syg
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 1,014
|
Post by syg on Jul 12, 2023 10:46:15 GMT
Now sending tweets that ref Andrew Tate and Tucker Carlson.
There is an argument by one of the more famous philosophers ,whose name escapes me, that however much you disagree with someone you should listen to them as they could say something of interest that you wouldn't have heard otherwise. Presumably something that B***** would have picked up on.
But listening to and referencing a nye on pathological lier and a man who has the values of something so low that I can't think of a comparison is pretty dumb.
|
|
kingswood Polak
Without music life would be a mistake
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 10,293
|
B*****
Jul 12, 2023 12:01:18 GMT
Post by kingswood Polak on Jul 12, 2023 12:01:18 GMT
Now sending tweets that ref Andrew Tate and Tucker Carlson. There is an argument by one of the more famous philosophers ,whose name escapes me, that however much you disagree with someone you should listen to them as they could say something of interest that you wouldn't have heard otherwise. Presumably something that B***** would have picked up on. But listening to and referencing a nye on pathological lier and a man who has the values of something so low that I can't think of a comparison is pretty dumb. It is also irresponsible given that the INCEL movement and younger guys look up to him, due to his lifestyle. Sad the Jordan Peterson seems to have an affinity for some of his content. He and his brother are incredibly gauche, that is being kind
|
|
|
Post by rideintothesun on Jul 12, 2023 12:39:07 GMT
Now sending tweets that ref Andrew Tate and Tucker Carlson. There is an argument by one of the more famous philosophers ,whose name escapes me, that however much you disagree with someone you should listen to them as they could say something of interest that you wouldn't have heard otherwise. Presumably something that B***** would have picked up on. But listening to and referencing a nye on pathological lier and a man who has the values of something so low that I can't think of a comparison is pretty dumb. Its Voltaire, and its more to do with freedom of speech than the value of what is said - 'I disagree with what you say but I would die for your right to say it.' However, I think even he may have made an exception in the case of Andrew Tate.
|
|
|
Post by rowdenhill on Jul 12, 2023 13:55:22 GMT
Wrong. Voltaire was cowed by Louis XV and would have been scared sh witless by Andrew Tate
|
|
|
B*****
Jul 12, 2023 14:16:36 GMT
via mobile
Post by CabbagePatchBlues on Jul 12, 2023 14:16:36 GMT
Sorry, sending tweets that what?
|
|
Peter Parker
Global Moderator
Richard Walker
You have been sentenced to DELETION!
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 4,920
|
B*****
Jul 12, 2023 14:30:16 GMT
Post by Peter Parker on Jul 12, 2023 14:30:16 GMT
Sorry, sending tweets that what?
|
|
syg
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 1,014
|
Post by syg on Jul 12, 2023 14:45:06 GMT
Wrong. Voltaire was cowed by Louis XV and would have been scared sh witless by Andrew Tate . Hegel I think. A Monty Python sketch comes to mind. Her game too will have to disassociate themselves from Rovers if they want to continue to be taken seriously. No way can we have a manager giving time to Tate and be looked on as embracing progression.
|
|
|
Post by swissgas on Jul 12, 2023 15:02:37 GMT
Maybe I shouldn't comment on this because I thought Andrew Tate was the bloke from Emmerdale.
On Gaschat heartofgas has summed up the feelings of many Gasheads when he says he thinks we shouldn't worry about the way B***** behaves because he is a "pretty decent manager".
But if Rovers are bending over backwards to make allowances for B***** on the basis that he is a "pretty decent manager" then I think we are making a big mistake because his record shows he isn't.
