Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2020 15:21:47 GMT
You've heard of rhetorical questions, I suppose. On interrogative adverbs specifically, try these authorities for starters: Derek Thompson, Mark Nichol, Bonnie Mills, Gertrude Stein. It behoves everybody to be succinct and abstain from misplaced punctiliousness and daft, asinine, silly, puerile, stupid, brainless, foolish, idiotic, senseless repetitiveness. Someone shagged a thesaurus.
|
|
|
Post by rowdenhill on Aug 20, 2020 15:29:14 GMT
And you the Anatomy of Melancholy.
|
|
|
Post by Curly Wurly on Aug 20, 2020 15:33:50 GMT
..... If Garner thinks he's going to get anywhere in this division with tippy-tappy tactics, it'll be interesting to see what happens when his wing backs get flattened by some 6 foot 4 monster for the 20th time in the first game whilst messing around with the ball trying to play out from the back. It's either going to be a spectacular success (5% chance) or we'll get beaten up all over the pitch and the players will be stood around looking confused wondering which of the hundreds of 'plays' he's shown them on his laptop they are supposed to be executing next (95% chance). I was worried that this would be the case, but I'm pleased that Ben Garner has added some muscle and nous in Ehmer and Baldwin. I was impressed by Josh Grant's physical approach for a youngster in the Exeter game and Nicholson looks like he can handle himself.
Darrel Clarke seemed to have a preference for diminutive players. I think we are a physically stronger team now than at the end of his reign.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2020 16:44:48 GMT
..... If Garner thinks he's going to get anywhere in this division with tippy-tappy tactics, it'll be interesting to see what happens when his wing backs get flattened by some 6 foot 4 monster for the 20th time in the first game whilst messing around with the ball trying to play out from the back. It's either going to be a spectacular success (5% chance) or we'll get beaten up all over the pitch and the players will be stood around looking confused wondering which of the hundreds of 'plays' he's shown them on his laptop they are supposed to be executing next (95% chance). I was worried that this would be the case, but I'm pleased that Ben Garner has added some muscle and nous in Ehmer and Baldwin. I was impressed by Josh Grant's physical approach for a youngster in the Exeter game and Nicholson looks like he can handle himself.
Darrel Clarke seemed to have a preference for diminutive players. I think we are a physically stronger team now than at the end of his reign.
We'll see how it pans out. I was commenting originally on trying to play out from the back, it's frigging difficult, even PL teams with world class forwards struggle, that means that the opposition have to keep defenders in place, but still more often than not it ends up as a complete mess. I'm standing by total confusion with laptops all over the place and play sheets being shown to players during drinks breaks though.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2020 16:48:05 GMT
And you the Anatomy of Melancholy. You what? That doesn't even make sense. All I did was ask for you to provide a link to somewhere credible that agrees with what you said, which was incorrect.
|
|
|
Post by rowdenhill on Aug 20, 2020 17:01:01 GMT
I'll try to be patient. The response is to 'Someone shagged a thesaurus'. So you have to read the response as 'And you (shagged) the Anatomy of Melancholy. It's like if someone says 'You write like a total tosspot.' The answer might be 'And you like a wounded pinfeather'. You see, you don't necessarily have to repeat the verb the second time. Do you understand now? Or do you want further tuition? It's not all that difficult. You may not have much of a brain, but you could summon up a degree of concentration.
'The Anatomy of Melancholy' is a book. Do you know what that is?
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2020 17:12:35 GMT
I'll try to be patient. The response is to 'Someone shagged a thesaurus'. So you have to read the response as 'And you (shagged) the Anatomy of Melancholy. It's like if someone says 'You write like a total tosspot.' The answer might be 'And you like a wounded pinfeather'. You see, you don't necessarily have to repeat the verb the second time. Do you understand now? Or do you want further tuition? It's not all that difficult. You may not have much of a brain, but you could summon up a degree of concentration. 'The Anatomy of Melancholy' is a book. Do you know what that is? Oh, I get it, we have someone being deliberately obtuse in an attempt to get attention or start an argument. Over and out.
|
|
|
Post by o2o2bo2ba on Aug 20, 2020 18:47:47 GMT
'The Anatomy of Melancholy' is a book. Do you know what that is? Is that another Mike Kay yawn? 🥱
|
|
c4h10
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 476
|
Post by c4h10 on Aug 20, 2020 19:58:02 GMT
You've heard of rhetorical questions, I suppose. On interrogative adverbs specifically, try these authorities for starters: Derek Thompson, Mark Nichol, Bonnie Mills, Gertrude Stein. It behoves everybody to be succinct and abstain from misplaced punctiliousness and daft, asinine, silly, puerile, stupid, brainless, foolish, idiotic, senseless repetitiveness. Remarkable! Bet you got an A* in your GCSE English Language results today!
