Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 1, 2014 11:40:10 GMT
Recent post on UWE Bristol Facebook page... www.facebook.com/groups/1419455094971841/permalink/1439183679665649/Text :- Sorry this is long but you need to see it. This is an e-mail sent by Trash to a Rovers fan, who they mistakenly believed was a supporter. Thank you Martin Lewis. Needless to say I have passed it onto the club, Charlotte and our local supportive councillor. Conversation started today Martin Lewis 09:38 Martin Lewis I've had an email over night from trash ( I took offence to one of their claims, emailed them , they now think I'm a supporter TWATS) not posted on the uwe start to finish due to the size but here it is Dear Supporters It was hugely disappointing that TRASHorfield were not able to take this case to the Court of Appeal after Justice Hickinbottom ruled against us in the judicial review. Whilst still sure of the merit of this legal argument, the value of protecting our high street, homes and neighbourhood, exposure to further forbidding costs and the inherent uncertainties of the Judicial system led us to conclude sadly that we had to draw a close to this legal process. The adverse impacts of the Sainsbury’s development are indisputable and irreversible and we remain determined to do what we can to highlight and challenge these, seeking appropriate mitigation wherever possible for the damage it will inflict. Since the Judicial Review lots has happened: Notably, local historian and photographer, Jamie Carstairs has made an application to English Heritage to have the whole of the Memorial Ground listed, in recognition of the entire sports ground being Bristol’s largest and most important war memorial. English Heritage have rejected the application so far, but we understand a challenge to this decision is being lodged with the Secretary of State. TRASHorfield are fully behind Jamie's campaign and you can find the 38 degrees petition and further information about the Memorial Ground here: tinyurl.com/savethememPlease sign if you feel that it is wrong and disrespectful to build a supermarket on a war memorial. Please also forward this email onto anyone you think could help the campaign by signing the petition. A significant piece of good news is the recent election by a large margin in the Bishopston Ward of a second Green Councillor. Tim Malnick joins Daniella Radice to represent the interests of constituents in Bishopston including our precious high street. We are delighted that Tim has been elected with over 47% of the vote. His clear stance on the supermarket and concerns about the Gloucester Road, traffic and pollution all confirm what local people already knew: that the majority of local residents are in opposition to a goliath supermarket on the Memorial Ground, despite what a press-hungry MP would have us believe. We also wonder what if any implications there may be for BRFC's new stadium now that they have been relegated. One thing is certain, we must ensure that the supermarket does not proceed unless the stadium is complete, this was Bristol City Council's justification for granting permission for the supermarket. Over the forthcoming months you will see our presence as we continue to raise the final outstanding funds to settle our legal bill with a number of community focused activities and events. We will also endeavour to raise awareness of our campaign nationally and publicise the injustices of poor planning decisions taken with scant regard for the wishes of local people. We will continue to keep the Council on its toes with regards to the impacts of poor air quality and inadequate highways planning as Bristol moves towards becoming the UK's first Green Capital of Europe. An essential part of this will be to keep abreast of any amendments to the plans for the Memorial Stadium. You may be aware that Sainsbury’s have already applied for an extension to delivery hours which would have rendered this development even more anti-social and was fortunately refused by Bristol City Council. TRASHorfield will take action should Sainsbury’s attempt to further alter the terms of the Section 106 Legal Agreement as they appear to be intent on doing. Once again, to all the thousands of you who worked with us to do our very best to stop this development we extend our continuing gratitude. This is not over yet; perhaps, just perhaps we will still see a better outcome for this special site. Best regards TRASHorfield
|
|
Lazza
Rod Hull
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 264
|
Post by Lazza on Jun 1, 2014 11:44:16 GMT
Oh give me strength! When will these loonies give up!
|
|
|
Post by The Man from Del Monte on Jun 1, 2014 11:51:43 GMT
Embarrassing.
