oldie
Joined: September 2021
Posts: 7,555
Member is Online
|
Post by oldie on Nov 1, 2023 16:18:21 GMT
"In my experience, even fully assimilated British Jews often have mannerisms or ways of speaking/thinking that give them away" Wow, really Such as? Please give us all an example? I will be gobsmacked if you can produce a tenable example of how a "Jewish person thinks" Assimilated? To the best of my knowledge over 80% of declared Jews in the UK were born here. They are UK citizens. Your words smack of an inherent prejudice. I dont deny any "self evident" "obvious" or "clearly demonstrated" evidence you have provided. The trouble is you have provided nothing of the sort other than your interpretations of what is in the general media. Thats hardly any of the above is it. Equally the "Islamic World" is such a broad stroke as to be meaningless. You ignore the cultural differences in every country that may have Islam as its primary religion. Take Malaysia as an example. Islam is the official religion of that country with 64% of the population declaring them selves as such. Counter to your prejudicial views on Islam, Malaysia also accommodates 19% being Buddhist, 9% being Christian, 6% being Hindus. Hang on...the ability to assimilate is predicated upon one's choice of faith? To wear a certain style of clothing is an indication that a person has not assimilated? How the hell does one "integrate" into British society to the fullest extent? How is that even measured? Perhaps by determining which cricket team you support? Honestly you sound like that old dinosaur Norman Tebbitt. You what? Please give us an example so we can stop laughing. Definition of prejudice: preconceived opinion that is not based on reasonIn buckets based upon that quoted statement from you. I do not who you are, where you are from or where you acquired your cultural influences. But now you are saying that you can determine whether someone is a Jew or not by their attitudes towards education? Really?? I dont know about you but I was raised in South Bristol within a white (uniformly white at that) family background. I can assure you that they, my family, placed a high value on education. I never met one family that didnt. There were those who did think that University education was not for the working classes, mainly predicated upon ignorance. Equally respect from professional qualifications was almost reverential. Instead of just saying it, provide examples. I should have been more direct. How does one "assimilate" into a society you were born into and where your family have been here for the longest time. Perhaps for a century or more. Are you suggesting that any citizen of the UK that doesnt fit into the perceived cultural norm of the pre 1950s is not fully assimilated? Just for clarity.
|
|
|
Post by rideintothesun on Nov 1, 2023 17:16:48 GMT
I dont deny any "self evident" "obvious" or "clearly demonstrated" evidence you have provided. The trouble is you have provided nothing of the sort other than your interpretations of what is in the general media. Thats hardly any of the above is it. Equally the "Islamic World" is such a broad stroke as to be meaningless. You ignore the cultural differences in every country that may have Islam as its primary religion. Take Malaysia as an example. Islam is the official religion of that country with 64% of the population declaring them selves as such. Counter to your prejudicial views on Islam, Malaysia also accommodates 19% being Buddhist, 9% being Christian, 6% being Hindus. Hang on...the ability to assimilate is predicated upon one's choice of faith? To wear a certain style of clothing is an indication that a person has not assimilated? How the hell does one "integrate" into British society to the fullest extent? How is that even measured? Perhaps by determining which cricket team you support? Honestly you sound like that old dinosaur Norman Tebbitt. You what? Please give us an example so we can stop laughing. Definition of prejudice: preconceived opinion that is not based on reasonIn buckets based upon that quoted statement from you. I do not who you are, where you are from or where you acquired your cultural influences. But now you are saying that you can determine whether someone is a Jew or not by their attitudes towards education? Really?? I dont know about you but I was raised in South Bristol within a white (uniformly white at that) family background. I can assure you that they, my family, placed a high value on education. I never met one family that didnt. There were those who did think that University education was not for the working classes, mainly predicated upon ignorance. Equally respect from professional qualifications was almost reverential. Instead of just saying it, provide examples. I should have been more direct. How does one "assimilate" into a society you were born into and where your family have been here for the longest time. Perhaps for a century or more. Are you suggesting that any citizen of the UK that doesnt fit into the perceived cultural norm of the pre 1950s is not fully assimilated? Just for clarity. I have used the term 'Islamic world' in the same way that others use 'the west'. So allow me to be more precise - let us say Middle-Eastern Muslim-majority countries. Are you going