Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 15, 2014 9:28:26 GMT
1. We didn't sneak a win2. When are the "happy clappers" allowed to come out? 3. Who said everything is fine & dandy? What do you call a sub's goal in extra time then? GASGOALTASTIC.
|
|
alwaysgas
Harry Bamford
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 153
|
Post by alwaysgas on Sept 15, 2014 9:30:24 GMT
1. We didn't sneak a win2. When are the "happy clappers" allowed to come out? 3. Who said everything is fine & dandy? What do you call a sub's goal in extra time then? I am sure you are right DC must have ordered Browner to miss the penalty so Ellis could get a late winner. When are you allowed to score as presumably the first minute is too early, oh and they scored right on half time so that must be lucky as well? Perhaps the FA should have games decided on when goals are actually scored in a match. However, please keep your comedy posts going.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 15, 2014 9:31:45 GMT
1. We didn't sneak a win2. When are the "happy clappers" allowed to come out? 3. Who said everything is fine & dandy? What do you call a sub's goal in extra time then? I call that good tactics - but what do i know about football I know MAN U are past masters in getting late winners
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 15, 2014 9:50:01 GMT
The best time to score a goal is with the last kick of the game with the scores at 0-0. At 12-0 with 4 minutes to go you're not safe.
|
|
LJG
Peter Beadle
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 969
|
Post by LJG on Sept 15, 2014 10:00:41 GMT
What do you call a sub's goal in extra time then? I am sure you are right DC must have ordered Browner to miss the penalty so Ellis could get a late winner. When are you allowed to score as presumably the first minute is too early, oh and they scored right on half time so that must be lucky as well? Perhaps the FA should have games decided on when goals are actually scored in a match. However, please keep your comedy posts going. You've sort of proved my point there haven't you? We missed a pen so without Ellis's last minute effort (again) we would've drawn - I'd call that sneaking a win.
|
|
|
Post by Curly Wurly on Sept 15, 2014 10:02:46 GMT
Games typically open up in the last 15-20 minutes due to physical and mental tiredness.
A habit of scoring late winners would suggest that a team is better mentally and physically prepared - for which credit needs to go to the manager. In this case DC also made a substitution and that player scored the winner.
Good management all round in my opinion.
|
|
GasHeadGaz
Vita Astafjevs
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 518
|
Post by GasHeadGaz on Sept 15, 2014 13:21:38 GMT
1. We didn't sneak a win2. When are the "happy clappers" allowed to come out? 3. Who said everything is fine & dandy? What do you call a sub's goal in extra time then? Did you listen or goto the game? A sneaky win, far from it. You do know a game is over 90 mins? What difference does it make if we scored in 26th min or 90th? We missed a pen, we missed 2 very good chances in the first half, we were all over 'em up until they scored. A sneaky win...
|
|
LJG
Peter Beadle
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 969
|
Post by LJG on Sept 15, 2014 13:28:08 GMT
What do you call a sub's goal in extra time then? Did you listen or goto the game? A sneaky win, far from it. You do know a game is over 90 mins? What difference does it make if we scored in 26th min or 90th? We missed a pen, we missed 2 very good chances in the first half, we were all over 'em up until they scored. A sneaky win... So if we hadn't scored in the last minute we would have won because we missed a pen, missed 2 very good chances in the first half and were all over them until they scored? Despite the fact the scoreline would have been 2 - 2? Makes sense. We could have sung "Two - two! We Beat the Lincoln Two - two! We beat the Lincoln two - two! We beat the Lincoln two - twooooooo!"
