LJG
Peter Beadle
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 969
|
Post by LJG on Sept 21, 2015 23:18:50 GMT
Who said anything about owning two clubs or having anything official in place? You can back a consortium and not become the owner of the target club. Clubs can have other clubs they prefer to loan and sell players to - an understanding. Still smells like bollocks to me. All adds up. You don't become a billionaire without a few hostile takeovers. Not great for Rovers in terms of maximum potential but at least we know we're safe from extinction long term with this as a possibility.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 21, 2015 23:19:38 GMT
Still smells like bollocks to me. All adds up. You don't become a billionaire without a few hostile takeovers. Not great for Rovers in terms of maximum potential but at least we know we're safe from extinction long term with this as a possibility. Its not a possiblity.
|
|
LJG
Peter Beadle
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 969
|
Post by LJG on Sept 22, 2015 6:44:56 GMT
All adds up. You don't become a billionaire without a few hostile takeovers. Not great for Rovers in terms of maximum potential but at least we know we're safe from extinction long term with this as a possibility. Its not a possiblity. It certainly is. Prove that it's not.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2015 7:10:28 GMT
Its not a possiblity. It certainly is. Prove that it's not. You are telling porkies to try and prove a point about those in the know disclosing info but not all the info you want. Not working though as you could come up with something better than Lansdown. When you are proved wrong when it all comes out, you will be the one looking a little bit silly sticking to this made up story
|
|
|
Post by Jon the Stripe on Sept 22, 2015 7:16:52 GMT
It certainly is. Prove that it's not. You are telling porkies to try and prove a point about those in the know disclosing info but not all the info you want. Not working though as you could come up with something better than Lansdown. When you are proved wrong when it all comes out, you will be the one looking a little bit silly sticking to this made up story I think they call it 'trolling' - sad really
|
|
Alveston Gas
Brucie Bannister
Once a Gashead always a Gashead
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 746
|
Post by Alveston Gas on Sept 22, 2015 7:18:41 GMT
I have a sound source who says it's a possibility the main backer of the consortium could be he who must live in Guernsey. Could be potentially looking to create a business conference planning and hosting enterprise - venues could include the new AG, the UWE and potentially one new site. Investing in Rovers might basically be a sideline to getting into that and could allow an interest in Rovers so they can be set up as the City feeder club. I know quite a bit more than this but can't say for legal reasons. I'm telling you all of this in the best interests of the club. Attention seeking......!!!
|
|
LJG
Peter Beadle
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 969
|
Post by LJG on Sept 22, 2015 7:26:03 GMT
I'm just repeating what I've been told by my source who has been right about these things in the past.
He knew about John Ward coming in before it happened and Sexton.
I also never said it was Lansdown directly. He has some influential friends.
For JTS to call me a troll when I'm just passing on what I consider reliable information - exactly what he has done - is just rude.
|
|
LJG
Peter Beadle
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 969
|
Post by LJG on Sept 22, 2015 7:28:14 GMT
You are telling porkies to try and prove a point about those in the know disclosing info but not all the info you want. Not working though as you could come up with something better than Lansdown. When you are proved wrong when it all comes out, you will be the one looking a little bit silly sticking to this made up story I think they call it 'trolling' - sad really This is an unbelievable slur. I'm passing on information which has come to me from a previouslt reliable source. If you're hypocritical enough to think I've done anything different to what you have I'm very sorry but I thought more of you than that.
|
|
|
Post by Jon the Stripe on Sept 22, 2015 7:28:42 GMT
|
|
LJG
Peter Beadle
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 969
|
Post by LJG on Sept 22, 2015 7:29:16 GMT
It certainly is. Prove that it's not. You are telling porkies to try and prove a point about those in the know disclosing info but not all the info you want. Not working though as you could come up with something better than Lansdown. When you are proved wrong when it all comes out, you will be the one looking a little bit silly sticking to this made up story Not proving a point just trying to be helpful and pass on info.
|
|
LJG
Peter Beadle
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 969
|
Post by LJG on Sept 22, 2015 7:31:09 GMT
I think this says it all. You want to be "in the know" and you don't want anyone else to be. The fact I have information seems to be getting to you.
