jackthegas
David Pritchard
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 313
|
Post by jackthegas on Jan 3, 2020 16:33:18 GMT
Not going well for England is it.
I think we are reaching a bit nadir. The era of Stokes, Bairstow, Buttler and Moeen in the middle order looks like it's drawing to a close to me. The sample size with Buttler is definitely big enough now to make a decision on him as a test cricketer. Averages less than 35 as a specialist middle order batsman with one hundred in 30 odd tests and less than 30 with no hundreds when he keeps wicket. Unless he scores a hundred in this series then I think Foakes will come back into the side for the Sri Lanka series.
I think Bairstow could come back in to the side in the future but he has to demonstrate that he has tightened up his technique first. It probably means he has to forgo some white ball cricket for a while. He probably has to average 55+ in first class cricket whilst looking demonstrably tighter before I'd consider him again.
Moeen would clearly walk in to the side if he was at his best. He's got a good record against everyone other than Australia but does he want to play Test Cricket or is he happy on the T20 circuit? In my opinion, he has copped a disproportionately high amount of criticism when playing for England. I am not sure he still enjoys playing Test cricket for England and I think that affects his performance levels.
Stokes is infuriating. He has the talent and technique to be a World Class player and consistently win England Test matches. Does he have the temperament though? His dismissal has been the catalyst for significant England collapses more than once this winter. Likewise Root. Australia have an average batting line up but they are supported by two superstars at the moment. Stokes and Root could be out Smith and Labuschagne. We would look an infinitely better side if we had the Root of a couple of years ago to hold our batting line up together.
Just as the middle and lower order fall apart, the top order have started to show some signs of at least offering England something better than 40/3 on a regular basis. Burns and Denley are not world beaters but are at least laying a platform on a semi regular basis.
We've gone in to another overseas test match with a seam attack that operates between 80-85 mph. I cannot imagine that will end well. It is starting to feel like we need to make a decision to play Anderson or Broad outside of England. Root has also broken Archer. The amount of over he has been asked to bowl it was only a matter of time before he picked up and injury.
I also think the jury is out on Giles and Silverwood. Given that our test cricket has been moving backwards was appointing a continuity candidate a sensible move? I think Giles was afraid to split the coaching roles based on his experience, but cricket has moved on and appointing two coaches at the same time meant that the kind of relationship Flower and Giles had was unlikely to be replicated.
On the plus side Pope looks the real deal to me. Obviously still very early to judge but I think his footwork is good and given his age he should have scope to improve.
|
|
simonj
Archie Stevens
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 818
|
Post by simonj on Jan 13, 2020 11:37:18 GMT
So, who did I meet at Springbok Pub outside the stadium? Met 4 gasheads, I was a bit pi$$ed. But what a test match.
|
|
irishrover
Global Moderator
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 3,372
|
Post by irishrover on Jan 16, 2020 17:07:14 GMT
Been away so not had the chance to comment on this and I can see Jack sent this at the low point in a moment of understandable frustration!
Under normal circumstances if you were looking at what we had done so far on this tour of South Africa then it could be said we're doing pretty well. This is normally one of the tougher tours - our record in South Africa is quite poor. So fighting back to level a series and then going toe to toe for control on Day 1 of this latest test is arguably pretty good going. However, in order to reach that view you do have to ignore the inconvenient fact that this is the weakest South African team for many years particularly with the bat.
Sibley more or less single handedly turned around the last test match and so there is some promise there. Once Burns returns from that ridiculous injury he picked up we could have some stability at the top of the order again.
The issue, and it raised its head again today, is that the middle order keep getting out in the 20s and 30s. There was a time that was considered more unforgiveable than registering a series of failures. They must push on.
I agree with Jack on Moeen - guy went from leading wicket taker in the calender year to bombed out of the side. No wonder his head is spinning with it all. The issue with Moeen all along has been a failure to properly establish the role he plays in the side. That was an issue throughout the Bayliss era for many players but Moeen (along with Bairstow) suffered more than anyone. It's easy to understand why he considers himself to always be the one who has to constantly prove himself - it's because we've never given him a stable role. Hopefully he comes back refreshed because he could be a key player in this team. He's been burnt out mentally. Leach and Bess have done reasonably well but they've not pulled up trees and Parkinson is intriguing but too expensive to do that first innings role England need- Moeen looks more likely to win a match with the ball than any of them with the added bonus that he's also capable of winning games with the bat.
