|
Post by a more piratey game on Sept 4, 2024 14:46:26 GMT
Our manager has recruited lots of young ‘uns, a bit like Benny Boy G did a while back
But whereas BBG went for tippy-tappy types with 1st touch, MT seems to go for speed and endurance, and a bit more experience under the belt
And then to play a more energetic and pressing game with them, rather than playing possession tiki taka - so far, to encouraging effect
How do others see it?
|
|
syg
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 1,070
|
Post by syg on Sept 4, 2024 15:21:43 GMT
Garner was trying to play 5 a side out of the division, and im not sure how good are recruitment system was then.
MT is more pragmatic and i dont think he will try pegs in wrong holes as often.
|
|
|
Post by o2o2bo2ba on Sept 4, 2024 15:36:33 GMT
|
|
syg
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 1,070
|
Post by syg on Sept 4, 2024 15:58:47 GMT
Appointing the right manager!
Raneiri at Leicester.
Pretty much a thankless task.
|
|
|
Post by rideintothesun on Sept 4, 2024 18:21:20 GMT
Worth remembering that people were originally very enthusiastic about Garner's recruitment.
Ehmer was viewed through the lens of Gillingham's robust defence, Westbrooke through Coventry's promotion, and Hanlan through Gillingham's efforts to keep him at the club. Daly was spoken about enthusiastically by Palace fans, eliciting further purrs of appreciation. A slimline Josh Barrel also gave no indication of subsequent horizontal expansion. Tutonda was a raw diamond, ready to be polished.
People didn't speak about a relegation struggle but rather a top six finish.
What went wrong? Everything. Players who weren't ready for L1, players who would never be ready for L1, and a lack of experience, guts, and know-how, things which Coughlan's side, for all its many other failings, possessed in abundance.
|
|
|
Post by a more piratey game on Sept 4, 2024 18:45:03 GMT
Worth remembering that people were originally very enthusiastic about Garner's recruitment. Ehmer was viewed through the lens of Gillingham's robust defence, Westbrooke through Coventry's promotion, and Hanlan through Gillingham's efforts to keep him at the club. Daly was spoken about enthusiastically by Palace fans, eliciting further purrs of appreciation. A slimline Josh Barrel also gave no indication of subsequent horizontal expansion. Tutonda was a raw diamond, ready to be polished. People didn't speak about a relegation struggle but rather a top six finish. What went wrong? Everything. Players who weren't ready for L1, players who would never be ready for L1, and a lack of experience, guts, and know-how, things which Coughlan's side, for all its many other failings, possessed in abundance. Yes to all of that
|
|
|
Post by Mrs V Smegma on Sept 4, 2024 19:12:26 GMT
Worth remembering that people were originally very enthusiastic about Garner's recruitment. Ehmer was viewed through the lens of Gillingham's robust defence, Westbrooke through Coventry's promotion, and Hanlan through Gillingham's efforts to keep him at the club. Daly was spoken about enthusiastically by Palace fans, eliciting further purrs of appreciation. A slimline Josh Barrel also gave no indication of subsequent horizontal expansion. Tutonda was a raw diamond, ready to be polished. People didn't speak about a relegation struggle but rather a top six finish. What went wrong? Everything. Players who weren't ready for L1, players who would never be ready for L1, and a lack of experience, guts, and know-how, things which Coughlan's side, for all its many other failings, possessed in abundance. Also worth remembering that Coughlan was getting a tune out of younger players like Menayese, Kilgour, Clarke, Tyler Smith etc, as well as out of misfiringTom Nicholls. True he had some old heads like Craig in the team too in key positions. Difference between him and Benny is that he kept things simple and first and foremost made us incredibly difficult to beat and every player had ajob and knew it. Benny thought he was a tactical genius like Poundland Pep without the chip on both shoulders and the arrogance. As a result he set us up in elaborate formations that did not suit the players we had. I’ll never forget the 4-2-2-2 horror show at home to Doncaster where they took the piss and passed through and around us at will whilst the likes of Sercombe and Hargraves were chasing shadows. Tactically inept and our equivalent of Benny Lennartsen
|
|
|
Post by rideintothesun on Sept 4, 2024 19:27:37 GMT