to claim that anti-Semitism is not an issue in Saudi Arabia, Egypt or Syria? This would be a good opportunity for you to address my previous question about imported anti-Semitism. The term 'assimilated' is widely used by historians and social scientists to refer to integration into a wider society or culture. It doesn't rest on any kind of value judgement and is simply used to distinguish those who sought to integrate into the society to the greatest extent possible from those who wished to retain a stronger and more visual link to their Jewish identity. I did not say you would be right every time. In the same way, I would often be able to guess/infer (with a reasonable degree of accuracy) that somebody is an Arab Christian before the point when they explicitly told me they were a Christian Arab. You grew up in a different generation and place. Times have changed. It has often been observed that minorities within the country place more value on education than 'native' Brits. The Chinese, Indian and Jewish British minority communities are obvious examples. Allow me to clarify. Even if you are born here or previous generations of your family have lived here, you are still a member of a minority community. You can choose not to be integrated by maintaining visual indicators of your minority status and culture (e.g. continuing to wear the hijab or the burka), and this does not change the fact that you are a British citizen or member of the wider society.
|
|
|
Post by lostinspace on Nov 2, 2023 14:43:16 GMT
M & S become embroiled in the war!! Because their traditional Xmas decorations are too similar to that of the Palestinian flag..red green and yellow.....in an Xmas advert that was compiled in AUGUST they are having to remove. it from their advertising campaign!! FFS
|
|
trymer
Joined: November 2018
Posts: 2,556
|
Post by trymer on Nov 2, 2023 15:28:12 GMT
M & S become embroiled in the war!! Because their traditional Xmas decorations are too similar to that of the Palestinian flag..red green and yellow.....in an Xmas advert that was compiled in AUGUST they are having to remove. it from their advertising campaign!! FFS The picture shows red,white and green decorations in flames,at the present time with M&S being (or were) Jewish owned that was going to be controversial, remember when Bryan Ferry got the sack from M&S for saying something about Nazi images ?......
|
|
trymer
Joined: November 2018
Posts: 2,556
|
Post by trymer on Nov 2, 2023 15:30:00 GMT
Police in Manchester and London tore down posters of Israeli hostages because they were a threat to 'community cohesion'.
|
|
|
Post by russiangas on Nov 2, 2023 22:53:04 GMT
So are you denying that over 8000 Palestinians have been killed since the start of this latest flare up? Are you denying that the majority of these are innocent civilians, and around 40% children? Of course the Hamas murders are abhorrent, but does that make killing that many innocent civilians just? Is there some kind of a hierarchy of the value of a life depending upon which religious denomination you belong to? Because I think don't that 8000 people, many children can be considered collateral damage. This is the actions of a state who's national security minister has convictions for inciting racial hatred, yeah really good people. It isn't a football match. Hamas attacked Israel in the full knowledge that there would be a strong Israeli military response. It knew from previous wars that there would be a substantial number of Palestinian civilian casualties as a result and still went ahead. Hamas uses the civilian population in the Strip as a human shield and views their lives as disposable. Any military action in such a densely populated area will cause civilian casualties. The number of casualties does not in itself show that the Israel is not taking necessary means to limit the loss of civilian life. After the 7/10 attacks, I don't see any alternative to destroying Hamas through military means. You cannot expect Israel and Israelis to live alongside Hamas. [br Ok so you obviously support the killing of innocent civilians and children, you've made it clear where you stand, you cannot say that and claim the moral high ground.
|
|
|
Post by Nobbygas on Nov 3, 2023 6:01:34 GMT
It isn't a football match. Hamas attacked Israel in the full knowledge that there would be a strong Israeli military response. It knew from previous wars that there would be a substantial number of Palestinian civilian casualties as a result and still went ahead. Hamas uses the civilian population in the Strip as a human shield and views their lives as disposable. Any military action in such a densely populated area will cause civilian casualties. The number of casualties does not in itself show that the Israel is not taking necessary means to limit the loss of civilian life. After the 7/10 attacks, I don't see any alternative to destroying Hamas through military means. You cannot expect Israel and Israelis to live alongside Hamas. [br Ok so you obviously support the killing of innocent civilians and children, you've made it clear where you stand, you cannot say that and claim the moral high ground. "Hamas killers 'roasted babies in an oven' during October 7 terror attack, Israeli first responder claims " Moral high ground?
