Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2015 12:00:06 GMT
I think its the other way around and you are proving it to be the case. Starters, you moan about people who are or claim to be in the know. You hate the fact that they have info but can only share some and not all so you rather nothing be shared at all. Then you 'apparently' have a 'source' of your own and copy those in the know by giving some detail and not all, trying to prove a point regarding your original argument. Its this or you are pretty hypocritical with the fact that one minute you moan about the lack of info being shared by those in the know and rather nothing at all is shared but then the next minute you have your own so called source giving some but not all info out. Funny that. What info has anyone else been shown to have that I don't? Simple question to answer.... The truth
|
|
LJG
Peter Beadle
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 969
|
Post by LJG on Sept 22, 2015 12:01:40 GMT
What info has anyone else been shown to have that I don't? Simple question to answer.... The truth Which is what?
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2015 12:08:46 GMT
I'm personally 100% behind what JTS has said/leaked. He's done the right thing by us gasheads.
The little bit of info regarding the a take over is like the Inception movie, a small idea that can grow in Nicks dreams until they find out that Leonardo's character was the real patient on the island and everyone else was just acting.
|
|
|
Post by Nobbygas on Sept 22, 2015 12:24:40 GMT
I'm personally 100% behind what JTS has said/leaked. He's done the right thing by us gasheads. The little bit of info regarding the a take over is like the Inception movie, a small idea that can grow in Nicks dreams until they find out that Leonardo's character was the real patient on the island and everyone else was just acting. I think you have got your films mixed up there !
|
|
kingswood Polak
Without music life would be a mistake
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 10,353
|
Post by kingswood Polak on Sept 22, 2015 12:26:16 GMT
I know. But if you digested your Lansdown rumour and still decided it was true and worth sharing, I'm happy with my assumptions. There is no alternative rumour it's made up s*** by an attention seeking saddo but it's working because he's getting plenty of attention. Look at the language in the original post he made on this made up rumour and subsequent responses. it's a piss take throwing back language that other posters who mainly do have something useful to pass on have used Like I said earlier I can't believe people are biting and giving him the attention he craves. I blocked him good while ago. A proper WUM with some sort of chip on his/her shoulder. Makes it much nicer for me on here. Unfortunately it doesn't stop me seeing posts when others quote him/her but the blocking is a great feature if you find that certain posters spoil your experience on here.
|
|
kingswood Polak
Without music life would be a mistake
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 10,353
|
Post by kingswood Polak on Sept 22, 2015 12:29:42 GMT
I'm personally 100% behind what JTS has said/leaked. He's done the right thing by us gasheads. The little bit of info regarding the a take over is like the Inception movie, a small idea that can grow in Nicks dreams until they find out that Leonardo's character was the real patient on the island and everyone else was just acting. Shutter Island lol
|
|
|
Post by a more piratey game on Sept 22, 2015 12:42:50 GMT
I put it to you, my Lord, that in using the phrase 'it's a possibility the main backer of the consortium could be he who must live in Guernsey' you were seeking to imply, and for readers of this forum to infer, that the main backer might be thought of as Mr Lansdown, thereby not only implicating Mr Lansdown in the proposal but implicating him as 'the main backer'
if the above is not true, might you inform of us of any other purpose for the phraseology used? For myself, I am struggling to think of any other purpose
It's possible. Google is your friend. I put it to you, my Lord, that as you have said we have all 'have to be careful about these things', but you have not, in fact, been careful
|
|
LJG
Peter Beadle
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 969
|
Post by LJG on Sept 22, 2015 12:44:12 GMT
It's possible. Google is your friend. I put it to you, my Lord, that as you have said we have all 'have to be careful about these things', but you have not, in fact, been careful Always careful.