The adage that you're never a better player than when you're out of the team spings to mind and it applies to Bairstow too. Again, you have to question how we manage players when a guy goes from being one of the best Test batsmen in the world to an afterthought. The lack of strategic planning clearly has an impact on the pscyhology of players. They should have told Bairstow to take a break and come back after Christmas - he was clearly burnt out too. But I'd ultimately have him in ahead of Buttler whose red ball record has always been very average. I'd say that Buttler's defence is just not good enough to consitently survive the pressure of Test cricket. He's possibly the best white ball batsman we've ever produced though so just let him go and fill his boots in the T20 comps as that will probably prolong his England white ball career that way.
Still, stability at the top and a return to form for Root would give us some breathing room. Pope and Stokes are going well here again. So I don't entirely agree that it was a nadir. I think we might have reached that last winter. I think we're seeing spluttering green shoots of recovery. For me a team of Burns, Sibley, Denly/Crawley, Root, Stokes, Pope, Bairstow, Moeen, Archer, Broad/Anderson/Woakes, Wood/Overton/Curran is a reasonable basis for a lineup. Although I don't think it would touch the Aussies who look like they are quietly building a powerhouse again.
Like you I want Root out as Captain and I worry a bit about our seam depth. Archer is the only real World Class seamer we've bought through in recent years and 'we' didn't really bring him through so I think England need to think about what we are doing in that department or we really will feel it when Broad and Anderson jack it in for good. Jury is very much out on Silverwood but, to be fair to him, he's had a tough hand with illness/injury this winter and I feel like he's probably been forced to manage situations rather than having the wiggle room to shape the team in the way he might want to. We have a friendly looking summer and should use it develop the team he wants to go forward with and I hope is looks like mine!
|
|
warehamgas
Predictions League
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,600
|
Post by warehamgas on Jan 17, 2020 10:45:14 GMT
Good to read your comments jack and irish. Can’t disagree with what you’ve said. Haven’t watched the whole series but have caught sessions and am sat watching this mornings play. With all the changes that have been made with the coaching team I’m happy that Giles and Silverwood were the best picks at the time and I happy to let them get on with it. I think this team, even now, is beginning to reflect what they both want. Silverwood will probably know more county cricket than Bayliss ever did and this team reflects that. Crawley, Sibley, Denley and even Bess and Leach are all players who’ve done it on the county circuit which they have recognised.
Despite not turning the 30/40s into bigger scores our batting does look as if it’s building into a fairly strong unit. Given that SA are as weak as I’ve seen for some time that might not be difficult to show but you only ever play what’s in front of you and we seem to be doing that well. Burns, Sibley, Crawley are doing ok for players at the start of their test careers. In the past we’d have introduced a new opener alongside Cook or Strauss or Trescothick and they would have bedded in. Having never replaced Strauss as an opener we were always trying to find a partner for Cook so once Cook went we were searching for two. We might have found them. It’s difficult to say against a weak SA side but to be fair their opening bowlers esp Rabada are their strength and our openers have done well. We persevere with them.
It’s the bowling which I think is our problem. Anderson if you can keep him fit is still our best bowler but at his age he will now keep getting the strains and pulls, it’s inevitable. Stuart Broad is a titan imo, and very underestimated. Usually the minor partner to Anderson but he’s more reliable fitness wise and has done well. We have a few others Woakes, Wood, Overton, Stone, but I’m not sure any will have the quality to get the new ball. Woakes is a good all rounder but more so in white ball cricket. Archer has suffered from playing so much cricket over the past 7 months when his body wasn’t really used to it. Bowling 24 balls for Hobart is very different from bowling 20 overs on a flat test track. But, used well he will get better and he should be in our team when fit. It’s the spinner that’s quite open. Obviously I like Leach and think he should be our number one because he is the best spinner. Bess bowled well in the second test but was never going to get 4 or 5 wickets. But I was surprised at how well he bowled and his economy was good, better than normal. JL does suffer with his health and I wonder if that will make him an unreliable tourist esp in some countries. Both Crane and Parkinson seem to be better white ball players although Parkinson is a really good player who with more cricket will get better. A fit, healthy and enthusiastic Moeen would walk back into the team if he chooses to. I wonder if his recent interview about feeling he gets blamed unfairly for failures might become less of a concern with Giles and Silverwood in charge. If those two can get him back firing then he would strengthen the team.
