Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2021 18:50:07 GMT
It's the view of Gas Guzzler, I suppose.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2021 19:14:37 GMT
I see you've attacked the sample size and not addressed the point that if the poll suggested support in the opposite direction you would gladly claim that it demonstrated that yours was the majority view. Rovers' average attendance last season I think was zero. "Attacked"? Whatever i or anyone reckons, 41 voters out of say 6000,just is'nt enough to base bugger all on. Then as you've been told more than once already, base opinion on the pretty much unanimous slating that Rovers' supporters gave Fleetwood when they employed the bloke. And as for reputational harm, if you want more opinion from around the country I'll find it, but it won't help your side of this debate one bit.
|
|
|
Post by baselswh on Aug 4, 2021 19:31:56 GMT
"Attacked"? Whatever i or anyone reckons, 41 voters out of say 6000,just is'nt enough to base bugger all on. Then as you've been told more than once already, base opinion on the pretty much unanimous slating that Rovers' supporters gave Fleetwood when they employed the bloke. And as for reputational harm, if you want more opinion from around the country I'll find it, but it won't help your side of this debate one bit. Yeh,I think we all get the message by now.People have had their say.Clarifying your point of view over and over and over again,to effectively the same people does'nt make them understand more. I am most others ar'nt even arguing anymore.
|
|
dido
Predictions League
Peter Aitken
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,883
|
Post by dido on Aug 4, 2021 20:25:42 GMT
Then as you've been told more than once already, base opinion on the pretty much unanimous slating that Rovers' supporters gave Fleetwood when they employed the bloke. And as for reputational harm, if you want more opinion from around the country I'll find it, but it won't help your side of this debate one bit. Yeh,I think we all get the message by now.People have had their say.Clarifying your point of view over and over and over again,to effectively the same people does'nt make them understand more. I am most others ar'nt even arguing anymore. Basel. Steve; join the rest of us who have just stood back to allow the Half-Dozen (you know who they are) to make the same point(s) dozens of times a day. They clearly think other posters cannot reach their superior level of sensitivity to, and understanding of, all the issues in play here at the moment so they need to kindly help us. And because we are not blessed with their acute degree of insight and interpretation they have to state, iterate, and reiterate their opinion daily. Some of them may tire of providing this service every day from now until mid-November. (However, as they are so benevolent, maybe not). Constant dripping does not wear away the stone. If their pressure on this was going to achieve anything identifiable, it would have long since done so.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2021 20:33:01 GMT
Sorry if we're boring you, dido. Have you anything to contribute yourself? Other than duck off?
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2021 21:02:48 GMT
Sorry if we're boring you, dido. Have you anything to contribute yourself? Other than duck off? Dido is right.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2021 21:04:15 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2021 21:06:59 GMT
Sorry if we're boring you, dido . Have you anything to contribute yourself? Other than duck off? Dido is right. Apart from constant dripping does wear away a stone.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2021 21:17:36 GMT
Apart from constant dripping does wear away a stone. Indeed. Works on me.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2021 21:17:54 GMT
Apart from constant dripping does wear away a stone. And the club have formed the opinion that people are unhappy on something. So it's not entirely wasted effort. Of course, it takes agitators from both sides for conversations to persist, but the usual 3 or 4 who like to snipe from the side lines with their snide comments appear not to notice that.
|
|
|
Post by alftupper on Aug 4, 2021 21:20:47 GMT
Apart from constant dripping does wear away a stone. Very slowly though. Even if the dripping started round about the battle of Bosworth, the stone would probably still be mostly intact. Unless it was a small stone. Also, the drips might miss the stone altogether. In which case, Dido is right. Mostly.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2021 21:23:36 GMT
Apart from constant dripping does wear away a stone. Very slowly though. Even if the dripping started round about the battle of Bosworth, the stone would probably still be mostly intact. Unless it was a small stone. Also, the drips might miss the stone altogether. In which case, Dido is right. Mostly.
Mostly isn't good enough.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2021 21:45:05 GMT
And there you go.
Intolerance disguised as righteous indignation drives a forum member away.
