjective decisions wrong anyway, so why are they being used for opinion-based decisions in matches? They've proven their input is often flawed, and takes way too long to get to that point. Stick with the ref for subjective decisions, but use VAR for things technology can clear up. Simple.
Martin: VAR - Goalkeepers should wear body cams to remove the subjectivity around whether something is within their view and whether that view is being blocked.
Richard, Aberdeen: Allow teams only one challenge per game. Otherwise referee's decision stands.
|
|
bluetornados
Predictions League
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 15,742
|
VAR
Nov 24, 2023 15:00:02 GMT
Post by bluetornados on Nov 24, 2023 15:00:02 GMT
VAR: Premier League referees helped by pilots and air traffic controllers..By Simon Stone, BBC Sport.ichef.bbci.co.uk/live-experience/cps/624/cpsprodpb/vivo/live/images/2023/11/24/5b6db9e6-a365-4a6c-9a54-c5cc432354f1.jpgPilots and air traffic controllers have been helping England's top referees. It is part of Howard Webb's drive, as head of refereeing, to improve standards around the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) system. Two pilots spoke at a Professional Game Match Officials Ltd (PGMOL) training camp last month. They offered their insight into the best method of communication in a stressful situation where multiple voices are having an input. A previous visit last year from air traffic control staff, prior to Webb taking on his role at PGMOL in December 2022, was arranged for the same reason. Webb has been on the back foot following a number of VAR controversies this season. On the opening weekend of the Premier League campaign, he had to apologise to Wolves manager Gary O'Neil after Manchester United goalkeeper Andre Onana was not punished for punching striker Sasa Kalajdzic in the face in stoppage time. Wolves lost the game 1-0. ichef.bbci.co.uk/ace/standard/240/cpsprodpb/16C75/production/_131810339_var1.pngThen Liverpool were denied a goal at Tottenham in farcical circumstances on 30th September when VAR Darren England thought he had confirmed a Luis Diaz goal but was actually endorsing an incorrect on-field offside decision against the Reds forward. Spurs won the game 2-1. Meanwhile, Arsenal boss Mikel Arteta is facing an FA charge after calling the decision to award Newcastle a goal in their match at St James' Park on 4 November "a disgrace". In Arteta's view, VAR ignored three incidents in the build-up all of which would have seen Anthony Gordon's effort disallowed. The following day Arsenal released a statement in defence of Arteta. Webb subsequently said on the internationally-broadcast Premier League Match Officials Mic'd Up programme he believed the decision to allow the goal had been correct. In last month's meeting, as reported by The Times, it was outlined that pilots have communication with numerous people before take-off and often have to speak to operators for whom English is not their first language. The need for clarity and accuracy was stressed. Although match referees do not hear the conversations in the VAR hub, there can often be three voices talking at the same time, with the VAR periodically communicating with the referee to let him know what is happening. In the aftermath of the Diaz incident, Webb introduced new communication protocols, which included confirmation over what the VAR was confirming. Meanwhile, it is understood Webb has also reminded referees of the need to take action against players waving imaginary cards after what appeared to be a lessening of the hard-line approach used at the start of the season.
|
|
|
Post by Nobbygas on Nov 28, 2023 9:08:55 GMT
VAR set to become even more complicated! New ideas for next season being discussed are:- "VAR to look at free-kicks, corners and second yellow cards".
How long will it be before we start seeing tv adverts being played while decisions are being made by the VAR crew? Slowly but surely it's turning football into American Football where adverts are shown during stoppages as the norm, with the 'refs' waiting to be told when to restart the game (once the advert has finished).
Personally I think they should be sorting out the crock of s**te it is now rather than trying to expand it. As for offside, every player nowadays wears a GPS tracker for data collection. Why not use that technology. No need to worry if a toe or elbow is offside, just use the location of the tracker to determine if the player is offside as it is located on the main body mass. Using this would also give an instant decision, no need for the long delay.
|
|