Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2020 18:50:41 GMT
So You are actively promoting taking on debt through a third party? When currently the club has none? As backward thinking as that is, I wonder which, or what sort of, organisation would loan money to an organisation like BRFC which has such negative cash flow? I know which sort... I do wonder about you sometimes Swiss It was a joke Oldie, you must have realized that when you saw me advocating player signings and team formations. But some take what you seriously
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2020 21:35:26 GMT
It was a joke Oldie, you must have realized that when you saw me advocating player signings and team formations. Yeah, I can't stand player signings or team formations, either.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2020 21:38:11 GMT
It was a joke Oldie, you must have realized that when you saw me advocating player signings and team formations. But some take what you seriously Try saying that again Oldie.
|
|
|
Post by johnmalyckyj on Sept 6, 2020 21:50:21 GMT
As long as the debt, until it is capitalised as Wael says it will be, is internal, is between companies wholly owned by the same shareholders, everything you worry about is irrelevant. Even capitalising doesn't mean much in those circumstances, other than a tidy balance sheet. Ultimately the debt or the share capital is owned by the same person / people. To the fans it's utterly irrelevant. Are you sure that this is the case. Knowall are you now able to indicate how many members the Presidents Club has please? Regards John Malyckyj
|
|
|
Post by irenestoyboy on Sept 6, 2020 22:01:38 GMT
Are you sure that this is the case. Knowall are you now able to indicate how many members the Presidents Club has please? Regards John Malyckyj Has he still not answered this yet John...?? 😂😂 I know they gave nothing to the FC last year so maybe the tin didn’t get passed around.
|
|
|
Post by johnmalyckyj on Sept 6, 2020 22:07:38 GMT
Knowall are you now able to indicate how many members the Presidents Club has please? Regards John Malyckyj Has he still not answered this yet John...?? 😂😂 I know they gave nothing to the FC last year so maybe the tin didn’t get passed around. The answer would appear to be as elusive as Lord Lucan's whereabouts.......
|
|
|
Post by a more piratey game on Sept 6, 2020 22:53:44 GMT
Has he still not answered this yet John...?? 😂😂 I know they gave nothing to the FC last year so maybe the tin didn’t get passed around. The answer would appear to be as elusive as Lord Lucan's whereabouts....... It seems to me that he's quick to insinuate and undermine others, but disappears when put under scrutiny himself
|
|
Cheshiregas
Global Moderator
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 2,164
Member is Online
|
Post by Cheshiregas on Sept 7, 2020 17:30:32 GMT
Swiss Are those nominee companies Jersey companies or other third parties own by the Al-Qadis in which the share capital could have changed? They are Jersey nominee companies, Equiom Nominees number 1 ( Jersey) Ltd and Equiom Nominees number 2 (Jersey) Ltd. I know what you are getting at Chesh and it’s quite possible that in June a revised agreement was made between the nominees and the family so they are now holding shares on behalf of Wael (90%) and Samer (10%). This is what we were told had happened and using a nominee structure doesn’t prevent it. But what I am really getting at is the July 8th statement which said the capitalization of the loan had taken place and been processed at Companies House but in fact it never was. Once this was queried I should have thought good practice would have been for Wael to issue a short statement saying the announcement on July 8th was made prematurely because some administrative issues had arisen which need to be addressed. Most would have accepted that and all the goodwill from June 19th would have been maintained. Now, depending what happens in the coming weeks, there is a danger that any hiccup with the capitalization and debt elimination will be tied in with poor team and managerial performance leading to a bigger crisis than it need be. I don't think the goodwill will evaporate for structural financial changes. It is only the likes of you, Oldie, myself and a few others who might recognise the implications of failing in good administration and business management. That goodwill is disappearing with the failure of BG to produce a winning side! I would agree that it is good business practice to ensure that formalities are carried out and kept up to date. It always worried me when the background information of a company was faulty or lacking in veracity and accountability. But perhaps a formal note the club or its accountants might be in order...
