Teigngas
Steve White
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 265
|
LDV??
Mar 24, 2015 8:16:41 GMT
Post by Teigngas on Mar 24, 2015 8:16:41 GMT
On the back of DC`s interview saying that he wants to bring in a couple of new faces, Lyle Dellaverde has posted a couple of interesting tweets. In reply to BRFC tweeting Darrens interview, he replied "I`m fit". He then posted a separate picture of himself in our kit. Make of this what you will.
If I was clever enough I would post a link. But I`m not.
|
|
faggotygas
Byron Anthony
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,862
|
Post by faggotygas on Mar 24, 2015 8:32:46 GMT
That would seem a sensible move
|
|
TaiwanGas
Paul Bannon
Tom Ramasuts Left Foot.
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 1,348
|
LDV??
Mar 24, 2015 9:17:58 GMT
Post by TaiwanGas on Mar 24, 2015 9:17:58 GMT
Lyle on the Left, Dawson on the Right....would be happy 'bout that!....
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
LDV??
Mar 24, 2015 10:15:44 GMT
Post by Deleted on Mar 24, 2015 10:15:44 GMT
On the back of DC`s interview saying that he wants to bring in a couple of new faces, Lyle Dellaverde has posted a couple of interesting tweets. In reply to BRFC tweeting Darrens interview, he replied "I`m fit". He then posted a separate picture of himself in our kit. Make of this what you will. If I was clever enough I would post a link. But I`m not.
|
|
LPGas
Stuart Taylor
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,240
|
LDV??
Mar 24, 2015 10:32:00 GMT
Post by LPGas on Mar 24, 2015 10:32:00 GMT
Lyle on the Left, Dawson on the Right....would be happy 'bout that!.... DC is looking for someone to replace Dawson as his time is up after the Dover match
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
LDV??
Mar 24, 2015 10:56:07 GMT
Post by Deleted on Mar 24, 2015 10:56:07 GMT
Lyle on the Left, Dawson on the Right....would be happy 'bout that!.... DC is looking for someone to replace Dawson as his time is up after the Dover match Not strictly true, he's after a loan player. Not just one after Dawson goes, the loan window is well shut by then.
|
|
harrybuckle
Always look on the bright side
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 5,424
|
LDV??
Mar 24, 2015 13:17:28 GMT
Post by harrybuckle on Mar 24, 2015 13:17:28 GMT
would be good to get LDV back he was superb in his brief spell with us
|
|
LJG
Peter Beadle
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 969
|
LDV??
Mar 24, 2015 13:20:17 GMT
via mobile
Post by LJG on Mar 24, 2015 13:20:17 GMT
PLEEEEEAAAAAAASE!!!!!!!
|
|
Smithy Gas
Craig Hinton
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 271
|
LDV??
Mar 24, 2015 13:36:43 GMT
Post by Smithy Gas on Mar 24, 2015 13:36:43 GMT
Main point though, does a 93 day emergency loan start again or is it accumulative? If the latter, surely there won't be long enough left to get LDV through the play offs if we need him?
If it starts again... get the man in!
|
|
pirate
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 223
|
LDV??
Mar 24, 2015 13:42:56 GMT
Post by pirate on Mar 24, 2015 13:42:56 GMT
Get him in regardless of whether he will be here for the play offs imo. Guys a game changer end of story.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
LDV??
Mar 24, 2015 14:15:04 GMT
Post by Deleted on Mar 24, 2015 14:15:04 GMT
Excuse me,
I've just cum.
|
|
|
LDV??
Mar 24, 2015 14:21:12 GMT
Post by Topper Gas on Mar 24, 2015 14:21:12 GMT
Main point though, does a 93 day emergency loan start again or is it accumulative? If the latter, surely there won't be long enough left to get LDV through the play offs if we need him? If it starts again... get the man in! Not even sure the Conference rules answer that question, I'd guess he can still return as long as the cummulative total of both loans spells does not exceed 93 days? “Emergency Loan” means a short term loan transfer to a Conference National club for a period of no fewer than 28 days (or, in exceptional circumstances, 7 days for a goalkeeper) and no more than 93 days in any one season for a qualifying player within the terms of the Rules. Applicable only during appropriate times during the closed transfer window period. " www.footballconference.co.uk/uploads/docs/RULES%20FOR%202014-15.pdf
|
|
LJG
Peter Beadle
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 969
|
LDV??