Worth remembering that people were originally very enthusiastic about Garner's recruitment. Ehmer was viewed through the lens of Gillingham's robust defence, Westbrooke through Coventry's promotion, and Hanlan through Gillingham's efforts to keep him at the club. Daly was spoken about enthusiastically by Palace fans, eliciting further purrs of appreciation. A slimline Josh Barrel also gave no indication of subsequent horizontal expansion. Tutonda was a raw diamond, ready to be polished. People didn't speak about a relegation struggle but rather a top six finish. What went wrong? Everything. Players who weren't ready for L1, players who would never be ready for L1, and a lack of experience, guts, and know-how, things which Coughlan's side, for all its many other failings, possessed in abundance. Also worth remembering that Coughlan was getting a tune out of younger players like Menayese, Kilgour, Clarke, Tyler Smith etc, as well as out of misfiringTom Nicholls. True he had some old heads like Craig in the team too in key positions. Difference between him and Benny is that he kept things simple and first and foremost made us incredibly difficult to beat and every player had ajob and knew it. Benny thought he was a tactical genius like Poundland Pep without the chip on both shoulders and the arrogance. As a result he set us up in elaborate formations that did not suit the players we had. I’ll never forget the 4-2-2-2 horror show at home to Doncaster where they took the piss and passed through and around us at will whilst the likes of Sercombe and Hargraves were chasing shadows. Tactically inept and our equivalent of Benny Lennartsen Ehmer for Craig, Westbrooke/Hargreaves for Clarke/Ogogo, and James Daly for JCH. There's a problem right there. The spine of the team went. I still think the Coughlan team was in an entirely false position. The football was pretty dire and the team's luck was eventually going to run out. The fall away that happened in the curtailed 'COVID' season would, I think, also have happened under GC. However, what followed was entirely on BG.
|
|
warehamgas
Predictions League
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,590
|
Post by warehamgas on Sept 4, 2024 19:31:33 GMT
Pretty much that o2. Reading it reminded me of conferences I used to go to where they talked about good stuff but which had little relevance to your everyday job and the day to day work you did. Sounds like he’s swallowed a thesaurus and just regurgitated the words in lots of different ways. If he believes a lot of that he really was in the wrong business. He moaned about it all being about 3 points on a Saturday and yet is working with players who want to get into football teams so they can ….be part of football where they need to win and get the 3 points on a Saturday. A tad bizarre. But at least it gives us an insight into his motivation perhaps. Iirc lots of us, in trying to understand his football, said he was no manager but was probably a very good coach. Which is what he seems to want to be. Good for him and I hope he can find whatever he wants. But boy his appointment certainly set us back. And I don’t know if Wael ever regained his confidence that he could do things with us after that poor decision. I’d say he never recovered from that appointment. UTG!
|
|
warehamgas
Predictions League
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,590
|
Post by warehamgas on Sept 4, 2024 19:42:55 GMT
And, trying to answer the title of the thread: This time last week I was worried that our recruitment, despite being good for the defence and just about ok for the midfield had still not produced a really balanced squad. We were short in attack. It reminded me of Summer ‘20. But the late signings of Forde and O’Donker did complete the squad.
So I’d say MT has recruited better. So far we’ve had a decent start. But that’s all, it is a results business and until we get decent results with this squad it will remain a hope not a reality. I’m sure MT has a very realistic view of what he has to do and he will be judged on his results. As was BG, unfortunately for him.
UTG!
|
|
|
Post by emperorsuperbus on Sept 4, 2024 20:56:53 GMT
If Matt v Ben is a kind of recruitment game buff off, only thing that needs to be said is Garner was here when we signed Josh Barrel, for actual real money, as was the contract. Game over man, game over.
But is it really Matt v Ben’s recruitment, did Ben or Tis actually have any say or influence over recruitment under the era of that “Master Plan”?
