|
|
Post by Finnish Gas on Nov 23, 2015 14:40:35 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Curly Wurly on Nov 23, 2015 19:03:11 GMT
This would seem to be a lapse of internal security within Sainsbury's. I think the issue on the CIL, Sainsbury's finding it unacceptable and the club's position all came out during the trial.
This also confirms that they were looking for a way out before the JR took place.
Breach of confidentiality? I don't really think so, but it does depend when it first appeared I suppose.
|
|
kingswood Polak
Without music life would be a mistake
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 10,278 
|
Post by kingswood Polak on Nov 24, 2015 15:44:02 GMT
Looks like maybe someone is trying to give us a hand ?
|
|
The Gas
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 484
|
Post by The Gas on Nov 25, 2015 0:42:14 GMT
An interesting item which may be genuine.
The CIL payment was fully discussed in the Court action, I was there. In the end BRFC agreed to pay the whole amount as Sainsbury's Chairman, Justine King, steadfastly refused to pay "one penny" of it as he considered CIL payments to be a tax on businesses and was fully prepared to cancel the Contract. It was indicated that this was decided at Board level at Sainsbury.
My interpretation was that BRFC backed down as they did not want Sainsbury to walk away.
|
|
