Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 17, 2015 14:46:31 GMT
Do behave!! You know full well what was meant and like quite a few so called intellectuals on here decided to twist words and whip up a frenzy! Which is very easily done. No comparison was meant at all, you and that gobs***e mentors know that. But used it as a reason to round on me...As if I give a damn! Moving on... You may have missed this comment I have since posted so I've copied and pasted. You made the claim that the law had failed to provide rovers justice, and repeatedly said the 'law is an ass' (which again, makes absolutely no sense). Having established an argument that the law is less than it should be, you offered Freemasons and the Rotherham child abuse scandal as supporting evidence for your argument. Thereby drawing an indirect comparison between Rovers, who you believe were betrayed by the legal system, and the victims of the Rotherham sex abuse scandal, who certainly were betrayed by the legal system. Just accept that you drew the comparison, accept that it was in bad taste and we can get back to talking about the court decision. God alive!! Just like the two shoplifters who stole a bottle of vodka. One was fined £50 and the other £60. Both had no previous convictions! Why the different punishments? This is a reference to the laws an ass!! twist that then give me your verdict!
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 17, 2015 14:50:20 GMT
Even ignoring the distasteful comparison, you seem to be conflating the criminal justice system with civil contract law. Why?
|
|
|
Post by timothyq on Jul 17, 2015 14:52:07 GMT
'lol' you've just proved what a fool you are But you wrote it no point denying its you wrote it ,'Rotherham', you, not the man in the moon, not Basil Fawlty, not Bishop Desmond Tutu, not Shirley Basey, not Joe Root, not Larry Grayson but you. Now go do 100 lines, "mustn't write juvenile crap on forum" I said I wrote it knob jockey!! I'm not denying that you complete and utter fool!! What the f are you on?? what a complete bellend you are!! fs sake you had too much coke?? Weed?? I Will repeat for you again my bell ended friend...I did write the word Rotherham but not discussed it at all and in the vein said by Tim!! Do you get it now you thick ****? Okay, let me explain. Suppose I was to comment on the conduct on this forum and I said something like this The occasional displays of bad manners and stubborn arguments suggest a deep rooted tribalism and a human trait of being unpleasant to people who are different. REMEMBER THE HOLOCAUST? People would rightly tell me to stop talking such utter f**king nonsense, and they would say that attempting to use the holocaust as an instrument to further my argument in this way is not only illogical, but aggressive and actually quite unpleasant.
|
|
|
Post by mentors on Jul 17, 2015 14:56:04 GMT
Even ignoring the distasteful comparison, you seem to be conflating the criminal justice system with civil contract law. Why? I don't think you're likely to get anything back that's half way towards rational but good luck.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 17, 2015 14:56:10 GMT
Even ignoring the distasteful comparison, you seem to be conflating the criminal justice system with civil contract law. Why? Not another one!! I made the comparison and reference to the law. NOT ROVERS v SAINSBURYS.mwhat part of that do you not get.?? if you want to twist take what I wrote to suit your own warped minds then carry on. If you and others get off on pulling people up and trying to belittle all the time carry on. NEXT.......
|
|
|
Post by timothyq on Jul 17, 2015 14:58:23 GMT
You may have missed this comment I have since posted so I've copied and pasted. You made the claim that the law had failed to provide rovers justice, and repeatedly said the 'law is an ass' (which again, makes absolutely no sense). Having established an argument that the law is less than it should be, you offered Freemasons and the Rotherham child abuse scandal as supporting evidence for your argument. Thereby drawing an indirect comparison between Rovers, who you believe were betrayed by the legal system, and the victims of the Rotherham sex abuse scandal, who certainly were betrayed by the legal system. Just accept that you drew the comparison, accept that it was in bad taste and we can get back to talking about the court decision. God alive!! Just like the two shoplifters who stole a bottle of vodka. One was fined £50 and the other £60. Both had no previous convictions! Why the different punishments? This is a reference to the laws an ass!! twist that then give me your verdict! I'd suggest the difference is perhaps one had greater means to pay the fine, or one or the other had a mitigating or aggravating factor. I suppose I'd have to know more about the case. I don't suggest that the law is perfect by any means, I think a major drawback of our common law system is that it often requires people to go to court where the law does not offer clear enough guidance, so which a common law system will have fewer instances of arbitrary law or miscarriages of justice than a codified system, it will unfortunately favour those with the resources and the iron will / stubbornness required to pursue a civil action through the courts. This is one of many areas where I take issue with the law. However, I still do not understand what it can mean to say the law is an ass.
|
|
|
Post by timothyq on Jul 17, 2015 15:00:06 GMT
Even ignoring the distasteful comparison, you seem to be conflating the criminal justice system with civil contract law. Why? I think, rather than the law, he's talking about the state in general. Either way, we've all stopped talking about Mondays judgement.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 17, 2015 15:03:03 GMT
Even ignoring the distasteful comparison, you seem to be conflating the criminal justice system with civil contract law. Why? Not another one!! I made the comparison and reference to the law. NOT ROVERS v SAINSBURYS.mwhat part of that do you not get.?? if you want to twist take what I wrote to suit your own warped minds then carry on. If you and others get off on pulling people up and trying to belittle all the time carry on. NEXT....... You initially wrote 'law' when talking directly about Rovers v Sainsbury's. When challenged you said "because the law is an 'ass', blah blah Rotherham". That's the conflation, just there.
|
|
LJG
Peter Beadle
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 969
|
Post by LJG on Jul 17, 2015 15:03:20 GMT
Hahahahahaha. Has crazytrain started PMing any of you to call you out for a fight yet?