The cycle of England test cricket now seems to be more about winning the Ashes rather than regaining the number 1 position in test cricket and as such we now have a couple of years to play teams who we will likely do well against. This series and the NZ one were both ideal chances to get certain positions in the team established. Ollie Pope seems to be the real thing as a young player who can really grasp the number 6 position in the team. Watching him this morning he looks very good and seems to have a very good temperament. Buttler, I’m sure we will be saying the same things about him in the next three years. I would prefer Bairstow in the test team but I could also make a case for Foakes as he has rarely let England down. Pope, Sibley, look to have had good series and that in itself must be good for English cricket. Pope is a strange one, I’m not sure that he would get his place in either Surrey or England if they both picked their strongest teams but he always does well, rarely lets anyone down and appears to be one of those players who grasps the opportunity when given.
England should get nearly up to 500 at least which will give them a good chance in this test although the pitch seems lifeless and even though SA are weak batting they could easily bat out and get a draw. It could be an opportunity for Dom Bess to prove me wrong and bowl well and get a 5 for.
|
|
jackthegas
David Pritchard
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 313
|
Post by jackthegas on Jan 17, 2020 11:31:33 GMT
England have had a good few days since my last post. There are finally some signs of progress from our batting line up. I maintain that we will not consistently win abroad without a top 3 who can score hundreds regularly, but I do think there are promising signs from Burns, Sibley and Crawley. Denley has also done a job and is worth his place in the side at the moment, but clearly, given his age, he has less scope to improve into someone who can regularly provide anything more than a solid platform.
I heard a bit of criticism about England's lack of tempo yesterday. I am not having that. The directive seems to me to be very clear at the moment to the guys who are batting in the top order. Play low risk cricket. Set a platform. Sometimes, we will plod along to 120/3 off 60 overs and then lose a couple of quick wickets and be bowled out for 250. That doesn't make the approach wrong in the short term though. The more time our young players spend in the middle the more chance our experienced middle order have of doing what Stokes and Pope have done this morning. Moreover, the more experience the top order get, the more match awareness they will pick up. Stokes has become a master at working out how to win us matches with the bat but it took him 50 odd test matches to get there.
I like Bess. Unless you are an exceptional spinner, I think it is very difficult to become England's first choice spinner unless you can bat and bowl. That is because more than half of England's tests are played on wickets that are not especially spin friendly. I am not saying that is fair, but it is undoubtedly true. It is also true of seamers when we play in the subcontinent. In Sri Lanka last time, Jimmy played because he is the best in the World. Broad, who is possibly a notch below was left out. If he could still bat I think he'd have played instead of Curran.
I think Leach is just a notch below exceptional. I really do rate him. His record is very good and I think he can get better. If he could bat at 8 and field at second slip then he'd play every week. As it is, I think he might find himself in and out of the team.
Bess isn't as good a bowler at the moment, but has a few things going for him. Because he can bat and is an exceptional fielder, you feel he will always find a way to contribute. He clearly has a very good temperament and he is only 21 so I think his ceiling is relatively high. Perversely, he is unlikely to get enough game time to develop in County Cricket, so his best chance may be finding a way to hang on to his place in the test side.
Parkinson really can't bat so again, for better or worse that counts against him. He is really slow through the air as well. I can't think of a leggie who has had a successful test career who has a stock ball less than 50mph.