Well done.
|
|
|
Post by swissgas on Aug 4, 2021 22:31:36 GMT
Yeh,I think we all get the message by now.People have had their say.Clarifying your point of view over and over and over again,to effectively the same people does'nt make them understand more. I am most others ar'nt even arguing anymore. Basel. Steve; join the rest of us who have just stood back to allow the Half-Dozen (you know who they are) to make the same point(s) dozens of times a day. They clearly think other posters cannot reach their superior level of sensitivity to, and understanding of, all the issues in play here at the moment so they need to kindly help us. And because we are not blessed with their acute degree of insight and interpretation they have to state, iterate, and reiterate their opinion daily. Some of them may tire of providing this service every day from now until mid-November. (However, as they are so benevolent, maybe not). Constant dripping does not wear away the stone. If their pressure on this was going to achieve anything identifiable, it would have long since done so. The pressure is achieving something identifiable because Wael is now reacting to criticism. He’s just done so by posting a definition of “internship” as a response to the criticism of the job advert which was clearly trying to attract a qualified candidate who would work for nothing rather than an unqualified trainee looking for experience. The big question is whether criticism will stir Wael into getting his act together and improving his performance as Rovers leader or whether it will cause him to retreat into his shell and sulk. If he is the man we all hope he is then it will be the former.
|
|
eppinggas
Administrator
Ian Alexander
Don't care
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 8,173
|
Post by eppinggas on Aug 5, 2021 7:33:41 GMT
Sorry if we're boring you, dido . Have you anything to contribute yourself? Other than duck off? Dido is right. Some people see "constant sniping". Some people see "constructive criticism". If you feel something is wrong with the Club, or with the manager it employs, then a football forum may be a good way of getting your point across. I mean, only if you're really angry... B***** Allegation Jul 27, 2021 at 8:45am via mobile CabbagePatchBlues, kingswood Polak, and 4 more like this Post by DrFaustus on Jul 27, 2021 at 8:45am "Anyone sticking up for the manager now, can only possibly be doing so in a puerile attempt to be "controversial". His appointment and the Mickey Mouse way in which the (in name only) owner has treated each bombshell is an unmitigated disaster. Sack the horrible turd".
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 5, 2021 9:41:24 GMT
Not sure I need a lecture from you Epping, but thanks anyway.
Dido is right...the same people drone on about the same points ad nauseum.
As for B*****? Sack the horrible turd.
|
|
eppinggas
Administrator
Ian Alexander
Don't care
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 8,173
|
Post by eppinggas on Aug 5, 2021 10:00:12 GMT
Not sure I need a lecture from you Epping, but thanks anyway. Dido is right...the same people drone on about the same points ad nauseum. As for B*****? Sack the horrible turd. My pleasure good Doctor, anytime. I would agree that perhaps some points are laboured. But it's about people wanting the best from their Football Club. An example would be people on here (and elsewhere) criticizing the amount of communication coming out of the Club. The Club acknowledged it, and it improved. I wholeheartedly agree with your last statement.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 5, 2021 10:18:11 GMT
The problem is, we know that what's said on these boards is monitored by the club, or reported back to the club, so unless, for example, points raised by people like Bas are challenged and also things like the content of Wael's last statement is looked at in detail and the bits that aren't agreed with pointed out the club could get the impression that everybody is behind their 'message' and is now backing Wael.
I get it, it's tedious, it's repetitious, sorry, but it's also the club that I've followed for over 50 years being destroyed in front of my eyes, so I'm a bit miffed to say the least.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 5, 2021 13:42:30 GMT
Not sure I need a lecture from you Epping, but thanks anyway. Dido is right...the same people drone on about the same points ad nauseum. As for B*****? Sack the horrible turd. My pleasure good Doctor, anytime. I would agree that perhaps some points are laboured. But it's about people wanting the best from their Football Club. An example would be people on here (and elsewhere) criticizing the amount of communication coming out of the Club. The Club acknowledged it, and it improved. I wholeheartedly agree with your last statement. You could say that again
|
|
|
Post by Bath Gas on Aug 5, 2021 22:37:48 GMT
And there you go. Intolerance disguised as righteous indignation drives a forum member away. Well done. But he will reincarnate again soon, as Shoveler - the Dr Who of Gas Guzzlers. Just having a breather for a bit - I can get that.
|
|