|
|
Post by buckrippers on Sept 11, 2015 7:39:47 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Antonio Fargas on Sept 11, 2015 9:01:08 GMT
Sorry to be a cock, but it's my job.
It's personnel, not clientele.
Good article, though.
|
|
|
|
Post by buckrippers on Sept 11, 2015 9:08:07 GMT
I have absolutely no idea why I wrote Clientele. Bonkers really as probably not a word I would ever use! Too many things to do, too little time I guess...
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 11, 2015 11:30:50 GMT
Holloway doesn't half talk some nonsense.
We did exactly what managers do 99% of the time when they lose a player.
It was such a stroke of tactical genius that we created virtually nothing until they went down to 10 men, oh, and we lost the game. Brilliant.
|
|
baffgas
Ian "Jock" Alexander
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 57 
|
Post by baffgas on Sept 11, 2015 12:05:17 GMT
Didn't we go to 4-3-2? Certainly seemed to be what he was shouting on the telly box
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 11, 2015 12:12:01 GMT
Didn't we go to 4-3-2? Certainly seemed to be what he was shouting on the telly box I thought so too. Same shape, one fewer defender. |
|
|
|
Post by milesy83 on Sept 11, 2015 14:39:25 GMT
Yes it was a 4-3-2.
|
|
|
|
Post by buckrippers on Sept 11, 2015 18:17:07 GMT
Well to be really pedantic it looked like a 4-3-1-1 because Easter certainly played a more withdrawn role with Matty Taylor playing mostly up top on his own
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 11, 2015 19:00:28 GMT
Well to be really pedantic it looked like a 4-3-1-1 because Easter certainly played a more withdrawn role with Matty Taylor playing mostly up top on his own And thus we descend into the neverending "formation" debate. Was Easter a forward going backwards or a withdrawn 'number 10'? Do players ever actually line up like they're on a subutteo board? And why does itveven matter? |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 11, 2015 20:48:14 GMT
Well to be really pedantic it looked like a 4-3-1-1 because Easter certainly played a more withdrawn role with Matty Taylor playing mostly up top on his own And thus we descend into the neverending "formation" debate. Was Easter a forward going backwards or a withdrawn 'number 10'? Do players ever actually line up like they're on a subutteo board? And why does itveven matter? your right theres a lot of tosh talked about formations,,,players have to react to things that happen on the pitch,a formation is just a general shape you try to roughly keep |
|
irishrover
Global Moderator
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 3,372
|
Post by irishrover on Sept 11, 2015 20:48:38 GMT
Well to be really pedantic it looked like a 4-3-1-1 because Easter certainly played a more withdrawn role with Matty Taylor playing mostly up top on his own And thus we descend into the neverending "formation" debate. Was Easter a forward going backwards or a withdrawn 'number 10'? Do players ever actually line up like they're on a subutteo board? And why does itveven matter? My understanding is that we arranged the Christmas trees in a diamond formation and then put a man in a hole. We gave another man a free roll which he could eat under whichever Christmas tree he wanted while telling another man to sweep up the mess he made while eating it. At which point the luxury player arrived in a rolls royce and wearing a rolex watch. I think this is what they call total football. |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 11, 2015 20:53:38 GMT
i think dc has organized us, got a team that know each other well on the pitch,play for each other and understand there individual roles within the team and along with stewart and yates thats a good achievement.
also i think in the main his recruitment has been very good
|
|
