|
Post by bluebeard on Sept 25, 2014 14:34:53 GMT
And I don't agree that the objectors have a strong case. It is generally accepted that;
A 44 tonner passing by will always wake you up. It won't. Final delivery will always take place at 11.59 and first delivery will always arrive at 5.01. Highly unlikely. HGV's would never need to enter the area were it not for the new Sainsbury's store. Untrue of course. If approved, Sainsburys will build their supermarket. They probably won't.
Factor in 20 minutes each way from the motorway and, based on these arguments, most of North Bristol will be restricted to a maximum of 5 hours sleep per night for the rest of their lives.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 25, 2014 14:42:00 GMT
It must be very rare for someone somewhere not to be inconvenienced by a major development. The real impact of this scheme has already been considered and consent was given. If fences sort the noise, someone else will be complaining about the visual consequences. If anything is ever to get done, the authorities need to balance negatives against positives and make decisions for the greater good. Approval will bring happiness to tens of thousands of blue Bristolians and prosperity to the region. The sleeping patterns of Doris in Thrubshaw Gardens should not be allowed to stand in the way of progress, The current Noise reduction scheme used for the new house estate built on the old training pitch are currently 7-9 foot above car park level. Sainsbury will be built 4 foot lower into the ground so those walls become 4 foot higher. Also between those walls and where the Store will be built are a row of new low cost housing. When people come to look at this new low cost housing they will see the revised new walls and have a choice to buy the house or not Also Sainsbury will be allowed to use 44 ton lorries to deliver i think it states in the application a smaller size and only 8 deliveries per day....
|
|
|
Post by bluebeard on Sept 25, 2014 14:48:10 GMT
It must be very rare for someone somewhere not to be inconvenienced by a major development. The real impact of this scheme has already been considered and consent was given. If fences sort the noise, someone else will be complaining about the visual consequences. If anything is ever to get done, the authorities need to balance negatives against positives and make decisions for the greater good. Approval will bring happiness to tens of thousands of blue Bristolians and prosperity to the region. The sleeping patterns of Doris in Thrubshaw Gardens should not be allowed to stand in the way of progress, Correct and i dont disagreehowever progress has only been stopped in this case by Sainsburys and they already have greater delivery hours than any store in Bristol Yes Sainsbury's are the barrier, but the new plan is for the get out to be removed so that the get out clause cannot be invoked. As such, the planners have an interesting dilemma. Should they give Project UWE a lifeline or should they refuse, as a point of principle, to extend delivery times by just a couple of hours to a hypothetical store that few believe will ever be built?
|
|