Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 3, 2019 17:45:17 GMT
Don't know why I bother. Mike hasn't even bothered to read the forum rules. Had he have made the effort to do that he would know that Rule 1 forbids advertising. Anyway, where do you reckon the SC stand legally with this, what I mean is, is there a problem with them still collecting money via the Share Scheme when they aren't able to honour the terms of the legal agreement? I should add though, if I understand the situation correctly, it doesn't sound as if it's the fault of the SC that they find themselves in that position. Bambi ….still waiting for that apology for Ken ...the Ken Loach of BR Community Trust
I was not advertising anything about the BRSC just saying you should stand to try and put the organisation back on the straight and narrow.
Fair enough. I'm sorry that I thought you had the intelligence to read and understand English. My mistake. Sorry. Yes, you are advertising, again. You've even started a new thread this time.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 3, 2019 18:01:41 GMT
A working class woman, who got herself into a grammar school then Cambridge, and as you say, all she gets are sneers and snipes. You're right, she isn't good debating on camera, but she is far more intelligent that the halfwits who criticise her based on that alone. Mate she can't debate full stop. If you listen to what she says in a role of responsibility it insults intelligence of a comprehensive education. Come on, be fair, Rex has a point. She's an educated Lady, so who are we to argue when she comes out with her words of wisdom, such as; 'Chairman Moa, on balance, did more good than harm' She's still pretty foxy though, no matter which wig she has on.
|
|
Rex
Predictions League
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 3,287
|
Post by Rex on Nov 3, 2019 19:32:34 GMT
Mate she can't debate full stop. If you listen to what she says in a role of responsibility it insults intelligence of a comprehensive education. Come on, be fair, Rex has a point. She's an educated Lady, so who are we to argue when she comes out with her words of wisdom, such as; 'Chairman Moa, on balance, did more good than harm' She's still pretty foxy though, no matter which wig she has on. She is still being vilified for f**king up her figures on TV, she obviously made a mistake, much like you made a mistake in spelling 'Mao' incorrectly. As for the foxy comment, it just makes you sound a bit of a fool.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 3, 2019 20:27:10 GMT
Come on, be fair, Rex has a point. She's an educated Lady, so who are we to argue when she comes out with her words of wisdom, such as; 'Chairman Moa, on balance, did more good than harm' She's still pretty foxy though, no matter which wig she has on. She is still being vilified for fing up her figures on TV, she obviously made a mistake, much like you made a mistake in spelling 'Mao' incorrectly. As for the foxy comment, it just makes you sound a bit of a fool. Made a mistake! Have you seen it? She didn't know the numbers. She wanted to be Home Secretary at the time. Why are you defending her? Sorry, whether she attended Newnham college or not, she's an idiot. I probably am as well, but I don't think that I'm fit to be in a position of authority and to make decisions relating to running the country. As you seem to think she's so super, can you explain what the good was that Mao did that offset the tens of millions that died both on his orders and as a direct result of his policies?
|
|
|
Post by o2o2bo2ba on Nov 3, 2019 21:05:49 GMT
"As you seem to think she's so super, can you explain what the good was that Mao did that offset the tens of millions that died both on his orders and as a direct result of his policies?"
Is the answer and has always been, better dead than red?
|
|
Rex
Predictions League
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 3,287
|
Post by Rex on Nov 3, 2019 23:36:40 GMT
She is still being vilified for fing up her figures on TV, she obviously made a mistake, much like you made a mistake in spelling 'Mao' incorrectly. As for the foxy comment, it just makes you sound a bit of a fool. Made a mistake! Have you seen it? She didn't know the numbers. She wanted to be Home Secretary at the time. Why are you defending her? Sorry, whether she attended Newnham college or not, she's an idiot. I probably am as well, but I don't think that I'm fit to be in a position of authority and to make decisions relating to running the country. As you seem to think she's so super, can you explain what the good was that Mao did that offset the tens of millions that died both on his orders and as a direct result of his policies? Did I defend Mao? Did I say Diane was 'super'? Come on Bambi, you are always telling people to read what you actually wrote. I just think she is far from thick and making sneering comments about a womans looks is a bit w**ky.
|
|
Admin
Administrator
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 51
|
Post by Admin on Nov 4, 2019 8:52:10 GMT
How many times does it need to be said...THIS IS A BRISTOL ROVERS FOOTBALL FORUM.