|
|
bluetornados
Predictions League
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 15,759
|
Post by bluetornados on Nov 3, 2023 9:15:42 GMT
[br Ok so you obviously support the killing of innocent civilians and children, you've made it clear where you stand, you cannot say that and claim the moral high ground. "Hamas killers 'roasted babies in an oven' during October 7 terror attack, Israeli first responder claims " Moral high ground?There are just no words to say about these shocking and horrific reports and images of the dreadful plight of the innocent civilians caught up in this sickening violence..
|
|
|
Post by Nobbygas on Nov 3, 2023 10:35:44 GMT
"Eyal Waldman, an Israeli high-tech tycoon, founder CEO of Mellanox Technologies, created research and development centers five years ago first in Judea and Samaria (Palestinian) and then two years ago in Gaza, employing hundreds of Arab Palestinian developers.
He used to say then: "We have a lot of employees in Gaza today. There are talented and smart people out there, economically it will pay off. We have good staff, within a time zone, highly motivated, accessible and opportunities.
And I believe this is very important to bring the two nations together. People used to be afraid of each other and didn't talk. But the positive is created when people start working together and see tension being reduced and cooperation working. It's good for all sides."
On October 7, 2023, Palestinian terrorists came from Gaza and murdered his 24 year-old daughter Danielle less than a mile from where her father opened the most innovative factory for Gazans."
|
|
|
Post by rideintothesun on Nov 3, 2023 11:56:40 GMT
[br Ok so you obviously support the killing of innocent civilians and children, you've made it clear where you stand, you cannot say that and claim the moral high ground. "Hamas killers 'roasted babies in an oven' during October 7 terror attack, Israeli first responder claims " Moral high ground?Has this been verified by an independent source? The same with the ISIS flag being planted during the attack, which to me sounded highly suspect - I was surprised it wasn't more broadly questioned. ISIS weren't particularly popular among Palestinians, and ISIS actually regard Hamas as an enemy. I have no doubt that Hamas committed horrific crimes against humanity on 7/10, but this is so extreme that I will need independent confirmation before believing it.
|
|
|
Post by russiangas on Nov 3, 2023 18:07:31 GMT
"Hamas killers 'roasted babies in an oven' during October 7 terror attack, Israeli first responder claims " Moral high ground?Has this been verified by an independent source? The same with the ISIS flag being planted during the attack, which to me sounded highly suspect - I was surprised it wasn't more broadly questioned. ISIS weren't particularly popular among Palestinians, and ISIS actually regard Hamas as an enemy. I have no doubt that Hamas committed horrific crimes against humanity on 7/10, but this is so extreme that I will need independent confirmation before believing it. Where have I said I am a supporter of Hamas? If you read back through the posts I said the murders by Hamas were abhorrent. I'm not a supporter of Hamas, I'm a critic of Israel and their policy of killing civilians and children in huge numbers that cannot be justified. I support the PLO but most definitely not Hamas. Before you criticise someone it's probably best to actually look at what that have said first because you obviously haven't actually read my comments or paid any attention to them.
|
|
eppinggas
Administrator
Ian Alexander
Don't care
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 8,612
|
Post by eppinggas on Nov 4, 2023 11:58:27 GMT
Still a good balanced debate. To simplify things. Israel has to wipe out Hamas. To do this there will be civilian casualties. Once the Gazza strip is rubble, and Hamas are no more, there will be a chance to negotiate peace. Because previously negotiations were impossible with Hamas, because their stated aim was to kill every Jew. An international/UN solution, and perhaps an independent Palestinian state could be the eventual outcome of all this. I try and stay positive.