Is it any wonder why Bristol is so far behind other cities in the UK.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 1, 2014 11:56:31 GMT
Typical of them,but it's not them stopping us at present,in fact what is. Is it ever going to be built,i for one could do with some positive news on the UWE
|
|
Five Apples
Predictions League
Joined: June 2014
Posts: 418
|
Post by Five Apples on Jun 1, 2014 12:07:42 GMT
It just makes me hate lentils and sandals even more...these people are like a bad fart that just lingers and won't go away.
|
|
|
Post by gasheadnaboo on Jun 1, 2014 12:16:49 GMT
"We are delighted that Tim has been elected with over 47% of the vote. His clear stance on the supermarket and concerns about the Gloucester Road, traffic and pollution all confirm what local people already knew: that the majority of local residents are in opposition to a goliath supermarket on the Memorial Ground"Since when was 47% of 36.5% a "majority"
|
|
Bridgeman
Alfie Biggs
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,549
|
Post by Bridgeman on Jun 1, 2014 12:37:37 GMT
"We are delighted that Tim has been elected with over 47% of the vote. His clear stance on the supermarket and concerns about the Gloucester Road, traffic and pollution all confirm what local people already knew: that the majority of local residents are in opposition to a goliath supermarket on the Memorial Ground"Since when was 47% of 36.5% a "majority" When 63.5% of the electorate couldn't be bothered to vote actually
|
|
|
Post by bluegashead on Jun 1, 2014 12:42:07 GMT
Is there anything new here? Not being funny but everything is what I expected. Are we still at the same stage waiting for the final decusion?
|
|
|
Post by bluegashead on Jun 1, 2014 12:42:55 GMT
Recent post on UWE Bristol Facebook page... www.facebook.com/groups/1419455094971841/permalink/1439183679665649/Text :- Sorry this is long but you need to see it. This is an e-mail sent by Trash to a Rovers fan, who they mistakenly believed was a supporter. Thank you Martin Lewis. Needless to say I have passed it onto the club, Charlotte and our local supportive councillor. Conversation started today Martin Lewis 09:38 Martin Lewis I've had an email over night from trash ( I took offence to one of their claims, emailed them , they now think I'm a supporter TWATS) not posted on the uwe start to finish due to the size but here it is Dear Supporters It was hugely disappointing that TRASHorfield were not able to take this case to the Court of Appeal after Justice Hickinbottom ruled against us in the judicial review. Whilst still sure of the merit of this legal argument, the value of protecting our high street, homes and neighbourhood, exposure to further forbidding costs and the inherent uncertainties of the Judicial system led us to conclude sadly that we had to draw a close to this legal process. The adverse impacts of the Sainsbury’s development are indisputable and irreversible and we remain determined to do what we can to highlight and challenge these, seeking appropriate mitigation wherever possible for the damage it will inflict. Since the Judicial Review lots has happened: Notably, local historian and photographer, Jamie Carstairs has made an application to English Heritage to have the whole of the Memorial Ground listed, in recognition of the entire sports ground being Bristol’s largest and most important war memorial. English Heritage have rejected the application so far, but we understand a challenge to this decision is being lodged with the Secretary of State. TRASHorfield are fully behind Jamie's campaign and you can find the 38 degrees petition and further information about the Memorial Ground here: tinyurl.com/savethememPlease sign if you feel that it is wrong and disrespectful to build a supermarket on a war memorial. Please also forward this email onto anyone you think could help the campaign by signing the petition. A significant piece of good news is the recent election by a large margin in the Bishopston Ward of a second Green Councillor. Tim Malnick joins Daniella Radice to represent the interests of constituents in Bishopston including our precious high street. We are delighted that Tim has been elected with over 47% of the vote. His clear stance on the supermarket and concerns about the Gloucester Road, traffic and pollution all confirm what local people already knew: that the majority of local residents are in opposition to a goliath supermarket on the Memorial Ground, despite what a press-hungry MP would have us believe. We also wonder what if any implications there may be for BRFC's new stadium now that they have been relegated. One thing is certain, we must ensure that the supermarket does not proceed unless the stadium is complete, this was Bristol City Council's justification for granting permission for the supermarket. Over the forthcoming months you will see our presence as we continue to raise the final outstanding funds to settle our legal bill with a number of community focused activities and events. We will also endeavour to raise awareness of our campaign nationally and publicise the injustices of poor planning decisions taken with scant regard for the wishes of local people. We will continue to keep the Council on its toes with regards to the impacts of poor air quality and inadequate highways planning as Bristol moves towards becoming the UK's first Green Capital of Europe. An essential part of this will be to keep abreast of any amendments to the plans for the Memorial Stadium. You may be aware that Sainsbury’s have already applied for an extension to delivery hours which would have rendered this development even more anti-social and was fortunately refused by Bristol City Council. TRASHorfield will take action should Sainsbury’s attempt to further alter the terms of the Section 106 Legal Agreement as they appear to be intent on doing. Once again, to all the thousands of you who worked with us to do our very best to stop this development we extend our continuing gratitude. This is not over yet; perhaps, just perhaps we will still see a better outcome for this special site. Best regards TRASHorfield