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2020 22:11:42 GMT
being deliberately obtuse in an attempt to get attention or start an argument. Is that not your entire life online though, Bambi?
|
|
warehamgas
Predictions League
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,430
|
Post by warehamgas on Aug 20, 2020 22:58:40 GMT
I'll try to be patient. The response is to 'Someone shagged a thesaurus'. So you have to read the response as 'And you (shagged) the Anatomy of Melancholy. It's like if someone says 'You write like a total tosspot.' The answer might be 'And you like a wounded pinfeather'. You see, you don't necessarily have to repeat the verb the second time. Do you understand now? Or do you want further tuition? It's not all that difficult. You may not have much of a brain, but you could summon up a degree of concentration. 'The Anatomy of Melancholy' is a book. Do you know what that is? Oh, I get it, we have someone being deliberately obtuse in an attempt to get attention or start an argument. Over and out. Good of you to admit it! You two should get on well. 😉 UTG!
|
|
|
Post by Curly Wurly on Aug 20, 2020 23:45:46 GMT
I'll try to be patient. The response is to 'Someone shagged a thesaurus'. So you have to read the response as 'And you (shagged) the Anatomy of Melancholy. It's like if someone says 'You write like a total tosspot.' The answer might be 'And you like a wounded pinfeather'. You see, you don't necessarily have to repeat the verb the second time. Do you understand now? Or do you want further tuition? It's not all that difficult. You may not have much of a brain, but you could summon up a degree of concentration. 'The Anatomy of Melancholy' is a book. Do you know what that is? Stop being pretentious and learn to use the 'quote' button.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 21, 2020 8:25:39 GMT
Oh, I get it, we have someone being deliberately obtuse in an attempt to get attention or start an argument. Over and out. Good of you to admit it! You two should get on well. 😉 UTG! What makes you think I like or get on with myself? If I had a choice I would make myself live in a complete dump like Bournemouth, that's how much I actually dislike me.
|
|
eppinggas
Administrator
Ian Alexander
Don't care
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 8,123
|
Post by eppinggas on Aug 21, 2020 9:15:16 GMT
You've heard of rhetorical questions, I suppose. On interrogative adverbs specifically, try these authorities for starters: Derek Thompson, Mark Nichol, Bonnie Mills, Gertrude Stein. It behoves everybody to be succinct and abstain from misplaced punctiliousness and daft, asinine, silly, puerile, stupid, brainless, foolish, idiotic, senseless repetitiveness. I'll get me coat.
|
|
kingswood Polak
Without music life would be a mistake
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 10,255
|
Post by kingswood Polak on Aug 25, 2020 13:22:33 GMT
There can't be many (any?) Managers that have began with such an awful run of results at a club and gone on to succeed. I hope Ben can do it a likeable bloke. I think that may be he weak point. Strong managers are often foolly and involved. From what I have seen of Garner, he looks like he’s on tranquillisers. I have no confidence in him personally but would love to be proved wrong. Players, who have underperformed sometimes need a good bollocking. I just don’t see that in him
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 25, 2020 13:38:29 GMT
There can't be many (any?) Managers that have began with such an awful run of results at a club and gone on to succeed. I hope Ben can do it a likeable bloke. I think that may be he weak point. Strong managers are often foolly and involved. From what I have seen of Garner, he looks like he’s on tranquillisers. I have no confidence in him personally but would love to be proved wrong. Players, who have underperformed sometimes need a good bollocking. I just don’t see that in him With his record last season it's difficult to see how, if things start to go wrong, all eyes in the dressing room won't go straight towards him. Can't help but have this feeling that he's a dead Man walking.
|
|
|
Post by a more piratey game on Aug 25, 2020 13:50:56 GMT
being deliberately obtuse in an attempt to get attention or start an argument. Is that not your entire life online though, Bambi? 'online' is potentially superfluous there?
|
|
|
Post by a more piratey game on Aug 25, 2020 13:52:08 GMT
I'll try to be patient. The response is to 'Someone shagged a thesaurus'. So you have to read the response as 'And you (shagged) the Anatomy of Melancholy. It's like if someone says 'You write like a total tosspot.' The answer might be 'And you like a wounded pinfeather'. You see, you don't necessarily have to repeat the verb the second time. Do you understand now? Or do you want further tuition? It's not all that difficult. You may not have much of a brain, but you could summon up a degree of concentration. 'The Anatomy of Melancholy' is a book. Do you know what that is? Stop being pretentious and learn to use the 'quote' button. disagree - I'm quite enjoying the new flavour that rowdenhill is bringing to the place
|
|
|
Post by Curly Wurly on Aug 26, 2020 13:11:11 GMT
Stop being pretentious and learn to use the 'quote' button. disagree - I'm quite enjoying the new flavour that rowdenhill is bringing to the place pays yer money and takes yer choice, I s'pose
|
|
|
Post by shineongas on Aug 26, 2020 14:19:06 GMT
You've heard of rhetorical questions, I suppose. On interrogative adverbs specifically, try these authorities for starters: Derek Thompson, Mark Nichol, Bonnie Mills, Gertrude Stein. It behoves everybody to be succinct and abstain from misplaced punctiliousness and daft, asinine, silly, puerile, stupid, brainless, foolish, idiotic, senseless repetitiveness. Punctiliousness Daft - Asinine - Silly Puerile - Stupid - Brainless - Foolish Idiotic - Senseless - Repetitiveness Sunderland must be $h1tting themselves!
|
|