|
|
Post by toteend3 on Jun 16, 2019 20:11:16 GMT
Apologies in advance if I upset anyone, here follows the thread that led to me being banned lat week.
The woman's football World Cup has arrived but who cares! Generally speaking a top woman's Premier league side would struggle to beat a means team from the Downs league. I accept the fact some female players are very skilled and the woman's game can only improve in time.
What woud make the womans football really watchable, would be to replace those those awful 'butch' football shorts with hockey/tennis skirts. Iam not being sexist (Well a little bit!) I am adamant that nobody would bet against audience figures not to double overnight.
There is another thread on Gasworks under the subject title The Woman's Game and here follows some of the responses - 90 minutes of my life i'am not getting back, the standard was atrocious like watching two sides on the Downs - after watching 10 minutes I could not get enthralled so watched Vera on catch up - Conclusion is that the standard of women's football is awful - Football equilient to youth u16's If they played a conference side they would crumble etc etc.
Now that the football has started, based the above quotes, it appears to confirm that my observation from my first paragraph was fair. There was also comments made to the effect that womans game will improve over time.
Whilst the content of my second paragraph was more of a 'wind up' a lot of comments did confirm the generally poor attendances in woman's football and one quote speaking behalf of four female fans that they had not been converted to the womens game, they remarked it would be more likely to attract men. On the same subject i did a follow up quote stating if female beach volleyball players were to be made to wear boiler suits then nobody would it.
At the end of the day i guess iam just an old toteender who hail's from a non pc era, and for the record i hope the England girls win the bloody thing! and do something us men havent been able to do since 66. UTG
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 16, 2019 20:16:18 GMT
The question you have to ask yourself, is why?
|
|
|
|
Post by toteend3 on Jun 16, 2019 20:22:53 GMT
The question you have to ask yourself, is why? ThREAD OR DEAD |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 16, 2019 20:31:00 GMT
Ive never read that site, but we're you banned for being stuck in the 1970s?
|
|
|
|
Post by toteend3 on Jun 16, 2019 20:45:55 GMT
Ive never read that site, but we're you banned for being stuck in the 1970s? Now then now then now then, as it appens could be life on mars! |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 16, 2019 20:51:13 GMT
Is he doing... Jimmy Savile? Really?
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 16, 2019 20:53:33 GMT
Ive never read that site, but we're you banned for being stuck in the 1970s? No, he wasn't even banned as far as I can tell, just one thread was anchored because it got a bit disrespectful to Women's football. Should have let the thread run, one of two things would have happened, either good points would have been made and discussed or people would have made themselves look a bit daft. |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 16, 2019 20:59:58 GMT
or people would have made themselves look a bit daft. Have you seen Gasworks? I think that ship has sailed. |
|
dido
Predictions League
Peter Aitken
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,883 
|
Post by dido on Jun 17, 2019 5:30:21 GMT
They're not just "a big daft" over there. They're plain quackers.
Unlike on here......oh, ...um,...
|
|
|
|
Post by Gregory Stevens on Jun 17, 2019 18:12:47 GMT
They are basically in a cult which makes them think their view is the only valid one. They’re basically bigots but they would use that term against you.
Don’t worry mate, these people don’t represent society. They’ve been brainwashed basically.
|
|
|
|
Post by Blue Mist on Jun 17, 2019 19:18:13 GMT
Apologies in advance if I upset anyone, here follows the thread that led to me being banned lat week. The woman's football World Cup has arrived but who cares! Generally speaking a top woman's Premier league side would struggle to beat a means team from the Downs league. I accept the fact some female players are very skilled and the woman's game can only improve in time. What woud make the womans football really watchable, would be to replace those those awful 'butch' football shorts with hockey/tennis skirts. Iam not being sexist (Well a little bit!) I am adamant that nobody would bet against audience figures not to double overnight. There is another thread on Gasworks under the subject title The Woman's Game and here follows some of the responses - 90 minutes of my life i'am not getting back, the standard was atrocious like watching two sides on the Downs - after watching 10 minutes I could not get enthralled so watched Vera on catch up - Conclusion is that the standard of women's football is awful - Football equilient to youth u16's If they played a conference side they would crumble etc etc. Now that the football has started, based the above quotes, it appears to confirm that my observation from my first paragraph was fair. There was also comments made to the effect that womans game will improve over time. Whilst the content of my second paragraph was more of a 'wind up' a lot of comments did confirm the generally poor attendances in woman's football and one quote speaking behalf of four female fans that they had not been converted to the womens game, they remarked it would be more likely to attract men. On the same subject i did a follow up quote stating if female beach volleyball players were to be made to wear boiler suits then nobody would it. At the end of the day i guess iam just an old toteender who hail's from a non pc era, and for the record i hope the England girls win the bloody thing! and do something us men havent been able to do since 66. UTG Certainly no Goody Two Shoes or Prince Charming but this is a Dog Eat Dog world and you're from The Rough Stuff! |
