|
Post by a more piratey game on Mar 2, 2019 0:31:48 GMT
to sell for more moolah with planning permission up and ready for both - like a 'kit car' or 'flat pack' (Ikea irony intended) and planning is very cheap compared with building Fully understand that AMPG but Fanatical/Knowall has been saying for some time that good news was imminent and I don’t think that he was hinting at planning permission for anything. I didn't realize they were one and the same Knowall was confident before Crimbo. Is he still? (Please feel free to answer Fanatical) - it would be nice to think that he has good reason to be
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 2, 2019 0:36:02 GMT
Nope - directors run functions within the business eg finance/sales/IT etc non-execs might sometimes keep an eye on behalf of particular shareholders, unofficially at least So not 'Nope' then? Executive directors running divisions of a company I understand, AMPG. However, we have only football, the stadium, and retail; the latter two of which can be one division, and we have a bloody CEO in charge of execution. You're too smart not to see the contradictions. You're too smart not to see the waste. BRFC do not need an executive chairman and a CEO, both accountable only to one hegemonous shareholder called Dwayne. It's one or the other. How much would annual losses be reduced by getting rid of one of these old goats, and that London bloody office?
|
|
|
Post by a more piratey game on Mar 2, 2019 0:54:31 GMT
Nope - directors run functions within the business eg finance/sales/IT etc non-execs might sometimes keep an eye on behalf of particular shareholders, unofficially at least So not 'Nope' then? Executive directors running divisions of a company I understand, AMPG. However, we have only football, the stadium, and retail; the latter two of which can be one division, and we have a bloody CEO in charge of execution. You're too smart not to see the contradictions. You're too smart not to see the waste. BRFC do not need an executive chairman and a CEO, both accountable only to one hegemonous shareholder called Dwayne. It's one or the other. How much would annual losses be reduced by getting rid of one of these old goats, and that London bloody office? Do u know who is on the board? I don't, but I'll guess Wael, Landing Lights, 8% Ken, Martyn Starnes. Any others?
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 2, 2019 1:07:19 GMT
|
|
vaughan
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 1,237
|
Post by vaughan on Mar 2, 2019 8:43:52 GMT
So Wael and Wael alone represents at BOD level the 92% shareholding of Dwayne Sports.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 2, 2019 9:13:52 GMT
So Wael and Wael alone represents at BOD level the 92% shareholding of Dwayne Sports. Wael Al Qadi, not sure who Wael Alone is.
|
|
Igitur
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 2,294
|
Post by Igitur on Mar 2, 2019 9:18:12 GMT
He's the sole survivor of Bob Marley's backing group.
|
|
Peter Parker
Global Moderator
Richard Walker
You have been sentenced to DELETION!
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 4,920
|
Post by Peter Parker on Mar 2, 2019 9:20:00 GMT
So Wael and Wael alone represents at BOD level the 92% shareholding of Dwayne Sports. And? Thought this had been explained before to some degree. If the club wants some it asks Dwane which is dad and the 3 brothers
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 2, 2019 10:48:31 GMT
He's the sole survivor of Bob Marley's backing group. Very good.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 2, 2019 10:58:47 GMT
|
|
|
Post by a more piratey game on Mar 2, 2019 12:08:32 GMT
thanks for these Shoveler - it's quite a web, and that's before adding in the offshore companies (Dwayne etc) to answer your question about BRFC board, we know what KM does (he enthuses), we know what MS does (runs the day-to-day), SH is a permanent rep for the owners here, and WAQ is El Presidente because that's what he wanted. He's also a big shareholder in the holding company. It's not exactly top-heavy, especially with no FD, or so it seems to me I don't know what purpose the other companies serve, save perhaps to separate the ownership of assets
|
|
vaughan
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 1,237
|
Post by vaughan on Mar 2, 2019 12:24:36 GMT
Is there a conclusion to all this?
We have a CEO who operates as a CEO.He has 11 direct reports to run the Club. He took part in Q&A to explain his priorities and role. He has done the role before at other EFL clubs and is a Chartered Accountant.
Is he crooked, wicked, incompetent....??
Please spell it out for me what the headline is here?