Take your political debates elsewhere, it's not welcome here.
|
|
Rex
Predictions League
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 3,287
|
Post by Rex on Nov 4, 2019 11:50:39 GMT
How many times does it need to be said...THIS IS A BRISTOL ROVERS FOOTBALL FORUM. Take your political debates elsewhere, it's not welcome here. The length of the thread in comparison to nearly all others , suggests that it is pretty welcome
|
|
trymer
Joined: November 2018
Posts: 1,442
|
Post by trymer on Nov 4, 2019 14:12:43 GMT
How many times does it need to be said...THIS IS A BRISTOL ROVERS FOOTBALL FORUM. Take your political debates elsewhere, it's not welcome here. I totally agree but what about the rugby thread ? THIS IS BRISTOL ROVERS FOOTBALL FORUM.
|
|
kingswood Polak
Without music life would be a mistake
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 10,255
|
Post by kingswood Polak on Nov 4, 2019 18:31:07 GMT
How many times does it need to be said...THIS IS A BRISTOL ROVERS FOOTBALL FORUM. Take your political debates elsewhere, it's not welcome here. I totally agree but what about the rugby thread ? THIS IS BRISTOL ROVERS FOOTBALL FORUM. There are other parts of the forum to do this rather than on this section. Fair play Admin as I think we have hit some low spots at times. I like to think of gasheads as the better of the 2 places and because it rarely gets personal nor does abusive language get used often
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 4, 2019 19:46:01 GMT
I totally agree but what about the rugby thread ? THIS IS BRISTOL ROVERS FOOTBALL FORUM. There are other parts of the forum to do this rather than on this section. Fair play Admin as I think we have hit some low spots at times. I like to think of gasheads as the better of the 2 places and because it rarely gets personal nor does abusive language get used often Well said. Nothing abusive here, just one arsey member from admin who most likely thinks he's a champion of free speech, but as usual with bigots, that only works when he agrees with and likes what's being said. It's a low grade messageboard for goodness sake, get a grip admin. Anyway, as already mentioned, as we are only allowed to talk about Rovers, I'll be looking out for the cricket, rugby, general sport and music sections to be removed before the end of the day. But of course, hypocrites don't work like that. There, that'll get his lip wobbling and the thread will probably get locked and anchored. Or maybe it's a double bluff, and now I've said you will do it you won't. Poor admin, big decision to make.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 4, 2019 20:38:54 GMT
Pathetic.
Lip well and truly set to 'wobble mode'.
Well done admin.
And this is why nobody uses this forum.
When it's just you and a couple of others who think exactly like you then you'll be happy I guess.
|
|
Peter Parker
Global Moderator
Richard Walker
You have been sentenced to DELETION!