It was the same when he was a player with clubs bending over backwards to make allowances for him because they thought he was "a pretty decent player" but in the end nearly all of them realised it wasn't working out and they got rid of him. Is it likely to be any different at Rovers ?
|
|
cornwallgas
Predictions League
Joined: February 2016
Posts: 470
|
Post by cornwallgas on Jul 12, 2023 15:10:10 GMT
Maybe I shouldn't comment on this because I thought Andrew Tate was the bloke from Emmerdale. On Gaschat heartofgas has summed up the feelings of many Gasheads when he says he thinks we shouldn't worry about the way B***** behaves because he is a "pretty decent manager". But if Rovers are bending over backwards to make allowances for B***** on the basis that he is a "pretty decent manager" then I think we are making a big mistake because his record shows he isn't. It was the same when he was a player with clubs bending over backwards to make allowances for him because they thought he was "a pretty decent player" but in the end nearly all of them realised it wasn't working out and they got rid of him. Is it likely to be any different at Rovers ? To make up for his "previous" and continuing abhorrent behaviour he'd have to more than pretty decent...would have to be in the Alex Ferguson league.
|
|
eppinggas
Administrator
Ian Alexander
Don't care
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 8,269
|
Post by eppinggas on Jul 12, 2023 15:45:57 GMT
Now sending tweets that ref Andrew Tate and Tucker Carlson. There is an argument by one of the more famous philosophers ,whose name escapes me, that however much you disagree with someone you should listen to them as they could say something of interest that you wouldn't have heard otherwise. Presumably something that B***** would have picked up on. But listening to and referencing a nye on pathological lier and a man who has the values of something so low that I can't think of a comparison is pretty dumb. Its Voltaire, and its more to do with freedom of speech than the value of what is said - 'I disagree with what you say but I would die for your right to say it.' However, I think even he may have made an exception in the case of Andrew Tate. It was actually Voltaire's biographer, Evelyn Hall. But perhaps the bigger issue here is with the despicable B*****, and his unstoppable and seemingly relentless gobs1ttery.
|
|
oldie
Joined: September 2021
Posts: 4,584
|
Post by oldie on Jul 12, 2023 18:17:19 GMT
Its Voltaire, and its more to do with freedom of speech than the value of what is said - 'I disagree with what you say but I would die for your right to say it.' However, I think even he may have made an exception in the case of Andrew Tate. It was actually Voltaire's biographer, Evelyn Hall. But perhaps the bigger issue here is with the despicable B*****, and his unstoppable and seemingly relentless gobs1ttery. This, absolutely. Plain speaking? An absolute pr*ck
|
|
basel
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,064
|
B*****
Jul 12, 2023 18:48:06 GMT
via mobile
Post by basel on Jul 12, 2023 18:48:06 GMT
Joe is right.Tate often offers up "food for thought".
|
|
bondigas
Joined: December 2017
Posts: 378
|
Post by bondigas on Jul 12, 2023 20:00:44 GMT
In total, B***** has managed 255 games: winning 99, drawing 62, and losing 94, with a win percentage of 38.8%
Suggests an average manager !
|
|
|
Post by Mrs V Smegma on Jul 12, 2023 21:17:43 GMT
Nah he’s an absolute genius - just ask Baself. You’re not believing hard enough Bondigas.
|
|
|
Post by rideintothesun on Jul 12, 2023 21:25:09 GMT
Its Voltaire, and its more to do with freedom of speech than the value of what is said - 'I disagree with what you say but I would die for your right to say it.' However, I think even he may have made an exception in the case of Andrew Tate. It was actually Voltaire's biographer, Evelyn Hall. But perhaps the bigger issue here is with the despicable B*****, and his unstoppable and seemingly relentless gobs1ttery. To be fair to B*****, he hasn't actually endorsed what either Tucker or Tate say in the interview. He has simply pointed out that it is an interesting conversation. In the same way, we might observe that Marie Le Pen or Nigel Farage raise interesting points about the value of a multi-cultural society, even if we profoundly disagree with their politics more generally. The boundaries of what we can actually say have become so narrow that perhaps sometimes it is better to hear a different view or perspective and to hear it expressed in deliberately provocative terms. Another issue, which is more important than B*****'s Twitter postings, is why so many young people look up to Tate as a role model.
|
|
Peter Parker
Global Moderator
Richard Walker
You have been sentenced to DELETION!