Maybe we just let him get on with the job?
|
|
|
Post by a more piratey game on Mar 2, 2019 12:28:18 GMT
We have a CEO who operates as a CEO.He has 11 direct reports to run the Club that's to many, as any fule kno. He's probably thinking about ways to sort that, now he's got his feet under the desk
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 2, 2019 14:45:40 GMT
thanks for these Shoveler - it's quite a web, and that's before adding in the offshore companies... I don't know what purpose the other companies serve, save perhaps to separate the ownership of assets Well, I don't know either. And to be fair, they're not new companies. None were incorporated under the Al Qadis. All pre-date the 2016 takeover. BRISTOL ROVERS FOOTBALL CLUB LIMITEDIncorporated on 16 March 1897 THE MEMORIAL STADIUM COMPANY LIMITEDIncorporated on 27 March 1998 under the Dunfords BRISTOL ROVERS COMMUNITY TRUSTIncorporated on 5 February 2001 under the Dunfords BRISTOL ROVERS (1883) LIMITEDIncorporated on 1 August 2002 under the Dunfords THE MEMORIAL STADIUM DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITEDIncorporated on 24 February 2009 under Mr Higgs FILTON AVENUE DEVELOPMENTS LIMITEDIncorporated on 24 February 2009 under Mr Higgs FILTON AVENUE GUARANTEE COMPANY LIMITEDIncorporated on 21 May 2009 under Mr Higgs to answer your question about BRFC board, we know what KM does (he enthuses), we know what MS does (runs the day-to-day), SH is a permanent rep for the owners here, and WAQ is El Presidente because that's what he wanted. He's also a big shareholder in the holding company. Yes, you're right. Not much of a portfolio each. There's a Commercial 'Director' too. But he's not on the board. It's not exactly top-heavy, especially with no FD, or so it seems to me. I don't say 'top heavy'. Some implied 'redundant heavy', myself for one. Let's not discuss the Commercial 'Director'. We'll only wake up Bamber.
|
|
|
Post by fanatical on Apr 20, 2019 17:01:44 GMT
Fanatical, I would reply, but you may write to the Moderator to get me banned on here as you did on the other Forum. Please write to Steve Hamer and let him know or alternatively ask a question at the next CEO Q&A. Omnipotent knowledge though. I have no need to have you banned because you obviously know nothing and rely on rumour I have never asked for you to be banned from anything because you are entitled to your opinion. I,on the other hand rely on fact. I suggest if you really want to meet then I am happy to do so when the season ends - you will learn why in due course. In the meantime, please be respectful to your elders and those more knowledgeable.
|
|
|
Post by a more piratey game on Apr 20, 2019 17:31:44 GMT
Fanatical, I would reply, but you may write to the Moderator to get me banned on here as you did on the other Forum. Please write to Steve Hamer and let him know or alternatively ask a question at the next CEO Q&A. Omnipotent knowledge though. I have no need to have you banned because you obviously know nothing and rely on rumour I have never asked for you to be banned from anything because you are entitled to your opinion. I,on the other hand rely on fact. I suggest if you really want to meet then I am happy to do so when the season ends - you will learn why in due course. In the meantime, please be respectful to your elders and those more knowledgeable. Interesting. Season end it is then
|
|
|
Post by droitwichgas on Apr 20, 2019 19:21:55 GMT
Fanatical, I would reply, but you may write to the Moderator to get me banned on here as you did on the other Forum. Please write to Steve Hamer and let him know or alternatively ask a question at the next CEO Q&A. Omnipotent knowledge though. I have no need to have you banned because you obviously know nothing and rely on rumour I have never asked for you to be banned from anything because you are entitled to your opinion. I,on the other hand rely on fact. I suggest if you really want to meet then I am happy to do so when the season ends - you will learn why in due course. In the meantime, please be respectful to your elders and those more knowledgeable. Fanatical = Knowall on Gaschat?
|
|
vaughan
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 1,237
|
Post by vaughan on Apr 20, 2019 19:48:16 GMT
They are the same person.
I fear we are in for another scoop.
Hold on and retain a sense of humour.😂
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 20, 2019 20:32:34 GMT
Laughable. As if you are the sole arbiter. Stupid quote function! The bit I was trying to quote was Fanatical saying;
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2019 1:02:44 GMT
He's the sole survivor of Bob Marley's backing group.
|
|