Mar 24, 2015 15:22:51 GMT
via mobile
Post by LJG on Mar 24, 2015 15:22:51 GMT
Main point though, does a 93 day emergency loan start again or is it accumulative? If the latter, surely there won't be long enough left to get LDV through the play offs if we need him? If it starts again... get the man in! Not even sure the Conference rules answer that question, I'd guess he can still return as long as the cummulative total of both loans spells does not exceed 93 days? “Emergency Loan” means a short term loan transfer to a Conference National club for a period of no fewer than 28 days (or, in exceptional circumstances, 7 days for a goalkeeper) and no more than 93 days in any one season for a qualifying player within the terms of the Rules. Applicable only during appropriate times during the closed transfer window period. " www.footballconference.co.uk/uploads/docs/RULES%20FOR%202014-15.pdfNo more than 93 days in any one season is the answer. So that means cumulative. Since if he came for 60 days then another 60 days he'd be here for 120 days in any one season.
|
|
|
LDV??
Mar 24, 2015 16:32:50 GMT
LJG likes this
Post by brisgas123 on Mar 24, 2015 16:32:50 GMT
Bit off topic but, what the heck was that hail storm? Clear evidence of global warming surely?
|
|
LincsBlue
Predictions League
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 685
|
LDV??
Mar 24, 2015 16:34:03 GMT
Post by LincsBlue on Mar 24, 2015 16:34:03 GMT
Main point though, does a 93 day emergency loan start again or is it accumulative? If the latter, surely there won't be long enough left to get LDV through the play offs if we need him? If it starts again... get the man in! I make it 33 days he was on loan to us (Nov 7th - Dec 9th), so hopefully allowed to do a further 60 days. The play off final is 53 days from this Thursday
|
|
strung out
Administrator
Paul Hardyman
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 758
|
LDV??
Mar 24, 2015 16:35:39 GMT
Post by strung out on Mar 24, 2015 16:35:39 GMT
Main point though, does a 93 day emergency loan start again or is it accumulative? If the latter, surely there won't be long enough left to get LDV through the play offs if we need him? If it starts again... get the man in! I make it 33 days he was on loan to us (Nov 7th - Dec 9th), so hopefully allowed to do a further 60 days. The play off final is 53 days from this Thursday He had two 30 day periods on loan to us. In the second period he went back early because of injury, but was still officially registered as a loanee in those 30 days. I think (would love to be wrong though).
|
|
kwoodgas
Joined: September 2014
Posts: 675
|
LDV??
Mar 24, 2015 18:15:26 GMT
Post by kwoodgas on Mar 24, 2015 18:15:26 GMT
Hate to sound boring, but think another centre half should be far higher up on the agenda than bringing back LDV.
I'm a big McCrystal fan but he's looked slightly off the pace the last couple of games, which possibly implies he's struggling with a niggle again. Lockyer would be an adequate replacement but he's also our first replacement for RB, LB and is probably ahead of Ollie Clarke for CM back-up until Sinclair is back.
Should be able to bring in an experienced League 1/League 2 player that's out of the team and hungry to win a new contract for next season.
|
|
|
LDV??
Mar 24, 2015 18:16:19 GMT
Post by Blue Mist on Mar 24, 2015 18:16:19 GMT
We've done well without him but have certainly missed someone with his ability on the wing. LDV could be the difference between automatic promotion and play offs, a key signing imo and one I'm sure DC will be trying his hardest to get in.
|
|
|
Post by clockendgas on Mar 24, 2015 18:24:45 GMT
Bit off topic but, what the heck was that hail storm? Clear evidence of global warming surely? clear evidence the gods are not pleased with an 82 cup win
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Mar 24, 2015 18:44:48 GMT
I make it 33 days he was on loan to us (Nov 7th - Dec 9th), so hopefully allowed to do a further 60 days. The play off final is 53 days from this Thursday He had two 30 day periods on loan to us. In the second period he went back early because of injury, but was still officially registered as a loanee in those 30 days. I think (would love to be wrong though). How can you state he was "official registered" unless you've checked with the club or the Conference? Surely once he return to Fulham his loan period would have been "officially" cancelled, unless Fulham refused to cancel his loan spell which seems unlikely. There seems no reason why LDV can't return if either club wanted him to return.
|
|