The “Master Plan” recruitment arguably resulted in Cocko and Tis walking out without a fair time in the job, as well as pull any real chance of success out from underneath Garner. Though Garner did go on to prove in following appointments, he wasn’t so great as a number 1.
Managers and club need to work together to some degree on recruitment, during that crazy era it wasn’t the case was it, till Joey wrestled back control to managers desk and cleaned out the Augean Stables.
For further example of “owner and chums” madness, if you look closely at Chelsea you can even see the strings operating Maresca.
Could I be any fairer?
|
|
|
Post by rufustfirefly on Sept 5, 2024 5:09:47 GMT
In his review of the season so far (August) Taylor did say George and his team did the hard yards and he was wheeled out in front of potential signings to describe the vision.
All the new signings interviewed have been very positive about the manner in which George has made his approach and sold the club.
Maybe the title of this thread could be expanded - Matt and George v Benny and Tommy: two approaches and styles to player recruitment.
|
|
|
Post by rideintothesun on Sept 5, 2024 6:24:30 GMT
If Matt v Ben is a kind of recruitment game buff off, only thing that needs to be said is Garner was here when we signed Josh Barrel, for actual real money, as was the contract. Game over man, game over. But is it really Matt v Ben’s recruitment, did Ben or Tis actually have any say or influence over recruitment under the era of that “Master Plan”? The “Master Plan” recruitment arguably resulted in Cocko and Tis walking out without a fair time in the job, as well as pull any real chance of success out from underneath Garner. Though Garner did go on to prove in following appointments, he wasn’t so great as a number 1. Managers and club need to work together to some degree on recruitment, during that crazy era it wasn’t the case was it, till Joey wrestled back control to managers desk and cleaned out the Augean Stables. For further example of “owner and chums” madness, if you look closely at Chelsea you can even see the strings operating Maresca. Could I be any fairer? You could tell from Josh's body shape alone that he would put on weight easily. Albeit perhaps not that quickly. He also wasn't that out of shape when he joined unlike Gary Kenneth, who had quite clearly lost any interest in even pretending to be a pro footballer when he joined - something that, strangely enough, didn't deter McGhee from signing him. Ben's approach of bringing in players who were nowhere near the level required and then coaching them in the hope that they might get better was a slight improvement on McGhee's approach of turning our football club into a care home/sanctuary for past-it Scottish footballers. But only a slight one. I have a lot of time of Tisdale, but only when he's not managing my football club. We actually still had a chance of staying up even after JB took control. Tisdale committed himself to pursuing a patently uninterested Stockley and signed a mediocre L2 full-back in the form of George Williams, apparently in the expectation that this was where we would soon be playing. Worth mentioning that GC's recruitment, while showing a tendency to harvest Coventry reserves (thanks Tommy), was actually astute. He identified exactly what we needed at that time and recruited accordingly. Hare down the right, Ogogo through the centre, and the bruising presence of JCH upfront, mixed with the promising Kilgour, and the combative Clarke. Pushing out the obnoxious 'panic buy' Payne and adding a dollop of Mayanese was exactly what we needed at the time. I remember a public Zoom call with Widdrington and a few people from the club in which the former Soton man sneered at GC's unsophisticated player preferences. It was almost worth seeing the club relegated in last place just to see this blow up quite spectacularly in his smug face.
