faggotygas
Byron Anthony
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,862
|
Post by faggotygas on Sept 13, 2014 20:46:53 GMT
No, but you can type and suck off a manager at the same time
|
|
|
Post by p4perlant3rn on Sept 13, 2014 20:57:01 GMT
Anyone know why Marcus did the post match?
|
|
|
Post by dickgherkin on Sept 13, 2014 21:14:43 GMT
I hope and pray, every day, that one day Darrell Clarke will realise his potential and become what we all want him to be: The Poor Man's Brian Clough.I think we should stick by him.
But you definitely get the impression he is making mistakes as he goes along, and then learning from them.
Fine, you don't get the finished article down here, but hopefully he'll turn out good enough for back-to-back promotions ;0)
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 13, 2014 21:20:38 GMT
I have said it before and will say it again. There are some really sad individuals who actually want the manager of the Rovers to fail,and they are not all City fans, just so they can say `i told you so`. Why would you want the manager of the team you so called `support` to fail? It is really puzzling. I've read some fairly extreme and premature reactions, dispare, anger, but I've never read anybody say that they want the team or the manger to fail. Could you point out a post where somebody has said that? jesus christ.
|
|
faggotygas
Byron Anthony
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,862
|
Post by faggotygas on Sept 13, 2014 22:00:15 GMT
I tip my hat to you sir. Wish I had His hair
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 13, 2014 23:26:07 GMT
I have said it before and will say it again. There are some really sad individuals who actually want the manager of the Rovers to fail,and they are not all City fans, just so they can say `i told you so`. Why would you want the manager of the team you so called `support` to fail? It is really puzzling. I've read some fairly extreme and premature reactions, dispare, anger, but I've never read anybody say that they want the team or the manger to fail. Could you point out a post where somebody has said that? i think quite a few people have said the manager and the team are utter rubbish in different words and when there are signs that maybe they can play etc its very hard for the critics to come on here and admit that. in fact some just wait for the next defeat to repost with enthusiastic vigour,,,but in fairness not all the critics of clarke/team are like that
|
|
faggotygas
Byron Anthony
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,862
|
Post by faggotygas on Sept 14, 2014 7:18:39 GMT
I've read some fairly extreme and premature reactions, dispare, anger, but I've never read anybody say that they want the team or the manger to fail. Could you point out a post where somebody has said that? i think quite a few people have said the manager and the team are utter rubbish in different words and when there are signs that maybe they can play etc its very hard for the critics to come on here and admit that. in fact some just wait for the next defeat to repost with enthusiastic vigour,,,but in fairness not all the critics of clarke/team are like that I think its a jump to go from that to saying that they want the team to fail. In my experience on this forum, people tend to fess up and admit that they were wrong, and that they are glad that they were wrong
|
|
|
Post by Antonio Fargas on Sept 14, 2014 7:58:05 GMT
i think quite a few people have said the manager and the team are utter rubbish in different words and when there are signs that maybe they can play etc its very hard for the critics to come on here and admit that. in fact some just wait for the next defeat to repost with enthusiastic vigour,,,but in fairness not all the critics of clarke/team are like that I think its a jump to go from that to saying that they want the team to fail. In my experience on this forum, people tend to fess up and admit that they were wrong, and that they are glad that they were wrong Yeah, a lot of stuff in this thread is really stupid, and just as divisive as the behaviour it's supposedly criticising. People who criticise the team don't necessarily want the team to fail. In fact almost everyone here wants success for the team. People who criticise the team on the internet do not necessarily criticise the team at the match. The forums are a good way to vent about the team, istm, without bringing it to the match. It's not about the positive posters versus the negative posters. It's about the team. Everyone wants us to do well, but people have different reasons for posting and different things prompt people to post. There's no moral superiority in posting positive stuff and it doesn't effect the team in any case. Some people seem to think that people who disagree with them want the team to do badly. It's a fundamental attribution error.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2014 8:14:29 GMT
I think its a jump to go from that to saying that they want the team to fail. In my experience on this forum, people tend to fess up and admit that they were wrong, and that they are glad that they were wrong Yeah, a lot of stuff in this thread is really stupid, and just as divisive as the behaviour it's supposedly criticising. People who criticise the team don't necessarily want the team to fail. In fact almost everyone here wants success for the team. People who criticise the team on the internet do not necessarily criticise the team at the match. The forums are a good way to vent about the team, istm, without bringing it to the match. It's not about the positive posters versus the negative posters. It's about the team. Everyone wants us to do well, but people have different reasons for posting and different things prompt people to post. There's no moral superiority in posting positive stuff and it doesn't effect the team in any case. Some people seem to think that people who disagree with them want the team to do badly. It's a fundamental attribution error. Critisizing is one thing,damn right poison venom is another. Some people criticise and obviously want success,we all do in different ways but to tag certain people on here with those who critisize in general is really unfair. Take a gander on here after the good results then come back after a loss and see if you can spot which people stand out a country mile and then tell me it's just criticism and that old chestnut ' concerned'. if you don't give a manager a chance from the off and constantly aim derogatory,poisonous even childish comments at him you don't really support that person and want him to succeed do you? But just to make myself clear....I don't think that all that criticise want Clarke to fail!! And not all our support is poisonous!! I have not said that. What I have said and stick by is that some aim poisonous comments towards Clarke and obviously want him to fail by what they say. And I stand by that.
