Igitur
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 2,294 
|
Post by Igitur on Sept 22, 2014 10:57:38 GMT
The AGM is this Thursday at 7.30.
Looking at the agenda in the Supporters Club News it looks pretty much routine constitutional business, including the election of one SC's director; is there not going to be a Q&A at the end of the meeting? |
|
|
|
Post by manchestergas on Sept 22, 2014 11:31:34 GMT
Are this year's accounts released yet. Would be interesting to see if the loss was as great as last year or maybe in the black?
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2014 11:42:22 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by manchestergas on Sept 22, 2014 12:30:41 GMT
Yes thanks. Still in deficit, but income up and outgoings down, so going in the right direction.
|
|
rovers2
Bruce Bannister
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 326
|
Post by rovers2 on Sept 22, 2014 14:13:39 GMT
It is worrying 37k is paid on wages and NI against 22k profit on sales.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2014 15:03:47 GMT
It is worrying 37k is paid on wages and NI against 22k profit on sales. That's why they're getting me in to sort the merchandise/annoy Swampy. |
|
|
|
Post by mancgas has left the building on Sept 22, 2014 15:57:14 GMT
It is worrying 37k is paid on wages and NI against 22k profit on sales. not sure I follow - surely any profit is a good thing in these troubled times and difficult to judge what you are going to make in a years time - ask Tesco about forward looking forecasts! |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2014 16:59:33 GMT
It is worrying 37k is paid on wages and NI against 22k profit on sales. not sure I follow - surely any profit is a good thing in these troubled times and difficult to judge what you are going to make in a years time - ask Tesco about forward looking forecasts! I think it means that the £22k profit is before salaries and employer's NI contributions, so the branch has made a loss of £15k? |
|
rovers2
Bruce Bannister
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 326
|
Post by rovers2 on Sept 22, 2014 17:01:57 GMT
not sure I follow - surely any profit is a good thing in these troubled times and difficult to judge what you are going to make in a years time - ask Tesco about forward looking forecasts! I think it means that the £22k profit is before salaries and employer's NI contributions, so the branch has made a loss of £15k? Correct. |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2014 17:08:22 GMT
I think it means that the £22k profit is before salaries and employer's NI contributions, so the branch has made a loss of £15k? Correct. Best thing they can do is get that run down old property sold ASAP. I'm guessing that in previous years the figures would have been lumped in together, so the profit from PL would have masked the fact that 199 has been costing money to keep open? |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2014 17:18:53 GMT
It is worrying 37k is paid on wages and NI against 22k profit on sales. That's why they're getting me in to sort the merchandise/annoy Swampy. Hey Chewy, at least we'll know who to blame if the merchandise is s**t then!  |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2014 17:48:43 GMT
That's why they're getting me in to sort the merchandise/annoy Swampy. Hey Chewy, at least we'll know who to blame if the merchandise is s*** then! I'll be too busy getting involved with local artists, illustrators and designers to care. |
|
|
|
Post by Nurse Ratched on Sept 22, 2014 17:51:48 GMT
I think it means that the £22k profit is before salaries and employer's NI contributions, so the branch has made a loss of £15k? Correct. Incorrect. I thought the operation at 199 was more than just selling merchandise. You have not included travel, membership (both showing a healthy increase on the previous year) and the Goldbond lottery. You have obviously forgotten to include these things. Now do your sums again.  These are hard times. Making an increase in sales profit in a relegation season to the non-league over the previous year is a minor miracle. Heaven knows what could happen if we have a winning team bouncing around the top of the table!  |
|
vaughan
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 1,237
|
Post by vaughan on Sept 22, 2014 17:52:57 GMT
Is someone still living above the Kingswood shop rent-free?
Those were the days eh?
|
|
|
|
Post by Nurse Ratched on Sept 22, 2014 18:01:17 GMT
Is someone still living above the Kingswood shop rent-free? Those were the days eh? What days were they? I thought it was just a malicious rumour. I am sure Kim Stuckey could confirm if this was true or not. |
|
|
|
Post by manchestergas on Sept 22, 2014 19:02:35 GMT
|
|
dagnogo
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 872
|
Post by dagnogo on Sept 22, 2014 19:40:36 GMT
Good god don't give it to the club as a lump sum!!!!
Look what happens to money at Rovers - it burns. Keep it as a contingency fund in case the s**t hits the fan and we're staring admin in the face.
If BRSC is for the future of the club rather than the benefit of the board, that money shouldn't be just handed over to cover a few months' running costs.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2014 22:19:32 GMT
Incorrect. I thought the operation at 199 was more than just selling merchandise. You have not included travel, membership (both showing a healthy increase on the previous year) and the Goldbond lottery. You have obviously forgotten to include these things. Now do your sums again. These are hard times. Making an increase in sales profit in a relegation season to the non-league over the previous year is a minor miracle. Heaven knows what could happen if we have a winning team bouncing around the top of the table! The figures come from published SC accounts, so why the barbed comments? I guess the equation for the SC to wrestle with would be to decide if the convenience to customers of supplying services that could be delivered at PL or online is worth carrying a loss of circa £15k per annum? |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2014 22:54:08 GMT
Incorrect. I thought the operation at 199 was more than just selling merchandise. You have not included travel, membership (both showing a healthy increase on the previous year) and the Goldbond lottery. You have obviously forgotten to include these things. Now do your sums again. These are hard times. Making an increase in sales profit in a relegation season to the non-league over the previous year is a minor miracle. Heaven knows what could happen if we have a winning team bouncing around the top of the table! But all of that could be done at the Mem, making the shop a loss making venture! it is simple really get rid asap (from a business point of view, mind you all my staff paid for their accommodation). |
|
Peter Parker
Global Moderator
Richard Walker
You have been sentenced to DELETION!
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 4,920
|
BRSC AGM
Sept 23, 2014 8:18:57 GMT
via mobile
Post by Peter Parker on Sept 23, 2014 8:18:57 GMT
Incorrect. I thought the operation at 199 was more than just selling merchandise. You have not included travel, membership (both showing a healthy increase on the previous year) and the Goldbond lottery. You have obviously forgotten to include these things. Now do your sums again. These are hard times. Making an increase in sales profit in a relegation season to the non-league over the previous year is a minor miracle. Heaven knows what could happen if we have a winning team bouncing around the top of the table! The figures come from published SC accounts, so why the barbed comments? I guess the equation for the SC to wrestle with would be to decide if the convenience to customers of supplying services that could be delivered at PL or online is worth carrying a loss of circa £15k per annum? I think NR has a point, but is being as obtuse as usual. Not sure why they cant back themselves up with facts The overall loss for BRSC with all income and expenditure is 8.8k compared to 22k loss last year |
|