|
|
oldie
Joined: September 2021
Posts: 7,555
Member is Online
|
Post by oldie on Nov 4, 2023 12:24:42 GMT
Still a good balanced debate. To simplify things. Israel has to wipe out Hamas. To do this there will be civilian casualties. Once the Gazza strip is rubble, and Hamas are no more, there will be a chance to negotiate peace. Because previously negotiations were impossible with Hamas, because their stated aim was to kill every Jew. An international/UN solution, and perhaps an independent Palestinian state could be the eventual outcome of all this. I try and stay positive. That would be the best outcome from a disastrous situation. What I fear is that with every passing day views are hardening. The more civilians that are killed, on both sides, the less chance for a lasting peace. There is no military solution to this, that is the truth facing both sides. This weekend I am sat here just hoping against hope Iran and it's proxy, Hesbollah, does not become directly involved. That would unleash unimaginable horror.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 5, 2023 7:58:06 GMT
Hamas are hiding in Qatar while Gazan Palestinians, loads of whom are not Hamas/Jihadis/antisemites, are killed on their behalf. Hamas has to be removed for peace, but Hamas cannot be removed, as their generals are hiding elsewhere. Netanyahu's war crimes in Gaza justify nothing Hamas did, but Israelis should remove him, as large numbers still intend to. There will be no peace in Israel Palestine while the parties of God wage Holy War, and want this more than peace.
|
|
oldie
Joined: September 2021
Posts: 7,555
Member is Online
|
Post by oldie on Nov 5, 2023 10:15:26 GMT
Hamas are hiding in Qatar while Gazan Palestinians, loads of whom are not Hamas/Jihadis/antisemites, are killed on their behalf. Hamas has to be removed for peace, but Hamas cannot be removed, as their generals are hiding elsewhere. Netanyahu's war crimes in Gaza justify nothing Hamas did, but Israelis should remove him, as large numbers still intend to. There will be no peace in Israel Palestine while the parties of God wage Holy War, and want this more than peace. Do you really believe that cutting off the head of HAMAS will resolve the issues in Palestine? Also what does peace look like? They all pack up and carry on as before? I don't think so. The core, the heart of all this, is that Palestinians and perhaps Arabs and others more generally, have never accepted the creation of millions of refugees to satisfy the desires of Israelis. It looks to me now that Israel is intent on destroying GAZA and creating another huge human crisis. This is the reason Egypt and Jordan have denied entry. To do so would play into Israel's hands. The Israelis will most likely destroy HAMAS, destroying GAZA in the process with all the consequences for Palestinians there. A couple of million of them. But the resentment will be intensified and will flare up in Lebanon where there are over 100,000 armed and trained people backed by a regime in Iran which is hostile to the west and will not listen to cries of restraint (unless we barter sanctions). They (Iran) have their own issues with historical activities of the West in their country. This is a powder Keg.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 5, 2023 11:45:10 GMT
No, I don't. Something being necessary is different to something being a complete solution. I fear it is absolutely necessary to remove the men who lead armies, services, or paramilitaries to attempt the extermination of your people.
|
|
oldie
Joined: September 2021
Posts: 7,555
Member is Online
|
Post by oldie on Nov 5, 2023 13:23:07 GMT
No, I don't. Something being necessary is different to something being a complete solution. I fear it is absolutely necessary to remove the men who lead armies, services, or paramilitaries to attempt the extermination of your people. I can understand that reaction. But beware, by so doing, you don't create something even worse. The neutralisation of the PLO was achieved and begat HAMAS. A single linear strategy will not work.