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 4,920
|
Post by Peter Parker on Nov 4, 2019 21:22:11 GMT
There are other parts of the forum to do this rather than on this section. Fair play Admin as I think we have hit some low spots at times. I like to think of gasheads as the better of the 2 places and because it rarely gets personal nor does abusive language get used often Well said. Nothing abusive here, just one arsey member from admin who most likely thinks he's a champion of free speech, but as usual with bigots, that only works when he agrees with and likes what's being said. It's a low grade messageboard for goodness sake, get a grip admin. Anyway, as already mentioned, as we are only allowed to talk about Rovers, I'll be looking out for the cricket, rugby, general sport and music sections to be removed before the end of the day. But of course, hypocrites don't work like that. There, that'll get his lip wobbling and the thread will probably get locked and anchored. Or maybe it's a double bluff, and now I've said you will do it you won't. Poor admin, big decision to make. I am sure we dont have to go over old ground on why there is no 'general'chat subsection here, because all the political stuff got poisonous And admin dont want to have to deal with it if it gets like that Remember this forum was initially set up to replace the old one, so it was up to those that set it up to set up it how they please. They can always take the forum down whenever they choose Plenty is allowed to go on here and we generally only act if something is reported, what we dont want is threads being turned into political debates that get out of hand, and the best way to do it, is to shut the debates down. Its an admin choice. You can always head over to Gaschat for political debate. I will be happy to interact there on any such debates As for people not using the forum, maybe it has simply had its time. Its no ones responsibility to keep alive and kicking, promote it and encourage people to use it. It was set up to fill a void/need at the time and perhaps it is no longer required
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 4, 2019 21:57:15 GMT
Well said. Nothing abusive here, just one arsey member from admin who most likely thinks he's a champion of free speech, but as usual with bigots, that only works when he agrees with and likes what's being said. It's a low grade messageboard for goodness sake, get a grip admin. Anyway, as already mentioned, as we are only allowed to talk about Rovers, I'll be looking out for the cricket, rugby, general sport and music sections to be removed before the end of the day. But of course, hypocrites don't work like that. There, that'll get his lip wobbling and the thread will probably get locked and anchored. Or maybe it's a double bluff, and now I've said you will do it you won't. Poor admin, big decision to make. I am sure we dont have to go over old ground on why there is no 'general'chat subsection here, because all the political stuff got poisonous And admin dont want to have to deal with it if it gets like that Remember this forum was initially set up to replace the old one, so it was up to those that set it up to set up it how they please. They can always take the forum down whenever they choose Plenty is allowed to go on here and we generally only act if something is reported, what we dont want is threads being turned into political debates that get out of hand, and the best way to do it, is to shut the debates down. Its an admin choice. You can always head over to Gaschat for political debate. I will be happy to interact there on any such debates As for people not using the forum, maybe it has simply had its time. Its no ones responsibility to keep alive and kicking, promote it and encourage people to use it. It was set up to fill a void/need at the time and perhaps it is no longer required Ah, so, the thread was reported by 1 person, whilst several people were interacting. There's your clue, right there.
|
|
JeffNZ
Administrator
Jimmy Morgan
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 2,450
|
Post by JeffNZ on Nov 4, 2019 21:58:47 GMT
After over 6 years of setting up, maintaining, administering and paying for it, I'd be very happy to hand over the keys to this asylum. Get in touch if you're interested.
|
|
Cheshiregas
Global Moderator
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 2,151
|
Post by Cheshiregas on Nov 5, 2019 9:44:38 GMT
I am sure we dont have to go over old ground on why there is no 'general'chat subsection here, because all the political stuff got poisonous And admin dont want to have to deal with it if it gets like that Remember this forum was initially set up to replace the old one, so it was up to those that set it up to set up it how they please. They can always take the forum down whenever they choose Plenty is allowed to go on here and we generally only act if something is reported, what we dont want is threads being turned into political debates that get out of hand, and the best way to do it, is to shut the debates down. Its an admin choice. You can always head over to Gaschat for political debate. I will be happy to interact there on any such debates As for people not using the forum, maybe it has simply had its time. Its no ones responsibility to keep alive and kicking, promote it and encourage people to use it. It was set up to fill a void/need at the time and perhaps it is no longer required Ah, so, the thread was reported by 1 person, whilst several people were interacting. There's your clue, right there. You attacking Admin for doing their job doesn't help. You are coming over as very self righteous, sarcastic and pompous to be honest. If you don't like the job admin does ~ which is very light touch ~ then you are welcome to take over running the forum. You can then do what you want ~ you could even rename it 'The Bamber forum'... And how do you know only one person complained? Happy to debate any subject with anyone but PP has outlined why there was no political section and as the saying goes 'other forums are also available'. Have a happy day, let others have one too. Regards