I agree with both of you regarding the quick bowlers. We could do with a couple who have been in and around the side kicking on. I think that Archer and Curran could be a decent opening partnership once Broad and Anderson retire. I know people aren't convinced by Curran but I think he has put on a yard of pace. He usually swings the new ball. Compare his record after 15 tests to Broad and Anderson and his record is favourable. He is only 21 and I think he will continue getting better. I really rate Woakes, but his injury record hasn't been great recently.
There are some players in first class cricket that look like they could succeed at Test level to me. Both Overtons, Tongue, Helm and Brooks are the ones that spring to mind, but if Broad and Anderson both retire in the next 12 months, we could do with a Sidebottom figure to come in to the side as a short term stop gap. I do not think there is on of those in County Cricket at the moment, although Woakes could fill that role. Steve Finn is another outside bet too.
Is today the day that we finally manage to score more than 400 in the first innings (and would 400 be enough, or is 500 closer to par)?
|
|
warehamgas
Predictions League
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,600
|
Post by warehamgas on Jan 17, 2020 13:58:40 GMT
It’s a good point you make about Dom Bess jack. Perhaps in September but I can’t see him playing too much for Somerset if Jack L is available yet he has enormous potential and is still very young and he needs what JL got, 5/6 seasons of county cricket, learning his craft. Somerset have finally been fined for producing spin wickets so they may be very wary of producing pitches that warrant two England spinners bowling. Last year he spent time at Yorkshire, it may well be repeated this year. And your correct about Curran, I should have mentioned him. He is a good partnership breaker and when he bowls or bats things happen. I’m sure he will become the 3rd or 4th bowler in the team eventually. Probably not quick enough to open but in the right conditions he will get his 3/4 wickets and bat well at 7/8/9 and get his 30s and 40s.
|
|
jackthegas
David Pritchard
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 313
|
Post by jackthegas on Jan 17, 2020 14:46:51 GMT
It’s a good point you make about Dom Bess jack. Perhaps in September but I can’t see him playing too much for Somerset if Jack L is available yet he has enormous potential and is still very young and he needs what JL got, 5/6 seasons of county cricket, learning his craft. Somerset have finally been fined for producing spin wickets so they may be very wary of producing pitches that warrant two England spinners bowling. Last year he spent time at Yorkshire, it may well be repeated this year. And your correct about Curran, I should have mentioned him. He is a good partnership breaker and when he bowls or bats things happen. I’m sure he will become the 3rd or 4th bowler in the team eventually. Probably not quick enough to open but in the right conditions he will get his 3/4 wickets and bat well at 7/8/9 and get his 30s and 40s. He has been operating at the same kind of pace that Hoggard and Anderson bowl / bowled at in this series and he is quicker than Philander. If he can bowl at 82/85mph then that is quick enough if he can develop exceptional control and skill levels. The key is to ensure you don't have an attack full of bowlers than all operate in the low to mid 80s though. I think my point with Bess is that he may not get to play enough county cricket to reach his potential. With that in mind, if England think his potential is high enough, they could just decide to invest some time in him and see where they are in 20 tests time. Given that Yorkshire have signed R.Ashwin for the 2020 season, I don't think he will be returning to Headingly this season. What do you make of Philander signing for Somerset? He could take a hat-full of wickets, but I wonder whether he will be able to stay fit for 14 matches, especially in 3 years time. I would have thought Somerset could do with a bit of top order batting experience but they keep signing bowlers!
|
|
warehamgas
Predictions League
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,600
|
Post by warehamgas on Jan 17, 2020 16:18:26 GMT
Yes, agree. When I said Bess may repeat going out on loan. I didn’t necessarily mean Yorkshire for the reason you said, I just think he may go out somewhere else. Glad for him that he got those two wickets today, it will give him a huge boost in confidence. Dom is a bouncy, enthusiastic guy who does best when he’s feeling good, that will do him a power of good as well as England. As to Philander, yes I think it’s a good move. We’ve watched other counties like Hampshire with Abbott sign very good Kolpak players and we haven’t gone down that route over the last 5 years. We’ve had very good overseas players but they’ve only been there for a few matches or a few months. I think it’s quite a departure from the norm. As to it being a paceman I’m not surprised. We lost Tim Groenewald to Kent and van Meekeren has left. Jamie O, Jack Brooks, Jack Daley all suffered injuries and with Craig O perhaps being called up by England even as cover it could leave us a bit short pace wise. So it is a good signing but he needs to remain fit! Yes we are short of a batsman but Matthew Wade for April and May and Babar Azam when Wade goes until July will be good. And it has the potential to be very good. I’m pretty sure we’ll sign someone up for August and September to cover that part but that will depend on availability I guess.
