|
|
Post by Blue Mist on May 24, 2022 15:56:18 GMT
|
|
oldie
Joined: September 2021
Posts: 4,332
Member is Online
|
Post by oldie on May 24, 2022 16:22:55 GMT
A 38 year old.... Jesus Christ |
|
|
|
Post by irenestoyboy on May 24, 2022 16:43:56 GMT
Idiots.
Perhaps the club will consider lifetime bans.
|
|
|
|
Post by laughinggas on May 24, 2022 16:49:10 GMT
A 38 year old.... Jesus Christ 16 year old I read. |
|
harrybuckle
Always look on the bright side
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 5,428 
|
Post by harrybuckle on May 24, 2022 17:21:45 GMT
I was condemned for pointing out the attack on the Scunthorpe goalkeeper and told I was making it all up..
Glad I was correct doubt those who criticised me will apologise mind you.
|
|
|
|
Post by Blue Mist on May 24, 2022 17:29:27 GMT
I was condemned for pointing out the attack on the Scunthorpe goalkeeper and told I was making it all up.. Glad I was correct doubt those who criticised me will apologise mind you. I heard you say at the time, just hoped it wasnt true. |
|
|
|
Post by droitwichgas on May 24, 2022 17:31:52 GMT
I was condemned for pointing out the attack on the Scunthorpe goalkeeper and told I was making it all up.. Glad I was correct doubt those who criticised me will apologise mind you. Not sure you'd class being pushed as an attack? |
|
|
|
Post by droitwichgas on May 24, 2022 17:48:37 GMT
Richard Hathaway, 19 and of Southmead, was convicted of using words or behaving in a way likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress and entering the playing area. He was handed a five-year football banning order by magistrates.
Lee Wells, 38 and of Oldland Common, was handed a three-year football banning order and ordered to carry out 100 hours of community service. He entered the pitch, was found to be in possession of a firework, flare or pyrotechnic item and was convicted of using words or behaving in a way likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress.
It seems they got the banning orders mixed up, as surely the second defendant's crimes warranted the longer banning order?
|
|
oldie
Joined: September 2021
Posts: 4,332
Member is Online
|
Post by oldie on May 24, 2022 18:04:28 GMT
Life ban.
That will sort it.
|
|
eppinggas
Administrator
Ian Alexander
Don't care
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 8,177
Member is Online
|
Post by eppinggas on May 25, 2022 8:03:12 GMT
Idiots. Perhaps the club will consider lifetime bans. No official comment from the Club yet? I would expect a strongly worded statement and longer bans from the Memorial Stadium for these two morons. We'll see. |
|
kingswood Polak
Without music life would be a mistake
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 10,263
|
Post by kingswood Polak on May 25, 2022 8:38:53 GMT
Idiots. Perhaps the club will consider lifetime bans. No official comment from the Club yet? I would expect a strongly worded statement and longer bans from the Memorial Stadium for these two morons. We'll see. I somehow doubt it, they stayed quiet with the domestic abuse so maybe that is the way we are now, keep your nut down and keep out of the way of things ? I cannot understand, not for the life of me, why anyone would go onto the pitch with any angry intent. 16 years old though, i know it’s no excuse but they can’t even publish his name as he would have been dealt with as a juvenile |
|
|
|
Post by CabbagePatchBlues on May 25, 2022 9:31:59 GMT
Life ban. That will sort it. So you want to give a life sentence to a 19-year-old from Southmead who ran onto the pitch as high as a kite and "assaulted" a Scunthorpe player? He probably thinks that if our illustrious manager can get away with it time and again then so can he. Five years is long enough for him to grow up - not like some I can mention. |
|
|
|
Post by rowdenhill on May 25, 2022 9:46:54 GMT
Send the worm to Burundi.
