Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2020 13:59:14 GMT
Blokes a prize fool freeloader I for one am glad hes banned
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2020 14:24:26 GMT
This is a proper Cowlin Construction era s***fest, well done to all involved for respecting the clubs history. Ha. Ken and Kevin can start their own exclusive club. I want nothing to do with Ken. He wasn't interested in representing my points of view when I was banned so why should I support him. Not bitter but I would rather remember those who supported me and my family.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2020 14:40:20 GMT
Ha. Ken and Kevin can start their own exclusive club. I want nothing to do with Ken. He wasn't interested in representing my points of view when I was banned so why should I support him. Not bitter but I would rather remember those who supported me and my family. Yes, particularly as he would have known the truth about who it was that didn't like the truth being discussed in public so decided to spit his dummy and ban you from the ground.
|
|
|
Post by pirate49 on Jan 13, 2020 14:50:09 GMT
Just the West enclosure?....... well, it's a start anyway!
|
|
kingswood Polak
Without music life would be a mistake
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 10,239
|
Post by kingswood Polak on Jan 13, 2020 15:29:44 GMT
Ha. Ken and Kevin can start their own exclusive club. I want nothing to do with Ken. He wasn't interested in representing my points of view when I was banned so why should I support him. Not bitter but I would rather remember those who supported me and my family. And that is precisely why I never tagged you. You could do without any of this π©
|
|
kingswood Polak
Without music life would be a mistake
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 10,239
|
Post by kingswood Polak on Jan 13, 2020 15:30:56 GMT
Just the West enclosure?....... well, it's a start anyway! Boxes, sorry as I get confused with the changing of stand names
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2020 15:57:34 GMT
I want nothing to do with Ken. He wasn't interested in representing my points of view when I was banned so why should I support him. Not bitter but I would rather remember those who supported me and my family. And that is precisely why I never tagged you. You could do without any of this π© Don't be concerned about me, BRFC has made my skin thicker than a Rhino's. I was told about this last week and was also told that Jim Chappell was asked to remove Masters from the board but he refused. Wael can remove him anytime he wants to , there is a clause in the share scheme agreement which allows him to do so quite easily. I will watch carefully to see if Masters does take legal action. I was advised that I had solid grounds to sue the club and the chance of winning substantial damages. Two London barristers approached me to take on the case at no cost to myself but obviously I refused. Why? It would have been totally wrong and hypocritical to sue and financially damage the club that I had fought all my life to improve with money, time and vocally over the years.
|
|
vaughan
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 1,237
|
Post by vaughan on Jan 13, 2020 16:08:52 GMT
So we have a massive falling-out between owners and FC?
Have I got this wrong?
Please respect Ken's privacy during this difficult time for Ken and his family.
Please remember that we are all one big family at Bristol Rovers. πππ
|
|
|
Post by a more piratey game on Jan 13, 2020 16:10:39 GMT
I was advised that I had solid grounds to sue the club and the chance of winning substantial damages. Two London barristers approached me to take on the case at no cost to myself but obviously I refused. Why? It would have been totally wrong and hypocritical to sue and financially damage the club that I had fought all my life to improve with money, time and vocally over the years. on what grounds please phil - it seems odd legal advice to me?
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2020 16:18:46 GMT
I was advised that I had solid grounds to sue the club and the chance of winning substantial damages. Two London barristers approached me to take on the case at no cost to myself but obviously I refused. Why? It would have been totally wrong and hypocritical to sue and financially damage the club that I had fought all my life to improve with money, time and vocally over the years. on what grounds please phil - it seems odd legal advice to me? Because the reasons given by club were untrue, libellous and damaging. Let's not rake that up again though, the current owners took only 4 days to overturn it so as far as I was concerned the matter ended there. Ken Masters was part of the problem though so not being religious I must say that there is something in this Karma thing.
|
|
|
Post by a more piratey game on Jan 13, 2020 16:26:07 GMT
on what grounds please phil - it seems odd legal advice to me? Because the reasons given by club were untrue, libellous and damaging ta. I guess that the same reasoning can't apply here though as no reason has been given
|
|
|
Post by PessimistGas on Jan 13, 2020 16:27:31 GMT
We are the football club equivalent of a collapsing clown car.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2020 16:36:22 GMT
Because the reasons given by club were untrue, libellous and damaging ta. I guess that the same reasoning can't apply here though as no reason has been given I believe it's because he sided with the ex chairman and made a lot of comments against the President. It will be interesting to see if he was telling the truth and successfully increases the clubs debt with successful legal action.
|
|
eppinggas
Administrator
Ian Alexander
Don't care
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 8,055
|
Post by eppinggas on Jan 13, 2020 16:41:24 GMT
We are the football club equivalent of a collapsing clown car. If you don't laugh, you cry.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2020 17:05:52 GMT
ta. I guess that the same reasoning can't apply here though as no reason has been given I believe it's because he sided with the ex chairman and made a lot of comments against the President. It will be interesting to see if he was telling the truth and successfully increases the clubs debt with successful legal action. If making negative comments about Wael gets you banned, he'll have a lot of choices about where to watch games from. Around 12,000 options I reckon.
|
|
|
Post by o2o2bo2ba on Jan 13, 2020 17:06:34 GMT
Most have been banned from West Side this season on selective matches..
Trust Ken to Master the art of banning..
|
|
eppinggas
Administrator
Ian Alexander
Don't care
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 8,055
|
Post by eppinggas on Jan 13, 2020 17:16:25 GMT
Just a bit odd that it's taken so long for (I presume Wael/Martyn) to take action. I understand that KM has not attended Board meetings for 9-12 months? So get rid and find someone else who can represent "the fans". Is this decision now down to Jim Chapple? God help us. Or does it suit Wael to have a non-attending SC Director?
|
|
|
Post by irenestoyboy on Jan 13, 2020 17:59:08 GMT
Perhaps someone should ask JC exactly what the score is?
|
|
JeffNZ
Administrator
Jimmy Morgan
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 2,407
|
Post by JeffNZ on Jan 13, 2020 18:10:30 GMT
...someone should ask JC exactly what the score is? Or in other words, God help us?
|
|
|
Post by droitwichgas on Jan 13, 2020 18:13:12 GMT
Just a bit odd that it's taken so long for (I presume Wael/Martyn) to take action. I understand that KM has not attended Board meetings for 9-12 months? So get rid and find someone else who can represent "the fans". Is this decision now down to Jim Chapple? God help us. Or does it suit Wael to have a non-attending SC Director? Any idea what the job is of the FD if it's not to sit in on Board meetings? Surely if he's banned then he needs to step down and let somebody else do the job, or at least speak up to the SC members and explain what's going on ?
|
|