|
|
irishrover
Global Moderator
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 3,372
|
Post by irishrover on Jan 17, 2020 16:32:13 GMT
There's a good point in there Jack about how young some of these players are. I think there's quite a lot of cause for optimism there. We do have a number of players who have a large upside and time on their side to properly bed into their roles and positions in the team. They also have a fairly friendly 12 months of Test matches by international standards. So if the aim is to forge a team for the next Ashes then this time next year some of those young fringe squad players will hopefully have become solid fixtures in the side.
I think Parkinson is an intriguing option. He is definitely a luxury player but he's a pure wicket taker. The slow pace he bowls ultimately means he has no holding role but he's a very exciting bowler to watch. You never dissapear from your seat in a Championship game when he's bowling. Runs and opportunities abound. It's possible that the modern game might have more of a place for that sort of bowler than in the past. Of the candidates available Leach is definitely the most well-rounded bowler but you have to give the nod to Moeen on the number of match winning performances he's put in up to this point, particularly in England. Surely if Moeen is an option then Bess would dissapear from the equation for a while. His best career option would clearly be to move on from Somerset at this point. There's a team 40 miles up the M5 who could use a decent spinner......
|
|
jackthegas
David Pritchard
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 313
|
Post by jackthegas on Jan 17, 2020 17:03:54 GMT
There's a team 40 miles up the M5 who could use a decent spinner......
and another one another 50 miles up the M5 as well! He'd get in to every other county side other than Essex wouldn't he? I reckon he'll have his pick if he moves on when his contract expires at the end of the season. I think Yorkshire will be back in for him when his contract expires. Is Bess a good enough batsmen to play at 6 or 7? I remember a game at New Road a few years ago. Bess had just finished his spell in the England side and Leach was coming back from injury. Somerset picked Leach and left Bess out. I think Peter Trego played as a batsman and I remember thinking that off the back of a couple of 50s for England, they could have gone with Bess at 7 and left Trego out. I think it really knocked Bess's confidence too. He was certainly very frustrated on the outfield during the lunch break. I heard Swann say that he felt he really learnt how to bowl when he moved away from the turning tracks they used to produce at Wantage Road. I guess you have to put more revs on the ball and learn some more variations if you are playing on flatter, or even greener wickets.
|
|
|
Post by lostinspace on Jan 19, 2020 13:50:05 GMT
WHAT A DAY!![so far] at tea S A the equivalent of 45 -7 on the day!! having lost their remaining first innings for 3 runs in no time at all!! subject to more rain and pressure this could be over this evening, but would expect it to go into day 5 with England favourites to take the game
|
|
jackthegas
David Pritchard
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 313
|
Post by jackthegas on Jan 20, 2020 11:03:22 GMT
Well that was a terrific win. Really good to see us bat long and make a huge first innings score for the first time in eons. To score 500 without Root (or Cook) contributing is really pleasing.
Can they start to put that kind of score on the board regularly? The top 4 will all need to start converting 50s into big hundreds but there are certainly signs of encouragement on that front and I think the young players they have bought into the side all seem to be learning and improving quickly.
Just a quick word on Root's captaincy in this test. I thought the decision to bowl himself first up this morning was a poor one. I know he out - bowled Bess yesterday, but I think he had an opportunity to give Bess a real confidence boost this morning by bowling him first up. Instead Root bowled first, and bowled at the best end. If I was Bess now I would be worrying that England may consider leaving him out in the next test and playing an extra seamer. With young players, you have to make them feel valued and see the longer term picture, especially this morning when the test was all but won.