|
|
GasHeadGaz
Vita Astafjevs
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 518
|
Post by GasHeadGaz on Sept 15, 2014 13:34:42 GMT
Did you listen or goto the game? A sneaky win, far from it. You do know a game is over 90 mins? What difference does it make if we scored in 26th min or 90th? We missed a pen, we missed 2 very good chances in the first half, we were all over 'em up until they scored. A sneaky win... So if we hadn't scored in the last minute we would have won because we missed a pen, missed 2 very good chances in the first half and were all over them until they scored? Despite the fact the scoreline would have been 2 - 2? Makes sense. We could have sung "Two - two! We Beat the Lincoln Two - two! We beat the Lincoln two - two! We beat the Lincoln two - twooooooo!" "So if we hadn't scored in the last minute we would have won" Like I said in my post, a game is over 90mins it doesn't matter when you score, 1st 35th or 90th. Just because we score in the 90th doesn't make it "sneaky" If we had gone 3-0 up & ended up winning 3-2 would you still be saying it was a sneaky win?
|
|
LJG
Peter Beadle
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 969
|
Post by LJG on Sept 15, 2014 13:45:39 GMT
So if we hadn't scored in the last minute we would have won because we missed a pen, missed 2 very good chances in the first half and were all over them until they scored? Despite the fact the scoreline would have been 2 - 2? Makes sense. We could have sung "Two - two! We Beat the Lincoln Two - two! We beat the Lincoln two - two! We beat the Lincoln two - twooooooo!" "So if we hadn't scored in the last minute we would have won" Like I said in my post, a game is over 90mins it doesn't matter when you score, 1st 35th or 90th. Just because we score in the 90th doesn't make it "sneaky" If we had gone 3-0 up & ended up winning 3-2 would you still be saying it was a sneaky win? It does matter if you score in the 1st, 35th or 90th minute because errr ... we didn't score in the 1st or 35th; we scored in the 90th (plus) minute and if we hadn't we wouldn't have won the game, we would've drawn ... not ... ummm, ... won.
|
|
GasHeadGaz
Vita Astafjevs
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 518
|
Post by GasHeadGaz on Sept 15, 2014 13:50:06 GMT
"So if we hadn't scored in the last minute we would have won" Like I said in my post, a game is over 90mins it doesn't matter when you score, 1st 35th or 90th. Just because we score in the 90th doesn't make it "sneaky" If we had gone 3-0 up & ended up winning 3-2 would you still be saying it was a sneaky win? It does matter if you score in the 1st, 35th or 90th minute because errr ... we didn't score in the 1st or 35th; we scored in the 90th (plus) minute and if we hadn't we wouldn't have won the game, we would've drawn ... not ... ummm, ... won. LOL I can see what you're doing. You carry on. No more biting from me. Have fun though. Good on you for jacking a positive thread and turn it into a negative one though.
|
|
LJG
Peter Beadle
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 969
|
Post by LJG on Sept 15, 2014 13:56:52 GMT
It does matter if you score in the 1st, 35th or 90th minute because errr ... we didn't score in the 1st or 35th; we scored in the 90th (plus) minute and if we hadn't we wouldn't have won the game, we would've drawn ... not ... ummm, ... won. LOL I can see what you're doing. You carry on. No more biting from me. Have fun though. Good on you for jacking a positive thread and turn it into a negative one though. Giving regard to actual real life facts rather than hopes, wishes and bonhomie?
|
|
|
Post by Curly Wurly on Sept 15, 2014 14:36:40 GMT
So unless we win by 5 and it is sewn up in the first 45 minutes, his lordship will not be happy I take it.
|
|
LJG
Peter Beadle
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 969
|
Post by LJG on Sept 15, 2014 14:41:05 GMT
So unless we win by 5 and it is sewn up in the first 45 minutes, his lordship will not be happy I take it. What are you yibber-yabbering about? Someone else (Bamber?) referred to us sneaking a win. Gaz said we didn't. I think what I'm doing is pointing out the obvious - clearly we did because without Ellis's goal ... how can I put this in it's simplest terms ... we wouldn't have won! The score would have been 2 - 2 which, last I checked was not a winning scoreline.
|
|
alwaysgas
Harry Bamford
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 153
|
Post by alwaysgas on Sept 15, 2014 14:57:51 GMT
So unless we win by 5 and it is sewn up in the first 45 minutes, his lordship will not be happy I take it. What are you yibber-yabbering about? Someone else (Bamber?) referred to us sneaking a win. Gaz said we didn't. I think what I'm doing is pointing out the obvious - clearly we did because without Ellis's goal ... how can I put this in it's simplest terms ... we wouldn't have won! The score would have been 2 - 2 which, last I checked was not a winning scoreline. If they hadn't scored right on half time we would have won 3-1. Have you ever actually played football?