|
|
warehamgas
Predictions League
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,590
|
Post by warehamgas on Sept 5, 2024 6:30:11 GMT
If Matt v Ben is a kind of recruitment game buff off, only thing that needs to be said is Garner was here when we signed Josh Barrel, for actual real money, as was the contract. Game over man, game over. But is it really Matt v Ben’s recruitment, did Ben or Tis actually have any say or influence over recruitment under the era of that “Master Plan”? The “Master Plan” recruitment arguably resulted in Cocko and Tis walking out without a fair time in the job, as well as pull any real chance of success out from underneath Garner. Though Garner did go on to prove in following appointments, he wasn’t so great as a number 1. Managers and club need to work together to some degree on recruitment, during that crazy era it wasn’t the case was it, till Joey wrestled back control to managers desk and cleaned out the Augean Stables. For further example of “owner and chums” madness, if you look closely at Chelsea you can even see the strings operating Maresca. Could I be any fairer? You could tell from Josh's body shape alone that he would put on weight easily. Albeit perhaps not that quickly. He also wasn't that out of shape when he joined unlike Gary Kenneth, who had quite clearly lost any interest in even pretending to be a pro footballer when he joined - something that, strangely enough, didn't deter McGhee from signing him. Ben's approach of bringing in players who were nowhere near the level required and then coaching them in the hope that they might get better was a slight improvement on McGhee's approach of turning our football club into a care home/sanctuary for past-it Scottish footballers. But only a slight one. I have a lot of time of Tisdale, but only when he's not managing my football club. We actually still had a chance of staying up even after JB took control. Tisdale committed himself to pursuing a patently uninterested Stockley and signed a mediocre L2 full-back in the form of George Williams, apparently in the expectation that this was where we would soon be playing. Worth mentioning that GC's recruitment, while showing a tendency to harvest Coventry reserves (thanks Tommy), was actually astute. He identified exactly what we needed at that time and recruited accordingly. Hare down the right, Ogogo through the centre, and the bruising presence of JCH upfront, mixed with the promising Kilgour, and the combative Clarke. Pushing out the obnoxious 'panic buy' Payne and adding a dollop of Mayanese was exactly what we needed at the time. I remember a public Zoom call with Widdrington and a few people from the club in which the former Soton man sneered at GC's unsophisticated player preferences. It was almost worth seeing the club relegated in last place just to see this blow up quite spectacularly in his smug face. Not a fan then? 😉 UTG!
|
|
|
Post by rideintothesun on Sept 5, 2024 6:34:34 GMT
You could tell from Josh's body shape alone that he would put on weight easily. Albeit perhaps not that quickly. He also wasn't that out of shape when he joined unlike Gary Kenneth, who had quite clearly lost any interest in even pretending to be a pro footballer when he joined - something that, strangely enough, didn't deter McGhee from signing him. Ben's approach of bringing in players who were nowhere near the level required and then coaching them in the hope that they might get better was a slight improvement on McGhee's approach of turning our football club into a care home/sanctuary for past-it Scottish footballers. But only a slight one. I have a lot of time of Tisdale, but only when he's not managing my football club. We actually still had a chance of staying up even after JB took control. Tisdale committed himself to pursuing a patently uninterested Stockley and signed a mediocre L2 full-back in the form of George Williams, apparently in the expectation that this was where we would soon be playing. Worth mentioning that GC's recruitment, while showing a tendency to harvest Coventry reserves (thanks Tommy), was actually astute. He identified exactly what we needed at that time and recruited accordingly. Hare down the right, Ogogo through the centre, and the bruising presence of JCH upfront, mixed with the promising Kilgour, and the combative Clarke. Pushing out the obnoxious 'panic buy' Payne and adding a dollop of Mayanese was exactly what we needed at the time. I remember a public Zoom call with Widdrington and a few people from the club in which the former Soton man sneered at GC's unsophisticated player preferences. It was almost worth seeing the club relegated in last place just to see this blow up quite spectacularly in his smug face. Not a fan then? 😉 UTG! Is anyone? You may remember the Zoom call? No fan of GC at all, but it spoke volumes about Widdrington.