This tactic of asking Wood to bang the ball in short is so frustrating. I don't mind trying that for 3 overs if you have two well set batsmen but we seem to go to it so early. Wood said himself that it takes a lot out of a bowler. He also bowled 7 overs on the spin yesterday which is madness. He should be asked to bowl 3 or 4 over spells as fast as he can with only the odd short one.
I think this is where my point regarding Silverwood comes in. Root is not a good captain but we have no other options so someone needs to work with him to improve that facet of his game. Is anyone talking to him at the end of a match and helping him to realise that some of his decisions are poor? Was Silverwood part of the discussion this morning when they decided who would bowl first up? If he wasn't then he should have been, and if he was then I would question his tactical acumen.
I know it might seem churlish to be critical after a magnificent win, but I want the best for the England team and whilst some areas have shown signs of improvement, I think this side has the talent to be even better with the right support and management.
|
|
irishrover
Global Moderator
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 3,372
|
Post by irishrover on Jan 20, 2020 16:46:12 GMT
Well that was a terrific win. Really good to see us bat long and make a huge first innings score for the first time in eons. To score 500 without Root (or Cook) contributing is really pleasing. Can they start to put that kind of score on the board regularly? The top 4 will all need to start converting 50s into big hundreds but there are certainly signs of encouragement on that front and I think the young players they have bought into the side all seem to be learning and improving quickly. Just a quick word on Root's captaincy in this test. I thought the decision to bowl himself first up this morning was a poor one. I know he out - bowled Bess yesterday, but I think he had an opportunity to give Bess a real confidence boost this morning by bowling him first up. Instead Root bowled first, and bowled at the best end. If I was Bess now I would be worrying that England may consider leaving him out in the next test and playing an extra seamer. With young players, you have to make them feel valued and see the longer term picture, especially this morning when the test was all but won. This tactic of asking Wood to bang the ball in short is so frustrating. I don't mind trying that for 3 overs if you have two well set batsmen but we seem to go to it so early. Wood said himself that it takes a lot out of a bowler. He also bowled 7 overs on the spin yesterday which is madness. He should be asked to bowl 3 or 4 over spells as fast as he can with only the odd short one. I think this is where my point regarding Silverwood comes in. Root is not a good captain but we have no other options so someone needs to work with him to improve that facet of his game. Is anyone talking to him at the end of a match and helping him to realise that some of his decisions are poor? Was Silverwood part of the discussion this morning when they decided who would bowl first up? If he wasn't then he should have been, and if he was then I would question his tactical acumen. I know it might seem churlish to be critical after a magnificent win, but I want the best for the England team and whilst some areas have shown signs of improvement, I think this side has the talent to be even better with the right support and management. Yes - I think there's something curious in the management of Bess. That first innings performance should have been a game changing one for him regarding how he's perceived as an international cricketer. Instead he ended up firmly put back in his box by his own Captain. I couldn't believe how badly the South Africans played Root yesterday by the way.
|
|
warehamgas
Predictions League
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,600
|
Post by warehamgas on Jan 27, 2020 15:08:38 GMT
Have been away so I’ve just caught up with this thread. I’m sat watching England just get Philander and de Kock out so they’re going to win the series 3-1. A great result for a young team. Jack you were right about Bess being left out for an extra paceman but the result will have proved the decision right albeit unlucky for Bess. But overall England will be pleased with the progress the team has made this winter. Although not at their best in NZ the team can point to having some real success, Crawley, Sibley and Burns have shown they need to be given some time trying to hold down a place in the side over next summer. Bess has shown he can bowl well, take wickets and hold an end down economy wise. I know it’s not the best SA team but all aspects of the team have done well. Keeping Wood fit will be important but he does give the team something and with Curran, Broad, Stokes and Woakes and Anderson to come back they have a good range of fast bowlers than can be rotated to help fitness and avoid burn out. Root has achieved an important series win and you give credit where it’s due. But I hope you are right jack about Silverwood helping Root and pointing out his mistakes. Against most other teams Root has been found out regarding his captaincy but he’s done well or got away with mistakes against this below par SA team. But if Silverwood can make him a better captain then that in itself will be a good result I still think that Root doesn’t see Bess as the answer to England’s spinning vacancy and that was why he was happy to bowl himself. I don’t think considering how it might appear to Bess would have been too high on his register. He knows he probably won’t captain Bess again for a time esp if others are fit for Sri Lanka.