If not, it'll happen soon enough. I'm sure I'll probably get another one now for this. Eeeeek!
|
|
|
Post by timothyq on Jul 17, 2015 15:09:57 GMT
Hahahahahaha. Has crazytrain started PMing any of you to call you out for a fight yet? If not, it'll happen soon enough. I'm sure I'll probably get another one now for this. Eeeeek! Not yet, but if he does I'll invite him for a drink at my masonic lodge where we can smooth things over.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 17, 2015 15:10:06 GMT
Hahahahahaha. Has crazytrain started PMing any of you to call you out for a fight yet? If not, it'll happen soon enough. I'm sure I'll probably get another one now for this. Eeeeek! Hey coward, how you doing?? I thought to myself,with the forum jumping on my back, it won't be long before Lord Justice Coward joins in!! And I was right Lmfao. come on tell the truth,my you pm'd me and it went from there...good fun. Plus it kept it off here,much like the little playground squabble going off now. your turn coward....
|
|
|
Post by mentors on Jul 17, 2015 15:11:20 GMT
Hahahahahaha. Has crazytrain started PMing any of you to call you out for a fight yet? If not, it'll happen soon enough. I'm sure I'll probably get another one now for this. Eeeeek! When he wrote 'lol' I realised he was young but hadn't anticipated a complete child.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 17, 2015 15:13:43 GMT
Hahahahahaha. Has crazytrain started PMing any of you to call you out for a fight yet? If not, it'll happen soon enough. I'm sure I'll probably get another one now for this. Eeeeek! Not yet, but if he does I'll invite him for a drink at my masonic lodge where we can smooth things over. expect a pm then...
|
|
|
Post by billyocean on Jul 17, 2015 15:13:55 GMT
We’ve already spent a fortune on the court case and there is talk of an appeal. I really can’t see us having any chance of winning an appeal based on what I saw in court and what I've read about the case and the process. It’s surely just throwing good money after bad. Does anyone actually think it’s worth appealing today's decision? When you say "we" who do you mean? Because at the moment the income from supporters isn't enough even to pay all the salaries I say "we won at home" but I've never played professional football. I think it's obvious what I meant.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 17, 2015 15:16:52 GMT
Hahahahahaha. Has crazytrain started PMing any of you to call you out for a fight yet? If not, it'll happen soon enough. I'm sure I'll probably get another one now for this. Eeeeek! When he wrote 'lol' I realised he was young but hadn't anticipated a complete child. Hey? You yourself wrote lol as well you complete plum!! The little gang is growing...frightened now.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 17, 2015 15:18:56 GMT
Even ignoring the distasteful comparison, you seem to be conflating the criminal justice system with civil contract law. Why? He's also conflating a disparate set of people pointing out that he wrote was distasteful and ludicrous with people ganging up on him. Probably best to leave him to it.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 17, 2015 15:19:03 GMT
When he wrote 'lol' I realised he was young but hadn't anticipated a complete child. Hey? You yourself wrote lol as well you complete plum!! The little gang is growing...frightened now. Its not a gang. You just said something silly and it got noticed. That's all. Don't be frightened.
|
|
|
Post by mentors on Jul 17, 2015 15:19:45 GMT
When he wrote 'lol' I realised he was young but hadn't anticipated a complete child. Hey? You yourself wrote lol as well you complete plum!! The little gang is growing...frightened now. I did but only in the context of ripping the piss out of you.
|
|
LJG
Peter Beadle
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 969
|
Post by LJG on Jul 17, 2015 15:20:55 GMT
Hahahahahaha. Has crazytrain started PMing any of you to call you out for a fight yet? If not, it'll happen soon enough. I'm sure I'll probably get another one now for this. Eeeeek! Hey coward, how you doing?? I thought to myself,with the forum jumping on my back, it won't be long before Lord Justice Coward joins in!! And I was right Lmfao. come on tell the truth,my you pm'd me and it went from there...good fun. Plus it kept it off here,much like the little playground squabble going off now. your turn coward.... Ahahahahahahaha!!!!! Happy to post a screen shot of all the messages you've sent me. Basically my entire inbox on here. Not one of them receiving a response from me. Funny how bully boys never grow out of it. The 80s are over you f**king dinosaur. No ones is scared by your bovver boots and turn ups anymore. You're just an old man. A relic.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 17, 2015 15:24:28 GMT
Hey? You yourself wrote lol as well you complete plum!! The little gang is growing...frightened now. I did but only in the context of ripping the piss out of you. Don't try covering your back. You start the name calling,get some back and come out with the tedious child/ school jibes still doing the rounds. Your not ripping the piss believe me! That is very tame, school playground standard.
|
|