|
|
|
|
Post by fatherjackhackett on May 25, 2022 10:05:08 GMT
I was condemned for pointing out the attack on the Scunthorpe goalkeeper and told I was making it all up.. Glad I was correct doubt those who criticised me will apologise mind you. Not sure you'd class being pushed as an attack? A - He shouldn’t have been on the pitch B - A push on anyone is classed as an assault. So yes, it was an attack, hope he gets a life ban. Thank you for coming to my TED talk. |
|
oldie
Joined: September 2021
Posts: 4,332
Member is Online
|
Post by oldie on May 25, 2022 10:13:20 GMT
Life ban. That will sort it. So you want to give a life sentence to a 19-year-old from Southmead who ran onto the pitch as high as a kite and "assaulted" a Scunthorpe player? He probably thinks that if our illustrious manager can get away with it time and again then so can he. Five years is long enough for him to grow up - not like some I can mention. To be honest I doubt the lad thinks at all. But this does need to be stamped out. It is starting to look like running on the pitch is seen as a badge of honour, assaulting a player or match official even more so. Life ban for me and a criminal record. |
|
eppinggas
Administrator
Ian Alexander
Don't care
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 8,177
Member is Online
|
Post by eppinggas on May 25, 2022 10:40:28 GMT
No official comment from the Club yet? I would expect a strongly worded statement and longer bans from the Memorial Stadium for these two morons. We'll see. I somehow doubt it, they stayed quiet with the domestic abuse so maybe that is the way we are now, keep your nut down and keep out of the way of things ? I cannot understand, not for the life of me, why anyone would go onto the pitch with any angry intent. 16 years old though, i know it’s no excuse but they can’t even publish his name as he would have been dealt with as a juvenile To be fair to the Club after the "victimless crime" statement was left to fester on the web-site for 3 or 4 days (after comments by the Court were wilfully mis-represented by Bristol Rovers FC), it was removed and Wael Al-Qadi did come out with a strongly worded statement. Well done Wael. Reminder. Wael Al-Qadi: "Firstly, I think it is really important to confirm that as a club we stand firmly against any form of violence. Any individual that is found guilty of any such offences will be dismissed immediately. I understand the concerns expressed by a number of you." So I am waiting for a similarly worded statement to come about the pitch invasion and intimidation of opposing players by violent thugs. |
|
|
|
Post by alftupper on May 25, 2022 10:41:21 GMT
Life ban. That will sort it. So you want to give a life sentence to a 19-year-old from Southmead who ran onto the pitch as high as a kite and "assaulted" a Scunthorpe player? Absolutely. |
|
|
|
Post by rideintothesun on May 25, 2022 11:10:37 GMT
So you want to give a life sentence to a 19-year-old from Southmead who ran onto the pitch as high as a kite and "assaulted" a Scunthorpe player? Absolutely. But you have no problem with the club employing a manager with an extensive history of violent conduct, who presumably would have received a similar life ban if your edict was pursued to its logical conclusion? Contradiction much? |
|
|
|
Post by rideintothesun on May 25, 2022 11:13:25 GMT
I somehow doubt it, they stayed quiet with the domestic abuse so maybe that is the way we are now, keep your nut down and keep out of the way of things ? I cannot understand, not for the life of me, why anyone would go onto the pitch with any angry intent. 16 years old though, i know it’s no excuse but they can’t even publish his name as he would have been dealt with as a juvenile To be fair to the Club after the "victimless crime" statement was left to fester on the web-site for 3 or 4 days (after comments by the Court were wilfully mis-represented by Bristol Rovers FC), it was removed and Wael Al-Qadi did come out with a strongly worded statement. Well done Wael. Reminder. Wael Al-Qadi: "Firstly, I think it is really important to confirm that as a club we stand firmly against any form of violence. Any individual that is found guilty of any such offences will be dismissed immediately. I understand the concerns expressed by a number of you." So I am waiting for a similarly worded statement to come about the pitch invasion and intimidation of opposing players by violent thugs. Well then presumably Wael is about to sack Paul Coutts for grabbing an opposition player by the throat in the penultimate game of the season? Or perhaps this is just meaningless bilge vomited out by the club's PR machine? I'll leave you to decide. |
|
|
|
Post by rideintothesun on May 25, 2022 11:32:34 GMT
Richard Hathaway, 19 and of Southmead, was convicted of using words or behaving in a way likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress and entering the playing area. He was handed a five-year football banning order by magistrates. Lee Wells, 38 and of Oldland Common, was handed a three-year football banning order and ordered to carry out 100 hours of community service. He entered the pitch, was found to be in possession of a firework, flare or pyrotechnic item and was convicted of using words or behaving in a way likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress. It seems they got the banning orders mixed up, as surely the second defendant's crimes warranted the longer banning order? Not really, because 'using words or behaving in a way likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress' is so broad as to be virtually meaningless. For example, it could easily apply to some of the stuff that has thrown in my direction. |
|