|
|
harrybuckle
Always look on the bright side
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 5,416
|
Post by harrybuckle on Nov 5, 2019 12:20:31 GMT
Bambi deserves a yellow card and a brief ban. He has insulted me and others. Can admin please arrange. He clearly feels he is superior to everyone else on this forum.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 5, 2019 13:14:46 GMT
Bambi deserves a yellow card and a brief ban. He has insulted me and others. Can admin please arrange. He clearly feels he is superior to everyone else on this forum. See you on the naughty step then Mike. You still haven't served your ban for threatening to have people beaten up. But Admin thought that was OK it seems.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 5, 2019 13:45:13 GMT
Ah, so, the thread was reported by 1 person, whilst several people were interacting. There's your clue, right there. You attacking Admin for doing their job doesn't help. You are coming over as very self righteous, sarcastic and pompous to be honest. If you don't like the job admin does ~ which is very light touch ~ then you are welcome to take over running the forum. You can then do what you want ~ you could even rename it 'The Bamber forum'... And how do you know only one person complained? Happy to debate any subject with anyone but PP has outlined why there was no political section and as the saying goes 'other forums are also available'. Have a happy day, let others have one too. Regards You have the forum that you deserve, hardly anybody uses it because you over-react as soon as anything happens that either one of the admin team don't like or one member spits his dummy, again. The thread in question wasn't an argument, there was nothing offensive, it was just a bit of silliness. Several people were 'having a good day', why exactly was it a problem to anybody not contributing to the thread? There are loads of threads that don't interest me, I just ignore them and respect the right of others to get on with it. Seems that's not reciprocated on here. Whatever. Keep going until there's nobody apart from the admin team and people who want to 'Guess The Gate', then it'll be a job well done. I'll take you up on your offer to 'debate any subject with anyone'', PM me your best shot at justifying the claim you get your moral standards from Christianity. I think we could have an interesting discussion. In fact, if you follow 1 Peter I think you can't really refuse to have that discussion if asked to?
|
|
Peter Parker
Global Moderator
Richard Walker
You have been sentenced to DELETION!
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 4,920
|
Post by Peter Parker on Nov 5, 2019 14:59:33 GMT
You attacking Admin for doing their job doesn't help. You are coming over as very self righteous, sarcastic and pompous to be honest. If you don't like the job admin does ~ which is very light touch ~ then you are welcome to take over running the forum. You can then do what you want ~ you could even rename it 'The Bamber forum'... And how do you know only one person complained? Happy to debate any subject with anyone but PP has outlined why there was no political section and as the saying goes 'other forums are also available'. Have a happy day, let others have one too. Regards You have the forum that you deserve, hardly anybody uses it because you over-react as soon as anything happens that either one of the admin team don't like or one member spits his dummy, again. The thread in question wasn't an argument, there was nothing offensive, it was just a bit of silliness. Several people were 'having a good day', why exactly was it a problem to anybody not contributing to the thread? There are loads of threads that don't interest me, I just ignore them and respect the right of others to get on with it. Seems that's not reciprocated on here. Whatever. Keep going until there's nobody apart from the admin team and people who want to 'Guess The Gate', then it'll be a job well done. I'll take you up on your offer to 'debate any subject with anyone'', PM me your best shot at justifying the claim you get your moral standards from Christianity. I think we could have an interesting discussion. In fact, if you follow 1 Peter I think you can't really refuse to have that discussion if asked to? Jeff set the forum up as a replacement to the old one. I wouldn't call it his forum, but if he chooses to shut it down tonight when he wakes up I wouldn't blame him.
As for over reacting Admin quite often ignore reports because we don't see the justification for acting.
For a place you seem to dislike, you seem to come back quite a lot. If you want to take over the forum from Jeff and moderate it yourself (or anybody you choose) so that it fits something you are happy with I am sure he will oblige.
Regards
Sprout
|
|