|
|
|
Post by Feeling The Blues on Sept 22, 2015 7:37:53 GMT
I have a sound source who says it's a possibility the main backer of the consortium could be he who must live in Guernsey. Could be potentially looking to create a business conference planning and hosting enterprise - venues could include the new AG, the UWE and potentially one new site. Investing in Rovers might basically be a sideline to getting into that and could allow an interest in Rovers so they can be set up as the City feeder club. I know quite a bit more than this but can't say for legal reasons. I'm telling you all of this in the best interests of the club. Attention seeking......!!! Exactly. I can't believe people are biting.
|
|
LJG
Peter Beadle
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 969
|
Post by LJG on Sept 22, 2015 7:45:05 GMT
Attention seeking......!!! Exactly. I can't believe people are biting. So when JTS et al pass on info they're martyrs but when anyone else does the same in good faith they're attention seeking? This place is unbelievable.
|
|
|
Post by a more piratey game on Sept 22, 2015 7:46:08 GMT
Who said anything about owning two clubs or having anything official in place? You can back a consortium and not become the owner of the target club. Clubs can have other clubs they prefer to loan and sell players to - an understanding. Still smells like bollocks to me. that wouldn't be my preferred phrase, but no doubting the sentiment
LJG is a JTS wannabe?
|
|
LJG
Peter Beadle
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 969
|
Post by LJG on Sept 22, 2015 8:01:32 GMT
Still smells like bollocks to me. that wouldn't be my preferred phrase, but no doubting the sentiment
LJG is a JTS wannabe?
Just passing on my info. Don't really get why because JTS cooked up a rumour with a couple of others they're suddenly referred to as some sort of oracles who can acid test the veracity of anything anyone says on here now but there we go. My guy has been right more than once before.
|
|
|
Post by Nobbygas on Sept 22, 2015 8:11:47 GMT
that wouldn't be my preferred phrase, but no doubting the sentiment
LJG is a JTS wannabe?
Just passing on my info. Don't really get why because JTS cooked up a rumour with a couple of others they're suddenly referred to as some sort of oracles who can acid test the veracity of anything anyone says on here now but there we go. My guy has been right more than once before. When I get home later I'll ask She Who Casts No Shadow what is going on, because she is right about absolutely everything, everytime, without exception.
|
|
|
Post by bttrsblue on Sept 22, 2015 8:24:13 GMT
My rumour is bigger than yours! haha
I think people don't like your version of things LJG, so don't want to believe you, whereas JTS's rumour is quite a positive change (seemingly) if true.
Who knows! In fairness anyone who is part of the 'consortium' (if it exists) could be claimed to have a link to the dark side - a simple fact that Lansdown is a very successful man in the financial world.
|
|
|
Post by Feeling The Blues on Sept 22, 2015 8:38:24 GMT
My rumour is bigger than yours! haha I think people don't like your version of things LJG, so don't want to believe you, whereas JTS's rumour is quite a positive change (seemingly) if true. Who knows! In fairness anyone who is part of the 'consortium' (if it exists) could be claimed to have a link to the dark side - a simple fact that Lansdown is a very successful man in the financial world. It's not a case of not liking his rumour, it's something he has just made up to try and score points off JTS. It's sad pathetic attention seeking nonsense. It adds nothing to this forum whatsoever but could be useful to a psychologist.
|
|
LJG
Peter Beadle
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 969
|
Post by LJG on Sept 22, 2015 8:47:33 GMT
My rumour is bigger than yours! haha I think people don't like your version of things LJG, so don't want to believe you, whereas JTS's rumour is quite a positive change (seemingly) if true. Who knows! In fairness anyone who is part of the 'consortium' (if it exists) could be claimed to have a link to the dark side - a simple fact that Lansdown is a very successful man in the financial world. Precisely! Some people seem to feel very threatened by a secondary information stream coming out of the club because they want to be the special ones with the precious rumour.
|
|
LJG
Peter Beadle
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 969
|
Post by LJG on Sept 22, 2015 8:48:18 GMT
My rumour is bigger than yours! haha I think people don't like your version of things LJG, so don't want to believe you, whereas JTS's rumour is quite a positive change (seemingly) if true. Who knows! In fairness anyone who is part of the 'consortium' (if it exists) could be claimed to have a link to the dark side - a simple fact that Lansdown is a very successful man in the financial world. It's not a case of not liking his rumour, it's something he has just made up to try and score points off JTS. It's sad pathetic attention seeking nonsense. It adds nothing to this forum whatsoever but could be useful to a psychologist. This is completely uncalled for. The same could be said about JTS.
|
|