|
|
|
Post by Antonio Fargas on Sept 14, 2014 8:26:49 GMT
Yeah, a lot of stuff in this thread is really stupid, and just as divisive as the behaviour it's supposedly criticising. People who criticise the team don't necessarily want the team to fail. In fact almost everyone here wants success for the team. People who criticise the team on the internet do not necessarily criticise the team at the match. The forums are a good way to vent about the team, istm, without bringing it to the match. It's not about the positive posters versus the negative posters. It's about the team. Everyone wants us to do well, but people have different reasons for posting and different things prompt people to post. There's no moral superiority in posting positive stuff and it doesn't effect the team in any case. Some people seem to think that people who disagree with them want the team to do badly. It's a fundamental attribution error. Critisizing is one thing,damn right poison venom is another. Some people criticise and obviously want success,we all do in different ways but to tag certain people on here with those who critisize in general is really unfair. Take a gander on here after the good results then come back after a loss and see if you can spot which people stand out a country mile and then tell me it's just criticism and that old chestnut ' concerned'. if you don't give a manager a chance from the off and constantly aim derogatory,poisonous even childish comments at him you don't really support that person and want him to succeed do you? Sure, but people are frustrated and want to vent. I'm talking about the forum. If you criticise the manager on the forum, I don't see anything wrong with that, as long as you keep it relevant, without mindless insults. Obviously, if you take it to the game that can have a negative effect. But anti- or pro-Clarke points should stand and fall on their own merits. It shouldn't have to rely on what side you're on. There is no positive side versus negative side. That's just a divisive sophistry. And one, actually, imposed by the supposedly positive posters. There is only one side: The Gas.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2014 8:39:25 GMT
Critisizing is one thing,damn right poison venom is another. Some people criticise and obviously want success,we all do in different ways but to tag certain people on here with those who critisize in general is really unfair. Take a gander on here after the good results then come back after a loss and see if you can spot which people stand out a country mile and then tell me it's just criticism and that old chestnut ' concerned'. if you don't give a manager a chance from the off and constantly aim derogatory,poisonous even childish comments at him you don't really support that person and want him to succeed do you? Sure, but people are frustrated and want to vent. I'm talking about the forum. If you criticise the manager on the forum, I don't see anything wrong with that, as long as you keep it relevant, without mindless insults. Obviously, if you take it to the game that can have a negative effect. But anti- or pro-Clarke points should stand and fall on their own merits. It shouldn't have to rely on what side you're on. There is no positive side versus negative side. That's just a divisive sophistry. And one, actually, imposed by the supposedly positive posters. There is only one side: The Gas. I know what you are saying but there are some,who are not that hard to spot,who go past the boundaries.there always will be. I find it odd that's why I have mentioned it. And i also find it strange on the other forum that those positive posters from last season who shot anyone down for the slightest negative are quite the opposite this season when support is needed more than ever before. But there you go. Here's looking forward to 6 good points next week. Like I am sure everyone is
|
|
|
Post by phillistine on Sept 14, 2014 9:03:31 GMT
Anyone know why Marcus did the post match? I dont know for sure but maybe DC has been trying to give Marcus a little more profile/ share of the PR but waited for a positive press conference rather than a baptism of fire when we have underperformed .