|
|
Cheshiregas
Global Moderator
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 2,164
Member is Online
|
Post by Cheshiregas on Sept 7, 2020 17:32:07 GMT
The answer would appear to be as elusive as Lord Lucan's whereabouts....... It seems to me that he's quick to insinuate and undermine others, but disappears when put under scrutiny himself T'was always thus, I am afraid.
|
|
|
Post by a more piratey game on Sept 7, 2020 17:34:42 GMT
It seems to me that he's quick to insinuate and undermine others, but disappears when put under scrutiny himself T'was always thus, I am afraid. maybe it should be renamed the 'Wish I was President Club'?
|
|
|
Post by irenestoyboy on Sept 7, 2020 17:46:31 GMT
T'was always thus, I am afraid. maybe it should be renamed the 'Wish I was President Club'? Even trump is looking better as a president...
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 7, 2020 19:27:40 GMT
maybe it should be renamed the 'Wish I was President Club'? Even trump is looking better as a president... 😱😱😱😱😝😝
|
|
harrybuckle
Always look on the bright side
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 5,425
|
Post by harrybuckle on Sept 7, 2020 20:12:07 GMT
The Brfc 1883 AGM scheduled for Monday 28 September @730pm bizarrely a virtual zoom meeting as company is Not wanting to risk the life's of shareholders with the dreaded virus.
Accounts being emailed future AGM minutes and agenda being emailed no paper copies. Another change allegedly to save trees!
|
|
|
Post by irenestoyboy on Sept 7, 2020 20:58:32 GMT
The Brfc 1883 AGM scheduled for Monday 28 September @730pm bizarrely a virtual zoom meeting as company is Not wanting to risk the life's of shareholders with the dreaded virus. Accounts being emailed future AGM minutes and agenda being emailed no paper copies. Another change allegedly to save trees! Sensible. They can keep the self important gobby ones on mute! Nothing like opposition to being dragged kicking and screaming into decade 3 of century 21! Covid or not! Shame the SC can’t do the same thing IMO.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 7, 2020 21:41:12 GMT
The Brfc 1883 AGM scheduled for Monday 28 September @730pm bizarrely a virtual zoom meeting as company is Not wanting to risk the life's of shareholders with the dreaded virus. Accounts being emailed future AGM minutes and agenda being emailed no paper copies. Another change allegedly to save trees! Sensible. They can keep the self important gobby ones on mute! Nothing like opposition to being dragged kicking and screaming into decade 3 of century 21! Covid or not! Shame the SC can’t do the same thing IMO. Have you given up on standing for election?
|
|
|
Post by irenestoyboy on Sept 8, 2020 9:16:21 GMT
Sensible. They can keep the self important gobby ones on mute! Nothing like opposition to being dragged kicking and screaming into decade 3 of century 21! Covid or not! Shame the SC can’t do the same thing IMO. Have you given up on standing for election? No. Why?
|
|
eppinggas
Administrator
Ian Alexander
Don't care
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 8,161
|
Post by eppinggas on Sept 8, 2020 9:41:48 GMT
Have you given up on standing for election? No. Why? Well - if you are standing - you will be attacked for not understanding what you are letting yourself in for. And if you're not standing - you will be attacked for giving it the big "I am", and then not following through with action.
|
|
|
Post by irenestoyboy on Sept 8, 2020 11:25:41 GMT
Well - if you are standing - you will be attacked for not understanding what you are letting yourself in for. And if you're not standing - you will be attacked for giving it the big "I am", and then not following through with action. I’m not expecting it to be any other way. For the record, I’m not giving it the big I am. It’s fair to say I’ve levelled criticism at the SC from just about every angle myself. Someone challenged me to put my money where my mouth was, so I have. If I don’t get elected, which I don’t expect to because I know already there is one other very good candidate, I’ve given it a shot and I’ll sit back and wait to see how it all plays out.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 8, 2020 12:05:43 GMT
Have you given up on standing for election? No. Why? Just thought you may have decided to step back as you are attacking a long standing support group and making political statements on a public forum, neither of those are exactly smart things to do in the run up to hustings etc. I do 'get' that the political thing was a joke, but still not great judgement. But that's just my opinion.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 8, 2020 12:34:52 GMT
Bloke might be right, but I don't like the cut of his jib at all.
|
|