|
|
|
Post by bluegashead on Jun 1, 2014 12:43:33 GMT
Recent post on UWE Bristol Facebook page... www.facebook.com/groups/1419455094971841/permalink/1439183679665649/Text :- Sorry this is long but you need to see it. This is an e-mail sent by Trash to a Rovers fan, who they mistakenly believed was a supporter. Thank you Martin Lewis. Needless to say I have passed it onto the club, Charlotte and our local supportive councillor. Conversation started today Martin Lewis 09:38 Martin Lewis I've had an email over night from trash ( I took offence to one of their claims, emailed them , they now think I'm a supporter TWATS) not posted on the uwe start to finish due to the size but here it is Dear Supporters It was hugely disappointing that TRASHorfield were not able to take this case to the Court of Appeal after Justice Hickinbottom ruled against us in the judicial review. Whilst still sure of the merit of this legal argument, the value of protecting our high street, homes and neighbourhood, exposure to further forbidding costs and the inherent uncertainties of the Judicial system led us to conclude sadly that we had to draw a close to this legal process. The adverse impacts of the Sainsbury’s development are indisputable and irreversible and we remain determined to do what we can to highlight and challenge these, seeking appropriate mitigation wherever possible for the damage it will inflict. Since the Judicial Review lots has happened: Notably, local historian and photographer, Jamie Carstairs has made an application to English Heritage to have the whole of the Memorial Ground listed, in recognition of the entire sports ground being Bristol’s largest and most important war memorial. English Heritage have rejected the application so far, but we understand a challenge to this decision is being lodged with the Secretary of State. TRASHorfield are fully behind Jamie's campaign and you can find the 38 degrees petition and further information about the Memorial Ground here: tinyurl.com/savethememPlease sign if you feel that it is wrong and disrespectful to build a supermarket on a war memorial. Please also forward this email onto anyone you think could help the campaign by signing the petition. A significant piece of good news is the recent election by a large margin in the Bishopston Ward of a second Green Councillor. Tim Malnick joins Daniella Radice to represent the interests of constituents in Bishopston including our precious high street. We are delighted that Tim has been elected with over 47% of the vote. His clear stance on the supermarket and concerns about the Gloucester Road, traffic and pollution all confirm what local people already knew: that the majority of local residents are in opposition to a goliath supermarket on the Memorial Ground, despite what a press-hungry MP would have us believe. We also wonder what if any implications there may be for BRFC's new stadium now that they have been relegated. One thing is certain, we must ensure that the supermarket does not proceed unless the stadium is complete, this was Bristol City Council's justification for granting permission for the supermarket. Over the forthcoming months you will see our presence as we continue to raise the final outstanding funds to settle our legal bill with a number of community focused activities and events. We will also endeavour to raise awareness of our campaign nationally and publicise the injustices of poor planning decisions taken with scant regard for the wishes of local people. We will continue to keep the Council on its toes with regards to the impacts of poor air quality and inadequate highways planning as Bristol moves towards becoming the UK's first Green Capital of Europe. An essential part of this will be to keep abreast of any amendments to the plans for the Memorial Stadium. You may be aware that Sainsbury’s have already applied for an extension to delivery hours which would have rendered this development even more anti-social and was fortunately refused by Bristol City Council. TRASHorfield will take action should Sainsbury’s attempt to further alter the terms of the Section 106 Legal Agreement as they appear to be intent on doing. Once again, to all the thousands of you who worked with us to do our very best to stop this development we extend our continuing gratitude. This is not over yet; perhaps, just perhaps we will still see a better outcome for this special site. Best regards TRASHorfield
|
|
|
Post by bluegashead on Jun 1, 2014 12:44:08 GMT