|
|
|
Post by nickchippenhamgas on Sept 14, 2014 9:21:01 GMT
After the last few years, I don't think you can blame people for being a bit negative. True enough, but like I've said on here before, being uber negative is City's domain, their supporters, by and large, moan to GT on Brissle about this and that when they've won 4-0!!!! We used to be better than that, but I really believe some of the so called fans on here want us to struggle so that they can say "I told you so", I'm just a simple guy whose pleased when we win and disappointed when we lose, now I might be in the Gary Johnson camp because I think he would be brilliant for us, but assuming he won't be joining in any capacity any time soon, I'm fully behind our manager to steer us back to the league, with one or two more bumps along the way, let's get behind him, and all the players, and make it an early New Years resolution not to call any of our players s**t!! (Unless your a City fan pretending to be a gashead right supersteve73??) UTG
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Sept 14, 2014 9:23:06 GMT
I've read some fairly extreme and premature reactions, dispare, anger, but I've never read anybody say that they want the team or the manger to fail. Could you point out a post where somebody has said that? jesus christ. So you can't find any posts then? Quite an easy thing to admit you are wrong
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2014 9:39:24 GMT
So you can't find any posts then? Quite an easy thing to admit you are wrong Hey County Ground,I am not going to highlight those `supporters` as that would be giving them more limelight than they truely deserve Besides,its my sunday morning lie in being pampared by my beautiful wife,if you know what I mean
|
|
|
Post by Bath Gas on Sept 14, 2014 9:44:52 GMT
Anyone know why Marcus did the post match? I dont know for sure but maybe DC has been trying to give Marcus a little more profile/ share of the PR but waited for a positive press conference rather than a baptism of fire when we have underperformed . Good point. DC mentioned that he did not learn as much as he had hoped from JW, so maybe he is endeavouring to make sure that Marcus has a different experience to his own.
|
|
|
Post by CountyGroundHotel on Sept 14, 2014 10:09:50 GMT
So you can't find any posts then? Quite an easy thing to admit you are wrong Hey County Ground,I am not going to highlight those `supporters` as that would be giving them more limelight than they truely deserve Besides,its my sunday morning lie in being pampared by my beautiful wife,if you know what I mean Going on just humour those us that know you're full of s**t
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2014 10:15:33 GMT
Hey County Ground,I am not going to highlight those `supporters` as that would be giving them more limelight than they truely deserve Besides,its my sunday morning lie in being pampared by my beautiful wife,if you know what I mean Going on just humour those us that know you're full of s*** Coming from the `King of Brown dribbles`,and knowing you, I wont stop laughing until next sunday. Keep it coming......
|
|
LJG
Peter Beadle
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 969
|
Post by LJG on Sept 15, 2014 9:20:37 GMT
Give the man and the team he is building time for ffs, some of you are so reactionary. Anyone that thinks his job, or this league, is a walk in the park is clearly, I'm sorry, a small brained idiot. If we are bottom come Christmas I'll join you in calling for his head. One of the problems though is the fear that you all so often mock him for touching upon. It's not nice playing in front of a bunch of drunk ws whether your a professional player or not. Psychologically speaking we are all similar and when a player makes a mistake do you think he will respond better if someone in the crowd shouts 'Harrison you useless !' or 'Come on Ellis, Head up!'. You'll hear me shout the latter. Great win today, UP THE GAS!! But why do we have to be bottom at Christmas for it not to be good enough? Why are we not allowed to expect more? I think the reactionary ones are those doing back-flips over DC becasue Ellis has saved his bacon in the dying seconds ... for the third time.
|
|
LJG
Peter Beadle
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 969
|
Post by LJG on Sept 15, 2014 9:21:29 GMT
The problem is that as soon as we sneak another late goal and win a game the happy clappers all come out as if everything in the world is just fine and dandy. It's not. 1. We didn't sneak a win2. When are the "happy clappers" allowed to come out? 3. Who said everything is fine & dandy? What do you call a sub's goal in extra time then?
|
|