|
|
|
Post by rideintothesun on Nov 5, 2023 20:41:05 GMT
Has this been verified by an independent source? The same with the ISIS flag being planted during the attack, which to me sounded highly suspect - I was surprised it wasn't more broadly questioned. ISIS weren't particularly popular among Palestinians, and ISIS actually regard Hamas as an enemy. I have no doubt that Hamas committed horrific crimes against humanity on 7/10, but this is so extreme that I will need independent confirmation before believing it. Where have I said I am a supporter of Hamas? If you read back through the posts I said the murders by Hamas were abhorrent. I'm not a supporter of Hamas, I'm a critic of Israel and their policy of killing civilians and children in huge numbers that cannot be justified. I support the PLO but most definitely not Hamas. Before you criticise someone it's probably best to actually look at what that have said first because you obviously haven't actually read my comments or paid any attention to them. Israel, unlike Hamas, does not seek to kill as many civilians as it can. If Israel wanted to do this, the casualty figures would be in the hundreds of thousands. During the siege of the Strip, Abbas actually encouraged Israel to tighten the siege as a way of undermining and weakening Hamas. If you are supporting a ceasefire, you are effectively supporting Hamas, as this will enable it to re-group and start planning future terrorist attacks. It has explicitly said it will do this. Abbas and many Palestinians would actually welcome the destruction of Hamas. Of course, they cannot openly say this at a time when the Strip is being attacked by Israel. Hamas need to be destroyed, the PA needs to be supported to re-establish its control of the Strip, and then meaningful peace negotiations need to be re-started. Had the Palestinians accepted what was offered at Camp David in 2000, we would clearly be in a better position.
|
|
|
Post by rideintothesun on Nov 5, 2023 20:59:32 GMT
No, I don't. Something being necessary is different to something being a complete solution. I fear it is absolutely necessary to remove the men who lead armies, services, or paramilitaries to attempt the extermination of your people. I can understand that reaction. But beware, by so doing, you don't create something even worse. The neutralisation of the PLO was achieved and begat HAMAS. A single linear strategy will not work. Its interesting - the PLO also carried out horrific terrorist attacks that killed many civilians, including the 1972 Munich terrorist attacks. Quite clearly, 'secular' Palestinian terrorism was equally undiscriminating in claiming the lives of many Israeli civilians. Arafat and his cohorts effectively surrendered when they entered into peace negotiations in 1993. Is this what you mean by 'neutralize'? Israel was willing to tolerate Hamas as the 'least worst option' in the Strip before 7/10 and Netanyahu even went as far as to suggest that the group should be supported as a way of dividing the Palestinian national movement. The Israelis also played this game in the 1980s and early 1990s.
|
|
|
Post by rideintothesun on Nov 5, 2023 21:06:50 GMT
Hamas are hiding in Qatar while Gazan Palestinians, loads of whom are not Hamas/Jihadis/antisemites, are killed on their behalf. Hamas has to be removed for peace, but Hamas cannot be removed, as their generals are hiding elsewhere. Netanyahu's war crimes in Gaza justify nothing Hamas did, but Israelis should remove him, as large numbers still intend to. There will be no peace in Israel Palestine while the parties of God wage Holy War, and want this more than peace. Do you really believe that cutting off the head of HAMAS will resolve the issues in Palestine? Also what does peace look like? They all pack up and carry on as before? I don't think so. The core, the heart of all this, is that Palestinians and perhaps Arabs and others more generally, have never accepted the creation of millions of refugees to satisfy the desires of Israelis. It looks to me now that Israel is intent on destroying GAZA and creating another huge human crisis. This is the reason Egypt and Jordan have denied entry. To do so would play into Israel's hands. The Israelis will most likely destroy HAMAS, destroying GAZA in the process with all the consequences for Palestinians there. A couple of million of them. But the resentment will be intensified and will flare up in Lebanon where there are over 100,000 armed and trained people backed by a regime in Iran which is hostile to the west and will not listen to cries of restraint (unless we barter sanctions). They (Iran) have their own issues with historical activities of the West in their country. This is a powder Keg. Egypt and Jordan are denying the Palestinians entry because they are seen as a national security threat. As already noted on this thread, the Palestinians have an unfortunate habit of biting the hand that feeds them. King Hussein was one of the most prominent international supporters of the Palestinian cause before the PLO turned on him and tried to overthrow him. The Arab states have repeatedly used the refugee issue in a highly cynical way, conveniently overlooking the fact that these people are refugees because of a war they started. Almost all of the refugees will never return. The resolution of the issue will involve a small number being permitted to return to Israel as part of a symbolic gesture and the rest being resettled in Arab states with international and Israeli compensation.
|
|