|
|
|
Post by emperorsuperbus on Sept 5, 2024 8:55:06 GMT
If Matt v Ben is a kind of recruitment game buff off, only thing that needs to be said is Garner was here when we signed Josh Barrel, for actual real money, as was the contract. Game over man, game over. But is it really Matt v Ben’s recruitment, did Ben or Tis actually have any say or influence over recruitment under the era of that “Master Plan”? The “Master Plan” recruitment arguably resulted in Cocko and Tis walking out without a fair time in the job, as well as pull any real chance of success out from underneath Garner. Though Garner did go on to prove in following appointments, he wasn’t so great as a number 1. Managers and club need to work together to some degree on recruitment, during that crazy era it wasn’t the case was it, till Joey wrestled back control to managers desk and cleaned out the Augean Stables. For further example of “owner and chums” madness, if you look closely at Chelsea you can even see the strings operating Maresca. Could I be any fairer? You could tell from Josh's body shape alone that he would put on weight easily. Albeit perhaps not that quickly. He also wasn't that out of shape when he joined unlike Gary Kenneth, who had quite clearly lost any interest in even pretending to be a pro footballer when he joined - something that, strangely enough, didn't deter McGhee from signing him. Ben's approach of bringing in players who were nowhere near the level required and then coaching them in the hope that they might get better was a slight improvement on McGhee's approach of turning our football club into a care home/sanctuary for past-it Scottish footballers. But only a slight one. I have a lot of time of Tisdale, but only when he's not managing my football club. We actually still had a chance of staying up even after JB took control. Tisdale committed himself to pursuing a patently uninterested Stockley and signed a mediocre L2 full-back in the form of George Williams, apparently in the expectation that this was where we would soon be playing. Worth mentioning that GC's recruitment, while showing a tendency to harvest Coventry reserves (thanks Tommy), was actually astute. He identified exactly what we needed at that time and recruited accordingly. Hare down the right, Ogogo through the centre, and the bruising presence of JCH upfront, mixed with the promising Kilgour, and the combative Clarke. Pushing out the obnoxious 'panic buy' Payne and adding a dollop of Mayanese was exactly what we needed at the time. I remember a public Zoom call with Widdrington and a few people from the club in which the former Soton man sneered at GC's unsophisticated player preferences. It was almost worth seeing the club relegated in last place just to see this blow up quite spectacularly in his smug face. I think you may have missed the main point I was making. This thread is set up as “Taylor recruitment v Garner recruitment” but should we see it like that if owners not managers have control of recruitment, if club has gone down the route of a powerful DOF having more say than manager on recruitment? Piece together an holistic puzzle of what’s unsaid, especially when managers walk. did Klopp walk from Liverpool because owners not allowing him to compete in transfer market and build another title winning team? It’s very hard to know from afar, its manager who turns up at press conferences, is the main media interface. As I said, as a metaphor, look closely for the strings operating the manager from above.
|
|
kingswood Polak
Without music life would be a mistake
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 10,361
|
Post by kingswood Polak on Sept 5, 2024 8:55:16 GMT
Worth remembering that people were originally very enthusiastic about Garner's recruitment. Ehmer was viewed through the lens of Gillingham's robust defence, Westbrooke through Coventry's promotion, and Hanlan through Gillingham's efforts to keep him at the club. Daly was spoken about enthusiastically by Palace fans, eliciting further purrs of appreciation. A slimline Josh Barrel also gave no indication of subsequent horizontal expansion. Tutonda was a raw diamond, ready to be polished. People didn't speak about a relegation struggle but rather a top six finish. What went wrong? Everything. Players who weren't ready for L1, players who would never be ready for L1, and a lack of experience, guts, and know-how, things which Coughlan's side, for all its many other failings, possessed in abundance. Wael ultimately made yet another disastrous decision and wanted to buy young , to develop and sell at profit. It was yet another of his bad choices. It put the club back a long way.
|
|
baldrick
Joined: July 2024
Posts: 1,345
Member is Online
|
Post by baldrick on Sept 5, 2024 12:08:15 GMT
Worth remembering that people were originally very enthusiastic about Garner's recruitment. Ehmer was viewed through the lens of Gillingham's robust defence, Westbrooke through Coventry's promotion, and Hanlan through Gillingham's efforts to keep him at the club. Daly was spoken about enthusiastically by Palace fans, eliciting further purrs of appreciation. A slimline Josh Barrel also gave no indication of subsequent horizontal expansion. Tutonda was a raw diamond, ready to be polished. People didn't speak about a relegation struggle but rather a top six finish. What went wrong? Everything. Players who weren't ready for L1, players who would never be ready for L1, and a lack of experience, guts, and know-how, things which Coughlan's side, for all its many other failings, possessed in abundance. Wael ultimately made yet another disastrous decision and wanted to buy young , to develop and sell at profit. It was yet another of his bad choices. It put the club back a long way. I thought the concept was sound, the execution less so. Still needed a couple of experienced heads.