|
|
irishrover
Global Moderator
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 3,372
|
Post by irishrover on Jan 28, 2020 15:50:10 GMT
Have been away so I’ve just caught up with this thread. I’m sat watching England just get Philander and de Kock out so they’re going to win the series 3-1. A great result for a young team. Jack you were right about Bess being left out for an extra paceman but the result will have proved the decision right albeit unlucky for Bess. But overall England will be pleased with the progress the team has made this winter. Although not at their best in NZ the team can point to having some real success, Crawley, Sibley and Burns have shown they need to be given some time trying to hold down a place in the side over next summer. Bess has shown he can bowl well, take wickets and hold an end down economy wise. I know it’s not the best SA team but all aspects of the team have done well. Keeping Wood fit will be important but he does give the team something and with Curran, Broad, Stokes and Woakes and Anderson to come back they have a good range of fast bowlers than can be rotated to help fitness and avoid burn out. Root has achieved an important series win and you give credit where it’s due. But I hope you are right jack about Silverwood helping Root and pointing out his mistakes. Against most other teams Root has been found out regarding his captaincy but he’s done well or got away with mistakes against this below par SA team. But if Silverwood can make him a better captain then that in itself will be a good result I still think that Root doesn’t see Bess as the answer to England’s spinning vacancy and that was why he was happy to bowl himself. I don’t think considering how it might appear to Bess would have been too high on his register. He knows he probably won’t captain Bess again for a time esp if others are fit for Sri Lanka. It must be a bit frustating for Bess though - I mean what more can he do?
He's clearly an extremely talented cricketer yet finds himself behind Leach at Somerset and England - and it's not even on ability really, more a case what each team need in terms of its balance. Quite a few young players would react badly to that situation. His age is what counts in his favour here - do others agree that he has capacity to get better? Maybe that's what he's being told - keep plugging away and in 2-3 years you will take over Moeen's role across the board.
It was an absolutely series for that Silverwood-Root axis. If we'd lost again both would have been under big pressure. Now they have quite a lot of breathing room with a friendly summer ahead of them to really shape the team they want. Sri Lanka is an interesting series. Not a very good team anymore but it will show which of our young batsmen can stand up to trial by spin and which of our spinners can be match winners. If Moeen comes back for that (which I think he should if he has long term Test ambitions) then England have an interesting selection headache in the spin department.
|
|
warehamgas
Predictions League
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,600
|
Post by warehamgas on Jan 28, 2020 17:49:15 GMT
Of course it must be frustrating for Bess, for all the reasons you’ve said irish. I think his best chance is if Jack Leach is fit and is the preferred England choice in this summers test matches. That way Bess will get a solid season of county cricket with Somerset where he will get better and in an atmosphere where if he has a bad day he’ll not be looking over his shoulder. And with spin bowlers (or any bowler for that matter) they do need overs to learn their craft, to bowl on different surfaces. Leach has had that but I don’t think Bess, or Mason Crane for that matter have had that experience. I don’t know about Matt P at Lancashire but I would guess that Bess has bowled fewer overs over the last two seasons than most of those spinners. (Except for Crane who has been injured for much of that time)
|
|
warehamgas
Predictions League
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,600
|
Post by warehamgas on Feb 19, 2020 13:19:50 GMT
Did anyone catch the T20 series. Irrespective of who won it must have been the closest 3 matches that 8 can remember. All going to the last over and all up for grabs from over 18 onwards. Fantastic cricket played in great spirit which isn’t always the case. Anyway in the build up to the T20 World Cup I think the batsmen pick themselves. Roy, Bairstow, Buttler, Morgan, Stokes and Moeen Ali are certain imo. Ali if he choose to play I know. Then it’s either Malan, Root or Denley. I’d go for Root to be the one who digs in if needed. Bowlers more of a problem but I’d go with Jordan, Archer and Tom C as first choices. Then Woakes, Wood or others depending on how the 2020 season goes. We’ll see.