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 15, 2014 14:59:01 GMT
It does matter if you score in the 1st, 35th or 90th minute because errr ... we didn't score in the 1st or 35th; we scored in the 90th (plus) minute and if we hadn't we wouldn't have won the game, we would've drawn ... not ... ummm, ... won. LOL I can see what you're doing. You carry on. No more biting from me. Have fun though. Good on you for jacking a positive thread and turn it into a negative one though. GasHeadGaz you have to realise that this is all part of the Hidden Agenda to be 100% Negative on every single subject known to the human race, but we know better
|
|
LJG
Peter Beadle
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 969
|
Post by LJG on Sept 15, 2014 15:05:05 GMT
What are you yibber-yabbering about? Someone else (Bamber?) referred to us sneaking a win. Gaz said we didn't. I think what I'm doing is pointing out the obvious - clearly we did because without Ellis's goal ... how can I put this in it's simplest terms ... we wouldn't have won! The score would have been 2 - 2 which, last I checked was not a winning scoreline. If they hadn't scored right on half time we would have won 3-1. Have you ever actually played football? Why? Does having ever played football change the fact that if there hadn't been more than a minute extra time we'd have drawn 2 - 2? Saying that about them scoring before half time isn't an ascertainable fact - what I'm saying is.
|
|
brizzle
Lindsay Parsons
No Buy . . . No Sell!
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 4,293
|
Post by brizzle on Sept 15, 2014 15:20:15 GMT
I said it in the match thread, the bloke should get the credit for the result today. He get's it loads when we lose(no plan b blah blah blah) When we win he gets no credit at all. After listening today, after the first half display & the changes he made well done DC I remember the good old days when fans were a collective at this club and we had unity, after a dramatic first away win of the season after a difficult start to the season you have chosen to start two separate threads goading the people who also put thier cash into a club failed by its directors. It seems to be epedemic online these days, I get it that the internet is a great place for people who wouldn't say boo to a goose in the real world an opportunity to goad behind a keyboard, I also get that some people have a default negative outlook with regards to Rovers, let's face it the past 6 years or so have been a nightmare. But just for once it would be good to visit this forum occasionally and not read the same repetitive divisions with posters comparing who is the best fan, all very sad and IMO so indicative of what is very wrong at the club at present. No need to make the effort to respond in detail defending your posts as I rarely post for the reasons given above. Careful there 1986gas, any more posts like this and you'll be labelled a rosetinter . . . or worse.
|
|
|
Post by Curly Wurly on Sept 15, 2014 15:26:14 GMT
So unless we win by 5 and it is sewn up in the first 45 minutes, his lordship will not be happy I take it. What are you yibber-yabbering about? Someone else (Bamber?) referred to us sneaking a win. Gaz said we didn't. I think what I'm doing is pointing out the obvious - clearly we did because without Ellis's goal ... how can I put this in it's simplest terms ... we wouldn't have won! The score would have been 2 - 2 which, last I checked was not a winning scoreline. If my aunt had balls she'd have been my uncle..........that's what I'm yibber yabbering about.
|
|
faggotygas
Byron Anthony
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,862
|
Post by faggotygas on Sept 15, 2014 15:31:00 GMT
So unless we win by 5 and it is sewn up in the first 45 minutes, his lordship will not be happy I take it. What are you yibber-yabbering about? Someone else (Bamber?) referred to us sneaking a win. Gaz said we didn't. I think what I'm doing is pointing out the obvious - clearly we did because without Ellis's goal ... how can I put this in it's simplest terms ... we wouldn't have won! The score would have been 2 - 2 which, last I checked was not a winning scoreline. There's a certain amount of luck in all wins. Doesn't make the victory invalid. By the sounds of it, on the balance of play, we deserved the win.
|
|