|
|
|
Post by emperorsuperbus on Sept 5, 2024 12:54:03 GMT
Wael ultimately made yet another disastrous decision and wanted to buy young , to develop and sell at profit. It was yet another of his bad choices. It put the club back a long way. I thought the concept was sound, the execution less so. Still needed a couple of experienced heads. Of course being a Baldrick, you love a cunning plan. But this one didn’t involve a turnip. It involved a barrel of Mars bars with arms and legs. But yes, some experienced heads in the backbone. The Master Plan era (that’s attributed to Garner but debatable how involved he was allowed to be in planning) was a side with the weakest backbone ever. Once he had wrestled control, Joey Barton took us straight back up by focussing on experienced backbone to the side. Not to underestimate the achievement of bouncing straight back up after being in free fall previous season. Just a shame the Barton who shows promise as young manager is also the Joey who can’t keep himself out of court and prison, for completely preventable and unnecessary actions. Even now, when in court for needless social media abuse, the News uses library pictures of him in Gas shirts with all our beloved logo’s on them.
|
|
|
Post by rideintothesun on Sept 5, 2024 13:19:20 GMT
You could tell from Josh's body shape alone that he would put on weight easily. Albeit perhaps not that quickly. He also wasn't that out of shape when he joined unlike Gary Kenneth, who had quite clearly lost any interest in even pretending to be a pro footballer when he joined - something that, strangely enough, didn't deter McGhee from signing him. Ben's approach of bringing in players who were nowhere near the level required and then coaching them in the hope that they might get better was a slight improvement on McGhee's approach of turning our football club into a care home/sanctuary for past-it Scottish footballers. But only a slight one. I have a lot of time of Tisdale, but only when he's not managing my football club. We actually still had a chance of staying up even after JB took control. Tisdale committed himself to pursuing a patently uninterested Stockley and signed a mediocre L2 full-back in the form of George Williams, apparently in the expectation that this was where we would soon be playing. Worth mentioning that GC's recruitment, while showing a tendency to harvest Coventry reserves (thanks Tommy), was actually astute. He identified exactly what we needed at that time and recruited accordingly. Hare down the right, Ogogo through the centre, and the bruising presence of JCH upfront, mixed with the promising Kilgour, and the combative Clarke. Pushing out the obnoxious 'panic buy' Payne and adding a dollop of Mayanese was exactly what we needed at the time. I remember a public Zoom call with Widdrington and a few people from the club in which the former Soton man sneered at GC's unsophisticated player preferences. It was almost worth seeing the club relegated in last place just to see this blow up quite spectacularly in his smug face. I think you may have missed the main point I was making. This thread is set up as “Taylor recruitment v Garner recruitment” but should we see it like that if owners not managers have control of recruitment, if club has gone down the route of a powerful DOF having more say than manager on recruitment? Piece together an holistic puzzle of what’s unsaid, especially when managers walk. did Klopp walk from Liverpool because owners not allowing him to compete in transfer market and build another title winning team? It’s very hard to know from afar, its manager who turns up at press conferences, is the main media interface. As I said, as a metaphor, look closely for the strings operating the manager from above. I think Taylor and Garner did at the very least have the last say on the players brought in? If the manager takes the DOF's word and accepts the transfer on this basis, they are still responsible for the eventual outcome? And even in cases where the DOF has extensive influence, it is usually the case that the manager has the power to veto, if they so wish? Aside from anything bad, it is extremely bad practice to expect managers to work with players they did not want in the first place. I can only think of very few instances where a player was brought over the manager's objections (Shevchenko at Chelsea is the main one I can think of). It usually happens at the big, big clubs, not in L1. Klopp left because he was mentally and physically exhausted. His board had actually given him extensive support in rebuilding the team.
|
|