Recent post on UWE Bristol Facebook page... www.facebook.com/groups/1419455094971841/permalink/1439183679665649/Text :- Sorry this is long but you need to see it. This is an e-mail sent by Trash to a Rovers fan, who they mistakenly believed was a supporter. Thank you Martin Lewis. Needless to say I have passed it onto the club, Charlotte and our local supportive councillor. Conversation started today Martin Lewis 09:38 Martin Lewis I've had an email over night from trash ( I took offence to one of their claims, emailed them , they now think I'm a supporter TWATS) not posted on the uwe start to finish due to the size but here it is Dear Supporters It was hugely disappointing that TRASHorfield were not able to take this case to the Court of Appeal after Justice Hickinbottom ruled against us in the judicial review. Whilst still sure of the merit of this legal argument, the value of protecting our high street, homes and neighbourhood, exposure to further forbidding costs and the inherent uncertainties of the Judicial system led us to conclude sadly that we had to draw a close to this legal process. The adverse impacts of the Sainsbury’s development are indisputable and irreversible and we remain determined to do what we can to highlight and challenge these, seeking appropriate mitigation wherever possible for the damage it will inflict. Since the Judicial Review lots has happened: Notably, local historian and photographer, Jamie Carstairs has made an application to English Heritage to have the whole of the Memorial Ground listed, in recognition of the entire sports ground being Bristol’s largest and most important war memorial. English Heritage have rejected the application so far, but we understand a challenge to this decision is being lodged with the Secretary of State. TRASHorfield are fully behind Jamie's campaign and you can find the 38 degrees petition and further information about the Memorial Ground here: tinyurl.com/savethememPlease sign if you feel that it is wrong and disrespectful to build a supermarket on a war memorial. Please also forward this email onto anyone you think could help the campaign by signing the petition. A significant piece of good news is the recent election by a large margin in the Bishopston Ward of a second Green Councillor. Tim Malnick joins Daniella Radice to represent the interests of constituents in Bishopston including our precious high street. We are delighted that Tim has been elected with over 47% of the vote. His clear stance on the supermarket and concerns about the Gloucester Road, traffic and pollution all confirm what local people already knew: that the majority of local residents are in opposition to a goliath supermarket on the Memorial Ground, despite what a press-hungry MP would have us believe. We also wonder what if any implications there may be for BRFC's new stadium now that they have been relegated. One thing is certain, we must ensure that the supermarket does not proceed unless the stadium is complete, this was Bristol City Council's justification for granting permission for the supermarket. Over the forthcoming months you will see our presence as we continue to raise the final outstanding funds to settle our legal bill with a number of community focused activities and events. We will also endeavour to raise awareness of our campaign nationally and publicise the injustices of poor planning decisions taken with scant regard for the wishes of local people. We will continue to keep the Council on its toes with regards to the impacts of poor air quality and inadequate highways planning as Bristol moves towards becoming the UK's first Green Capital of Europe. An essential part of this will be to keep abreast of any amendments to the plans for the Memorial Stadium. You may be aware that Sainsbury’s have already applied for an extension to delivery hours which would have rendered this development even more anti-social and was fortunately refused by Bristol City Council. TRASHorfield will take action should Sainsbury’s attempt to further alter the terms of the Section 106 Legal Agreement as they appear to be intent on doing. Once again, to all the thousands of you who worked with us to do our very best to stop this development we extend our continuing gratitude. This is not over yet; perhaps, just perhaps we will still see a better outcome for this special site. Best regards TRASHorfield
|
|
|
Post by bluegashead on Jun 1, 2014 12:45:47 GMT
Decision bloody phone.
|
|
|
Post by gas4life on Jun 1, 2014 13:07:20 GMT
Report to the police for constant harassment
About time they got on with there lives sad little nothing people
|
|
|
Post by gasheadnaboo on Jun 1, 2014 14:52:15 GMT
"We are delighted that Tim has been elected with over 47% of the vote. His clear stance on the supermarket and concerns about the Gloucester Road, traffic and pollution all confirm what local people already knew: that the majority of local residents are in opposition to a goliath supermarket on the Memorial Ground"Since when was 47% of 36.5% a "majority" When 63.5% of the electorate couldn't be bothered to vote actually I still can't work out how they think less than half is a majority!
|
|
Izza
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 7
|
Post by Izza on Jun 1, 2014 15:03:47 GMT
If there were 3 candidates and the other two shared the 53% between them say 30% and 23% the one with 47% would have the majority
|
|
|
Post by gasheadnaboo on Jun 1, 2014 15:40:19 GMT
If there were 3 candidates and the other two shared the 53% between them say 30% and 23% the one with 47% would have the majority 53% still voted against them.
|
|
Izza
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 7
|
Post by Izza on Jun 1, 2014 16:01:30 GMT
But 47% is still higher than both of the other individuals totals so is the majority for a single candidate, do you understand now?
|
|
|
Post by Antonio Fargas on Jun 1, 2014 17:31:07 GMT
|
|
Izza
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 7
|
Post by Izza on Jun 1, 2014 17:53:50 GMT
If we want exact wording then I should have wrote Plurality but I wasn't sure the majority of people here would even know of the words meaning
|
|
smashngrab
Harold Jarman
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 73
|
Post by smashngrab on Jun 1, 2014 18:28:45 GMT
I've watched it and still don't know.
|
|