|
|
irishrover
Global Moderator
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 3,372
|
Post by irishrover on Feb 19, 2020 14:07:14 GMT
Did anyone catch the T20 series. Irrespective of who won it must have been the closest 3 matches that 8 can remember. All going to the last over and all up for grabs from over 18 onwards. Fantastic cricket played in great spirit which isn’t always the case. Anyway in the build up to the T20 World Cup I think the batsmen pick themselves. Roy, Bairstow, Buttler, Morgan, Stokes and Moeen Ali are certain imo. Ali if he choose to play I know. Then it’s either Malan, Root or Denley. I’d go for Root to be the one who digs in if needed. Bowlers more of a problem but I’d go with Jordan, Archer and Tom C as first choices. Then Woakes, Wood or others depending on how the 2020 season goes. We’ll see. Not really to be honest. I followed the results. I struggle to get interested in international T20 cricket - it all geels a bit too random to me. Having said that I love the T20 World Cup which has produced some magnificent cricket. It's just these short series here and there that I'm not a fan of. They always feel tacked onto the end of the tour and lacking in context. I know that there's going to be more of them in the run-up to the World Cup but I find it all a bit uninspiring. T20 works very well in the high pressure context of a tournament but as bilateral contests I think something is lost. I'd like to see them experiment with a few more tri-series/mini-tournament structures. For example, Australia are playing SA now. A 3 team tournament would have interested me.
It did seem like 3 very good games though. I saw highlights of the 2nd one. Buttler opening the batting seems to be working. I think you're right in that we face a similar issue that we did heading into the 50 Over World Cup. Excellent batting but perhaps lacking the depth of seamers to go all the way. Plus it's in Aus and they've never won it so I think it's going to be a tough ask.
|
|
jackthegas
David Pritchard
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 313
|
Post by jackthegas on Feb 19, 2020 21:36:00 GMT
I did see the T20s. Usually, I agree with Irish regarding international T20s but I guess with a couple of World Cups on the horizon, these were a bit more meaningful. I enjoyed it.
There is clearly one batting slot up for grabs. The death bowling looks good to me and I like the first choice spinners. Not sure about Parkinson as a backup yet (I think the lack of a googly is a real hindrance but that could develop)
I wonder whether we're a bit light bowling wise in the first 6 overs. Archer will come back and make a difference but is there a case for picking Sam Curran or even David Willey instead of Root / Banton / Malan / Denley? I think Moeen is very capable of batting at 6 and Curran is probably better suited to batting in the middle order than most of our batting options. It would give us a left arm option too. All of the bowlers barring Rashid and Wood have a strike rate up at 130 anyway. I'm just not sure we need an extra batsman.
|
|
irishrover
Global Moderator
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 3,372
|
Post by irishrover on Feb 20, 2020 17:08:27 GMT
I did see the T20s. Usually, I agree with Irish regarding international T20s but I guess with a couple of World Cups on the horizon, these were a bit more meaningful. I enjoyed it. There is clearly one batting slot up for grabs. The death bowling looks good to me and I like the first choice spinners. Not sure about Parkinson as a backup yet (I think the lack of a googly is a real hindrance but that could develop) I wonder whether we're a bit light bowling wise in the first 6 overs. Archer will come back and make a difference but is there a case for picking Sam Curran or even David Willey instead of Root / Banton / Malan / Denley? I think Moeen is very capable of batting at 6 and Curran is probably better suited to batting in the middle order than most of our batting options. It would give us a left arm option too. All of the bowlers barring Rashid and Wood have a strike rate up at 130 anyway. I'm just not sure we need an extra batsman. I have always liked Willey but he seems to have fallen down the pecking order considerably in the last few years. Injuries are probably the main reason but I'm not sure the move to Yorkshire was the best idea for him.
|
|