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Sept 22, 2015 13:02:03 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2015 13:10:19 GMT
Simple question to answer.... The truth Which is what? Wouldn't you like to know
|
|
LJG
Peter Beadle
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 969
|
Post by LJG on Sept 22, 2015 13:11:31 GMT
Wouldn't you like to know No. I already do. But I think you would.
|
|
LJG
Peter Beadle
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 969
|
Post by LJG on Sept 22, 2015 13:12:20 GMT
As I said the "consortium" will need a "face".
|
|
LJG
Peter Beadle
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 969
|
Post by LJG on Sept 22, 2015 13:13:12 GMT
There is no alternative rumour it's made up s*** by an attention seeking saddo but it's working because he's getting plenty of attention. Look at the language in the original post he made on this made up rumour and subsequent responses. it's a piss take throwing back language that other posters who mainly do have something useful to pass on have used Like I said earlier I can't believe people are biting and giving him the attention he craves. I blocked hi a good while ago. A proper WUM with some sort of chip on his/her shoulder. Makes it much nicer for me on here If you've blocked me how would you know who hes talking about? No mention of usernames in the post you've quoted.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2015 13:23:41 GMT
Wouldn't you like to know No. I already do. But I think you would. Of course you know. You have read what those in the know have said. However you just disregarded it but some made up nonsense
|
|
|
Post by bttrsblue on Sept 22, 2015 13:33:29 GMT
Just agree to disagree and move on... the bigger question is...is there a consortium at all!??
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2015 13:46:58 GMT
Just agree to disagree and move on... the bigger question is...is there a consortium at all!?? Certainly seems to be the key issue, rather than the motives or integrity or who-said-whats of the people talking about it. Why do things have to revert to slagging off other people so often? Don't agree with someone? Say so. Don't like someone? Move away. Where's Dude Lebowski? I want to sit in the lotus position with him until the squabbling stops.
|
|
|
Post by Jon the Stripe on Sept 22, 2015 14:00:33 GMT
But to me it is clear that until the court case is finally resolved there is not going to be any announcement from the club. Be that right or wrong in your eyes I believe it is the way it is. That may take some months to resolve depending on when the case comes to court. I think this is where we are. It's going to be hard to agree a price to buy/sell at whilst the Sainsbury's situation is still in flux. For what it's worth, I think Jon's rumour is probably accurate, but still don't see what was gained from leaking it. It gave us soomething to gossip about, but hard to see how it will create trust and help negotiations with Nick and the people considering investing. If the intention was to try to put pressure on Higgs, just look at the Sainsbury's situation, he isn't someone who just shrugs his shoulders and gives up. Hi Bamber always enjoy reading your posts so i'll give you my response - my 'rumour' is fact to the best of my knowledge - i think some people may be seeing this purely as an attack on our chairman by myself and this is not true - my motive if any was to 'out' the story cause if i know it others must too and why shouldn't everyone know? - plus try to get either the club or the consortium to 'show their hand' cause like everyone else i would like more and fuller details of whats happening - of course time will tell if i was right or wrong to do so and i have to live with that - just thought i tried to clarify ok mate - UTG
|
|
LJG
Peter Beadle
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 969
|
Post by LJG on Sept 22, 2015 14:10:00 GMT
No. I already do. But I think you would. Of course you know. You have read what those in the know have said. However you just disregarded it but some made up nonsense You don't know what I know. You don't know what they know. You calling anyone "those in the know" is silly because I know what I know, they know what they know and the only person who doesn't know anything - apart from what you know - is you. In which case you don't know who "those in the know" are. All you know is you're not in the know.
|
|
|
Post by Nobbygas on Sept 22, 2015 14:15:14 GMT
Of course you know. You have read what those in the know have said. However you just disregarded it but some made up nonsense You don't know what I know. You don't know what they know. You calling anyone "those in the know" is silly because I know what I know, they know what they know and the only person who doesn't know anything - apart from what you know - is you. In which case you don't know who "those in the know" are. All you know is you're not in the know. Can anyone remember the brilliant American comedy 'Soap'?
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2015 14:23:48 GMT
Of course you know. You have read what those in the know have said. However you just disregarded it but some made up nonsense You don't know what I know. You don't know what they know. You calling anyone "those in the know" is silly because I know what I know, they know what they know and the only person who doesn't know anything - apart from what you know - is you. In which case you don't know who "those in the know" are. All you know is you're not in the know. You say that like I am upset about not being in the know. I am not bothered about not being in the know. If I was bothered about it then I would act a fool and make up some nonsense to gain attention and pretend I'm in the know. Im not the one who has done that
|
|