|
|
|
Post by lostinspace on Jun 17, 2019 21:11:26 GMT
Apologies in advance if I upset anyone, here follows the thread that led to me being banned lat week. The woman's football World Cup has arrived but who cares! Generally speaking a top woman's Premier league side would struggle to beat a means team from the Downs league. I accept the fact some female players are very skilled and the woman's game can only improve in time. What woud make the womans football really watchable, would be to replace those those awful 'butch' football shorts with hockey/tennis skirts. Iam not being sexist (Well a little bit!) I am adamant that nobody would bet against audience figures not to double overnight. There is another thread on Gasworks under the subject title The Woman's Game and here follows some of the responses - 90 minutes of my life i'am not getting back, the standard was atrocious like watching two sides on the Downs - after watching 10 minutes I could not get enthralled so watched Vera on catch up - Conclusion is that the standard of women's football is awful - Football equilient to youth u16's If they played a conference side they would crumble etc etc. Now that the football has started, based the above quotes, it appears to confirm that my observation from my first paragraph was fair. There was also comments made to the effect that womans game will improve over time. Whilst the content of my second paragraph was more of a 'wind up' a lot of comments did confirm the generally poor attendances in woman's football and one quote speaking behalf of four female fans that they had not been converted to the womens game, they remarked it would be more likely to attract men. On the same subject i did a follow up quote stating if female beach volleyball players were to be made to wear boiler suits then nobody would it. At the end of the day i guess iam just an old toteender who hail's from a non pc era, and for the record i hope the England girls win the bloody thing! and do something us men havent been able to do since 66. UTG |
|
|
|
Post by lostinspace on Jun 17, 2019 21:12:21 GMT
and the beauty is you can go back to school tomorrow and recover your chewing gum from under your seat
|
|
|
|
Post by toteend3 on Jun 17, 2019 21:30:04 GMT
They are basically in a cult which makes them think their view is the only valid one. They’re basically bigots but they would use that term against you. Don’t worry mate, these people don’t represent society. They’ve been brainwashed basically. Thinking back you have hit the nail on the head, a smug little band of self righteous bigots who run the cult. All they seem interested in is tittle tattle between themselves. Lo and behold anyone having an opinion, which one could expect a immediate negative put down. It's not as if many of them actually watch the gas they just sit in their armchairs spouting bollocks amoung themselves. Thank goodness they have done me a favour by banning me from gascrap! |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 17, 2019 23:13:01 GMT
OK, we get it, that's done and dusted, you were a bit rude and the SJWs all waded in.
What else have you got?
|
|
|
|
Post by toteend3 on Jun 18, 2019 7:01:16 GMT
OK, we get it, that's done and dusted, you were a bit rude and the SJWs all waded in. What else have you got? Nothing Bye |
|
|
|
Post by Henbury Gas on Jun 18, 2019 7:49:32 GMT
OK, we get it, that's done and dusted, you were a bit rude and the SJWs all waded in. What else have you got? Some would say did he have anything in the first place ? |
|
eppinggas
Administrator
Ian Alexander
Don't care
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 8,119
Member is Online
|
Post by eppinggas on Jun 18, 2019 8:24:04 GMT
OK, we get it, that's done and dusted, you were a bit rude and the SJWs all waded in. What else have you got? Some would say did he have anything in the first place ? Bit harsh. toteend4 - where are you? You have a right to an opinion. If it's universally shouted down, on reflection you may think your original supposition was incorrect, or at least very poorly expressed. I think that's how it works anyway. I like both sides of an argument. I even listen to James O'Brien occasionally. He says some interesting stuff. But invariably ruins his own argument with one of his tiresome anti Jacob Rees-Mogg rants. But I still listen to him. And he's still a ***t. |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 18, 2019 8:39:46 GMT
OK, we get it, that's done and dusted, you were a bit rude and the SJWs all waded in. What else have you got? Some would say did he have anything in the first place ? He'll be back. He's just off glueing pics of faces of the England Women's footballers all through the nightwear section of the Freeman's catalogue. |
|
|
|
Post by Henbury Gas on Jun 18, 2019 9:15:37 GMT
Some would say did he have anything in the first place ? He'll be back. He's just off glueing pics of faces of the England Women's footballers all through the nightwear section of the Freeman's catalogue. lol  |
|