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 4,920
|
Post by Peter Parker on Jul 13, 2023 4:50:25 GMT
It was actually Voltaire's biographer, Evelyn Hall. But perhaps the bigger issue here is with the despicable B*****, and his unstoppable and seemingly relentless gobs1ttery. To be fair to B*****, he hasn't actually endorsed what either Tucker or Tate say in the interview. He has simply pointed out that it is an interesting conversation. In the same way, we might observe that Marie Le Pen or Nigel Farage raise interesting points about the value of a multi-cultural society, even if we profoundly disagree with their politics more generally. The boundaries of what we can actually say have become so narrow that perhaps sometimes it is better to hear a different view or perspective and to hear it expressed in deliberately provocative terms. Another issue, which is more important than B*****'s Twitter postings, is why so many young people look up to Tate as a role model. Isnt that the problem. He may well have found something interesting, but hasnt enlightened anyone. Someone may go and listen and find something different equally interesting from the piece of s**t Tate. For a self stlyed intellectual he isnt very bright. B***** surely must be aware enough given his own controversies and those surrounding a recent club signing that finding something interesting in an Andrew Tate and Tucker Carlson interview (lets not forget him bigging up Joe Rogan) and not leaving what he finds interesting open to interpretation given Tate's problematic image a bit dodgy. B***** is just courting attention himself because he is an arsehole. As I say he cant be the "Why always me guy?" Without realising he brings it on himself surely. For all his protestations, he must like his image. Not hard to imagine what he might find interesting from Andrew Tate
|
|
basel
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,064
|
Post by basel on Jul 13, 2023 5:22:22 GMT
It was actually Voltaire's biographer, Evelyn Hall. But perhaps the bigger issue here is with the despicable B*****, and his unstoppable and seemingly relentless gobs1ttery. To be fair to B*****, he hasn't actually endorsed what either Tucker or Tate say in the interview. He has simply pointed out that it is an interesting conversation. In the same way, we might observe that Marie Le Pen or Nigel Farage raise interesting points about the value of a multi-cultural society, even if we profoundly disagree with their politics more generally. The boundaries of what we can actually say have become so narrow that perhaps sometimes it is better to hear a different view or perspective and to hear it expressed in deliberately provocative terms. Another issue, which is more important than B*****'s Twitter postings, is why so many young people look up to Tate as a role model. The baying Left mob don't lend themselves to conversation.They actually pay people to stalk others that have a different opinion,trying to ruin their lives. The local 'charmers',once it comes into their view ,will itch to get people banned from the Mem. Bullies. Not to be trusted and they're on their way to getting out of hand.
|
|
basel
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,064
|
B*****
Jul 13, 2023 5:27:39 GMT
via mobile
Post by basel on Jul 13, 2023 5:27:39 GMT
Now sending tweets that ref Andrew Tate and Tucker Carlson. There is an argument by one of the more famous philosophers ,whose name escapes me, that however much you disagree with someone you should listen to them as they could say something of interest that you wouldn't have heard otherwise. Presumably something that B***** would have picked up on. But listening to and referencing a nye on pathological lier and a man who has the values of something so low that I can't think of a comparison is pretty dumb. This response to a tweet by Rovers manager and others that have expressed a similar reaction, look hysterical and really quite daft. Full of h a t e.
|
|
|
Post by CabbagePatchBlues on Jul 13, 2023 7:24:54 GMT
Now sending tweets that ref Andrew Tate and Tucker Carlson. There is an argument by one of the more famous philosophers ,whose name escapes me, that however much you disagree with someone you should listen to them as they could say something of interest that you wouldn't have heard otherwise. Presumably something that B***** would have picked up on. But listening to and referencing a nye on pathological lier and a man who has the values of something so low that I can't think of a comparison is pretty dumb. It is also irresponsible given that the INCEL movement and younger guys look up to him, due to his lifestyle. Sad the Jordan Peterson seems to have an affinity for some of his content. He and his brother are incredibly gauche, that is being kind Ah, Jordan Peterson. "The professor of piffle". "The stupid man's smart person".
|
|
Peter Parker
Global Moderator
Richard Walker
You have been sentenced to DELETION!
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 4,920
|
Post by Peter Parker on Jul 13, 2023 7:44:43 GMT
Bas, It's more than one tweet as we all know. The bloke can't help himself and next week he will say something else. for any fans of B*****, I'd be concerned he is heading down the Lambert and Le Tissier route.
Carlson, Tate, Rogan, Robert Kennedy Jr. Cancel Culture all things Joseph is getting on board with slowly
|
|